Lawsuits concerning the impacts of climate change make causal claims about the effect of defendants’ greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions on plaintiffs and have proliferated around the world. Plaintiffs have sought, inter alia, compensation for climate-related losses and to compel governments to reduce their GHG emissions. So far, most of these claims have been unsuccessful. Here we assess the scientific and legal bases for establishing causation and evaluate judicial treatment of scientific evidence in 73 lawsuits. We find that the evidence submitted and referenced in these cases lags considerably behind the state of the art in climate science, impeding causation claims. We conclude that greater appreciation and exploitation of existing methodologies in attribution science could address obstacles to causation and improve the prospects of litigation as a route to compensation for losses, regulatory action and emission reductions by defendants seeking to limit legal liability.
This is a preview of subscription content
Subscribe to Nature+
Get immediate online access to the entire Nature family of 50+ journals
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $8.25 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Case documents were sourced primarily from the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law at Columbia Law School’s Climate Change Litigation database (http://climatecasechart.com/). Where relevant case documents were unavailable on this database, they were sourced from individual courts’ public databases or from Westlaw.
Setzer, J. & Byrnes, R. Global Trends in Climate Change Litigation: 2020 Snapshot (Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, 2020); https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Global-trends-in-climate-change-litigation_2020-snapshot.pdf
Toussaint, P. Loss and damage and climate litigation: the case for greater interlinkage. Rev. Eur. Comp. Int. Environ. Law https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12335 (2020).
Marjanac, S. & Patton, L. Extreme weather event attribution science and climate change litigation: an essential step in the causal chain? J. Energy Nat. Resour. Law 36, 265–298 (2018).
McCormick, S. et al. Strategies in and outcomes of climate change litigation in the United States. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 829–833 (2018).
Minnerop, P. & Otto, F. E. L. Climate change and causation: joining law and climate science on the basis of formal logic. Buffalo J. Environ. Law 27, 49–86 (2020).
Hannart, A., Pearl, J., Otto, F. E. L., Naveau, P. & Ghil, M. Causal counterfactual theory for the attribution of weather and climate-related events. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 97, 99–110 (2016).
Peel, J. & Osofsky, H. M. A rights turn in climate change litigation? Transnatl Environ. Law 7, 37–67 (2018).
Burger, M., Horton, R. M. & Wentz, J. The law and science of climate change attribution. Columbia J. Environ. Law 45, 57–241 (2020).
Lee, M. The sources and challenges of norm generation in tort law. Eur. J. Risk Regul. 9, 34–47 (2018).
van Oldenborgh, G. J. et al. Attribution of extreme rainfall from Hurricane Harvey, August 2017. Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 124009 (2017).
Cowan, T., Undorf, S., Hegerl, G. C., Harrington, L. J. & Otto, F. E. L. Present-day greenhouse gases could cause more frequent and longer Dust Bowl heatwaves. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 505–510 (2020).
Vautard, R. et al. Human contribution to the record-breaking June and July 2019 heatwaves in western Europe. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 094077 (2020).
Schaller, N. et al. Human influence on climate in the 2014 southern England winter floods and their impacts. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 627–634 (2016).
Stuart-Smith, R. F., Roe, G. H., Li, S. & Allen, M. R. Increased outburst flood hazard from Lake Palcacocha due to human-induced glacier retreat. Nat. Geosci. 14, 85–90 (2021).
Hegerl, G. C. et al. Climate change detection and attribution: beyond mean temperature signals. J. Clim. 19, 5058–5077 (2006).
Harrington, L. J. & Otto, F. E. L. Adapting attribution science to the climate extremes of tomorrow. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 123006 (2018).
Otto, F. E. L. et al. Toward an inventory of the impacts of human-induced climate change. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 101, E1972–E1979 (2020).
Otto, F. E. L., Massey, N., Van Oldenborgh, G. J., Jones, R. G. & Allen, M. R. Reconciling two approaches to attribution of the 2010 Russian heat wave. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L04702 (2012).
Philip, S. et al. Attribution analysis of the Ethiopian drought of 2015. J. Clim. 31, 2465–2486 (2018).
Allen, M. R. et al. Scientific challenges in the attribution of harm to human influence on climate. Univ. PA Law Rev. 155, 1353–1400 (2007).
Marjanac, S., Patton, L. & Thornton, J. Acts of God, human influence and litigation. Nat. Geosci. 10, 616–619 (2017).
Sacchi et al. v. Argentina et al. Communication to the Committee on the Rights of the Child (23 September 2019).
Bushfire Survivors for Climate Action Inc. v. Environment Protection Authority  NSWLEC 152.
In re Greenpeace Southeast Asia and Others No. CHRNI-2016-0001 (19 September 2019).
Otto, F. E. L. Attribution of weather and climate events. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 42, 627–646 (2017).
van Oldenborgh, G. J. et al. Extreme heat in India and anthropogenic climate change. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 18, 365–381 (2018).
Patricola, C. M. & Wehner, M. F. Anthropogenic influences on major tropical cyclone events. Nature 563, 339–346 (2018).
Otto, F. E. L. et al. Anthropogenic influence on the drivers of the Western Cape drought 2015–2017. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 124010 (2018).
Oppenheimer, M. et al. in IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate (eds. Pörtner, H.-O. et al.) 321–446 (IPCC, 2019).
Ward, P. J., Marfai, M. A., Yulianto, F., Hizbaron, D. R. & Aerts, J. C. J. H. Coastal inundation and damage exposure estimation: a case study for Jakarta. Nat. Hazards 56, 899–916 (2011).
Sagredo, E. A., Rupper, S. & Lowell, T. V. Sensitivities of the equilibrium line altitude to temperature and precipitation changes along the Andes. Quat. Res. 81, 355–366 (2014).
City of Oakland v. BP p.l.c. No. C 17-06011 WHA (N.D. Cal. 27 July 2018).
Lliuya v. RWE AG District Court of Essen Judgment of 15 December 2016—2 O 285/15.
Native Village of Kivalina v. ExxonMobil Corp. 663 F. Supp. 2d 863, 879–80 (N.D. Cal. 2009).
Comer v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc. 839 F. Supp. 2d 849 (S.D. Miss. 2012).
Connecticut v. American Electric Power Company Inc. 582 F.3d 309 (2d Cir. 2009).
Smith v. Fonterra Co-operative Group Ltd  NZHC 419.
California v. General Motors Corp. No. C06-05755 MJJ, WL 2726871 (N.D. Cal. 2007).
Board of County Commissioners of Boulder County v. Suncor Energy (USA), Inc. 405 F. Supp. 3d 947 (D.C. 2019).
Rhode Island v. Chevron Corp. 393 F. Supp. 3d 142 (D.R.I. 2019).
Mayor and City Council of Baltimore v. BP p.l.c. 952 F.3d 452 (4th Cir. 2020).
Otto, F. E. L., Skeie, R. B., Fuglestvedt, J. S., Berntsen, T. & Allen, M. R. Assigning historic responsibility for extreme weather events. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 757–759 (2017).
Licker, R. et al. Attributing ocean acidification to major carbon producers. Environ. Res. Lett. 14, 124060 (2019).
Ekwurzel, B. et al. The rise in global atmospheric CO2, surface temperature, and sea level from emissions traced to major carbon producers. Climatic Change 144, 579–590 (2017).
Nauels, A. et al. Attributing long-term sea-level rise to Paris Agreement emission pledges. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 23487–23492 (2019).
Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago No. 2014CH06608 (Ill. Cir. Ct. 2014).
Sinnok et al. v. State of Alaska et al. No. 3AN-17-09910 CI (Alaska Super. Ct. 2018).
Skeie, R. B. et al. Perspective has a strong effect on the calculation of historical contributions to global warming. Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 024022 (2017).
Clarke, B. J., E. L. Otto, F. & Jones, R. G. Inventories of extreme weather events and impacts: implications for loss and damage from and adaptation to climate extremes. Clim. Risk Manag. 32, 100285 (2021).
Ebi, K. L. et al. Using detection and attribution to quantify how climate change is affecting health. Health Aff. 39, 2168–2174 (2020).
Banda, M. L. Climate Science in the Courts: A Review of U.S. and International Judicial Pronouncements (Environmental Law Institute, 2020); https://www.eli.org/sites/default/files/eli-pubs/banda-final-4-21-2020.pdf
Fisher, E., Scotford, E. & Barritt, E. The legally disruptive nature of climate change. Mod. Law Rev. 80, 173–201 (2017).
We are grateful to P. Guzik for research assistance and to C.-F. Schleussner for valuable comments on the manuscript. We gratefully acknowledge support from the Foundation for International Law for the Environment; R.F.S.-S. acknowledges support from the Natural Environment Research Council grant NE/S007474/1, Climate Analytics and the Oxford Martin Programme on the Post-Carbon Transition.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information Nature Climate Change thanks Sabrina McCormick, Lindene Patton and Joana Setzer for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Stuart-Smith, R.F., Otto, F.E.L., Saad, A.I. et al. Filling the evidentiary gap in climate litigation. Nat. Clim. Chang. 11, 651–655 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01086-7
Nature Climate Change (2021)
Nature Climate Change (2021)
Nature Energy (2021)