Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Climate hazards are threatening vulnerable migrants in Indian megacities

In recent decades, India has witnessed a rapid pace of migration from areas with intensive agriculture to populated megacities, which are faced with increasing threat from climate hazards. Greater attention is needed for vulnerable new migrants who lack necessary resources when designing adaptation and mitigation policies.

Reducing the impact of human-induced climate change through mitigation and adaptation is one of the most important challenges of our time, especially for vulnerable developing countries1. Among these, large-scale population displacements, historically driven by socioeconomic factors and increasingly exacerbated by climate change, is a pressing global issue2. In India, as per the 2011 Census, around 455 million people migrated, of which 64% were from the rural areas3. A large majority of the migrants are from the low-income states of Uttar Pradesh and Bihar (36% of the total out of state migration) — these northern states belong to South Asia’s most intensively cropped Indo-Gangetic (IG) region4 (Fig. 1). This out-migration is both seasonal and permanent in nature, mainly undertaken by the marginalized population who primarily depend on agriculture3,5, revealing a systemic instability, or ‘risk’, in the sector. The IG region is also India’s most densely populated area, where approximately 640 million people live in poverty4. The pace of migration from these regions has intensified during the recent decade (Fig. 1) — a trend that is likely to continue in future6.

Fig. 1: Pattern of flow of inter-state migration based on the 2011 India Census.

For lucidity, the migration volume greater than 50,000 people is shown, and the migrant destinations are accordingly sized based on the in-migration volume. The pace of migration between the decades 2001 and 2011 for two major sources (Uttar Pradesh (UP) and Bihar (BR)) and destinations (Maharashtra (MH) and Delhi (DL)) is provided in the inset.

Rising temperature adversely impacts the agriculture, thereby increasing the vulnerability7,8 of marginalized agriculture-dependent rural populations. Thus, climate change can be a catalyst for such migrants to relocate in search of better living conditions and alternate livelihoods9. Although migration is perceived as an important adaptation mechanism to counteract the negative outcomes of climate change2, climate extremes at the destination location, on the other hand, can have a detrimental effect on these migrants10, as population dynamics and climate change is considered a mutually interacting two-way avenue2. Therefore, an improved and systematic understanding of climate change-induced risks that the migrants face at the destinations, especially in megacities, is of utmost importance.

Challenges at migrant destinations

While migrating to mega cities makes sense from a socioeconomic perspective, it is important to acknowledge that major migrant destinations — specifically the megacities, like Mumbai and Delhi — are witnessing a substantial increase in multiple climate-related threats. Here, we highlight how the emergence of two fundamentally different but equally devastating hazards — heatwaves and floods — can contribute to the vulnerability of migrants at their destination. In South Asia, deadly heatwaves are projected to increase in the future11, thus posing a serious threat to public health. As increasing heat in urban areas is intrinsically linked to population growth12, we envisage that a large influx of migrants will further amplify the effect of heatwaves in the already densely populated megacities. For example, Delhi has witnessed record summer temperatures for several years in a row, accompanied by higher fatalities and hospitalization13. More importantly, the most adverse effects of these heatwaves will likely be felt more by the migrant community, as they already live in closely packed, sub-optimal dwellings, and any mitigating resource, such as appropriate housing or air conditioning, is beyond their reach.

Another major hazard is flooding in coastal cities such as Mumbai caused by tropical cyclones and sea-level rise. A substantial rise in the pre-monsoon sea-surface temperature trends across the Northern Indian Ocean, specifically in the Arabian Sea, creates a conducive environment for the genesis and propagation of tropical cyclones14. This situation, further aggravated by the swift increase in the mean sea level15, would increase the risk of coastal flooding. Moreover, flooding in the coastal cities would likely pose major difficulties16 for both short-term emergency management and the longer-term recovery of these marginal communities, who generally live in low-elevation areas16. Due to this, the coastal cities — specifically Mumbai, where the influx of marginal migrants is very high — face immense challenges in managing the increasing hydroclimatic hazards, the consequences of which are experienced by the large vulnerable population and are often met with huge monetary losses17.

These climate-related hazards paint an alarming scenario in which the major migrant destinations will emerge as hotspots of climate-induced disruptions, wherein vulnerable migrants are expected to be the most impacted. The lack of basic resources — such as proper shelter, healthcare and clean drinking water — for these segments of population may therefore make them more susceptible to higher health risks17. Overall, there is a pressing need for robust policy frameworks to protect these marginal migrants from contemporary and future climatic hazards.

Strategies for migrant communities

While adaptation measures had generally taken a backseat to mitigation efforts in the fight against climate change18, in India, there is an emerging cognizance of the need to simultaneously undertake mitigation and adaptation efforts, as outlined in its National Action Plan for Climate Change19. India has evolved from a ‘growth-first’ stance to a more ‘climate responsible and mitigating’ stance in its policies20. This change in the national policy outlook has trickled down to the State Action Plans as well21. Various strategies are being implemented in the agricultural sector to curtail the adverse impacts of climate change, including credits for crops, better and adaptive water and crop management (for example, stress-tolerant varieties, crop rotation) and climate-smart (resilient) measures22. Such measures are especially necessary given that the overall risk in agriculture sector has risen over the past decades owing to increased climatic hazards7,8,23, and the trend is likely to continue in the future. These conditions generally act as a catalyst for the contemporary and future migration of marginal communities from agriculture-intensive areas to megacities6. Even though such strategies are in place at the source of migration, policies targeting the vulnerable migrants at the destinations are severely lacking.

Cities — specifically in the global south — despite having increased footprint of carbon emissions, have enormous potential for transformational adaptation24. In India, many cities have endorsed climate adaptation actions25 — for example, Ahmedabad, a city prone to intense heatwaves, has evolved a comprehensive Heat Action Plan26. Mumbai, on the other hand, where the influx of migrants is more pronounced, faces myriad climate-related challenges and lacks the requisite sectoral- or city-level adaptation policies25. While there are a few government schemes that exist to reduce the vulnerability of these migrants, some only exist in the state of their domicile and are not easily portable to the states of destination. Social-security-related initiatives of the government, such as the unique identification number (‘Aadhaar’ in India), enable availing of certain services such as insurance, pensions and bank accounts, irrespective of the domicile. The most recent such effort has been that of the portability of ration cards across the country27. However, services which are important for the subsistence of the migrants, such as healthcare and housing, are generally not accessible at destinations. In addition, the lack of access to education, which is hindered by language barriers, and lack of housing due to limited and/or unaffordable housing supply in megacities28, exemplifies the existing vulnerability of migrants to a large extent. The marginal migrants — who usually have the fewest resources to protect against external disturbances — are among the worst hit by these impacts.

External shocks usually have detrimental effects on the coping capacities of marginal migrants. This was, for example, starkly evident during India’s COVID-19 lockdown in 2020 — the reverse migration of around 40 million marginal migrants from urban areas back to their respective places of origin, in a span of few days29, highlights the vulnerability of migrants in the face of an external adversity. Such increased vulnerability of socioeconomically disadvantaged migrants from rural areas is a common concern for not only India, but also other developing countries experiencing both climate threat and rapid urbanization. Therefore, concerted efforts should be devoted towards capacity building and adaptation actions to not only accommodate these migrants in the megacities, but also ensure that they can withstand the vagaries of climate-related hazards. While devising policies for climate mitigation and adaptation, special focus is needed for attenuating the vulnerability of the marginal migrants in megacities and other major destinations.


  1. 1.

    Smith, M. R. & Myers, S. S. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 834–839 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Marotzke, J., Semmann, D. & Milinski, M. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 518–525 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Data on Migration 2011. Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India (2011).

  4. 4.

    Lopez-Ridaura, S. et al. Agric. Syst. 159, 57–68 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Keshri, K. & Bhagat, R. B. Asian Popul. Stud. 9, 175–195 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    FAO Migration Framework – Migration as a Choice and an Opportunity for Rural Development (FAO, 2019).

  7. 7.

    Sharma, T., Vittal, H., Karmakar, S. & Ghosh, S. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 034010 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Vittal, H., Karmakar, S., Ghosh, S. & Murtugudde, R. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 014005 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Black, R., Bennett, S. R., Thomas, S. M. & Beddington, J. R. Nature 478, 447–449 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Panda, A. Econ. Polit. Wkly 14, 20 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Saeed, F., Schleussner, C.-F. & Ashfaq, M. Geophys. Res. Lett. 48, e2020GL091191 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Manoli, G. et al. Nature 573, 55–60 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Murari, K. K., Ghosh, S., Patwardhan, A., Daly, E. & Salvi, K. Reg. Environ. Change 15, 569–579 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Murakami, H., Vecchi, G. A. & Underwood, S. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 885–889 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Hallegatte, S. et al. Flood Risks, Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation Benefits in Mumbai: An Initial Assessment of Socio-Economic Consequences of Present and Climate Change Induced Flood Risks and of Possible Adaptation Options OECD Environment Working Papers, No. 27 (OECD, 2010).

  16. 16.

    Prandi, P. et al. Sci. Data 8, 1 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Mazdiyasni, O. & AghaKouchak, A. GeoHealth 4, e2019GH000219 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Khan, M. R. & Roberts, J. T. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change 4, 171–189 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    National Action Plan on Climate Change. Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Government of India (2021).

  20. 20.

    Mohan, A. Rising Powers Quarterly 2, 39–60 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    State Action Plan on Climate Change. Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Government of India (2021).

  22. 22.

    Amjath-Babu, T. S., Aggarwal, P. K. & Vermeulen, S. Clim. Policy 19, 283–298 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Lobell, D. B., Schlenker, W. & Costa-Roberts, J. Science 333, 616–620 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    IPCC Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability (eds Field, C. B. et al.) 535–612 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).

  25. 25.

    Singh, C., Madhavan, M., Arvind, J. & Bazaz, A. Urban Clim. 36, 100783 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Ahmedabad Heat Action Plan (Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation, 2018);

  27. 27.

    Implementation of ONORC scheme. Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food & Public Distribution (2021).

  28. 28.

    Report of the Working Group on Migration (Ministry of Housing and Poverty Alleviation, 2017);

  29. 29.

    COVID-19 Crisis Through a Migration Lens (World Bank Group, 2020);

Download references


The authors acknowledge the efforts of Census of India (Government of India) for making the migration data publicly available. This work was partly carried out within the bilateral project XEROS (eXtreme EuRopean drOughtS: multimodel synthesis of past, present and future events), funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (grant RA 3235/1-1) and Czech Science Foundation (grant 19-24089J). S.K. acknowledges the Department of Science & Technology (SPLICE-Climate Change Programme) and the Government of India (project reference no. DST/CCP/CoE/140/2018; grant no. 00000000000010013072 (UC ID: 18192442)). A.K. acknowledges support from the European Union Horizon 2020 program, project no. 869550 (DOWN2EARTH).

Author information




V.H. and S.D. conceptualized and designed the study together with R.K. and S.K. S.D. and V.H. conducted the analysis, with inputs from R.K. and A.K. S.D., V.H. and A.K. drafted the manuscript. All author contributed in editing and reviewing of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Vittal Hari or Rohini Kumar.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hari, V., Dharmasthala, S., Koppa, A. et al. Climate hazards are threatening vulnerable migrants in Indian megacities. Nat. Clim. Chang. 11, 636–638 (2021).

Download citation


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing