On 15 January 2022, the Hunga Tonga–Hunga Ha’apai (HTHH) eruption injected 146 MtH2O and 0.42 MtSO2 into the stratosphere. This large water vapour perturbation means that HTHH will probably increase the net radiative forcing, unusual for a large volcanic eruption, increasing the chance of the global surface temperature anomaly temporarily exceeding 1.5 °C over the coming decade. Here we estimate the radiative response to the HTHH eruption and derive the increased risk that the global mean surface temperature anomaly shortly exceeds 1.5 °C following the eruption. We show that HTHH has a tangible impact of the chance of imminent 1.5 °C exceedance (increasing the chance of at least one of the next 5 years exceeding 1.5 °C by 7%), but the level of climate policy ambition, particularly the mitigation of short-lived climate pollutants, dominates the 1.5 °C exceedance outlook over decadal timescales.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Subscribe to Nature+
Get immediate online access to Nature and 55 other Nature journal
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $8.25 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
The ERA5 data required to estimate the radiative perturbation caused by the HTHH eruption are available at https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/cdsapp#!/dataset/reanalysis-era5-pressure-levels-monthly-means?tab=overview23, including atmospheric temperature, specific humidity (water vapour MMR), ozone MMR, cloud fraction, cloud liquid and ice water content, evaluated on pressure levels. ERA5 surface albedo and surface temperature variables are available at https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/cdsapp#!/dataset/reanalysis-era5-single-levels-monthly-means?tab=form23. The SSP ERF time series used to estimate the global temperature response are available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5705391 (ref. 28).
The FaIR v.2.0 simple climate model used to estimate the global temperature response is available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4683173 (ref. 20). The SOCRATES radiative transfer model is available at https://code.metoffice.gov.uk/trac/socrates/wiki15, with instructions on how to access in https://homepages.see.leeds.ac.uk/~lecsjed/winscpuse/socrates_userguide.pdf. Figure production code is available from https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7319240 (ref. 28).
Matoza, R. S. et al. Atmospheric waves and global seismoacoustic observations of the January 2022 Hunga eruption, Tonga. Science 377, 95–100 (2022).
Global Sulfur Dioxide Monitoring Home Page (NASA, 2022); https://so2.gsfc.nasa.gov/
Hunga Tonga–Hunga Ha’apai (Smithsonian Institution, 2022); https://volcano.si.edu/volcano.cfm?vn=243040
León, J. A. P. Monitoring the Atmospheric Impacts of the Hunga-Tonga Eruption (ECMWF, 2022); https://www.ecmwf.int/en/newsletter/171/news/monitoring-atmospheric-impacts-hunga-tonga-eruption
Millán, L. et al. The Hunga Tonga–Hunga Ha’apai hydration of the stratosphere. Geophys. Res. Lett. 49, e2022GL099381 (2022).
Guo, S., Bluth, G., Rose, W., Watson, M. & Prata, A. Re-evaluation of SO2 release of the 15 June 1991 Pinatubo eruption using ultraviolet and infrared satellite sensors. Geochem. Geophys. Geosys. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GC000654 (2004).
Sellitto, P. et al. The unexpected radiative impact of the Hunga Tonga eruption of January 15th, 2022. Commun. Earth. Environ. 3, 288 (2022).
Zhang, H. et al. Potential impact of Tonga volcano eruption on global mean surface air temperature. J. Meteorol. Res. 36, 1–5 (2022).
Zhu, Y. et al. Perturbations in stratospheric aerosol evolution due to the water-rich plume of the 2022 Hunga-Tonga eruption. Commun. Earth Environ. 3, 248 (2022).
WMO Update: 50:50 Chance of Global Temperature Temporarily Reaching 1.5 °C Threshold in Next Five Years (WMO, 2022); https://public.wmo.int/en/media/press-release/wmo-update-5050-chance-of-global-temperature-temporarily-reaching-15%C2%B0c-threshold
Hermanson, L. et al. WMO global annual to decadal climate update: a prediction for 2021–2025. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 103, E1117–E1129 (2022).
Meinshausen, M. et al. The shared socio-economic pathway (SSP) greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions to 2500. Geosci. Model Dev. 13, 3571–3605 (2020).
Boer, G. J. et al. The Decadal Climate Prediction Project (DCPP) contribution to CMIP6. Geosci. Model Dev. 9, 3751–3777 (2016).
Edwards, J. M. & Slingo, A. Studies with a flexible new radiation code. I: Choosing a configuration for a large-scale model. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 122, 689–719 (1996).
Manners, J., Edwards, J. M., Hill, P. & Thelen, J.-C. SOCRATES Technical Guide Suite Of Community Radiative Transfer Codes Based on Edwards and Slingo (Univ. Leeds, 2017).
Hersbach, H. et al. The ERA5 global reanalysis. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 146, 1999–2049 (2020).
Zuo, M. et al. Volcanoes and climate: sizing up the impact of the recent Hunga Tonga–Hunga Ha’apai volcanic eruption from a historical perspective. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 39, 986–1993 (2022).
Schoeberl, M. R. et al. Analysis and impact of the Hunga Tonga–Hunga Ha’apai stratospheric water vapor plume. Geophys. Res. Lett. 49, e2022GL100248 (2022).
Smith, C. et al. in Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) Annex III (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2021).
Leach, N. J. et al. FaIRv2.0.0: a generalized impulse response model for climate uncertainty and future scenario exploration. Geosci. Model Dev. 14, 3007–3036 (2021).
IPCC: Summary for Policymakers. In Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2021).
ERA5 Monthly Averaged Data on Pressure Levels From 1979 to Present (Copernicus Climate Change Service, 2019); https://doi.org/10.24381/CDS.6860A573
Copernicus Climate Change Service. ERA5 monthly averaged data on single levels from 1979 to present (2019); https://doi.org/10.24381/CDS.F17050D7
Forster, P. M. et al. Recommendations for diagnosing effective radiative forcing from climate models for CMIP6. J. Geophys. Res. 121, 460–12,475 (2016).
Hansen, J. et al. Efficacy of climate forcings. J. Geophys. Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD005776 (2005).
Myhre, G. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) Ch. 8 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
Smith, C. et al. IPCC Working Group 1 (WG1) Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) Annex III Extended Data (2021); https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5705391
Jenkins, S., Smith, C., Allen, M. & Grainger, R. Code and data for ‘Tonga eruption increases chance of temporary surface temperature anomaly above 1.5 °C’. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7319240 (2022).
S.J. acknowledges NERC grant NE/L002612/1 and support from the European Space Agency’s Climate Change Initiative. S.J. and M.A. acknowledge funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research programme with grant agreement no. 821205 (FORCeS). R.G. acknowledges support of the National Centre for Earth Observation, contract no. PR140015. C.S. acknowledges the NERC/IIASA collaborative research fellowship scheme with grant no. NE/T009381/1.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information
Nature Climate Change thanks Simone Tilmes, Daniele Visioni and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Jenkins, S., Smith, C., Allen, M. et al. Tonga eruption increases chance of temporary surface temperature anomaly above 1.5 °C. Nat. Clim. Chang. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01568-2