Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Evidence complacency hampers conservation

The pernicious problem of evidence complacency, illustrated here through conservation policy and practice, results in poor practice and inefficiencies. It also increases our vulnerability to a ‘post-truth’ world dealing with ‘alternative facts’.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Sutherland, W. J., Pullin, A. S., Dolman, P. M. & Knight, T. M. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 305–308 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Pullin, A. S., Knight, T. M., Stone, D. A. & Charman, K. Biol. Conserv. 119, 245–252 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Dicks, L. V. et al. Conserv. Lett. 7, 119–125 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Berthinussen, A. & Altringham, J. PLoS ONE 7, e38775 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Berthinussen, A. & Altringham, J. WC1060: Development of a Cost-Effective Method for Monitoring the Effectiveness of Mitigation for Bats Crossing Linear Transport Infrastructure (Defra, 2015).

  6. 6.

    Riddell, R. C. Does Foreign Aid Really Work? An Updated Assessment (Development Policy Centre, 2014).

  7. 7.

    Ntshotsho, P., Esler, K. J. & Reyers, B. Sustainability 7, 15871–15881 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Walsh, J. C., Dicks, L. V. & Sutherland, W. J. Conserv. Biol. 29, 88–98 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Kool, W., McGuire, J. T., Rosen, Z. B. & Botvinick, M. M. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 139, 665–682 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Traynor, M., Boland, M. & Buus, N. J. Adv. Nurs. 66, 1584–1591 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Thompson, C., Cullum, N., McCaughan, D., Sheldon, T. & Raynor, P. Evid. Based Nurs. 7, 68–72 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Pravikoff, D. S., Tanner, A. B. & Pierce, S. T. Am. J. Nurs. 105, 40–51 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Langer, L., Tripney, J. & Gough, D. The Science of Using Science: Researching the Use of Research Evidence in Decision-Making (Institute of Education, 2016).

  14. 14.

    Breckon, J. & Dodson, J. Using Evidence: What Works? (Alliance for Useful Evidence, 2016).

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claire F. R. Wordley.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sutherland, W.J., Wordley, C.F.R. Evidence complacency hampers conservation. Nat Ecol Evol 1, 1215–1216 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0244-1

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing