The value of climate change mitigation largely depends on the social discount rate, which has almost exclusively been influenced by economists. A survey of expert philosophers shows that, as a group, they support the same social discount rate as economists, resulting in the same mitigation policy, but for different ethical and practical reasons.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Hänsel, M. et al. Climate economics support for the UN climate targets. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 781–789 (2020). This paper presents an updated version of the DICE model.
Standards of Performance For New, Reconstructed, And Modified Sources And Emissions Guidelines For Existing Sources: Oil And Natural Gas Sector Climate Review https://go.nature.com/3IgExyE (Environmental Protection Agency, 2022). A report proposing new rules of how to assess today’s societal cost of future climate damages.
Wagner, G. et al. Eight priorities for calculating the social cost of carbon. Nature 590, 548–550 (2021). A paper advising the Biden administration on the steps to calculate the societal cost today of future climate damages.
Drupp, M. et al. Discounting disentangled. Am. Econ. J. 10, 109–134 (2018). The paper surveys expert economists on the SDR.
Greaves, H. Discounting for public policy: a survey. Econ. Philos. 33, 391–439 (2017). A paper that gives an overview of the SDR debate with climate change as an application.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This is a summary of: Nesje, F. et al. Philosophers and economists agree on climate policy paths but for different reasons. Nat. Clim. Change https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01681-w (2023).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Philosophers reinforce economists’ support for climate change mitigation. Nat. Clim. Chang. 13, 513–514 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01693-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01693-6
