Perspective

Revisiting the biodiversity–ecosystem multifunctionality relationship

  • Nature Ecology & Evolution 1, Article number: 0168 (2017)
  • doi:10.1038/s41559-017-0168
  • Download Citation
Received:
Accepted:
Published online:

Abstract

A recent and prominent claim for the value of biodiversity is its importance for sustaining multiple ecosystem functions. The general idea is intuitively appealing: since all species are to some extent unique, each will be important for a different set of functions. Therefore, as more functions are considered, a greater diversity of species is necessary to sustain all functions simultaneously. However, we show here that the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning does not change with the number of functions considered. Biodiversity affects the level of multifunctionality via non-additive effects on individual functions, and the effect on multifunctionality equals the average effect on single functions. These insights run counter to messages in the literature. In the light of our simulations, we present limitations and pitfalls with current methods used to study biodiversity–multifunctionality, which together provide a perspective for future studies.

  • Subscribe to Nature Ecology & Evolution for full access:

    $99

    Subscribe

Additional access options:

Already a subscriber?  Log in  now or  Register  for online access.

References

  1. 1.

    et al. in Biodiversity, Ecosystem Functioning, and Human Wellbeing: an Ecological and Economic Perspective (eds Naeem, S. et al.) Ch. 2 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2009).

  2. 2.

    et al. The functional role of producer diversity in ecosystems. Am. J. Botany 98, 572–592 (2011).

  3. 3.

    et al. Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 486, 59–67 (2012). The most-recently published scientific consensus statement on how biodiversity influences ecosystem functions and services, including a short forward-looking perspective on biodiversity and multifunctionality.

  4. 4.

    , & Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 45, 471–493 (2014).

  5. 5.

    et al. Marine biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: what's known and what's next? Oikos 124, 252–265 (2015).

  6. 6.

    et al. Effects of biodiversity on the functioning of trophic groups and ecosystems. Nature 443, 989–992 (2006).

  7. 7.

    et al. A general biodiversity–function relationship is mediated by trophic level. Oikos 126, 18–31 (2016).

  8. 8.

    & Biodiversity and ecosystem multifunctionality. Nature 448, 188–190 (2007).

  9. 9.

    , & Grazer diversity effects on ecosystem functioning in seagrass beds. Ecol. Lett. 6, 637–645 (2003). This was the first explicit biodiversity–multifunctionality paper, and it concluded that a mixture of species simultaneously maximizes multiple functions.

  10. 10.

    , & Multiple functions increase the importance of biodiversity for overall ecosystem functioning. Ecology 89, 1223–1231 (2008).

  11. 11.

    , , & Linking soil bacterial diversity to ecosystem multifunctionality using backward-elimination boosted trees analysis. J. Soils Sediments 9, 547–554 (2009).

  12. 12.

    , , & Sustaining multiple ecosystem functions in grassland communities requires higher biodiversity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 1443–1446 (2010).

  13. 13.

    et al. High plant diversity is needed to maintain ecosystem services. Nature 477, 199–202 (2011).

  14. 14.

    , , & Functional structure of biological communities predicts ecosystem multifunctionality. PLoS ONE 6, e17476 (2011).

  15. 15.

    et al. Multifunctionality and diversity in bacterial biofilms. PLoS ONE 6, e23225 (2011).

  16. 16.

    et al. plant species richness and ecosystem multifunctionality in global drylands. Science 335, 214–218 (2012).

  17. 17.

    et al. Discontinuity in the responses of ecosystem processes and multifunctionality to altered soil community composition. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 14478–14483 (2014).

  18. 18.

    , , & Soil biodiversity and soil community composition determine ecosystem multifunctionality. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 5266–5270 (2014).

  19. 19.

    et al. Higher biodiversity is required to sustain multiple ecosystem processes across temperature regimes. Global Change Biol. 21, 396–406 (2015).

  20. 20.

    , , & The importance of biodiversity and dominance for multiple ecosystem functions in a human-modified tropical landscape. Ecology 97, 2772–2779 (2016).

  21. 21.

    et al. Low multifunctional redundancy of soil fungal diversity at multiple scales. Ecol. Lett. 19, 249–259 (2016).

  22. 22.

    et al. Locally rare species influence grassland ecosystem multifunctionality. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 371, 20150269 (2016).

  23. 23.

    et al. Jack-of-all-trades effects drive biodiversity-ecosystem multifunctionality relationships in European forests. Nat. Commun. 7, 11109 (2016).

  24. 24.

    et al. Biodiversity enhances ecosystem multifunctionality across trophic levels and habitats. Nat. Commun. 6, 6936 (2015). This is to date the only meta-analysis of biodiversity–multifunctionality studies.

  25. 25.

    et al. Investigating the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem multifunctionality: challenges and solutions. Methods Ecol. Evol. 5, 111–124 (2014). This is the first methods and review paper about the different approaches available to analyse biodiversity and multifunctionality.

  26. 26.

    et al. Testing the effects of diversity on ecosystem multifunctionality using a multivariate model. Ecol. Lett. 18, 1242–1251 (2015).

  27. 27.

    & Consumer diversity across kingdoms supports multiple functions in a coastal ecosystem. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 20621–20626 (2013).

  28. 28.

    et al. Biodiversity at multiple trophic levels is needed for ecosystem multifunctionality. Nature 536, 456–459 (2016).

  29. 29.

    Why biodiversity is important to the functioning of real-world ecosystems. Front. Ecol. Environ. 7, 437–444 (2009).

  30. 30.

    et al. Biotic homogenization can decrease landscape-scale forest multifunctionality. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 3557–3562 (2016).

  31. 31.

    et al. Higher levels of multiple ecosystem services are found in forests with more tree species. Nat. Commun. 4, 1340 (2013).

  32. 32.

    et al. The global spectrum of plant form and function. Nature 529, 167–171 (2016).

  33. 33.

    Entropy and diversity. Oikos 113, 363–375 (2006).

  34. 34.

    , & The consequences of dominance: A review of the effects of evenness on local and regional ecosystem processes. Ecology 89, 1510–1520 (2008).

  35. 35.

    & Effects of plant composition and diversity on nutrient cycling. Ecol. Monogr. 68, 121–149 (1998).

  36. 36.

    & Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments. Nature 412, 72–75 (2001).

  37. 37.

    et al. The statistical inevitability of stability–diversity relationships in community ecology. Am. Nat. 151, 264–276 (1998).

  38. 38.

    et al. Plant diversity and productivity experiments in European grasslands. Science 286, 1123–1127 (1999).

  39. 39.

    et al. Ecosystem effects of biodiversity manipulations in European grasslands. Ecol. Monogr. 75, 37–63 (2005).

  40. 40.

    , & Understanding the effects of marine biodiversity on communities and ecosystems. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 38, 739–766 (2007).

  41. 41.

    et al. Ecological impacts of invasive alien plants: a meta-analysis of their effects on species, communities and ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 14, 702–708 (2011).

  42. 42.

    Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects. J. Ecol. 86, 902–910 (1998).

  43. 43.

    , & Bioturbators enhance ecosystem function through complex biogeochemical interactions. Nature 431, 1092–1095 (2004).

  44. 44.

    et al. in Biodiversity, Ecosystem Functioning, and Human Wellbeing: an Ecological and Economic Perspective (eds Naeem, S. et al.) Ch. 8 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2009).

  45. 45.

    , & Multiple stressors and multifunctionality: limited effects on an illuminated benthic system. Biol. Lett. 10, 20140640 (2014).

  46. 46.

    et al. Land use intensification alters ecosystem multifunctionality via loss of biodiversity and changes to functional composition. Ecol. Lett. 18, 834–843 (2015).

  47. 47.

    et al. The links between ecosystem multifunctionality and above- and belowground biodiversity are mediated by climate. Nat. Commun. 6, 8159 (2015).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank M. Jonsson, J. Griffin and J. Bengtsson for providing valuable feedback and comments on earlier drafts. This work was supported by grant 621-2009-5457 from the Swedish research council VR to L.G.

Author information

Author notes

    • Lars Gamfeldt
    •  & Fabian Roger

    These authors contributed equally to this work.

Affiliations

  1. Department of Marine Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Box 461, SE-405 30 Göteborg, Sweden.

    • Lars Gamfeldt
    •  & Fabian Roger

Authors

  1. Search for Lars Gamfeldt in:

  2. Search for Fabian Roger in:

Contributions

Study idea by L.G.; L.G. and F.R. designed the study; F.R. wrote the script for the analyses; L.G. and F.R. interpreted the analyses and wrote the paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Lars Gamfeldt or Fabian Roger.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Figures 1–3