Atmospheric rivers (ARs) are filamentary conduits of intense water vapour transport in the extratropics, accounting for the majority of poleward moisture transport in the mid-latitudes and acting as a key precipitation source for coastal regions. How ARs have responded to climate change nevertheless remains uncertain. Here we use a series of coupled model experiments to show that there was little to no change in mean AR characteristics in 1920–2005 due to opposite but equal influences from industrial aerosols, which weaken ARs, and greenhouse gases (GHGs), which strengthen them. Despite little historical change, the simulations project steep intensification of ARs in the coming decades, including mean AR-driven precipitation increases of up to ~20 mm per month, as the influence of GHGs greatly outpaces that of industrial aerosols. We also investigate the extent to which future AR changes are dynamically and thermodynamically driven, highlighting the need to conceptualize AR change beyond the scaling of humidity with warming.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Subscribe to Nature+
Get immediate online access to the entire Nature family of 50+ journals
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $8.25 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
All NCAR CESM1 Large Ensemble model data are publicly available through the Casper cluster at /glade/campaign/cesm/collections/cesmLE/CESM-CAM5-BGC-LE/. The three-hourly IVT and IWV variables calculated from MERRA-2 can be found through the NCAR Climate Data Gateway at https://www.earthsystemgrid.org/dataset/ucar.cgd.ccsm4.merra.artmip.011980-062017.atm.proc.3hourly_inst.html. The Lora_v2 catalogue to identify ARs within MERRA-2 can also be found through the Climate Data Gateway at https://www.earthsystemgrid.org/dataset/ucar.cgd.ccsm4.artmip.tier1.html. The DAMIP experiments are part of Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 and are available at https://esgf-node.llnl.gov/search/cmip6.
All code necessary for performing the reported analyses is available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.
Zhu, Y. & Newell, R. E. A proposed algorithm for moisture fluxes from atmospheric rivers. Mon. Weather Rev. 126, 725–735 (1998).
Ralph, F. M. & Dettinger, M. D. Storms, floods, and the science of atmospheric rivers. Eos 92, 265–266 (2011).
Ralph, F. M., Dettinger, M. D., Cairns, M. M., Galarneau, T. J. & Eylander, J. Defining ‘atmospheric river’: how the glossary of meteorology helped resolve a debate. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 99, 837–839 (2018).
Sodemann, H. & Stohl, A. Moisture origin and meridional transport in atmospheric rivers and their association with multiple cyclones. Mon. Weather Rev. 141, 2850–2868 (2013).
Zhang, Z., Ralph, F. M. & Zheng, M. The relationship between extratropical cyclone strength and atmospheric river intensity and position. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 1814–1823 (2019).
Newman, M., Kiladis, G. N., Weickmann, K. M., Ralph, F. M. & Sardeshmukh, P. D. Relative contributions of synoptic and low-frequency eddies to time-mean atmospheric moisture transport, including the role of atmospheric rivers. J. Clim. 25, 7341–7361 (2012).
Ralph, F. M. et al. Dropsonde observations of total integrated water vapor transport within North Pacific atmospheric rivers. J. Hydrometeorol. 18, 2577–2596 (2017).
Shields, C. A. et al. Meridional heat transport during atmospheric rivers in high‐resolution CESM climate projections. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 14702–14712 (2019).
Payne, A. E. et al. Responses and impacts of atmospheric rivers to climate change. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 1, 143–157 (2020).
Neiman, P. J., Ralph, F. M., Wick, G. A., Lundquist, J. D. & Dettinger, M. D. Meteorological characteristics and overland precipitation impacts of atmospheric rivers affecting the west coast of North America based on eight years of SSM/I satellite observations. J. Hydrometeorol. 9, 22–47 (2008).
Dettinger, M. D., Ralph, F. M., Das, T., Neiman, P. J. & Cayan, D. R. Atmospheric rivers, floods and the water resources of California. Water 3, 445–478 (2011).
Ralph, F. M. & Dettinger, M. D. Historical and national perspectives on extreme west coast precipitation associated with atmospheric rivers during December 2010. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 93, 783–790 (2012).
Warner, M. D., Mass, C. F. & Salathe, E. P. Changes in winter atmospheric rivers along the North American west coast in CMIP5 climate models. J. Hydrometeorol. 16, 118–128 (2015).
Hagos, S. M., Leung, L. R., Yoon, J.-H., Lu, J. & Gao, Y. A projection of changes in landfalling atmospheric river frequency and extreme precipitation over western North America from the large ensemble CESM simulations. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 1357–1363 (2016).
Lora, J. M., Mitchell, J. L., Risi, C. & Tripati, A. E. North Pacific atmospheric rivers and their influence on western North America at the last glacial maximum. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 1051–1059 (2017).
Viale, M., Valenzuela, R., Garreaud, R. D. & Ralph, F. M. Impacts of atmospheric rivers on precipitation in southern South America. J. Hydrometeorol. 19, 1671–1687 (2018).
Garreaud, R. Warm winter storms in central Chile. J. Hydrometeorol. 14, 1515–1534 (2013).
Blamey, R. C., Ramos, A. M., Trigo, R. M., Tomé, R. & Reason, C. J. C. The influence of atmospheric rivers over the South Atlantic on winter rainfall in South Africa. J. Hydrometeorol. 19, 127–142 (2018).
Lavers, D. A. et al. Winter floods in Britain are connected to atmospheric rivers. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L23803 (2011).
Lavers, D. A., Villarini, G., Allan, R. P., Wood, E. F. & Wade, A. J. The detection of atmospheric rivers in atmospheric reanalyses and their links to British winter floods and the large‐scale climatic circulation. J. Geophys. Res. 117, D20106 (2012).
Lavers, D. A. & Villarini, G. The nexus between atmospheric rivers and extreme precipitation across Europe. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 3259–3264 (2013).
Lavers, D. A. & Villarini, G. The contribution of atmospheric rivers to precipitation in Europe and the United States. J. Hydrol. 522, 382–390 (2015).
Waliser, D. & Guan, B. Extreme winds and precipitation during landfall of atmospheric rivers. Nat. Geosci. 10, 179–183 (2017).
Gao, Y. et al. Dynamical and thermodynamical modulations on future changes of landfalling atmospheric rivers over western North America. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 7179–7186 (2015).
Gao, Y., Lu, J. & Leung, L. R. Uncertainties in projecting future changes in atmospheric rivers and their impacts on heavy precipitation over Europe. J. Clim. 29, 6711–6726 (2016).
Payne, A. E. & Magnusdottir, G. An evaluation of atmospheric rivers over the North Pacific in CMIP5 and their response to warming under RCP 8.5. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 120, 11173–11190 (2015).
Held, I. M. & Soden, B. J. Robust responses of the hydrological cycle to global warming. J. Clim. 19, 5686–5699 (2006).
Lavers, D. A. et al. Future changes in atmospheric rivers and their implications for winter flooding in Britain. Environ. Res. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034010 (2013).
Espinoza, V., Waliser, D. E., Guan, B., Lavers, D. A. & Ralph, F. M. Global analysis of climate change projection effects on atmospheric rivers. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 4299–4308 (2018).
Barnes, E. A. & Screen, J. A. The impact of Arctic warming on the midlatitude jet‐stream: Can it? Has it? Will it? WIREs Clim. Change 6, 277–286 (2015).
Zavadoff, B. L. & Kirtman, B. P. Dynamic and thermodynamic modulators of European atmospheric rivers. J. Clim. 33, 4167–4185 (2020).
Yin, J. H. A consistent poleward shift of the storm tracks in simulations of 21st century climate. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L18701 (2005).
Barnes, E. A. & Polvani, L. Response of the midlatitude jets, and of their variability, to increased greenhouse gases in the CMIP5 models. J. Clim. 26, 7117–7135 (2013).
Deser, C. et al. Isolating the evolving contributions of anthropogenic aerosols and greenhouse gases: a new CESM1 large ensemble community resource. J. Clim. 33, 7835–7858 (2020).
Myhre, G. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) Ch. 8 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
Bellouin, N. et al. Bounding global aerosol radiative forcing of climate change. Rev. Geophys. 58, e2019RG000660 (2020).
Persad, G. G. & Caldeira, K. Divergent global-scale temperature effects from identical aerosols emitted in different regions. Nat. Commun. 9, 3289 (2018).
Samset, B. H. et al. Emerging Asian aerosol patterns. Nat. Geosci. 12, 582–584 (2019).
Zhao, A., Stevenson, D. S. & Bollasina, M. A. Climate forcing and response to greenhouse gases, aerosols and ozone in CESM1. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 124, 13876–13894 (2019).
Ramos, A. M., Tomé, R., Trigo, R. M., Liberato, M. L. R. & Pinto, J. G. Projected changes in atmospheric rivers affecting Europe in CMIP5 models. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 9315–9323 (2016).
Meinshausen, M. et al. The RCP greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions from 1765 to 2300. Climatic Change 109, 213 (2011).
Lamarque, J. F. et al. Global and regional evolution of short-lived radiatively-active gases and aerosols in the representative concentration pathways. Climatic Change 109, 191 (2011).
Kay, J. E. et al. The Community Earth System Model (CESM) large ensemble project: a community resource for studying climate change in the presence of internal climate variability. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 96, 1333–1349 (2015).
Skinner, C. B., Lora, J. M., Payne, A. E. & Poulsen, C. J. Atmospheric river changes shaped mid-latitude hydroclimate since the mid-Holocene. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 541, 116293 (2020).
Shields, C. A. et al. Atmospheric River Tracking Method Intercomparison Project (ARTMIP): project goals and experimental design. Geosci. Model Dev. 11, 2455–2474 (2018).
Rutz, J. J. et al. The Atmospheric River Tracking Method Intercomparison Project (ARTMIP): quantifying uncertainties in atmospheric river climatology. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2019, 13777–13802 (2019).
Lora, J. M., Shields, C. A. & Rutz, J. J. Consensus and disagreement in atmospheric river detection: ARTMIP global catalogues. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e2020GL089302 (2020).
Ralph, F. M. et al. ARTMIP—early start comparison of atmospheric river detection tools: how many atmospheric rivers hit northern California’s Russian River watershed? Clim. Dyn. 52, 4973–4994 (2019).
Eyring, V. et al. Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization. Geosci. Model Dev. 9, 1937–1958 (2016).
Gillett, N. P. et al. The Detection and Attribution Model Intercomparison Project (DAMIP v1.0) contribution to CMIP6. Geosci. Model Dev. 9, 3685–3697 (2016).
Gelaro, R. et al. The Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2 (MERRA-2). J. Clim. 30, 5419–5454 (2017).
This work was supported by the Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences at Yale University. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information Nature Climate Change thanks Breanna Zavadoff and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
(top) AR IVT identified on MERRAv2 and (middle) CESM1 ALL ensemble, both over 1980-2005. (bottom) Differences in AR IVT between MERRAv2 and CESM1 over 1980-2005.
(left) Climatological AR-driven precipitation and IVT and (right) percent of total precipitation accounted by AR-driven precipitation (top) due to internal variability exclusive of historical forcings, (middle) over 1920-2005 with historical forcings, and (bottom) over 2006-2080 under the RCP8.5 scenario.
Influences of greenhouse gases (orange) and industrial aerosols (blue), respectively, on mean surface air temperature over the mid-latitude (20°-70°) oceans from 1920–2005.
Changes in (left) specific humidity and (right) zonal winds induced by industrial aerosols for 1920–2005 for (top) the 500 hPa and (bottom) 850 hPa levels. IVT changes for each level are shown as contours. Note that different contour intervals are used for the 500 hPa and 850 hPa panels.
Same as Extended Data Fig. 4, but for greenhouse gases.
The influence of industrial aerosols (AER) on vertical winds at 527.4 hPa over 2006-2080. Contours show AER-induced change in specific humidity (g/kg) at 850 hPa.
About this article
Cite this article
Baek, S.H., Lora, J.M. Counterbalancing influences of aerosols and greenhouse gases on atmospheric rivers. Nat. Clim. Chang. 11, 958–965 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01166-8
This article is cited by
Nature Climate Change (2021)