Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Reply to: Limitations of reanalyses for detecting tropical cyclone trends

The Original Article was published on 20 November 2023

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type



Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Global TC-like circulation counts.

Data availability

The 20CR dataset used in Fig. 1 is publicly available at


  1. Chand, S. S. et al. Declining tropical cyclone frequency under global warming. Nat. Clim. Change 12, 655–661 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Emanuel, K. Limitations of reanalyses for detecting tropical cyclone trends. Nat. Clim. Change (2023).

  3. Tory, K., Dare, R., Davidson, N., McBride, J. & Chand, S. The importance of low-deformation vorticity in tropical cyclone formation. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13, 2115–2132 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tory, K., Chand, S., Dare, R. & McBride, J. The development and assessment of a model-, grid-, and basin-independent tropical cyclone detection scheme. J. Clim. 26, 5493–5507 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chand, S. et al. Review of tropical cyclones in the Australian region: climatology, variability, predictability, and trends. Wiley. Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change 10, e602 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Klotzbach, P. et al. Trends in global tropical cyclone activity: 1990–2021. Geophys. Res. Lett. 49, e2021GL095774 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Compo, G. et al. The Twentieth Century Reanalysis project. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 137, 1–28 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Laloyaux, P. et al. CERA-20C: a coupled reanalysis of the twentieth century. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 10, 1172–1195 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mizuta, R. et al. Over 5,000 years of ensemble future climate simulations by 60-km global and 20-km regional atmospheric models. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 98, 1383–1398 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Stone, D. et al. Experiment design of the International CLIVAR C20C+detection and attribution project. Weather Clim. Extremes 24, 100206 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



S.S.C. and K.J.T. wrote the initial reply. S.S.C. did the additional analysis. All authors reviewed the reply and provided necessary feedback.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Savin S. Chand.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Climate Change thanks Michael Montgomery, Jill Trepanier and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chand, S.S., Walsh, K.J.E., Camargo, S.J. et al. Reply to: Limitations of reanalyses for detecting tropical cyclone trends. Nat. Clim. Chang. (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing