Article | Published:

Evolutionary transitions towards eusociality in snapping shrimps

Nature Ecology & Evolution volume 1, Article number: 0096 (2017) | Download Citation

Abstract

Animal social organization varies from complex societies where reproduction is dominated by a single individual (eusociality) to those where reproduction is more evenly distributed among group members (communal breeding). Yet, how simple groups transition evolutionarily to more complex societies remains unclear. Competing hypotheses suggest that eusociality and communal breeding are alternative evolutionary endpoints, or that communal breeding is an intermediate stage in the transition towards eusociality. We tested these alternative hypotheses in sponge-dwelling shrimps, Synalpheus spp. Although species varied continuously in reproductive skew, they clustered into pair-forming, communal and eusocial categories based on several demographic traits. Evolutionary transition models suggested that eusocial and communal species are discrete evolutionary endpoints that evolved independently from pair-forming ancestors along alternative paths. This ‘family-centred’ origin of eusociality parallels observations in insects and vertebrates, reinforcing the role of kin selection in the evolution of eusociality and suggesting a general model of animal social evolution.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    & Comparative Social Evolution (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2017).

  2. 2.

    & Evolutionary Ecology of Social and Sexual Systems (Oxford Univ. Press, 2007).

  3. 3.

    Avian communal breeding systems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 9, 123–155 (1978).

  4. 4.

    & Cooperative Breeding in Mammals (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1997).

  5. 5.

    , , , & Primate Societies. (Univ. Chicago Press, 1987).

  6. 6.

    Sociobiology. The New Synthesis (Harvard Univ. Press, 1975).

  7. 7.

    in Social Behavior and Communication (eds Marler, P. & Vandenbergh, J. G.) 351–394 (Springer, 1979).

  8. 8.

    , , & The eusociality continuum. Behav. Ecol. 6, 102–108 (1995).

  9. 9.

    & Redefining eusociality: concepts, goals and levels of analysis. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 42, 573–577 (2005).

  10. 10.

    , & Discrete but variable structure of animal societies leads to the false perception of a social continuum. R. Soc. Open Sci. 3, 160147 (2016).

  11. 11.

    & Kin structure, ecology and the evolution of social organization in shrimp: a comparative analysis. Proc. Biol. Sci. 277, 575–584 (2010).

  12. 12.

    Nests and social behavior of halictine bees of India. Indian J. Entomol. 28, 375–393 (1966).

  13. 13.

    & in Organization of Insect Societies from Genome to Sociocomplexity (eds Gadau, J. & Fewell, J.) 148–169 (Harvard Univ. Press, 2009).

  14. 14.

    Comparative social behavior of bees. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 14, 299–342 (1969).

  15. 15.

    Lifetime monogamy and the evolution of eusociality. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 364, 3191–3207 (2009).

  16. 16.

    An evolutionary theory of the family. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 8092–8099 (1995).

  17. 17.

    et al. Only full-sibling families evolved eusociality. Nature 471, E4–E5 (2011).

  18. 18.

    The Social Behavior of the Bees. A Comparative Study (Harvard Univ. Press, 1974).

  19. 19.

    The validity and value of inclusive fitness theory. Proc. R. Soc. B 278, 3313–3320 (2011).

  20. 20.

    , & Relatedness, conflict, and the evolution of eusociality. PLoS Biol. 13, e1002098 (2015).

  21. 21.

    & Social terminology revisited: where are we ten years later? Ann. Zool. Fennici 42, 559–564 (2005).

  22. 22.

    & The definition of eusociality. Behav. Ecol. 6, 109–115 (1995).

  23. 23.

    Evolution of sociality in a primitively eusocial lineage of bees. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 286–290 (2002).

  24. 24.

    , , , & Multigene phylogeny reveals eusociality evolved twice in vespid wasps. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 3295–3299 (2007).

  25. 25.

    & Adaptive radiation in socially advanced stem-group ants from the Cretaceous. Curr. Biol. 26, 515–521 (2016).

  26. 26.

    Evolution of eusociality in termites. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28, 27–54 (1997).

  27. 27.

    & The antiquity and evolutionary history of social behavior in bees. PLoS ONE 6, e21086 (2011).

  28. 28.

    , , & Phylogenetics of allodapine bees: a review of social evolution, parasitism and biogeography. Apidologie 39, 3–15 (2008).

  29. 29.

    , & Changing paradigms in insect social evolution: insights from Halictine and Allodapine bees. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 52, 127–150 (2007).

  30. 30.

    , , & Ancestral monogamy shows kin selection is key to the evolution of eusociality. Science 320, 1213–1216 (2008).

  31. 31.

    , & in Comparative Social Evolution (eds Rubenstein, D. R. & Abbot, P.) 224–249 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2017).

  32. 32.

    , & Biodiversity, host specificity, and dominance by eusocial species among sponge-dwelling alpheid shrimp on the Belize Barrier Reef. Divers. Distrib. 12, 165–178 (2006).

  33. 33.

    Sexual selection and dimorphism in two demes of a symbiotic, pair-bonding snapping shrimp. Evolution 34, 161–173 (1980).

  34. 34.

    , & Reproductive skew drives patterns of sexual dimorphism in sponge-dwelling snapping shrimps. Proc. R. Soc. B 282, 20150342 (2015).

  35. 35.

    Eusociality in a coral-reef shrimp. Nature 381, 512–514 (1996).

  36. 36.

    , & Social control of reproduction and breeding monopolization in the eusocial snapping shrimp Synalpheus elizabethae. Am. Nat. 186, 660–668 (2015).

  37. 37.

    in Genes, Behavior, and Evolution in Social Insects (eds Kikuchi, T., Azuma, N. & Higashi, S.) 1–38 (Hokkaido Univ. Press, 2003).

  38. 38.

    & Quantifying the level of eusociality. Proc. R. Soc. B 260, 311–315 (1995).

  39. 39.

    & Phylogenetic community ecology and the role of social dominance in sponge-dwelling shrimp. Ecol. Lett. 15, 704–713 (2012).

  40. 40.

    , , , & Sociality in Theridiid spiders: repeated origins of an evolutionary dead end. Evolution 60, 2342–2351 (2006).

  41. 41.

    , , & Promiscuity and the evolutionary transition to complex societies. Nature 466, 969–972 (2010).

  42. 42.

    & in Cooperative Breeding in Mammals (eds Solomon, N. G. & French, J. A.) 267–301 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1997).

  43. 43.

    & A review of the sponge-dwelling snapping shrimp from Carrie Bow Cay, Belize, with description of Zuzalpheus, new genus, and six new species (Crustacea: Decapoda: Alpheidae). Zootaxa 1602, 1–89 (2007).

  44. 44.

    , & Phylogenetic relationships within the snapping shrimp genus Synalpheus (Decapoda: Alpheidae). Mol. Phylogen. Evol. 77, 116–125 (2014).

  45. 45.

    Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17, 540–552 (2000).

  46. 46.

    MrModeltest v2 (Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala Univ., 2004).

  47. 47.

    , & Phylogenetic evidence for an ancient rapid radiation of Caribbean sponge-dwelling snapping shrimps (Synalpheus). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 30, 563–581 (2004).

  48. 48.

    & Multi-locus phylogeny of sponge-dwelling snapping shrimp (Caridea: Alpheidae: Synalpheus) supports morphology-based species concepts. J. Crust. Biol. 31, 352–360 (2011).

  49. 49.

    et al. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 61, 539–542 (2012).

  50. 50.

    Missing data and the design of phylogenetic analyses. J. Biomed. Inf. 39, 34–42 (2006).

  51. 51.

    Estimating absolute rates of molecular evolution and divergence times: a penalized likelihood approach. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19, 101–109 (2002).

  52. 52.

    , & APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20, 289–290 (2004).

  53. 53.

    MCMC methods for multi-response generalized linear mixed models: the MCMCglmm R package. J. Stat. Softw. 33, 1–22 (2010).

  54. 54.

    , , & Clustering rules: a comparison of partitioning and hierarchical clustering algorithms. J. Math. Model. Algor. 5, 475–504 (2006).

  55. 55.

    , , , & Cluster: cluster analysis basics and extensions. R package version 2.0.2 (2015).

  56. 56.

    & Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis (Wiley, 1999).

  57. 57.

    , , & Classification and Regression Trees (CRC, 1984).

  58. 58.

    , & rpart: Recursive partitioning and regression trees. R package version 4.1–9 (2015).

  59. 59.

    , , & Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. 64, 583–639 (2002).

  60. 60.

    et al. Geiger v2.0: an expanded suite of methods for fitting macroevolutionary models to phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 30, 2216–2218 (2014).

  61. 61.

    Modern Phylogenetic Comparative Methods and Their Application in Evolutionary Biology (Springer, 2014).

  62. 62.

    in Selected Papers of Hirotugu Akaike (eds Parzen, E., Tanabe, K. & Kitagawa, G.) 199–213 (Springer, 1998).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank K. W. Leong, K. MacDonald III, C. L. Morrison, E. Tóth, J. Kealey, S. Bornbusch, M. Chang, and D. Hall for assisting in field collection. S.T.C.C. was funded by the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute Short-Term Fellowship Program. J.E.D. and S.T.C.C. were funded by the US National Science Foundation to J.E.D. (DEB 92-01566, DEB 98–15785, IBN-0131931, IOS-1121716). K.M.H. was supported by the National Geographic Society (Research and Exploration Grant no. 8312- 07) and by the Murdock Charitable Trust. D.R.R. was supported by the US National Science Foundation (IOS-1121435, IOS-1257530, IOS-1439985). This work benefited substantially from the Smithsonian Institution’s Caribbean Coral Reef Ecosystem Program and is CCRE contribution no. 994. This Article is contribution 3610 of the Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary.

Author information

Author notes

    • J. Emmett Duffy

    Present address: Tennenbaum Marine Observatories Network, Smithsonian Institution, PO Box 37012 NHB MRC 106, Washington DC 20013, USA

Affiliations

  1. Virginia Institute of Marine Science, The College of William and Mary, Gloucester Point, Virginia 23062, USA

    • Solomon Tin Chi Chak
    •  & J. Emmett Duffy
  2. Department of Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Biology, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, USA

    • Solomon Tin Chi Chak
    •  & Dustin R. Rubenstein
  3. Biology Department, Seattle University, Seattle, Washington 98122, USA

    • Kristin M. Hultgren

Authors

  1. Search for Solomon Tin Chi Chak in:

  2. Search for J. Emmett Duffy in:

  3. Search for Kristin M. Hultgren in:

  4. Search for Dustin R. Rubenstein in:

Contributions

S.T.C.C., J.E.D., K.M.H. and D.R.R. collected field samples. S.T.C.C. carried out the statistical analyses and drafted the manuscript; S.T.C.C., J.E.D., K.M.H. and D.R.R. conceived of the study, designed the study, coordinated the study and helped draft the manuscript. All authors gave final approval for publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Solomon Tin Chi Chak.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Methods; Supplementary Figure 1; Supplementary Tables 1–9.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0096