There is ongoing debate as to whether fish body size will decrease with global warming and how these changes may impact dispersal ability and speciation rate. Theory predicts that, under warmer temperatures, fish grow to a smaller size, undergo a reduction in dispersal ability and increase speciation rates. However, evaluations of such predictions are hampered owing to the lack of empirical data spanning both wide temporal and geographical scales. Here, using phylogenetic methods, we show that smaller clupeiform fish (anchovies and herrings) occurred historically in warmer waters, moved the shortest distances at low speed and displayed the lowest speciation rates. Furthermore, fish moved faster and evolved rapidly under higher rates of temperature change but these historical rates are far lower than current warming rates. Our results predict a future where smaller clupeiform fish that have reduced ability to move will be more prevalent; this, in turn, may reduce future speciation.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Open Access articles citing this article.
Communications Biology Open Access 03 February 2022
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
The dataset analysed during this study is available from the Dryad repository https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.cfxpnvx5g.
All analyses in this study were done using BayesTraits v.3 available at http://www.evolution.rdg.ac.uk/SoftwareMain.html.
Parmesan, C. Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 37, 637–669 (2006).
Sheridan, J. A. & Bickford, D. Shrinking body size as an ecological response to climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 1, 401–406 (2011).
Gardner, J. L., Peters, A., Kearney, M. R., Joseph, L. & Heinsohn, R. Declining body size: a third universal response to warming? Trends Ecol. Evol. 26, 285–291 (2011).
McCauley, S. J. & Mabry, K. E. Climate change, body size, and phenotype dependent dispersal. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26, 554–555 (2011).
Norberg, J., Urban, M. C., Vellend, M., Klausmeier, C. A. & Loeuille, N. Eco-evolutionary responses of biodiversity to climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 2, 747–751 (2012).
Amigo, I. The Amazon’s fragile future. Nature 578, 505–507 (2020).
Reddin, C. J., Nätscher, P. S., Kocsis, Á. T., Pörtner, H. O. & Kiessling, W. Marine clade sensitivities to climate change conform across timescales. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 249–253 (2020).
Comte, L. & Olden, J. D. Climatic vulnerability of the world’s freshwater and marine fishes. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 718–722 (2017).
Skelly, D. K. et al. Evolutionary responses to climate change. Conserv. Biol. 21, 1353–1355 (2007).
Chen, I., Hill, J. K., Ohlemûller, R., Roy, D. B. & Thomas, C. D. Rapid range shifts of species associated with high levels of climate warming. Science 333, 1024–1026 (2011).
Cheung, W. W. L. et al. Projecting global marine biodiversity impacts under climate change scenarios. Fish Fish. 10, 235–251 (2009).
Cheung, W. W. L. et al. Shrinking of fishes exacerbates impacts of global ocean changes on marine ecosystems. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 254–258 (2013).
Crozier, L. G. & Hutchings, J. A. Plastic and evolutionary responses to climate change in fish. Evol. Appl. 7, 68–87 (2014).
Travis, J. M. J. et al. Dispersal and species’ responses to climate change. Oikos 122, 1532–1540 (2013).
Pauly, D. & Cheung, W. W. L. Sound physiological knowledge and principles in modeling shrinking of fishes under climate change. Glob. Change Biol. 24, e15–e26 (2018).
Tamario, C., Sunde, J., Petersson, E., Tibblin, P. & Forsman, A. Ecological and evolutionary consequences of environmental change and management actions for migrating fish. Front. Ecol. Evol. 7, 271 (2019).
Ljungström, G., Claireaux, M., Fiksen, Ø. & Jørgensen, C. Body size adaptions under climate change: zooplankton community more important than temperature or food abundance in model of a zooplanktivorous fish. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 636, 1–18 (2020).
Daufresne, M., Lengfellner, K. & Sommer, U. Global warming benefits the small in aquatic ecosystems. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 12788–12793 (2009).
Lenoir, J. et al. Species better track climate warming in the oceans than on land. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 1044–1059 (2020).
Audzijonyte, A. et al. Fish body sizes change with temperature but not all species shrink with warming. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 809–814 (2020).
Rosenzweig, M. L. Loss of speciation rate will impoverish future diversity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 5404–5410 (2001).
Burns, M. D. & Bloom, D. D. Migratory lineages rapidly evolve larger body sizes than non-migratory relatives in ray-finned fishes. Proc. Biol. Sci. 287, 20192615 (2020).
Comte, L. & Olden, J. D. Evidence for dispersal syndromes in freshwater fishes. Proc. R. Soc. B 285, 20172214 (2018).
Bohonak, A. J. Dispersal, gene flow, and population structure. Q. Rev. Biol. 74, 21–45 (1999).
Perry, A. L., Low, P. J., Ellis, J. R. & Reynolds, J. D. Climate change and distribution shifts in marine fishes. Science 308, 1912–1915 (2005).
Pinsky, M. L., Worm, B., Fogarty, M. J., Sarmiento, J. L. & Levin, S. A. Marine taxa track local climate velocities. Science 341, 1239–1242 (2013).
Stevens, V. M. et al. A comparative analysis of dispersal syndromes in terrestrial and semi-terrestrial animals. Ecol. Lett. 17, 1039–1052 (2014).
Dieckmann, U., O’Hara, B. & Weisser, W. The evolutionary ecology of dispersal. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14, 88–90 (1999).
Kokko, H. & López-Sepulcre, A. From individual dispersal to species ranges: perspectives for a changing world. Science 313, 789–791 (2006).
Lavoué, S., Miya, M., Musikasinthorn, P., Chen, W. J. & Nishida, M. Mitogenomic evidence for an indo-west Pacific origin of the Clupeoidei (Teleostei: Clupeiformes). PLoS ONE 8, e56485 (2013).
Bloom, D. D., Burns, M. D. & Schriever, T. A. Evolution of body size and trophic position in migratory fishes: a phylogenetic comparative analysis of Clupeiformes (anchovies, herring, shad and allies). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 125, 302–314 (2018).
O’Donovan, C., Meade, A. & Venditti, C. Dinosaurs reveal the geographical signature of an evolutionary radiation. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 452–458 (2018).
Cheng, L. et al. Record-setting ocean warmth continued in 2019. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 37, 137–142 (2020).
Pinek, L., Mansour, I., Lakovic, M., Ryo, M. & Rillig, M. C. Rate of environmental change across scales in ecology. Biol. Rev. 95, 1798–1811 (2020).
Avaria-Llautureo, J., Hernández, C. E., Rodríguez-Serrano, E. & Venditti, C. The decoupled nature of basal metabolic rate and body temperature in endotherm evolution. Nature 572, 651–654 (2019).
Gaston, K. J. Species-range size distributions: products of speciation, extinction and transformation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 353, 219–230 (1998).
Baker, J., Meade, A., Pagel, M. & Venditti, C. Positive phenotypic selection inferred from phylogenies. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 118, 95–115 (2016).
Angilletta, M. J. & Dunham, A. E. The temperature–size rule in ectotherms: simple evolutionary explanations may not be general. Am. Nat. 162, 332–342 (2003).
Quintero, I. & Wiens, J. J. Rates of projected climate change dramatically exceed past rates of climatic niche evolution among vertebrate species. Ecol. Lett. 16, 1095–1103 (2013).
Pauly, D., Christensen, V., Dalsgaard, J., Froese, R. & Torres, F. Jr Fishing down marine food webs. Science 279, 860–863 (1998).
Rabosky, D. L. et al. An inverse latitudinal gradient in speciation rate for marine fishes. Nature 559, 392–395 (2018).
Whitehead, P. J. P. FAO species catalogue: vol. 7 Clupeoid fishes of the world. FAO Fish. Synop. 7, 303 (1985).
Charnov, E. L. & Berrigan, D. Evolution of life history parameters in animals with indeterminate growth, particularly fish. Evol. Ecol. 5, 63–68 (1991).
Önsoy, B., Tarkan, A. S., Filiz, H. & Bilge, G. Determination of the best length measurement of fish. North. West. J. Zool. 7, 178–180 (2011).
Mohseni, O. & Stefan, H. G. Stream temperature/air temperature relationship: a physical interpretation. J. Hydrol. 218, 128–141 (1999).
Morrill, J. C., Bales, R. C. & Conklin, M. H. Estimating stream temperature from air temperature: implications for future water quality. J. Environ. Eng. 131, 139–146 (2005).
Sharma, S., Jackson, D. A., Minns, C. K. & Shuter, B. J. Will northern fish populations be in hot water because of climate change? Glob. Change Biol. 13, 2052–2064 (2007).
Avaria-Llautureo, J. et al. Data for: Historical Warming Consistently Decreased Size, Dispersal and Speciation Rate of Fish (Dryad, 2021); https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.cfxpnvx5g
Pagel, M., Meade, A. & Barker, D. Bayesian estimation of ancestral character states on phylogenies. Syst. Biol. 53, 673–684 (2004).
Venditti, C., Meade, A. & Pagel, M. Multiple routes to mammalian diversity. Nature 479, 393–396 (2011).
Kocsis, Á. T. & Raja, N. B. chronosphere (Zenodo, 2020); https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3530703
Raftery, A. E. in Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice (eds Gilks, W. et al.) 163–187 (Chapman & Hall, 1996).
Hijmans, R. J. geosphere: spherical trigonometry. R package version 1.5-10 https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=geosphere (2019).
Harvey, M. G. & Rabosky, D. L. Continuous traits and speciation rates: alternatives to state-dependent diversification models. Methods Ecol. Evol. 9, 984–993 (2018).
Title, P. O. & Rabosky, D. L. Tip rates, phylogenies and diversification: what are we estimating, and how good are the estimates? Methods Ecol. Evol. 10, 821–834 (2019).
Louca, S. & Pennell, M. W. Extant timetrees are consistent with a myriad of diversification histories. Nature 580, 502–505 (2020).
