Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

More protist genomes needed

DNA sequencing is faster and cheaper than ever before but quantity does not necessarily mean quality. Towards a comprehensive understanding of the microbial biosphere, we need more reference genomes from single-celled eukaryotes (protists) across the full breadth of eukaryotic diversity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it


Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Protist diversity.
Figure 2: Genomes and transcriptomes across the eukaryotic tree of life.


  1. Mukherjee, S. et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, D446–D456 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Burki, F. et al. Proc. R. Soc. Lon. B 283, 20152802 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Keeling, P. K. et al. PLoS Biol. 12, e1001889 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Caron, D. A. et al. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 15, 6–20 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bork, P. et al. Science 348, 873 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Flegontova, O. et al. Curr. Biol. 26, 3060–3065 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lukeš, J., Flegontova, O. & Horák, A. Curr. Biol. 25, R702–R704 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Land, M. et al. Funct. Integr. Genomics 15, 141–161 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Soucy, S. M., Huang, J. & Gogarten, J. P. Nat. Rev. Genet. 16, 472–482 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Eme, L., Gentekaki, E., Curtis, B., Archibald, J. M. & Roger, A. J. Curr. Biol. 27, 807–820 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ku, C. et al. Nature 524 427–432 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Richards, T. A. & Monier, A. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 4892–4894 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Maumus, F. & Blanc, G. Genome Biol. Evol. 8, 3351–3363 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gawad, C., Koh, W. & Quake, S. R. Nat. Rev. Genet. 17, 175–188 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gawryluk, R. M. R. et al. Curr. Biol. 26, 3053–3059 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to John M. Archibald.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sibbald, S., Archibald, J. More protist genomes needed. Nat Ecol Evol 1, 0145 (2017).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research