Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Historical DNA reveals climate adaptation in an endangered songbird

Nature Climate Change volume 13, pages 735–741 (2023)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

To cope with climate change, species may shift their distributions or adapt in situ to changing environmental conditions. However, clear examples of genetic changes via adaptation are limited. We explore evolutionary responses to climate change in the endangered southwestern willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus) through whole-genome comparisons between historical specimens, collected from 1888 to 1909 near San Diego, California, United States, and contemporary individuals from across the breeding range. Genomic analyses revealed that introgression into San Diego increased adaptive potential over time and shifted genome-wide population structure towards that of neighbouring populations. In contrast, loci linked to climate (dew point temperature and precipitation) shifted away from neighbouring populations and in a direction consistent with adaptation to climate change in southern California. This research highlights the role of admixture in facilitating adaptive shifts through its impact on genome-wide genetic variation and represents one of the few studies to document climate adaptation in a wild population.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Sampling design and patterns of genomic differentiation from WGS data.
Fig. 2: Geographic sampling and genomic differentiation from SNP genotyping data.
Fig. 3: Genomic differentiation over time at climate-linked SNPs.
Fig. 4: Allele frequency shifts at climate-linked loci within San Diego.

Data availability

The data generated for this study are available in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (BioProject PRJNA957938) and Dryad Digital Repository (https://datadryad.org/stash/share/qlafA02RwIPjoptjefUaKbrMszEsMJWP8a_H9-e24MY)68.

Code availability

Code associated with this study can be accessed on GitHub (https://github.com/sturbek/WIFL-Climate-Adaptation)69.

References

  1. Hoffmann, A. A. & Sgrò, C. M. Climate change and evolutionary adaptation. Nature 470, 479–485 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Razgour, O. et al. Considering adaptive genetic variation in climate change vulnerability assessment reduces species range loss projections. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 10418–10423 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Catullo, R. A., Llewelyn, J., Phillips, B. L. & Moritz, C. C. The potential for rapid evolution under anthropogenic climate change. Curr. Biol. 29, R996–R1007 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Merilä, J. & Hendry, A. P. Climate change, adaptation, and phenotypic plasticity: the problem and the evidence. Evol. Appl 7, 1–14 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bi, K. et al. Temporal genomic contrasts reveal rapid evolutionary responses in an alpine mammal during recent climate change. PLoS Genet. 15, e1008119 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Geerts, A. N. et al. Rapid evolution of thermal tolerance in the water flea Daphnia. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 665–668 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Umina, P. A., Weeks, A. R., Kearney, M. R., McKechnie, S. W. & Hoffmann, A. A. A rapid shift in a classic clinal pattern in Drosophila reflecting climate change. Science 308, 691–693 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kardos, M. et al. The crucial role of genome-wide genetic variation in conservation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2104642118 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Eizaguirre, C. & Baltazar-Soares, M. Evolutionary conservation—evaluating the adaptive potential of species. Evol. Appl. 7, 963–967 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Aitken, S. N. & Whitlock, M. C. Assisted gene flow to facilitate local adaptation to climate change. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 44, 367–388 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bell, D. A. et al. The exciting potential and remaining uncertainties of genetic rescue. Trends Ecol. Evol. 34, 1070–1079 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chan, W. Y., Hoffmann, A. A. & van Oppen, M. J. H. Hybridization as a conservation management tool. Conserv. Lett. 12, e12652 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Billerman, S. M. & Walsh, J. Historical DNA as a tool to address key questions in avian biology and evolution: a review of methods, challenges, applications, and future directions. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 19, 1115–1130 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sogge, M. K., Marshall, R. M., Sferra, S. J. & Tibbitts, T. J. A Southwestern Willow Flycatcher Natural History Summary and Survey Protocol. Technical Report NPS/NAUCPRS/NRTR-97/12 (USGS, 1997).

  15. Diffenbaugh, N. S., Giorgi, F. & Pal, J. S. Climate change hotspots in the United States. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L16709 (2008).

  16. Ruegg, K. et al. Ecological genomics predicts climate vulnerability in an endangered southwestern songbird. Ecol. Lett. 21, 1085–1096 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Southwestern Willow Flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus). 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation (US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2014).

  18. Unitt, P. Empidonax traillii extimus: an endangered subspecies. West. Birds 18, 137–162 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Indicators of Climate Change in California 4th edn (California Environmental Protection Agency, OEHHA, 2022).

  20. Ruegg, K. et al. Linking climate niches across seasons to assess population vulnerability in a migratory bird. Glob. Change Biol. 27, 3519–3531 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hamilton, J. A. & Miller, J. M. Adaptive introgression as a resource for management and genetic conservation in a changing climate. Conserv. Biol. 30, 33–41 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Whiteley, A. R., Fitzpatrick, S. W., Funk, W. C. & Tallmon, D. A. Genetic rescue to the rescue. Trends Ecol. Evol. 30, 42–49 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. DeWoody, J. A., Harder, A. M., Mathur, S. & Willoughby, J. R. The long-standing significance of genetic diversity in conservation. Mol. Ecol. 30, 4147–4154 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lavergne, S. & Molofsky, J. Increased genetic variation and evolutionary potential drive the success of an invasive grass. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 3883–3888 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Nolte, A. W., Freyhof, J., Stemshorn, K. C. & Tautz, D. An invasive lineage of sculpins, Cottus sp. (Pisces, Teleostei) in the Rhine with new habitat adaptations has originated from hybridization between old phylogeographic groups. Proc. R. Soc. B 272, 2379–2387 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Racimo, F., Sankararaman, S., Nielsen, R. & Huerta-Sánchez, E. Evidence for archaic adaptive introgression in humans. Nat. Rev. Genet. 16, 359–371 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Becker, M. et al. Hybridization may facilitate in situ survival of endemic species through periods of climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 1039–1043 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bay, R. A. et al. Genomic signals of selection predict climate-driven population declines in a migratory bird. Science 359, 83–86 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Fitzpatrick, M. C. & Keller, S. R. Ecological genomics meets community-level modelling of biodiversity: mapping the genomic landscape of current and future environmental adaptation. Ecol. Lett. 18, 1–16 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kus, B. E., Beck, P. P. & Wells, J. M. Southwestern willow flycatcher populations in California: distribution, abundance, and potential for conservation. Stud. Avian Biol. 26, 12–21 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bird Species Distribution Maps of the World (BirdLife International & NatureServe, 2012).

  32. Paxton, E. H. Molecular Genetic Structuring and Demographic History of the Willow Flycatcher, Empidonax traillii (Northern Arizona Univ., 2000).

  33. Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754–1760 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Li, H. et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Picard Toolkit (Broad Institute, 2018); http://broadinstitute.github.io/picard/

  36. Schmieder, R. & Edwards, R. Quality control and preprocessing of metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics 27, 863–864 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Jónsson, H., Ginolhac, A., Schubert, M., Johnson, P. L. F. & Orlando, L. mapDamage2.0: fast approximate Bayesian estimates of ancient DNA damage parameters. Bioinformatics 29, 1682–1684 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Korneliussen, T. S., Albrechtsen, A. & Nielsen, R. ANGSD: analysis of next generation sequencing data. BMC Bioinf. 15, 356 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Li, H. Improving SNP discovery by base alignment quality. Bioinformatics 27, 1157–1158 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Danecek, P. et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 27, 2156–2158 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Raxworthy, C. J. & Smith, B. T. Mining museums for historical DNA: advances and challenges in museomics. Trends Ecol. Evol. 36, 1049–1060 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Meisner, J. & Albrechtsen, A. Inferring population structure and admixture proportions in low-depth NGS data. Genetics 210, 719–731 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Joseph, T. A. & Pe’er, I. Inference of population structure from time-series genotype data. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 105, 317–333 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Grabherr, M. G. et al. Genome-wide synteny through highly sensitive sequence alignment: Satsuma. Bioinformatics 26, 1145–1151 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Turner, S. D. qqman: an R package for visualizing GWAS results using QQ and manhattan plots. J. Open Source Softw. 3, 731 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2020).

  47. Patterson, N. et al. Ancient admixture in human history. Genetics 192, 1065–1093 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Petr, M., Vernot, B. & Kelso, J. admixr—R package for reproducible analyses using ADMIXTOOLS. Bioinformatics 35, 3194–3195 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Purcell, S. et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 81, 559–575 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Pritchard, J. K., Stephens, M. & Donnelly, P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155, 945–959 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Do, C. et al. NeEstimator v2: re-implementation of software for the estimation of contemporary effective population size (Ne) from genetic data. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 14, 209–214 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Biscarini, F., Cozzi, P., Gaspa, G. & Marras, G. detectRUNS: Detect runs of homozygosity and runs of heterozygosity in diploid genomes. R package version 0.9.6 (2019).

  53. Goudet, J. hierfstat, a package for R to compute and test hierarchical F-statistics. Mol. Ecol. Notes 5, 184–186 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Excoffier, L. & Lischer, H. E. L. Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 10, 564–567 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Ellis, N., Smith, S. J. & Pitcher, C. R. Gradient forests: calculating importance gradients on physical predictors. Ecology 93, 156–168 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Forester, B. R., Lasky, J. R., Wagner, H. H. & Urban, D. L. Comparing methods for detecting multilocus adaptation with multivariate genotype–environment associations. Mol. Ecol. 27, 2215–2233 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Browning, B. L., Zhou, Y. & Browning, S. R. A one-penny imputed genome from next-generation reference panels. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 103, 338–348 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Oksanen, J. et al. vegan: Community ecology package. R package version 2.6-4 (2022).

  59. Forester, B. R., Jones, M. R., Joost, S., Landguth, E. L. & Lasky, J. R. Detecting spatial genetic signatures of local adaptation in heterogeneous landscapes. Mol. Ecol. 25, 104–120 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Frichot, E. & François, O. LEA: an R package for landscape and ecological association studies. Methods Ecol. Evol. 6, 925–929 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Robinson, J. T. et al. Integrative genomics viewer. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 24–26 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Quinlan, A. R. & Hall, I. M. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26, 841–842 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Backström, N., Qvarnström, A., Gustafsson, L. & Ellegren, H. Levels of linkage disequilibrium in a wild bird population. Biol. Lett. 2, 435–438 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Vitorino Carvalho, A. et al. Embryonic thermal manipulation impacts the postnatal transcriptome response of heat-challenged Japanese quails. BMC Genom. 22, 488 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Kumar, H. et al. Transcriptome of chicken liver tissues reveals the candidate genes and pathways responsible for adaptation into two different climatic conditions. Animals 9, 1076 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Zhang, J., Schmidt, C. J. & Lamont, S. J. Transcriptome analysis reveals potential mechanisms underlying differential heart development in fast- and slow-growing broilers under heat stress. BMC Genom. 18, 295 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Wang, Y. et al. Liver transcriptome responses to heat stress and Newcastle disease virus infection in genetically distinct chicken inbred lines. Genes 11, 1067 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Turbek, S. T. et al. Data for ‘Historical DNA reveals climate adaptation in an endangered songbird’. Dryad https://datadryad.org/stash/share/qlafA02RwIPjoptjefUaKbrMszEsMJWP8a_H9-e24MY (2023).

  69. Turbek, S. T. et al. Code for ‘Historical DNA reveals climate adaptation in an endangered songbird’. GitHub https://github.com/sturbek/WIFL-Climate-Adaptation (2023).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a National Science Foundation (NSF) Postdoctoral Research Fellowship in Biology (2208881) to S.T. and an NSF CAREER grant (1942313) to K.R. We thank B. Forester for contributing funding for sequencing. We thank all of the individuals who contributed genetic samples, including T. Kita, B. Keith, R. Taylor and S. Birks. The following museums generously provided historical samples for the analyses presented in this study: the University of California Berkeley Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, California Academy of Sciences, Los Angeles County Natural History Museum, American Museum of Natural History, Buffalo Museum of Science, Charles R. Conner Museum, Cornell University Museum of Vertebrates, University of Kansas Biodiversity Institute & Natural History Museum, New York State Museum, Royal Ontario Museum, University of Colorado Museum of Natural History and the University of Michigan Museum of Zoology. All samples were collected under federal, state and IACUC permits necessary for the research. Any use of trade, firm or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the US government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA

    Sheela P. Turbek, Christen Bossu, Christine Rayne & Kristen C. Ruegg

  2. Center for Tropical Research, Institute of the Environment and Sustainability and Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Cristian Gruppi & Thomas B. Smith

  3. Western Ecological Research Center, San Diego Field Station, US Geological Survey, San Diego, CA, USA

    Barbara E. Kus

  4. Southern Sierra Research Station, Weldon, CA, USA

    Mary Whitfield

  5. Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center, US Geological Survey, Hawaii Volcanoes National Park, HI, USA

    Eben H. Paxton

  6. Department of Evolution and Ecology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA

    Rachael A. Bay

Authors
  1. Sheela P. Turbek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christen Bossu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christine Rayne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Cristian Gruppi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Barbara E. Kus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mary Whitfield
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Thomas B. Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Eben H. Paxton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Rachael A. Bay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Kristen C. Ruegg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

S.T. and K.R. designed the study. B.K., M.W. and E.P. contributed samples for genomic analysis. R.B. and K.R. obtained museum samples. C.R. and C.G. generated the genomic data. S.T. and C.B. analysed the genomic data. K.R. funded the study. K.R. and T.S. provided logistical support. S.T. wrote the paper with edits from all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sheela P. Turbek.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Climate Change thanks Fumin Lei, Orly Razgour and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Genomic differentiation between historical and contemporary willow flycatchers in San Diego.

Manhattan plot showing mean FST, averaged over 25-kb windows, between historical (n = 17) and contemporary (n = 18) individuals breeding in San Diego. Colours (black and grey) alternate between scaffolds in the willow flycatcher reference genome.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Results from the gradient forest analysis of 500,000 loci and 11 contemporary populations across the breeding range of the southwestern willow flycatcher.

(A) PCA of the top three climate variables associated with genomic variation. The arrows indicate the loadings of the top-ranking environmental variables. Colours are based on the predicted genomic composition from the top climate variables at 100,000 random points. (B) Gradient forest-transformed environmental variables from the PCA mapped across the breeding range of the southwestern willow flycatcher. Sampling locations are indicated with black circles.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Redundancy analysis (RDA) showing the relationship between genomic variation and top-ranking climate variables for 221 contemporary willow flycatchers breeding across the United States.

The loadings on (A) axes one and two and (B) axes one and three for monthly mean dew point temperature (tdmean), monthly precipitation (precip), and monthly maximum temperature (tmax) are shown. Points are coloured by sampling location and the grey cloud in the center of each plot shows the 128,147 SNPs included in the analysis. The four subspecies of willow flycatcher are shown as different shapes.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Redundancy analysis (RDA) showing the candidate SNPs associated with top-ranking climate variables for 221 contemporary willow flycatchers breeding across the United States.

The loadings of 128,147 SNPs on (A) axes one and two and (B) axes one and three and their relationship with monthly mean dew point temperature (tdmean), monthly precipitation (precip), and monthly maximum temperature (tmax) are shown. Candidate SNPs (with loadings greater than three standard deviations from the mean) are coloured according to their associations, while non-candidate SNPs are shown in light grey.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Shifts in patterns of genomic differentiation over time in willow flycatchers breeding across the United States at climate-linked SNPs.

Principal component analysis (PCA) of loci associated with (A) monthly mean dew point temperature (n = 104), (B) monthly precipitation (n = 72), and (C) monthly maximum temperature (n = 56) across 238 contemporary and historical samples of the willow flycatcher. Details as in Fig. 1. Contemporary samples of the four subspecies are shown as squares, circles, diamonds, and triangles, while upside-down triangles indicate historical samples.

Extended Data Fig. 6 Allele frequency shifts within San Diego at climate-linked loci located near genes associated with avian thermal tolerance and bill morphology.

Number of loci linked to (A) monthly mean dew point temperature (n = 20), (B) monthly precipitation (n = 10), and (C) monthly maximum temperature (n = 7) in willow flycatchers breeding in San Diego that shifted in a direction consistent with climate adaptation. The p-values show the results for one-tailed binomial tests examining whether the observed proportion of loci that shifted in the expected direction (that is, consistent with climate adaptation) was significantly greater than expected by chance.

Extended Data Table 1 Patterns of introgression between willow flycatchers in San Diego and neighbouring populations
Full size table

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Methods, Tables 1–5 and Figs. 1–15.

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Table

Fluidigm primer information (5’ to 3’) for the 96 SNP markers included in the SNP genotyping analyses. ASP1, the SNP allele detected with allele-specific primer 1; ASP2, the SNP allele detected with allele-specific primer 2; SNP_SEQ, the sequence of the amplified fragment containing the SNP; ASP1_SEQ, the sequence of allele-specific primer 1; ASP2_SEQ, the sequence of allele-specific primer 2; LSP_SEQ, the sequence of locus-specific reverse primer; STA_SEQ, the sequence of forward primer for specific target amplification; AMP_GC, the proportional GC content.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Turbek, S.P., Bossu, C., Rayne, C. et al. Historical DNA reveals climate adaptation in an endangered songbird. Nat. Clim. Chang. 13, 735–741 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01696-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01696-3

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing