Article | Published:

Recent human history governs global ant invasion dynamics

Nature Ecology & Evolution volume 1, Article number: 0184 (2017) | Download Citation

Abstract

Human trade and travel are breaking down biogeographic barriers, resulting in shifts in the geographical distribution of organisms, yet it remains largely unknown whether different alien species generally follow similar spatiotemporal colonization patterns and how such patterns are driven by trends in global trade. Here, we analyse the global distribution of 241 alien ant species and show that these species comprise four distinct groups that inherently differ in their worldwide distribution from that of native species. The global spread of these four distinct species groups has been greatly, but differentially, influenced by major events in recent human history, in particular historical waves of globalization (approximately 1850–1914 and 1960 to present), world wars and global recessions. Species in these four groups also differ in six important morphological and life-history traits and their degree of invasiveness. Combining spatiotemporal distribution data with life-history trait information provides valuable insight into the processes driving biological invasions and facilitates identification of species most likely to become invasive in the future.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    , , , & The dispersal of alien species redefines biogeography in the Anthropocene. Science 348, 1248–1251 (2015).

  2. 2.

    The Anthropocene concept in ecology and conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 30, 36–41 (2015).

  3. 3.

    et al. Impacts of biological invasions — what’s what and the way forward. Trends Ecol. Evol. 28, 58–66 (2013).

  4. 4.

    et al. Socioeconomic legacy yields an invasion debt. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 203–207 (2011).

  5. 5.

    Trade, transport and trouble: managing invasive species pathways in an era of globalization. J. Appl. Ecol. 46, 10–18 (2009).

  6. 6.

    et al. Global invasion history of the fire ant Solenopsis invicta. Science 331, 1066–1068 (2011).

  7. 7.

    et al. Global exchange and accumulation of non-native plants. Nature 525, 100–103 (2015).

  8. 8.

    et al. Disentangling the role of environmental and human pressures on biological invasions across Europe. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 12157–12162 (2010).

  9. 9.

    , , & The link between international trade and the global distribution of invasive alien species. Biol. Invasions 10, 391–398 (2008).

  10. 10.

    & The Ants (Harvard Univ. Press, 1990).

  11. 11.

    , & Patterns of spread in biological invasions dominated by long-distance jump dispersal: insights from Argentine ants. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 1095–1100 (2001).

  12. 12.

    The hitchhiker’s guide to alien ant invasions. BioControl 56, 551–572 (2011).

  13. 13.

    et al. The causes and consequences of ant invasions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33, 181–233 (2002).

  14. 14.

    , , & Community disassembly by an invasive species. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 2474–2477 (2003).

  15. 15.

    in Exotic Ants: Biology, Impact and Control of Introduced Species (ed. Williams, D.) 23–43 (Westview, 1994).

  16. 16.

    Diversity and dissimilarity coefficients: a unified approach. Theor. Popul. Biol. 21, 24–43 (1982).

  17. 17.

    World Trade Report 2014 (World Trade Organization, 2014).

  18. 18.

    & Two Waves of Globalisation: Superficial Similarities, Fundamental Differences (National Bureau of Economic Research, 1999).

  19. 19.

    et al. Wavelet analysis of ecological time series. Oecologia 156, 287–304 (2008).

  20. 20.

    et al. No saturation in the accumulation of alien species worldwide. Nat. Commun. 8, 14435 (2017).

  21. 21.

    , , , & Spread dynamics of invasive species. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 374–378 (2006).

  22. 22.

    & Invasion success of vertebrates in Europe and North America. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 7198–7202 (2005).

  23. 23.

    , , & The role of global trade and transport network topology in the human-mediated dispersal of alien species. Ecol. Lett. 18, 188–199 (2015).

  24. 24.

    , , , & Live plant imports: the major pathway for forest insect and pathogen invasions of the US. Front. Ecol. Environ. 10, 135–143 (2012).

  25. 25.

    & Forecasting biological invasions with increasing international trade. Conserv. Biol. 17, 322–326 (2003).

  26. 26.

    , , & Ant Profiler — a database of ecological characteristics of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecol. News 18, 73–76 (2013).

  27. 27.

    Non-native ants are smaller than related native ants. Am. Nat. 154, 690–699 (1999).

  28. 28.

    , & Predicting Argentine ant spread over the heterogeneous landscape using a spatially explicit stochastic model. Ecol. Appl. 19, 1176–1186 (2012).

  29. 29.

    & Are there any consistent predictors of invasion success? Biol. Invasions 10, 483–506 (2008).

  30. 30.

    et al. What it takes to invade grassland ecosystems: traits, introduction history and filtering processes. Ecol. Lett. 19, 219–229 (2015).

  31. 31.

    et al. Unraveling the life history of successful invaders. Science 337, 580–583 (2012).

  32. 32.

    , & Fast life history traits promote invasion success in amphibians and reptiles. Ecol. Lett. 20, 220–230 (2017).

  33. 33.

    Invasion Biology (Oxford Univ. Press, 2009).

  34. 34.

    et al. The global distribution and drivers of alien bird species introduction and richness. PLoS Biol. 15, 942–942 (2017).

  35. 35.

    et al. Temporal and interspecific variation in rates of spread for insect species invading Europe during the last 200 years. Biol. Invasions 18, 907–920 (2016).

  36. 36.

    et al. Corruption, development and governance indicators predict invasive species risk from trade. Proc. Biol. Sci. 283, 20160901 (2016).

  37. 37.

    et al. Invasion debt — quantifying future biological invasions. Divers. Distrib. 22, 445–456 (2015).

  38. 38.

    & Characteristics of exotic ants in North America. NeoBiota 64, 47–64 (2011).

  39. 39.

    The worldwide transfer of ants: geographical distribution and ecological invasions. J. Biogeogr. 26, 535–548 (1999).

  40. 40.

    ., ., & Bolton’s Catalogue of the Ants of the World (Harvard Univ. Press, 2007).

  41. 41.

    , , & New Zealand Ant Distribution Database v.2.0 (Landcare Research, 2016);

  42. 42.

    , & Exotic ants in Florida. Trans. Am. Entomol. Soc. 126, 293–326 (2000).

  43. 43.

    , & Make trade not war? Rev. Econ. Stud. 75, 865–900 (2008).

  44. 44.

    , & A principal component method to impute missing values for mixed data. Adv. Data Anal. Classif. 10, 5–26 (2016).

  45. 45.

    Virtues of the haversine. Sky Telescope 68, 159 (1984).

  46. 46.

    Cluster-wise assessment of cluster stability. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 52, 258–271 (2007).

  47. 47.

    R: A language and environment for statistical computing v.3.1.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2014).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank M. Chapuisat, P. Christe, P. Lester, J. Pannell, J. Søe Pedersen, I. Sanders and C. Wedekind for their comments, and A. Suarez, E. Robinson and J. Longino for supplying data on morphological and life-history traits. This work was supported by several grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation and a European Research Council advanced grant. Data reported in the paper are presented in the Supplementary materials.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne CH-1015, Switzerland.

    • Cleo Bertelsmeier
    •  & Laurent Keller
  2. Department of Ecology, Systematics and Evolution, Université Paris-Sud, CNRS, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, F-91405 Orsay Cedex, France.

    • Sébastien Ollier
  3. US Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Morgantown, West Virginia 26505, USA.

    • Andrew Liebhold

Authors

  1. Search for Cleo Bertelsmeier in:

  2. Search for Sébastien Ollier in:

  3. Search for Andrew Liebhold in:

  4. Search for Laurent Keller in:

Contributions

C.B. and L.K. designed the study, C.B. and A.L. collected the data, C.B. and S.O. analysed the data and all authors discussed the analyses and wrote the paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Cleo Bertelsmeier or Laurent Keller.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Four Supplementary Figures, two Supplementary Tables, and Supplementary Notes detailing the calculation of historical transition rates among dispersion stages

Zip files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Dataset 1

    An R object containing all data used in analyses.

  2. 2.

    Supplementary Dataset 2

    An R script with code for all analyses and figures.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0184

Further reading