Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Carbon budget

Estimating vanishing allowable emissions for 1.5 °C

Nature Climate Change volume 13, pages 1284–1285 (2023)Cite this article

Subjects

The remaining carbon budget for 1.5 °C has been a highly discussed tool to communicate the urgency of efforts needed to meet the Paris Agreement. Now, research reassesses IPCC estimates, suggesting that ongoing near-flat emissions and methodological choices can make big relative differences to the tiny remaining 1.5 °C budget.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: An illustration of the RCBs detailed in the IPCC AR6 WGI assessment and by Lamboll and colleagues.

References

  1. Allen, M. R. et al. Nature 458, 1163–1166 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Canadell, J. G. et al. in Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) 673–816 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2023).

  3. Lamboll, R. D. et al. Nat. Clim. Change https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01848-5 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Friedlingstein, P. et al. Earth Sys. Sci. Data 14, 4811–4900 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jenkins, S. et al. J. Clim. 35, 7873–7890 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Riahi, K. et al. in Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Shukla, P. R. et al.) 295–408 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2023).

  7. Monasterolo, I., Nieto, M. & Schets, E. The Good, the Bad and the Hot House World: Conceptual Underpinnings of the NGFS Scenarios and Suggestions for Improvement (SSRN, 2022).

  8. Quaas, J. et al. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 22, 12221–12239 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rogelj, J. et al. Nature 571, 335–342 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jenkins, S. et al. npj Clim. Atmos. Sci. 4, 1–10 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Damon Matthews, H. et al. Commun. Earth Environ. 2, 1–11 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cox, P., Williamson, M., Friedlingstein, P., Jones, C. & Rogelj, J. Preprint at Research Square https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2384796/v1 (2023).

  13. Rogelj, J. et al. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 245–252 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Forster, P. M. et al. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 15, 2295–2327 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for International Climate and Environmental Research, Oslo, Norway

    Benjamin M. Sanderson

Authors
  1. Benjamin M. Sanderson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin M. Sanderson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sanderson, B.M. Estimating vanishing allowable emissions for 1.5 °C. Nat. Clim. Chang. 13, 1284–1285 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01846-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01846-7

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing