Abstract
Glaciers in the Arctic respond sensitively to climate change, recording the polar amplification of global warming with increasing mass loss. Here, we use glacier mass balances in Svalbard and northern Arctic Canada to categorize tropospheric variability and the associated summer circulation over the Arctic. We establish a link between annual glacier mass balances and their respective atmospheric forcings since 1950 using GRACE/GRACEFO satellite data (2002–2021), as well as regional climate models and reanalysis data (1950–2019). We find that asynchronous behaviour of mass balance between the regions has become very likely since the early 2000s, exceeding the range of previous decadal variability. Related tropospheric circulation exhibits more meridional patterns, a greater influence of meridional heat advection and a wavier summer circulation. The traceable impact on glacier mass balances emphasizes the importance of dynamic next to thermodynamic climate changes for the future of glacier mass loss, Arctic ecology and societal impacts.
Main
Global warming has disproportionately affected the northern polar latitudes (Arctic amplification)^{1,2,3}, and record temperatures have triggered sensitive responses in the mass storage of Arctic glaciers^{4}. Glacier mass depends on the balance between accumulation and ablation processes: snowfall, refreeze and retention of meltwater add mass to the glacier system or redistribute it, whereas snowmelt, evaporation and sublimation subtract mass from it. The difference between accumulation and ablation processes is summarized in the surface mass balance (SMB). For marineterminating glaciers, such as 163 tidewater glaciers in Svalbard (SVA)^{5,6} and over 300 in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago^{7}, mass is additionally removed by submarine melt and calving (terminal discharge, D). Regional climate models specialized in snow and ice processes, such as MAR3.11^{8} or RACMO2.3^{9,10}, have been shown to successfully reproduce satellite^{11} and in situ observations of glacier and ice sheet mass balance when forced by global reanalysis data^{12} such as the European Centre for MediumRange Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Reanalysis v.5 (ERA5)^{13}.
Here, we focus on Arctic Canada North (ACN) and SVA as part of the circumpolar ring of glaciercovered islands and landmasses (Fig. 1) affected by disproportionate Arctic warming, with their substantial contributions to sea level rise^{4}. These glacier regions are separated by roughly 100° of longitude with ice surfaces covering an area of about 34,000 km^{2} (SVA) and 105,000 km^{2} (ACN)^{4}, respectively. Located at about the same latitude (74°–83° N), climatic conditions over both archipelagos are influenced by the same circulation regime characterized by yearround jetstream dynamics and the winter polar vortex^{14}. As ACN is situated east and SVA west of the Greenland Ice Sheet, both regions have been influenced by more frequent blocking conditions in recent years^{15,16}.
Temperatures in Svalbard are projected to rise by 6–7 °C until 2100 under the IPCC scenario representative concentration pathway (RCP) 4.5 and up to 10 °C under businessasusual conditions (RCP 8.5) compared with 1971–2000^{17}. Precipitation is said to increase by 45–65% and to contain a progressively lower fraction of snowfall, causing unchanged or more snow storage under RCP 4.5 and less snow for RCP 8.5 over most of Svalbard (50–100% in many places)^{17}. Combined with a shorter accumulation season^{18}, the overall SMB will become increasingly negative. Dynamic loss of ice through calving accounts for about 21% of the ablation of tidewater glaciers in Svalbard^{6,19}.
Temperatures in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago are projected to rise similarly, by about 6.5 °C until 2100 under the moderate RCP 4.5 scenario, causing the loss of about 18% of its glacier volume, mainly through runoff^{20}. Between 1996 and 2015, temperatures have increased more in northern than southern Arctic Canada and, in combination with reduced precipitation, drove an acceleration in mass loss of 2.1 ± 0.8 Gt yr^{–2} in ACN^{21} with a marked transition to increased mass loss in 2004^{11}.
Glacier mass balances of ACN and SVA
Timevariable gravity field measurements of the GRACE/GRACEFO satellite missions^{22,23} prove continuous mass loss, with rates amounting to –30.9 ± 8.3 Gt yr^{–1} (±2σ) in ACN and –13.2 ± 2.3 Gt yr^{–1} in SVA for 2002–2021 (Fig. 1a,b). The GRACE/GRACEFO twin orbiters record the intersatellite distance variations caused by the differential gravitational attraction as they pass over Earth features of varying density at slightly different times. Repeated measurements provide a unique monthly time series of gravity field variations, from which mass changes, such as ice loss to the ocean, can be deduced with a typical spatial resolution of 300 km and an accuracy of 2 cm water equivalent^{23,24}. The GRACE/GRACEFO uncertainties for mass changes in ACN and SVA are shown in Extended Data Fig. 1.
Apart from the longterm mass loss, GRACE/GRACEFO data reveal that SVA’s annual massbalance anomalies consistently deviate in the opposite direction from those of ACN (Fig. 1c). The annual balances represent the mass change from March to March of the following year (Methods), selected to encompass the full melt season and to centre on the minimum Arctic ice conditions in September. Out of 16 annual mass balances (2003–2016 and 2019–2020) and one biennial mass balance (2017 and 2018; bridging GRACE/GRACEFO gap, displayed as white dotted line in Fig. 1a,b), only two years are exceptions from this counterdirectional massbalance behaviour.
To examine whether the same characteristics hold true for the time before the GRACE/GRACEFO era, we reconstruct the SMB of the two regions using the regional climate model MAR3.11 (1950–2019), sixhourly forced by ERA5^{13}, run at a resolution of 15 km with its coupled multilayer snow and ice energy balance model SISVAT^{8}. Cumulative monthly SMB from MAR3.11 typically lies within 2σ error margins of the GRACE/GRACEFO time series for their common period as shown on Fig. 1a,b (for alternative SMB models, see Extended Data Fig. 2). Note that we account for longterm icedynamic changes and the retreat of marineterminating glaciers on the basis of the difference between the GRACE/GRACEFO trend and the mean MAR3.11 SMB for 2002–2019, while additionally considering the mass loss of 4.4 ± 0.8 Gt related to the episodic surge loss of Austfonna Glacier in 2013 in Svalbard^{25} (Fig. 1b). This estimated discharge D* is then subtracted from the SMB time series to approximate the complete mass balance (SMBD*) for ACN and SVA back to 1950, which is the first available year of our MAR3.11 dataset. At this point, we do not aim to fully reconstruct the time evolution of the dynamic discharge for both regions due to our focus on interannual changes, but note the widespread acceleration of D* in ACN^{7} and evidence for increased discharge of selected glaciers in SVA^{26}.
To isolate the interannual mass variations related to atmospheric dynamics and to remove longterm climate change signals, including the gradual icedynamic changes in D*^{7,26}, we detrend the monthly time series for the entire period 1950–2019 using a polynomial fit (order n = 3). With the polynomial fit, we remove mass loss trends and accelerations from the time series (orders n = 1 and n = 2, respectively) and improve the recovery of interannual variations, particularly at the beginning and at the end of the period (order n = 3). As before, we then estimate annual mass balances on the basis of the detrended monthly SMBD* estimates from MAR3.11.
Synchronicity of mass balances in the regions
The annual massbalance anomalies in SVA and ACN reveal interesting transitions in temporal relationship between the regions (Fig. 2a). While their annual massbalance anomalies tend to have the same sign from 1960 to the early 1970s and in the mid1990s, they show asynchronous behaviour between 1975 and 1985 and a distinct transition beginning in the late 1990s, continuing until today (Fig. 2a). Thus, the period up to the year 2002 is characterized by moderately covarying or opposing massbalance behaviour in SVA and ACN, with 15 yr running correlations ranging typically between –0.4 and 0.4 (Fig. 2b). Beginning in the year 2002, however, massbalance anomalies in the two glacier regions show distinct alternations: in years with positive anomalies in ACN (reduced melt), SVA experiences negative anomalies (enhanced melt) and vice versa, pointing to a new state of atmospheric forcing conditions. Correlations become significant with values <–0.7 starting with the 15 yr period 1999–2013 (significance threshold r = ± 0.55 at the 95% confidence level, accounting for autocorrelation^{27}).
To analyse the relationship with atmospheric conditions, we categorize the yearly massbalance anomalies of ACN and SVA into four types on the basis of their sign and synchronicity: concurrent massbalance anomalies in both regions, either positive (++) or negative (––), and contrary massbalance anomalies, either positive in ACN and negative in SVA ( +  –) or the other way around (–+). We count the years belonging to each of the four categories within running 15 yr bins, approximately the time span of continuous data from the first GRACE mission (2002–2017). The MAR3.11 reconstruction reveals that bins centred between 1960 and 1973 include a majority of years with samesign anomalies (9 or more out of 15 years; Fig. 2b). Starting in the early 2000s, opposite massbalance anomalies become dominant in both glacier regions (for example, 10 or more out of 15 years starting 2001). Considering bins between the late 1970s and the late 1990s, asynchronous massbalance years prevail in the first decade, while no single category dominates in the following decade (Fig. 2b).
Atmospheric drivers of mass change in the past and today
We analyse the atmospheric conditions in years with dominantly synchronous (1963–1977) and asynchronous (2004–2018) massbalance behaviour, corresponding to the periods with the highest positive and negative massbalance correlations (Fig. 2b). We focus on the months June, July and August (JJA) as fluctuations in the summer melt rate cause the greatest yeartoyear variability in the annual mass balances of both regions (75% for ACN and 68% for SVA)^{11,17,18} (Extended Data Fig. 3). Consequently, we investigate atmospheric variables characterizing the summer circulation and associated melt potential in the Arctic, namely the geopotential height of the 500 hPa pressure surface (z500), the vertically integrated northward heat flux and the 2 m air temperature (t2m; Extended Data Fig. 4) from NCEP/NCAR, ERA5 and ERA20C monthly reanalysis data (Methods).
The correlation of z500 and northward heat flux with the annual massbalance anomalies for both regions and time windows 1963–1977 and 2004–2018 are shown in Fig. 3. The early period, characterized by synchronous massbalance behaviour, shows correlations with the largest values over the respective glacier region, suggesting a regional atmospheric forcing of the mass balance (Fig. 3a). Negative correlations indicate that reduced z500s in JJA lead to higher mass balances (less melting) and vice versa. However, mass balances also correlate significantly with z500 in other areas of the Arctic (P < 0.05). Between 2004 and 2018, by contrast, the correlations for ACN and SVA reveal nearly complementary patterns for both regions (Fig. 3b). Interestingly and dissimilar to the early period, the (anti) correlation with the mass balance does not peak over the glacier regions themselves. Instead, extensive areas of statistically significant, alternating correlation flank the regions, leaving areas with coefficients around zero west of ACN and over SVA. Employing GRACE/GRACEFO massbalance anomalies instead of SMB anomalies for 2004–2018 produces very consistent correlation patterns with z500 and northward heat flux (Extended Data Fig. 5). This shift in correlation patterns points to an increased importance of longitudinal pressure gradients and heat transport for the mass balances of ACN and SVA.
To further analyse this, we utilize the JJA vertically integrated northward heat flux as an indicator of the additional energy available for enhanced melt as a result of the heat advection across latitudes. The correlation patterns confirm two distinct channels of heat transport to govern the recent massbalance years (Fig. 3d), not pronounced in the early years for ACN and to a lesser extent for SVA (Fig. 3c). Reduced northward heat flux slightly south of ACN prevails during times of positive massbalance anomalies (reduced melt conditions), while SVA experiences enhanced northward heat flux (enhanced melt conditions), and the other way around. This alternating relationship with its spatial similarity has manifested itself only in recent years.
Next, we investigate the effect of uncertainties in the SMB reconstruction (1950–2019) on the categorization massbalance years. For this, we randomize the categorization on the basis of random sampling (N = 5,000) of the annual SMB anomalies in the presence of SMB uncertainties (Methods). From the resulting ensemble of annual categorizations, we infer the probability of any 15 yr bin containing a majority of either synchronous or asynchronous massbalance years, with the latter shown in Fig. 4 (symmetry for synchronous years inferred). The SMB reconstruction suggests that the synchronicity underwent decadal variations, swinging back and forth between synchronous and asynchronous states. Before 2000, there is no clear evidence of a dominant synchronicity as at least 10% of the random samples fall into the respective opposite category. Starting in the early 2000s, asynchronous behaviour has become very likely (following the IPCC definitions^{28}), with probabilities exceeding the significance threshold of 5% for the 15 yr bin centred on 2004 (Fig. 4).
This underpins the strong anticorrelations shown in Fig. 2b, promoted by an increasing magnitude of massbalance variability seen in the recent two decades (Figs. 1c and 2a). The probability distributions of the number of years for each individual category are shown in Extended Data Fig. 6. The distinctly higher probability of asynchronous years dominating the recent 15 yr bins, compared with their likelihood in the years before 2000, is further depicted in Extended Data Fig. 7.
Changing summer circulation in the Arctic
On the basis of the four categories of massbalance years shown in Fig. 2b, together with their likelihood shown in Fig. 4, we examine the corresponding atmospheric circulation in summer (JJA), focusing on the geopotential height of 500 hPa and the wind velocity at 250 hPa, reflecting the polar front jetstream level. Figure 5a,b shows two composites, (1) the JJA z500 mean of positive (++) minus the JJA mean of negative (––) years and (2) the JJA z500 mean of oppositesign massbalance years, positive in ACN (+–) minus positive in SVA (–+). The samesign composite difference (Fig. 5a) exhibits a large circumpolar area of significant negative z500 values over the Arctic Ocean, amplifying the zonal pattern of pressure differences and midtropospheric winds (Fig. 5a). By contrast, the composite difference of oppositesign years depicts a wave pattern of z500 anomalies across the Arctic domain (Fig. 5b). The difference between (+–) and (–+) years, therefore, corresponds to intensified meridional flow and more northward heat flux over the Arctic North Atlantic and towards SVA with its inherent impact on the nearsurface air temperature and related glacier melt. For samesign massbalance anomalies, the wind composites at 250 hPa (jetstream level) show dominantly circumpolar flow of air masses affecting both regions in years with samesign mass balances (Fig. 5c). A consistent zonal westerly flow over Northern Europe indicates a canonical maritime summer climate state, similar to a negative summer North Atlantic Oscillation state. The perturbation in the other years differs greatly between ACN and SVA (Fig. 5d), showing a pronounced planetary wave structure passing south of Greenland. During years with more positive mass balances in ACN, air masses tend to move southwards over ACN and northwards over SVA. The latter circulation patterns occur more frequently in recent years (Fig. 5e). A highpressure anomaly is located above Northern Europe, deflecting maritime air masses and promoting stationary weather patterns. In addition, the increase in frequency of the (–+) pattern shown in Fig. 2b and Extended Data Fig. 6 is in line with enhanced blocking conditions over Greenland. Individual composites for each category underlying the composite differences are shown in Extended Data Figs. 8 and 9. The uncertainties in the z500 composites arising from uncertainties in the SMB reconstruction are presented in Extended Data Fig. 10.
Conclusions
We show that years with predominantly meridional circulation have become more frequent in the past two decades, superseding zonal circulation patterns since the late 1990s (Figs. 4 and 5e). The occurrence of years associated with zonal circulation drops from roughly 73% in the time frame 1963–1977 to only 20% during 2004–2018 (Supplementary Table 1). Today, years with primarily meridional circulation occur about three to four times more often than years with zonal circulation, pointing towards the fact that melt and thus glacier mass balances in the North Atlantic and northeast Canadian Arctic are increasingly controlled by meridional airflow during summer.
The interannual and interregional temperature variability over the investigated Arctic glaciers has increased with the meridionalization of atmospheric flow and is superimposed on the strong thermodynamic warming of the Arctic. We have shown that the intensification of meridional heat advection from 1950 to 2019 has directly impacted the glacier mass balances of ACN and SVA, promoting more frequent exceptional mass loss and greater changes from one year to the next. For example, in 2011 and 2012, GRACE measured substantial losses in ACN, accompanied by weak losses in SVA, while recording the reverse for the following year, 2013 (Fig. 1c).
We regard this asynchrony in the massbalance behaviour to be a characteristic of the ‘new Arctic’^{3}, in line with a statistically significant increase of quasistationary planetary wave patterns^{29} and enhanced blocking situations over Greenland^{15,16}, affecting midlatitude weather patterns over the Northern Hemisphere^{2,30,31,32,33,34,35}. Other factors include trends or nonstationarity in the summer North Atlantic Oscillation^{36} or trends in synoptic variance^{37}. In general, a combination of natural decadal variability and anthropogenic effects is expected.
The exact impact of increasing temperature variability on Arctic systems and their potential ensuing tipping points is yet unknown, as are the detailed mechanisms of the polar to midlatitude linkages. To date, global models fail to reproduce the observed atmospheric characteristics of the new Arctic^{31,38}. Therefore, projections may grossly underestimate the climate impacts on the Arctic cryosphere, including^{39} ecosystems and indigenous communities^{40,41,42}.
Methods
GRACE/GRACEFO processing and gravimetric inversion
Our study is based on GRACE and GRACEFO Level 2 data of 196 mean monthly gravity field solutions from April 2002 to April 2021, with a data gap of 11 months between the last available GRACE solution (June 2017) and the first retrievable GRACEFO solution (June 2018). We use release six (RL06) gravity field solutions up to degree and order 60 as provided by the Science Data Systems (SDS) Centres (Center for Space Research at the University of Texas, CSR; Jet Propulsion Laboratory; and GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences) in the form of Stokes potential coefficients. Following ref. ^{43}, we combine the SDS datasets by weighting each monthly solution coefficientwise with the inverse of the uncertainty associated with each GRACE/GRACEFO coefficient. For this, we first estimate the overall noise level for each solution on the basis of the degree power in the noisedominated spectral range of spherical harmonic degrees 40 to 60, after subtracting bias, trend, annual, and semiannual and temporal variations longer than four months (using a movingaverage filter) from the GRACE/GRACEFO coefficients’ time series. The resulting empirical estimate of the noise level is used to calibrate the GRACE/GRACEFO coefficient uncertainties, provided by the SDS centres along with the Level 2 data, which are then used to determine the optimal weight of each solution for each GRACE/GRACEFO coefficient. The combination is done for the detrended coefficient time series; the trend is later restored by applying equal weights to trends obtained from all SDS centres. We carry out the combination on detrended data as the differences in the trends appear to be systematic and arising from different processing choices of the SDS centres (Extended Data Fig. 1). Therefore, the monthly weights derived from coefficients beyond degree and order 40 are not representative for the relative uncertainty of the trends. Applying these weights to the different temporal linear signals would introduce artificial monthly temporal variability. Therefore, we remove the trends before combination and restore them, assuming equal weights for each SDS centre, in the combined solution. Extended Data Fig. 1 shows time series of GRACE/GRACEFO mass changes and their uncertainties, respectively, for individual SDS solutions, as well as their combination.
GRACE/GRACEFO corrections
We use Stokes potential coefficients up to degree and order 60 and apply the following common corrections to the Level 2 data: (1) insertion of degree1 coefficients—which are not recovered by GRACE/GRACEFO—provided by the SDS on the basis of ref. ^{44}, an improvement to the original method proposed by ref. ^{45} (for each SDS dataset, these coefficients are available as GRACE Technical Note 13^{46}) and (2) replacement of highly uncertain C_{20} coefficients from GRACE/GRACEFO by more accurate estimates from satellitelaser ranging^{47} (GRACE Technical Note 11^{48}). Following the recommendation of ref. ^{49} adopted by the GRACE/GRACEFO SDS centres, we replace the C_{30} coefficients from GRACE/GRACEFO with the satellitelaserranging estimate provided in the GRACE Technical Note 14^{50}, starting August 2016.
We apply the ICE6G Model^{51} to correct for the linear trends in the gravity field caused by glacial isostatic adjustment. The linear trend caused by hydrological variations is subtracted on the basis of the average of the two models presented in ref. ^{4}. No correction is applied for glacial isostatic adjustment caused by the retreat after the Little Ice Age as it approximates zero for both regions^{4}.
GRACE/GRACEFO gravimetric inversion
We estimate mass changes from the GRACE/GRACEFO coefficients of degree j and order m representing the gravity field, \(C_{jm}^{{\mathrm{GRACE}}}\left( {t_i} \right)\) at the time t_{i} of the ith measurement epoch using forwardmodellingbased inversion approach in the spatial domain, an adaption of the approach previously applied to Greenland^{52,53} and Antarctica^{54}. The regions of ACN and SVA and other glaciated areas, n = 1…N, are geographically defined using a global subdivision of glacier regions^{55,56} and the Randolph Glacier Inventory Version 4.0^{57}. First, we model the spatial representation of the gravity field signal arising from a known uniform mass distribution of 1 Gt in magnitude within each region, C_{n}(Ω), where Ω stands for the spherical colatitude ϑ and longitude φ, and hence Ω = (ϑ,φ). Then, the mass change is obtained by estimating an adjustment factor, m_{n}(t_{i}), to the known mass change of 1 Gt, minimizing \(\left( {C_{{\mathrm{GRACE}}}\left( {t_i} \right)  \mathop {\sum }\limits_{n = 1}^N m_nC_n} \right)^2! = \underbrace {{{{\mathrm{min}}}}}_{m_n}\) with respect to m_{n}, where C_{GRACE}(t_{i}) is the spatial representation of the gravity field from GRACE/GRACEFO at each time step t_{i}. The grid points used for the adjustment are limited to the glaciated areas.
GRACE/GRACEFO uncertainties
The uncertainty of the mass change σ_{n}(t_{i}) for each region n is obtained by multiplying the relative noise level of each GRACE/GRACEFO solution with the rootmeansquare residual of the mass change in each glacier region after removal of offset, trend, (semi)annual temporal components and components longer than four months. The estimate of the relative noise level is obtained from the power of the noisedominated part of the GRACE/GRACEFO coefficients, \(\mathop {\sum }\limits_{j = 40}^{60} \mathop {\sum }\limits_{m =  j}^j C_{jm}^{{\mathrm{GRACE}}},\) normalized by the mean power in this spectral range over the entire period. The mean monthly uncertainty of the GRACE/GRACEFO data for ACN and SVA are ±10 Gt and ±6 Gt (1σ), respectively. (Extended Data Fig. 1).
Signal leakage out of the region of interest constitutes an additional source of uncertainty^{58}. While the forwardmodelling approach mitigates this leakage effect, it does not eliminate it completely. The fundamental resolution of the GRACE/GRACEFO data used here (maximum degree and order 60) cannot fully capture the masschange information at the spatial scales of the Randolph Glacier Inventory Version 4.0^{57}. Therefore, masschange estimates differ due to the processing/postprocessing strategy applied. To quantify uncertainties associated with processing/postprocessing choices, we analyse the differences between our estimates and those obtained by ref. ^{4} (updated to November 2019 by the authors; 179 monthly solutions). We estimate the uncertainty related to the processing choices in the gravimetric inversion to be ±15 Gt and ±5 Gt (1σ) for ACN and SVA, respectively.
The total median uncertainty of monthly mass changes for ACN and SVA obtained by quadratic summation of both uncertainty sources is estimated to be ±18 Gt and ±8 Gt (1σ), respectively. Propagation of these uncertainties to the annual massbalance rates yields a mean uncertainty of ±12 Gt yr^{–1} and ±5 Gt yr^{–1} (1σ). For comparison, using the gridded Level 3 data product CSR RL06 mascons^{59} (April 2002 to April 2021) yields annual rates that differ from our estimates within ±4 Gt yr^{–1} for ACN and ±5 Gt yr^{–1} for SVA.
Uncertainties of the rates of mass change for ACN and SVA for 2002–2021 (Fig. 1a,b) amount to ±4.2 Gt yr^{–1} and ±1.1 Gt yr^{–1} (1σ), respectively. The uncertainties are the quadratic sum of propagated total monthly uncertainties and the maximum difference between rates of mass change obtained here and those using the processing of ref. ^{4}. For this estimate, we randomly select 163 of the 179 monthly solutions following a bootstrap approach (n = 200) and estimate a maximum difference between the rates of ±1.3 (ACN) and ±0.7 (SVA), using the same selection of months. Using the gridded Level 3 CSR RL06 mascons yields a rate of mass change of –32.7 Gt yr^{–1} and –13.2 Gt yr^{–1} for ACN and SVA, respectively, well within uncertainties of the values presented here (–30.9 ± 8.3 Gt yr^{–1} for ACN and –13.2 ± 2.3 Gt yr^{–1} for SVA).
MAR3.11 SMB
The SMB and its components are obtained from the output of the regional climate model MAR3.11^{8}. MAR3.11 output is obtained at 15 km horizontal resolution for the period 1950–2019, sixhourly forced at its lateral boundaries with ERA5 reanalysis^{13}. Our analysis shows that alternative MAR3.11 simulations, using National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP)/National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) forcing at a spatial resolution of 20 km, provide similar results, albeit with a slightly larger difference to the GRACE/GRACEFO data, making the ERA5 forced time series the preferential model output. Simulations based on the regional climate model RACMO2p1^{21} for 1958–2015 are consistent with MAR3.11 output using ERA5, in line with a high level of agreement between MAR3.9/MAR3.10 and RACMO2p1 over the Greenland Ice Sheet^{12,52}.
Grid cells of non or partially glaciated land surfaces in ACN and SVA are excluded using the land surface mask of MAR3.11. From the monthly fluxes, cumulative storage changes are calculated by summation over time. The MAR3.11 monthly time series is interpolated onto the GRACE/GRACEFO time epochs, t_{i}, when both data are directly compared. To account for icedynamic discharge of marineterminating glaciers, linear trends of GRACE/GRACEFO and MAR3.11 SMB from 2002 to 2019 are estimated and their difference obtained as discharge D*, reconciling trends in both datasets for the common observation period. For SVA, a mass loss of 4.4 ± 0.8 Gt related to the episodic surge event of Austfonna Glacier in 2013^{25} is subtracted from the SMB output before estimating D*. To complete the mass balance, the same value of D* is assumed in the MAR3.11 time series starting 1950, neglecting a possible gradual increase in icedynamic loss^{26}. However, as we remove a polynomial fit of order n = 3 from the mass balances to focus on interannual changes, any longterm changes of D* are removed, thus not altering the results of the study.
Uncertainty of SMB estimate
We empirically estimate the uncertainty of the cumulative monthly SMB on the basis of the comparison with GRACE/GRACEFO data. For this, we assume that the mean monthly difference between the reconciled GRACE/GRACEFO and SMB time series arises from the uncertainties both in GRACE/GRACEFO and in the SMB data, \(\sigma _{{\mathrm{Total}}}^2 = \sigma _G^2 + \sigma _{{\mathrm{SMB}}}^2\). The GRACE/GRACEFO uncertainty, \(\sigma _G^2\), is estimated on the basis of the detrended difference between two independent time series for each glacier system, one of which is derived in this paper while the other one is an update to ref. ^{4}. Therefore, the GRACE/GRACEFO uncertainty estimate includes stochastic noise induced by measurement errors as well as difference caused by processing choices made during the inversion of the gravity field changes for mass changes. The resulting monthly SMB uncertainties are ±12 Gt for ACN and ±9 Gt for SVA (±1σ), leading to an uncertainty of the annual balance anomalies of ±7 Gt yr^{–1} and ±5 Gt yr^{–1}, respectively. These uncertainties are comparable to the independent estimates of ±12 Gt yr^{–1} for ACN^{21} and ±7 Gt yr^{–1} for SVA^{8}, which, however, represent full SMB temporal components in the annual mass balance, not massbalance anomalies.
NCEP/NCAR, ERA5 and ERA20C data
We analyse NCEP/NCAR and ERA5 monthly reanalysis atmospheric data, with a spatial resolution of 2.5° × 2.5° and 0.25° × 0.25°, respectively, to study the climatic drivers of mass balance in ACN and SVA. In particular, we investigate the following variables: geopotential height at 500 hPa (z500; NCEP), vertically integrated northward heat flux (ERA5/ERA20C), wind velocity at 250 hPa (NCEP) and t2m (NCEP). As ERA5 monthly reanalysis datasets reach back only to 1979 (at the time of this analysis), monthly data for northward heat flux is extended to 1950 using ERA20C data to obtain the full time series from 1950 to 2020. For consistency, ERA20C and ERA5 output is resampled to the same equiangular grid of 1° × 1° using geographic bilinear interpolation. Correlations with the massbalance anomalies as well as the composites are calculated for each grid point using the JJA mean of each selected variable for the years in question. To assess the consistency between datasets, we calculate the spatial correlations between the annual mass balances of ACN/SVA and the northward heat flux on the basis of ERA20C and ERA5 within the overlapping period 1979–1995. The resulting standard deviation of the difference of the correlation coefficients is <0.05 in both cases, indicating acceptable consistency between datasets. The results are plotted with the NorthPolar equalarea azimuthal projection centred on the longitude of 0° (EPSG: 3897).
Correlation of atmospheric variables and mass balances
We calculate the Pearson correlation coefficient (lag zero) of the summer (JJA) mean of the atmospheric variables z500 and northward heat flux (Fig. 3) and t2m (Extended Data Fig. 4) for the periods 1963–1977 and 2004–2018 with the respective annual mass balance in ACN and SVA. Significance of the correlation is determined using a critical value of 5% for N – 2 degrees of freedom (P < 0.05) based on the Student’s t test and marked in the plot. We account for autocorrelation in SMB time series by reducing the degrees of freedom following ref. ^{27}.
Timeseries analysis and categorization
Annual balances of the cumulative mass change from MAR3.11 and GRACE/GRACEFO represent linear trends based on a piecewise fit with break points on 1 March of each year. The break points are chosen such that the annual balances include the full melt season of each year and centre on the minimum ice conditions in the Arctic in September. Coefficients for the polynomial fit describing the rate of icemass change between 2002 and 2021 (Fig. 1; order n = 1) and for detrending the MAR3.11 SMB time series since 1950 (Fig. 2; order n = 3) are estimated using unweighted leastsquares adjustment. Categorization of massbalance years (Fig. 2) is based on the anomalies of the annual mass balance after polynomial detrending of the MAR3.11 SMB time series. Temporal correlations between the regions’ annual massbalance anomalies are represented by Pearson’s correlation coefficients of lag zero in moving windows of N = 15 years, where significance is determined using Student’s t test for P < 0.05, considering autocorrelation of each region’s SMB time series in the determination of the degrees of freedom^{27}. Significance thresholds for the composite differences shown in Fig. 5 are determined on the basis of the Wilcoxon test (P < 0.05).
Data availability
Monthly datasets of summer (June–July–August, JJA) twometre surface air temperature (t2m) and 500 hPa geopotential heights (z500) were obtained from the latest reanalysis of the National Centers for Environmental Prediction and National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCEP/NCAR Reanalysis 1, 1948–2020^{60}). NCEP reanalysis data are provided by the NOAA/OAR/ESRL PSD, Boulder, Colorado, USA, from their website at https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/. Monthly data of JJA vertically integrated northward heat flux were obtained from the latest reanalysis of the European Centre for MediumRange Weather Forecasts (ERA5) for 1979–2019^{13}, augmented with ERA20C for 1950–1978^{61} (https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/). GRACE/GRACEFO gravity fields (Level 2 data) and supporting documentation are freely available from the websites of the Science Data Systems Centres and may be accessed at http://podaac.jpl.nasa.gov and http://isdc.gfzpotsdam.de. The gridded Level 3 data product CSR RL06 GRACE/GRACEFO mascon solutions can be downloaded from http://www2.csr.utexas.edu/grace. MAR3.11 output of the surface mass balance and its components are freely available from the authors upon request and without conditions. To submit a request, please contact Xavier Fettweis: xavier.fettweis@uliege.be. Source data for the reproduction of Figs. 1, 2 and 4 are available for download^{62}, allowing the reproduction of Figs. 3 and 5 using public archives of NCEP (https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/) and ERA (https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/) reanalysis data. Additional mass time series for ACN and SVA from GRACE/GRACEFO data are freely available without further conditions from the corresponding author.
Code availability
In the GRACE/GRACEFO data processing, spherical harmonic functions were handled using the software package of Frederik J. Simons, kindly provided at http://geoweb.princeton.edu/people/simons/software.html (last accessed 17 June 2021). Geographic maps were produced using the Matlab Mapping Toolbox based on publicly available digital datasets.
References
Mortimer, C. A., Sharp, M. & Wouters, B. Glacier surface temperatures in the Canadian high Arctic, 2000–15. J. Glaciol. 62, 963–975 (2016).
Francis, J. A. & Vavrus, S. J. Evidence for a wavier jet stream in response to rapid Arctic warming. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 014005 (2015).
Pithan, F. & Mauritsen, T. Arctic amplification dominated by temperature feedbacks in contemporary climate models. Nat. Geosci. 7, 181–184 (2014).
Wouters, B., Gardner, A. S. & Moholdt, G. Global glacier mass loss during the GRACE satellite mission (2002–2016). Front. Earth Sci. 7, 96 (2019).
Hagen, J. O., Liestøl, O., Roland, E. & Jørgensen, T. Glacier Atlas of Svalbard and Jan Mayen (Norsk Polarinstitutt, 1993).
Błaszczyk, M., Jania, J. A. & Hagen, J. O. Tidewater glaciers of Svalbard: recent changes and estimates of calving fluxes. Pol. Polar Res. 30, 85–142 (2009).
Cook, A. J. et al. Atmospheric forcing of rapid marineterminating glacier retreat in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago. Sci. Adv. 5, eaau8507 (2019).
Amory, C. et al. Performance of MAR (v3.11) in simulating the driftingsnow climate and surface mass balance of Adélie Land, East Antarctica. Geosci. Model Dev. 14, 3487–3510 (2021).
Noël, B. et al. Modelling the climate and surface mass balance of polar ice sheets using RACMO2—part 1: Greenland (1958–2016). Cryosphere 12, 811–831 (2018).
Noël, B. et al. Evaluation of the updated regional climate model RACMO2.3: summer snowfall impact on the Greenland Ice Sheet. Cryosphere 9, 1831–1844 (2015).
Gardner, A. S. et al. Sharply increased mass loss from glaciers and ice caps in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago. Nature 473, 357–360 (2011).
Fettweis, X. et al. GrSMBMIP: intercomparison of the modelled 1980–2012 surface mass balance over the Greenland Ice Sheet. Cryosphere 14, 3935–3958 (2020).
Hersbach, H. et al. The ERA5 global reanalysis. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 146, 1999–2049 (2020).
Serreze, M. C. & Barry, R. G. The Arctic Climate System (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).
Ballinger, T. J. et al. Anomalous blocking over Greenland preceded the 2013 extreme early melt of local sea ice. Ann. Glaciol. 59, 181–190 (2018).
Hanna, E. et al. The influence of North Atlantic atmospheric and oceanic forcing effects on 1900–2010 Greenland summer climate and ice melt/runoff. Int. J. Climatol. 33, 862–880 (2013).
Bilt, W. V. D., Bakke, J. B. & Smedsrud, L. H. Climate in Svalbard 2100 (Norsk Klimaservicesenter, 2019).
Maturilli, M. & Kayser, M. Arctic warming, moisture increase and circulation changes observed in the NyÅlesund homogenized radiosonde record. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 130, 1–17 (2017).
Schuler, T. V. et al. Reconciling Svalbard Glacier mass balance. Front. Earth Sci. 8, 156 (2020).
Lenaerts, J. T. M. et al. Irreversible mass loss of Canadian Arctic Archipelago glaciers. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 870–874 (2013).
Noël, B. et al. Six decades of glacial mass loss in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago. J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 123, 1430–1449 (2018).
Flechtner, F., Morton, P., Watkins, M. & Webb, F. in Gravity, Geoid and Height Systems (ed. Marti, U.) 117–121 (Springer, 2014).
Tapley, B. D. et al. Contributions of GRACE to understanding climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 358–369 (2019).
Wouters, B. et al. GRACE, timevarying gravity, Earth system dynamics and climate change. Rep. Prog. Phys. 77, 116801 (2014).
McMillan, M. et al. Rapid dynamic activation of a marinebased Arctic ice cap. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 8902–8909 (2014).
Nuth, C., Schuler, T. V., Kohler, J., Altena, B. & Hagen, J. O. Estimating the longterm calving flux of Kronebreen, Svalbard, from geodetic elevation changes and massbalance modeling. J. Glaciol. 58, 119–133 (2012).
Barker, L. J., Hannaford, J., Chiverton, A. & Svensson, C. From meteorological to hydrological drought using standardised indicators. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 20, 2483–2505 (2016).
Mastrandrea, M. D. et al. Guidance Note for Lead Authors of the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report on Consistent Treatment of Uncertainties (IPCC, 2010).
Coumou, D., Petoukhov, V., Rahmstorf, S., Petri, S. & Schellnhuber, H. J. Quasiresonant circulation regimes and hemispheric synchronization of extreme weather in boreal summer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 12331–12336 (2014).
Cohen, J. et al. Recent Arctic amplification and extreme midlatitude weather. Nat. Geosci. 7, 627–637 (2014).
Coumou, D., Di Capua, G., Vavrus, S., Wang, L. & Wang, S. The influence of Arctic amplification on midlatitude summer circulation. Nat. Commun. 9, 2959 (2018).
Overland, J. E. et al. Nonlinear response of midlatitude weather to the changing Arctic. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 992–999 (2016).
Vihma, T. et al. Effects of the tropospheric large‐scale circulation on European winter temperatures during the period of amplified Arctic warming. Int. J. Climatol. 40, 509–529 (2020).
Overland, J. E. & Wang, M. Largescale atmospheric circulation changes are associated with the recent loss of Arctic sea ice. Tellus A 62, 1–9 (2010).
Francis, J. A. & Vavrus, S. J. Evidence linking Arctic amplification to extreme weather in midlatitudes. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L06801 (2012).
Baker, H. S., Woollings, T., Forest, C. E. & Allen, M. R. The linear sensitivity of the North Atlantic Oscillation and eddydriven jet to SSTs. J. Clim. 32, 6491–6511 (2019).
Coumou, D., Lehmann, J. & Beckmann, J. The weakening summer circulation in the Northern Hemisphere midlatitudes. Science 348, 324–327 (2015).
Delhasse, A., Hanna, E., Kittel, C. & Fettweis, X. Brief communication: CMIP6 does not suggest any atmospheric blocking increase in summer over Greenland by 2100. Int. J. Climatol. 41, 2589–2596 (2021).
Delhasse, A., Fettweis, X., Kittel, C., Amory, C. & Agosta, C. Brief communication: Impact of the recent atmospheric circulation change in summer on the future surface mass balance of the Greenland Ice Sheet. Cryosphere 12, 3409–3418 (2018).
Cameron, E. S. Securing Indigenous politics: a critique of the vulnerability and adaptation approach to the human dimensions of climate change in the Canadian Arctic. Glob. Environ. Change 22, 103–114 (2012).
IPCC Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability (eds Field, C. B. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).
Ford, J. D., Couture, N., Bell, T. & Clark, D. G. Climate change and Canada’s north coast: research trends, progress, and future directions. Environ. Rev. 26, 82–92 (2018).
Jean, Y., Meyer, U. & Jäggi, A. Combination of GRACE monthly gravity field solutions from different processing strategies. J. Geod. 92, 1313–1328 (2018).
Sun, Y., Riva, R. & Ditmar, P. Optimizing estimates of annual variations and trends in geocenter motion and J_{2} from a combination of GRACE data and geophysical models. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 121, 8352–8370 (2016).
Swenson, S., Chambers, D. & Wahr, J. Estimating geocenter variations from a combination of GRACE and ocean model output. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 113, B08410 (2008).
Landerer, F. Monthly Estimates of Degree1 (Geocenter) Gravity Coefficients, Generated from GRACE (042002–06/2017) and GRACEFO (06/2018 Onward) RL06 Solutions GRACE Technical Note 13 (The GRACE Project, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, 2019); https://podaactools.jpl.nasa.gov/drive/files/allData/grace/docs/TN13_GEOC_CSR_RL06.txt
Cheng, M., Tapley, B. D. & Ries, J. C. Deceleration in the Earth’s oblateness: J_{2} variations. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 118, 740–747 (2013).
Cheng, M. & Ries, J. Monthly Estimates of C20 from 5 SLR Satellites Based on GRACE RL06 Models GRACE Technical Note 11 (The GRACE Project, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, 2019); https://podaactools.jpl.nasa.gov/drive/files/allData/grace/docs/TN11_C20_SLR.txt
Loomis, B. D., Rachlin, K. E. & Luthcke, S. B. Improved Earth oblateness rate reveals increased ice sheet losses and mass‐driven sea level rise. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 6910–6917 (2019).
Loomis, B. D. & Rachlin, K. E. NASA GSFC SLR C20 and C30 Solutions GRACE Technical Note 14 (The GRACE Project, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, 2022); https://podaactools.jpl.nasa.gov/drive/files/allData/gracefo/docs/TN14_C30_C20_GSFC_SLR.txt
Peltier, W. R., Argus, D. F. & Drummond, R. Space geodesy constrains ice age terminal deglaciation: the global ICE6G_C (VM5a) model. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 120, 450–487 (2015).
Sasgen, I. et al. Return to rapid ice loss in Greenland and record loss in 2019 detected by the GRACEFO satellites. Commun. Earth Environ. 1, 8 (2020).
Sasgen, I. et al. Timing and origin of recent regional icemass loss in Greenland. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 333, 293–303 (2012).
Sasgen, I. et al. Antarctic icemass balance 2003 to 2012: regional reanalysis of GRACE satellite gravimetry measurements with improved estimate of glacialisostatic adjustment based on GPS uplift rates. Cryosphere 7, 1499–1512 (2013).
Jacob, T., Wahr, J., Pfeffer, W. T. & Swenson, S. Recent contributions of glaciers and ice caps to sea level rise. Nature 482, 514–518 (2012).
Marzeion, B., Jarosch, A. H. & Hofer, M. Past and future sealevel change from the surface mass balance of glaciers. Cryosphere 6, 1295–1322 (2012).
Randolph Glacier Inventory—A Dataset of Global Glacier Outlines Version 4.0 (RGI Consortium, 2014); https://doi.org/10.7265/N5RGI40
Horwath, M. & Dietrich, R. Signal and error in mass change inferences from GRACE: the case of Antarctica. Geophys. J. Int. 177, 849–864 (2009).
Save, H., Bettadpur, S. & Tapley, B. D. Highresolution CSR GRACE RL05 mascons. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 121, 7547–7569 (2016).
Kalnay, E. et al. The NCEP/NCAR 40year reanalysis project. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 77, 437–472 (1996).
Poli, P. et al. ERA20C: an atmospheric reanalysis of the twentieth century. J. Clim. 29, 4083–4097 (2016).
Sasgen, I. Replication Data for: Sasgen, I. et al. Arctic Glaciers Record Wavier Circumpolar Winds, Nature Clim. Change, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558021012754 (Havard Dataverse, 2022); https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/HG9C3B
Acknowledgements
I.S. and A.S. acknowledge funding by the Helmholtz Climate Initiative REKLIM (Regional Climate Change), a joint research project of the Helmholtz Association of German Research Centres (HGF). I.S. further acknowledges support by the Open Access Publication Funds of AlfredWegenerInstitut, HelmholtzZentrum für Polar und Meeresforschung. B.W. was funded by NWO VIDI grant 016.Vidi.171.063. B.P.Y.N. was funded by NWO VENI grant VI.Veni.192.019. We acknowledge the use of modified Copernicus Climate Change Service Information 2020. Computational resources used to perform MARv3.11 simulations have been provided by the Consortium des Équipements de Calcul Intensif (CÉCI), funded by the F.R.S.FNRS under grant 2.5020.11 and the Tier1 supercomputer (Zenobe) of the Fédération Wallonie Bruxelles infrastructure funded by the Walloon Region under grant agreement 1117545. The study is a contribution to the Regional Assessments of Glacier Mass Change (RAGMAC) initiative of the Glacier Division of the International Association of Cryospheric Science.
Funding
Open access funding provided by AlfredWegenerInstitut, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
I.S. and A.S. designed and performed research. I.S., A.S., M.W. and B.W. analysed data. X.F. and B.P.Y.N. contributed MAR3.11 and RACMO2.3p1 output, respectively, and assisted in its analysis and interpretation. C.B. provided conceptual advice and contributed statistical expertise. All authors contributed to the writing, the revision and the editing of the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Climate Change thanks Bryant Loomis, Louise Sørensen and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data
Extended Data Fig. 1 GRACE/GRACEFO solutions for mass change and related uncertainties.
GRACE/GRACEFO mass change time series for a, Arctic Canada North and b, Svalbard based on the data sets of the three SDS processing centres (GFZ RL06, CSR RL06 and JPL RL06), as well as their combination AV RL06 used throughout the study. Uncertainty of GRACE/GRACEFO mass changes for c, Actic Canada North and d, Svalbard estimated for each of the 196 monthly solutions of the three SDS processing centres (GFZ RL06, CSR RL06 and JPL RL06), as well as for the combined solutions AV RL06 used throughout the study.
Extended Data Fig. 2 Comparison of GRACE/GRACEFO time series and different SMB models.
Same as Fig. 1a,b, with additional estimates of the cumulative SMB. Shown are results based on MAR3.11 forced by ERA5 reanalysis (used in paper)^{8}, MAR3.11 forced by NCEP/NCAR reanalysis^{8}, and RACMO2.3p1^{9,10} forced by ERA40 (1958–1978)^{61} and ERAInterim (1979–2015)^{62} reanalyses. The best agreement with GRACE/GRACEFO and longest simulation period is provided by MAR3.11 forced by ERA5 reanalysis.
Extended Data Fig. 3 Climatology of the SMB and its components.
Climatology of the surface mass balance (SMB) and its components snowfall and melt runoff in ACN (a, c, and e, respectively) and SVA (b, d, and f, respectively) for 1950–2019 as represented by MAR3.11 forced by ERA5. The mean is depicted as coloured line, the variability as grey area (dark: one standard deviation; light: two standard deviations). It is discernible that the surface mass balance fluctuations for both regions are determined by the variability of the melt production in the summer months JJA. Relative contribution of the SMB components shown in af to the variability of the annual mass balance for g, ACN and h, SVA. The variability of each component is estimated as the standard deviation with respect to the climatological mean for the years 1950–2019. Discharge variability is assumed to be ± 15% of the mean discharge rate of 4.3 Gt yr^{1} (ACN) and 5.2 Gt yr^{1} (SVA) based on Blasczyk et al.^{6}. It is visible that melt runoff is the dominant contributor to interannual variability, accounting for 75% (ACN) and 66% (SVA) of the variability of the annual mass balance. Note that SMB highly correlates with melt runoff (0.98 for ACN and 0.89 for SVA) and to a lesser extent with snowfall (0.50 for ACN and 0.48 for SVA).
Extended Data Fig. 4 Correlation of t2m with SMB mass balances.
Correlation (lag zero) of each region’s annual mass balance anomaly with the JJA mean of the 2 m air temperature (t2m) for ACN for time period a, 1963–1977 and c, 2004–2018. b,d are the same but for SVA. Areas of significance (Pvalue < 0.05) are contained within yellow dotted contours.
Extended Data Fig. 5 Correlation of z500 and northward heat flux with GRACE/GRACEFO mass balances.
Correlation (lag zero) of each region’s annual mass balance anomaly obtained from GRACE/GRACEFO with the JJA mean of the a, 500 hPa geopotential height (z500) and b, vertically integrated northward heat flux (nhf). Areas of significance lie within yellow dotted contours. The time window of 2004–2018 is identical to the analysis using SMB shown in Fig. 3.
Extended Data Fig. 6 Number of years in each category distribution.
Distribution of the number of years attributed to each category based on random sampling of annual balances of the SMBD* in the presence of SMB uncertainties (N=5000). The four categories shown are a, ACN +  SVA + and b, ACN –  SVA – (synchronous), as well as c, ACN +  SVA – and d, ACN –  SVA + (asynchronous). The analysis is limited to the periods with maximum correlation (1963–1977; purple bars) and anticorrelation (2004–2018; brown bars) between the mass balances in ACN and SVA. The mean and standard deviation of the number of years belonging to each time period and category is specified with matching colours in the diagram, together with the amount of overlap (%; darker shading of bars) between the early and late period. Without noise in the SMB estimates, each period would be associated with a distinct number of years in each category. With noise dominating the SMB data, the same number of years would belong to each category, impeding a meaningful categorization.
Extended Data Fig. 7 Ensemble distributions of categorization.
a, Overlap of the probability distributions of random realisations (N=5000) with respect to their categorization splits (number of synchronous vs. asynchronous years) varying from just under 40% to well over 90% until the early 2000s. The overlap is expressed as fraction and number of members. An example of the distributions of the four categories for two specific periods is shown in Extended Data Fig. 6. b, Fraction and number of random realisations exceeding the number of asynchronous years in 2011. Similar to Fig. 4 the graph illustrates that phases of asynchronous behaviour have existed in the past, however, the portion of asynchronous members exceeding the value of 2011 (11.3 yr) remains below 5%.
Extended Data Fig. 8 Composites of the geopotential height for all four categories.
Composites of the z500 geopotential height (m) for years belonging to one of the four categories with respect to the 1950–2019 mean. Composite differences shown in Fig. 5 a represent a minus c, Fig. 5 b represents b minus d. Areas of significance are determined based on the Wilcoxon test (Pvalue < 0.05). The increase in frequency of the (–+) pattern shown in d is in line with enhanced blocking conditions over Greenland.
Extended Data Fig. 10 Categorization uncertainty propagated to composites differences (z500).
Standard deviation of the ensemble based on random sampling and categorization of the SMB reconstruction in the presence of uncertainty, a for synchronous years and b for asynchronous years. Composites for asynchronous show lower variability due to lower fluctuations in the categorization as visible from Fig. 4.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Table 1.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Sasgen, I., Salles, A., Wegmann, M. et al. Arctic glaciers record wavier circumpolar winds. Nat. Clim. Chang. 12, 249–255 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558021012754
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558021012754
This article is cited by

Remote connections in the Arctic
Nature Climate Change (2022)