Shafir, A., Azouri, D., Goldberg, E. E. & Mayrose, I. Heterogeneity in the rate of molecular sequence evolution substantially impacts the accuracy of detecting shifts in diversification rates. Evolution 74, 1620–1639 (2020).
Ganzach, Y. Misleading interaction and curvilinear terms. Psychol. Methods 2, 235–247 (1997).
Revell, L. J. phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things). Methods Ecol. Evol. 3, 217–223 (2012).
Lunt, D. J. et al. Palaeogeographic controls on climate and proxy interpretation. Clim. Past 12, 1181–1198 (2016).
We thank C. O’Donovan for her help and advice with the Geo model analyses and A. Meade for data analysis with the computer cluster at University of Reading. We thank D. D. Bloom who shared data of Clupeiformes. ANID FONDECYT postdoctoral grant no. 3200654 supported J.A.-L. ANID FONDECYT initiation grant no. 11180897 and Nucleo Milenio INVASAL funded by ANID – Millennium Science Initiative – NCN16_034 supported C.B.C.-A. The Leverhulme Trust Research Project grant (RPG-2017-071) and a Leverhulme Trust Research Leadership Award (RL-2019-012) supported C.V. ANID FONDECYT regular grant no. 1200843 supported M.M.R. ANID FONDECYT regular grant nos 1201506 and 1170815 supported J.A.-L., C.E.H. and R.J.R.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information Nature Climate Change thanks Sarah Friedman, Joseph Flannery Sutherland and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Blue dots represent both the geographic occurrences obtained from Aquamaps and the random sample within IUCN polygons. We obtained 21,795 datapoints for 158 species. The paleo coordinates (red dots) for the fossils of Dorosoma (America) and Engraulidae (Europe) were estimated using the PALEOMAP model in the chronosphere R package, using the current coordinates of fossils (purple dots). The coordinates of extant species (blue dots) plus the two paleo coordinates (red dots) were used as input data to reconstruct ancestral locations across phylogenetic nodes.
The phylogenetic tree was obtained from the Fish Tree of Life and represent the most updated topology and divergence times of the group. Note that branch colours represent the taxonomic arrangement of the group and are used for reference only. Fossils and type of migration are indicated. For the Geo model analyses we excluded Denticeps clupeoides (Methods). Nevertheless, we included D. cupleoides in all other analyses. Phylogeny species names, from top to bottom, are in the dataset available in the Dryad repository.
Extended Data Fig. 3 Posterior geographic distribution and posterior probability of habitat type for eight phylogenetic nodes.
We selected eight random nodes ranging from 111 to 33 Ma. a = 78 Mya; c = 56 Mya; e = 52 Mya; g = 41 Mya; i = 4 Mya; k = 38.8 Mya; m = 38.4 Mya; o = 36 Mya. The posterior coordinates were estimated with Geo model. b, d, f, h, j, j, I, n, p, the ancestral habitat type for these eight random nodes was estimated using phylogenetic models for discrete trait evolution.
Extended Data Fig. 4 Two continuous geographic routes for the lines of descent leading to Chirocentrus dorab and Engraulis australis.
The Geo model estimate the posterior probability of ancestral species locations (phylogenetic nodes) from georeferenced occurrences of individuals within extinct and extant species. Ancestral locations are estimated while allowing the speed of species movement to vary across phylogenetic branches. a, The circles and squares are the geographic centroid estimated from the posterior distribution of coordinates (at phylogenetic nodes in b) and the sample of coordinates from extant species. Note that the geographic centroids are used to obtain an example of the average route travelled for each species. However, we used 1,000 values of total distance and speed (using the full posterior distribution of estimated locations) for each species in all the analyses of this study. Note also that the map represents the actual location of continents – it is included for reference only.
Extended Data Fig. 5 The estimated location for Denticeps clupeiodes made their speed and distance of movement to be an outlier in regression analyses.
We removed D. clupeoides (red dot) from the Geo analyses because that species descends directly from the MRCA of Clupeiformes and its location is estimated near to the location of the MRCA. This means that species has dispersed a short distance in an exceptionally long time of 150 million years. This causes the speed (a) and distance (b) of movement for that species to be extremely low and far away from the rest of data when evaluating the correlates of speed and distance. We plot the mean speed and distance for all species.
Extended Data Fig. 6 Comparison between median temperatures inferred independently from the phylogenetic approach and the HadCM3L Earth-System-Model.
a, Comparison with sea temperature from the HadMC3L model. b, Comparison with air temperature from the HadMC3L model. We selected eight random nodes plus the MRCA of Clupeoidei for comparison.
About this article
Cite this article
Avaria-Llautureo, J., Venditti, C., Rivadeneira, M.M. et al. Historical warming consistently decreased size, dispersal and speciation rate of fish. Nat. Clim. Chang. 11, 787–793 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01123-5
This article is cited by
Communications Biology (2022)
Nature Climate Change (2021)