Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Research on public support for climate policy instruments must broaden its scope

The transition to net-zero emissions will be contested and could lead to political polarization and social unrest. To contribute to a transition that is accepted as legitimate while remaining effective, research on public support must evolve rapidly along several dimensions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it


Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout


  1. Lee, T. M., Markowitz, E. M., Howe, P. D., Ko, C.-Y. & Leiserowitz, A. A. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 1014–1020 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bergquist, M., Nilsson, A., Harring, N. & Jagers, S. C. Nat. Clim. Change 12, 235–240 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Drews, S. & van den Bergh, J. Clim. Policy 16, 855–876 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Maestre-Andrés, S., Drews, S. & van den Bergh, J. Clim. Policy 19, 1186–1204 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rhodes, E., Axsen, J. & Jaccard, M. Ecol. Econ. 137, 56–69 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fairbrother, M., Johansson Sevä, I. & Kulin, J. Glob. Environ. Change 59, 102003 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Savin, I., Drews, S., Maestre-Andrés, S. & van den Bergh, J. Climatic Change 162, 2107–2138 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dubash, N. K. et al. in Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Shukla, P. R. et al.) Ch. 13, 13-11–13-160 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022).

  9. Givoni, M., Macmillen, J., Banister, D. & Feitelson, E. Transp. Rev. 33, 1–20 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wicki, M., Fesenfeld, L. P. & Bernauer, T. Environ. Res. Lett. 14, 084048 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pahle, M. et al. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 861–867 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Schuitema, G., Steg, L. & Forward, S. Transport. Res. Part A 44, 99–109 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Carattini, S., Baranzini, A., Thalmann, P., Varone, F. & Vöhringer, F. Environ. Resour. Econ. 68, 97–128 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Devine-Wright, P. Wind Energy 8, 125–139 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kallbekken, S., Kroll, S. & Cherry, T. L. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 62, 53–64 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kallbekken, S. & Aasen, M. Ecol. Econ. 69, 2183–2190 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Konc, T., Drews, S., Savin, I. & van den Bergh, J. Glob. Environ. Change 74, 102528 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Peng, W. et al. Nature 594, 174–176 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Badura, T., Krkoška Lorencová, E., Ferrini, S. & Vačkářová, D. Land. Urban Plan. 215, 104215 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Burstein, P. Polit. Res. Quart. 56, 29–40 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steffen Kallbekken.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kallbekken, S. Research on public support for climate policy instruments must broaden its scope. Nat. Clim. Chang. 13, 206–208 (2023).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing