Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Decision-making psychology can bolster conservation

The actions that lead to conservation successes and failures are the result of decision-making by individuals and organizations about what to conserve and how to conserve it. The psychology of decision-making should be considered when assessing conservation outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type



Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout


  1. Sutherland, W. J., Pullin, A. S., Dolman, P. M. & Knight, T. M. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 4–7 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kørnøv, L. & Thissen, W. Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais. 18, 191–200 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Meek, M. H. et al. Biol. Conserv. 184, 209–217 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Osbaldiston, R. Sustainability 5, 2770–2795 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Clayton, S. & Myers, G. Conservation Psychology: Understanding and Promoting Human Care for Nature (John Wiley & Sons, 2015).

  6. Evans, J. S. B. T. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 59, 255–278 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Allen, D. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 62, 2165–2181 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hammond, K. R., Hamm, R. M., Grassia, J. & Pearson, T. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 17, 753–770 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pullin, A. S., Knight, T. M., Stone, D. A. & Charman, K. Biol. Conserv. 119, 245–252 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Walsh, J. C., Dicks, L. V. & Sutherland, W. J. Conserv. Biol. 29, 88–98 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Pullin, A. S. & Knight, T. M. Conserv. Biol. 19, 1989–1996 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cook, C. N., Wardell-Johnson, G., Carter, R. W. & Hockings, M. Ecol. Soc.  19, 32 (2014).

  13. Fazey, I., Fazey, J. A., Salisbury, J. G., Lindenmayer, D. B. & Dovers, S. Environ. Conserv. 33, 1–10 (2006).

  14. Salas, E., Rosen, M. A. & DiazGranados, D. J. Manage. 36, 941–973 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Martin, T. G. et al. Conserv. Biol. 26, 29–38 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah Papworth.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Papworth, S. Decision-making psychology can bolster conservation. Nat Ecol Evol 1, 1217–1218 (2017).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing