The ambitious targets for shipping emissions reduction and challenges for mechanism design call for new approaches to encourage decarbonization. Here we build a compound model chain to deconstruct global international shipping emissions to fine-scale trade flows and propose trade-linked indicators to measure shipping emissions efficiency. International maritime trade in 2018 contributes 746.2 Tg to shipping emissions of CO2, of which 17.2% is contributed from ten out of thousands of trade flows at the country level. We argue that potential unfairness exists if allocating shipping emissions responsibility to bilateral traders due to external beneficiaries. However, a huge shipping emissions-reduction potential could be expected by optimizing international trade patterns, with a maximum reaching 38% of the current total. Our comprehensive modelling system can serve as a benchmark tool to support the construction of a systematic solution and joint effort from the shipping industry and global trade network to address climate change.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $8.25 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
The AIS data and STSD are restricted to the third party and used under licence for the current study. Trade data including the BACI database (http://www.cepii.fr/CEPII/en/bdd_modele/presentation.asp?id=37), UN Comtrade database (https://comtrade.un.org/data), the US census (https://usatrade.census.gov/) and the Eurostat database (https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database) are all publicly available, with details described in the Methods. Emissions data are available from the corresponding author upon request. Source data are provided with this paper.
Python codes used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Review of Maritime Transport 2019 (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, 2019); https://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/rmt2019_en.pdf
Fourth IMO Greenhouse Gas Study (International Maritime Organization, 2020).
Bows-Larkin, A., Anderson, K., Mander, S., Traut, M. & Walsh, C. Shipping charts a high carbon course. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 293–295 (2015).
Peters, G. P. et al. Carbon dioxide emissions continue to grow amidst slowly emerging climate policies. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 3–6 (2020).
Crippa, M. et al. Fossil CO2 Emissions of All World Countries—2020 Report (Publications Office of the European Union, 2020); https://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/report_2020
Capaldo, K., Corbett, J. J., Kasibhatla, P., Fischbeck, P. & Pandis, S. N. Effects of ship emissions on sulphur cycling and radiative climate forcing over the ocean. Nature 400, 743–746 (1999).
Doelle, M. The Paris Agreement: historic breakthrough or high stakes experiment? Clim. Law 6, 1–20 (2016).
Traut, M. et al. CO2 abatement goals for international shipping. Clim. Policy 18, 1066–1075 (2018).
Initial IMO Strategy on Reduction of GHG Emissions from Ships MEPC.304(72) (Marine Environment Protection Committee, 2018); https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/KnowledgeCentre/IndexofIMOResolutions/MEPCDocuments/MEPC.304(72).pdf
2012 Guidelines of the Method of Calculation of the Attained Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI) for New Ships MEPC.212(63); Annex 8 (Marine Environment Protection Committee, 2012); https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/KnowledgeCentre/IndexofIMOResolutions/MEPCDocuments/MEPC.212(63).pdf
2012 Guidelines for the Development of a Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan (SEEMP) MEPC.212(63); Annex 9 (Marine Environment Protection Committee, 2012); https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/OurWork/Environment/Documents/213(63).pdf
Guidelines for Voluntary Use of the Ship Energy Efficiency Operational Indicator MEPC.213(65) (Marine Environment Protection Committee, 2009); https://gmn.imo.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Circ-684-EEOI-Guidelines.pdf
Shi, Y. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from international shipping: is it time to consider market-based measures? Mar. Policy 64, 123–134 (2016).
Bouman, E. A., Lindstad, E., Rialland, A. I. & Strømman, A. H. State-of-the-art technologies, measures, and potential for reducing GHG emissions from shipping—a review. Transp. Res. D 52, 408–421 (2017).
Mallouppas, G. & Yfantis, E. A. Decarbonization in shipping industry: a review of research, technology development, and innovation proposals. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9040415 (2021).
Balcombe, P. et al. How to decarbonise international shipping: options for fuels, technologies and policies. Energy Convers. Manag. 182, 72–88 (2019).
Report of its Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice on the Fourth Session Held in Geneva from 16 to 18 December 1996 FCCC/SBSTA/1996/9/Add.1 (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 1996); https://unfccc.int/documents/1439
Corbett, J. J. & Fischbeck, P. Emissions from ships. Science 278, 823–824 (1997).
Cadarso, M.-Á., López, L.-A., Gómez, N. & Tobarra, M.-Á. CO2 emissions of international freight transport and offshoring: measurement and allocation. Ecol. Econ. 69, 1682–1694 (2010).
Heitmann, N. & Khalilian, S. Accounting for carbon dioxide emissions from international shipping: burden sharing under different UNFCCC allocation options and regime scenarios. Mar. Policy 35, 682–691 (2011).
Rahim, M. M., Islam, M. T. & Kuruppu, S. Regulating global shipping corporations’ accountability for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the seas. Mar. Policy 69, 159–170 (2016).
den Elzen, M. G. J., Oilvier, J. G. J. & Berk, M. M. An Analysis of Options for Including International Aviation and Marine Emissions in a Post-2012 Climate Mitigation Regime (Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, 2007).
Selin, H., Zhang, Y., Dunn, R., Selin, N. E. & Lau, A. K. H. Mitigation of CO2 emissions from international shipping through national allocation. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 045009 (2021).
Lee, T.-C., Lam, J. S. L. & Lee, P. T.-W. Asian economic integration and maritime CO2 emissions. Transp. Res. D 43, 226–237 (2016).
Cristea, A., Hummels, D., Puzzello, L. & Avetisyan, M. Trade and the greenhouse gas emissions from international freight transport. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 65, 153–173 (2013).
Martínez, L. M., Kauppila, J. & Castaing, M. International freight and related carbon dioxide emissions by 2050. Transp. Res. Rec. 2477, 58–67 (2015).
Yoon, Y., Yang, M. & Kim, J. An analysis of CO2 emissions from international transport and the driving forces of emissions change. Sustainability https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051677 (2018).
Stojanović, Đ., Ivetić, J. & Veličković, M. Assessment of international trade-related transport CO2 emissions—a logistics responsibility perspective. Sustainability https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031138 (2021).
Nunes, R. A. O., Alvim-Ferraz, M. C. M., Martins, F. G. & Sousa, S. I. V. The activity-based methodology to assess ship emissions—a review. Environ. Pollut. 231, 87–103 (2017).
Johansson, L., Jalkanen, J.-P. & Kukkonen, J. Global assessment of shipping emissions in 2015 on a high spatial and temporal resolution. Atmos. Environ. 167, 403–415 (2017).
Liu, H. et al. Health and climate impacts of ocean-going vessels in East Asia. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 1037–1041 (2016).
Winther, M. et al. Emission inventories for ships in the Arctic based on satellite sampled AIS data. Atmos. Environ. 91, 1–14 (2014).
Jalkanen, J. P., Johansson, L. & Kukkonen, J. A comprehensive inventory of ship traffic exhaust emissions in the European sea areas in 2011. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 71–84 (2016).
Schim van der Loeff, W., Godar, J. & Prakash, V. A spatially explicit data-driven approach to calculating commodity-specific shipping emissions per vessel. J. Clean. Prod. 205, 895–908 (2018).
Liu, H. et al. Emissions and health impacts from global shipping embodied in US–China bilateral trade. Nat. Sustain. 2, 1027–1033 (2019).
Adland, R., Jia, H. & Strandenes, S. P. The determinants of vessel capacity utilization: the case of Brazilian iron ore exports. Transp. Res. A 110, 191–201 (2018).
Prill, K. & Igielski, K. Calculation of operational indicator EEOI for ships designed to other purpose than transport based on a research-training vessel. New Trends Prod. Eng. 1, 335–340 (2018).
Streets, D. G., Guttikunda, S. K. & Carmichael, G. R. The growing contribution of sulfur emissions from ships in Asian waters, 1988–1995. Atmos. Environ. 34, 4425–4439 (2000).
Liu, J. & Diamond, J. China’s environment in a globalizing world. Nature 435, 1179–1186 (2005).
Andersen, O. et al. CO2 emissions from the transport of China’s exported goods. Energy Policy 38, 5790–5798 (2010).
Davis, S. J. & Caldeira, K. Consumption-based accounting of CO2 emissions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 5687–5692 (2010).
Peters, G. P. & Hertwich, E. G. CO2 embodied in international trade with implications for global climate policy. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42, 1401–1407 (2008).
The Existing Shipping Fleet’s CO2 Efficiency (UCL Energy Institute, 2015); https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/MediaCentre/HotTopics/Documents/MEPC%2068%20INF%2024%20REV1%20The%20existing%20shipping%20fleet%20CO2%20efficiency.pdf
Cherkassky, B. V., Goldberg, A. V. & Radzik, T. Shortest paths algorithms: theory and experimental evaluation. Math. Program. 73, 129–174 (1996).
Shipping Statistics Yearbook (Institute of Shipping Economics and Logistics, 2017).
This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 41822505 and 42061130213 to H.L.). H.L. is supported by the Royal Society of the United Kingdom through a Newton Advanced Fellowship (NAF\R1\201166).
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information Nature Climate Change thanks James Corbett and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, XT., Liu, H., Lv, ZF. et al. Trade-linked shipping CO2 emissions. Nat. Clim. Chang. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01176-6