Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Human exposure and sensitivity to globally extreme wildfire events


Extreme wildfires have substantial economic, social and environmental impacts, but there is uncertainty whether such events are inevitable features of the Earth’s fire ecology or a legacy of poor management and planning. We identify 478 extreme wildfire events defined as the daily clusters of fire radiative power from MODIS, within a global 10 × 10 km lattice, between 2002 and 2013, which exceeded the 99.997th percentile of over 23 million cases of the ΣFRP 100 km−2 in the MODIS record. These events are globally distributed across all flammable biomes, and are strongly associated with extreme fire weather conditions. Extreme wildfire events reported as being economically or socially disastrous (n = 144) were concentrated in suburban areas in flammable-forested biomes of the western United States and southeastern Australia, noting potential biases in reporting and the absence of globally comprehensive data of fire disasters. Climate change projections suggest an increase in days conducive to extreme wildfire events by 20 to 50% in these disaster-prone landscapes, with sharper increases in the subtropical Southern Hemisphere and European Mediterranean Basin.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type



Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: The methodological workflow used to identify and classify extremely energetic fire events (ΣFRP 100 km −2 ) in our MODIS record over the period 2002–2013.
Figure 2: Global distribution of 478 objectively defined extreme wildfire events, classified by those identified as being disasters (red triangles) or not (blue dots).
Figure 3: Plot of all extreme wildfire events classified as disastrous and non-disastrous according to our systematic web search of existing media reports and official records ordinated by a FWI percentile and human population.

Similar content being viewed by others


  1. Moritz, M. A. et al. Learning to coexist with wildfire. Nature 515, 58–66 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Westerling, A. L. Increasing western US forest wildfire activity: sensitivity to changes in the timing of spring. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 371, 20150178 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jolly, W. M. et al. Climate-induced variations in global wildfire danger from 1979 to 2013. Nat. Commun. 6, 7537 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lannom, K. O. et al. Defining extreme wildland fires using geospatial and ancillary metrics. Int. J. Wildland Fire 23, 322–337 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Keeley, J. E. Fire intensity, fire severity and burn severity: a brief review and suggested usage. Int. J. Wildland Fire 18, 116–126 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Smith, A. M. S. et al. The science of firescapes: achieving fire-resilient communities. BioScience 66, 130–146 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Williams, J. Exploring the onset of high-impact mega-fires through a forest land management prism. Forest Ecol. Manage. 294, 4–10 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Stephens, S. L. et al. Temperate and boreal forest mega-fires: characteristics and challenges. Front. Ecol. Environ. 12, 115–122 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Smith, A. M. S. et al. Remote sensing the vulnerability of vegetation in natural terrestrial ecosystems. Remote Sens. Environ. 154, 322–337 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Reid, C. E. et al. Critical review of health impacts of wildfire smoke exposure. Environ. Health Persp. 124, 1334–1343 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pausas, J. G. & Ribeiro, E. The global fire–productivity relationship. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 22, 728–736 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cochrane, M. A. Fire science for rainforests. Nature 421, 913–919 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Barbero, R., Abatzoglou, J. T., Larkin, N. K., Kolden, C. A. & Stocks, B. Climate change presents increased potential for very large fires in the contiguous United States. Int. J. Wildland Fire 24, 892–899 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bentz, B. J. et al. Climate change and bark beetles of the western United States and Canada: direct and indirect effects. BioScience 60, 602–613 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Allen, C. D. et al. A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests. Forest Ecol. Manage. 259, 660–684 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Doerr, S. H. & Santín, C. Global trends in wildfire and its impacts: perceptions versus realities in a changing world. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 371, 20150345 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Giglio, L., Descloitres, J., Justice, C. O. & Kaufman, W. An enhanced contextual fire detection algorithm for MODIS. Remote Sens. Environ. 87, 273–282 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Williamson, G. J., Price, I. F., Henderson, S. B. & Bowman, D. M. J. S. Satellite-based comparison of fire intensity and smoke plumes from prescribed fires and wildfires in south-eastern Australia. Int. J. Wildland Fire 22, 121–129 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Archibald, S., Scholes, R. J., Roy, D. P., Roberts, G. & Boschetti, L. Southern African fire regimes as revealed by remote sensing. Int. J. Wildland Fire. 19, 861–878 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kaiser, J. W. et al. Biomass burning emissions estimated with a global fire assimilation system based on observed fire radiative power. Biogeosciences 9, 527–554 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Barrett, K. & Kasischke, E. S. Controls on variations in MODIS fire radiative power in Alaskan boreal forests: implications for fire severity conditions. Remote Sens. Environ. 130, 171–181 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Heward, W. et al. Is burn severity related to fire intensity? Observations from landscape scale remote sensing. Int. J. Wildland Fire 9, 910–918 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dee, D. P. et al. The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Quart. J. Royal Meteorol. Soc. 137, 553–597 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Flannigan, M. et al. Global wildland fire season severity in the 21st century. Forest Ecol. Manage. 294, 54–61 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Harris, I., Jones, P. D., Osborn, T. J. & Lister, D. W. Updated high-resolution grids of monthly climatic observations — the CRU TS3.10 Dataset. Int. J. Climatol. 34, 623–642 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bedia, J et al. Forest fire danger projections in the Mediterranean using ENSEMBLES regional climate change scenarios. Clim. Change 122, 185–199 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sillmann, J., Kharin, V. V., Zwiers, F. W., Zhang, X. & Bronaugh, D. Climate extremes indices in the CMIP5 multimodel ensemble: Part 2. Future climate projections. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 118, 2473–2493 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rind, D. et al. Potential evapotranspiration and the likelihood of future drought. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 95, 9983–10004 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gridded Population of the World, Version 4 (GPWv4): Population Count . (CIESIN, SEDAC, 2016);

Download references


D.M.J.S.B. and G.J.W. have been supported by Australian Research

Council Linkage Grant (LLP130100146) and C.A.K., A.M.S.S. and J.T.A. were supported by the National Science Foundation under award DMS-1520873.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



D.M.J.S.B. conceived the study and directed the project, G.J.W. conducted the MODIS data analysis and aggregation; C.A.K. and A.M.S.S. undertook the extreme fire event validation; J.T.A. undertook the climate analyses and M.A.C. contributed to the study design. All authors wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David M. J. S. Bowman.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures 1,2; Supplementary Table 1 (PDF 915 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bowman, D., Williamson, G., Abatzoglou, J. et al. Human exposure and sensitivity to globally extreme wildfire events. Nat Ecol Evol 1, 0058 (2017).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing