Africa’s ecosystems have an important role in global carbon dynamics, yet consensus is lacking regarding the amount of carbon stored in woody vegetation and the potential impacts to carbon storage in response to changes in climate, land use and other Anthropocene risks. In this study, we explore the socioenvironmental conditions that have shaped the contemporary distribution of woody vegetation across sub-Saharan Africa and evaluate ecosystem response to multiple scenarios of climate change, anthropogenic pressures and fire disturbance. Our projections suggest climate change will have a small but negative effect on above-ground woody biomass at the continental scale, and the compounding effects of population growth, increasing human pressures and socioclimatic-driven changes in fire behaviour further exacerbate climate-driven trends. Relatively modest continental-scale trends obscure much larger regional perturbations, with climatic and anthropogenic factors leading to increased carbon storage potential in East Africa, offset by large deficits in West, Central and Southern Africa.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $8.25 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
The datasets used for this analysis can be accessed as described below.
(2) Aridity data were provided by Feng and Fu12.
(4) Future projections of human population density based on Shared Socioeconomic Pathways37 are available as GeoTiff files from the Socioeconomic Data and Application Center (SEDAC; https://doi.org/10.7927/m30p-j498).
(5) Contemporary estimates of burned area are available as GeoTiff files and were acquired from Kahiu and Hanan30.
(7) Shuttle Radar Topography Mission elevation data were acquired from the United States Geological Survey Earth Explorer (https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/).
(8) The biophysical regions were derived from The Nature Conservancy Terrestrial Ecoregions and are provided as GIS shapefiles (http://maps.tnc.org/gis_data.html).
Davis, S. J. & Caldeira, K. Consumption-based accounting of CO2 emissions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 5687–5692 (2010).
Wiedmann, T. O. et al. The material footprint of nations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 6271–6276 (2015).
Rogelj, J. et al. Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 °C. Nature 534, 631–639 (2016).
Brandt, M. et al. Satellite passive microwaves reveal recent climate-induced carbon losses in African drylands. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 827–835 (2018).
Sankaran, M. et al. Determinants of woody cover in African savannas. Nature 438, 846–849 (2005).
Bond, W. J. & Keane, R. E. Fires, Ecological Effects of☆. In Reference Module in Life Sciences (Elsevier, 2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809633-8.02098-7
Valentini, R. et al. A full greenhouse gases budget of Africa: synthesis, uncertainties, and vulnerabilities. Biogeosciences 11, 381–407 (2014).
Williams, C. A. et al. Africa and the global carbon cycle. Carbon Balance Manag. 2, 3 (2007).
Hanan, N. P. Agroforestry in the Sahel. Nat. Geosci. 11, 296–297 (2018).
Dai, A. Increasing drought under global warming in observations and models. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 52–58 (2013).
Zhou, L. et al. Widespread decline of Congo rainforest greenness in the past decade. Nature 509, 86–90 (2014).
Feng, S. & Fu, Q. Expansion of global drylands under a warming climate. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13, 10081–10094 (2013).
Anchang, J. Y. et al. Trends in woody and herbaceous vegetation in the savannas of West Africa. Remote Sens. 11, 576 (2019).
Andela, N., Liu, Y. Y., van Dijk, A. I. J. M., de Jeu, R. A. M. & McVicar, T. R. Global changes in dryland vegetation dynamics (1988–2008) assessed by satellite remote sensing: comparing a new passive microwave vegetation density record with reflective greenness data. Biogeosciences 10, 6657–6676 (2013).
Kaptué, A. T., Prihodko, L. & Hanan, N. P. On regreening and degradation in Sahelian watersheds. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 12133–12138 (2015).
Schneider, S. H. The greenhouse effect: science and policy. Science 243, 771–781 (1989).
Walsh, J. et al. Climate Change Impacts in the United States: The Third National Climate Assessment Ch. 2 (US Global Change Research Program, 2014); https://doi.org/10.7930/J0KW5CXT
Filatova, T., Polhill, J. G. & van Ewijk, S. Regime shifts in coupled socio-environmental systems: review of modelling challenges and approaches. Environ. Model. Softw. 75, 333–347 (2016).
Loarie, S. R. et al. The velocity of climate change. Nature 462, 1052–1055 (2009).
Brandt, M. et al. Reduction of tree cover in West African woodlands and promotion in semi-arid farmlands. Nat. Geosci. 11, 328–333 (2018).
Keys, P. W. et al. Anthropocene risk. Nat. Sustain. 2, 667–673 (2019).
Rockström, J. et al. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461, 472–475 (2009).
Steffen, W. et al. Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347, 1259855 (2015).
Hanan, N. P., Prihodko, L., Ross, C. W., Bucini, G. & Tredennick, A. T. Gridded Estimates of Woody Cover and Biomass across Sub-Saharan Africa, 2000-2004 (ORNL DAAC, 2020); https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1777
Bouvet, A. et al. An above-ground biomass map of African savannahs and woodlands at 25 m resolution derived from ALOS PALSAR. Remote Sens. Environ. 206, 156–173 (2018).
Avitabile, V. et al. An integrated pan-tropical biomass map using multiple reference datasets. Glob. Change Biol. 22, 1406–1420 (2016).
Saatchi, S. S. et al. Benchmark map of forest carbon stocks in tropical regions across three continents. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 9899–9904 (2011).
Baccini, A. et al. Estimated carbon dioxide emissions from tropical deforestation improved by carbon-density maps. Nat. Clim. Change 2, 182–185 (2012).
Anchang, J. Y. et al. Toward operational mapping of woody canopy cover in tropical savannas using Google Earth Engine. Front. Environ. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2020.00004 (2020).
Kahiu, M. N. & Hanan, N. P. Fire in sub-Saharan Africa: the fuel, cure and connectivity hypothesis. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 27, 946–957 (2018).
Venter, O. et al. Global terrestrial Human Footprint maps for 1993 and 2009. Sci. Data 3, 160067 (2016).
Ross, C. W. et al. HYSOGs250m, global gridded hydrologic soil groups for curve-number-based runoff modeling. Sci. Data 5, 180091 (2018).
Lüdeke, M. K. B., Moldenhauer, O. & Petschel-Held, G. Rural poverty driven soil degradation under climate change: the sensitivity of the disposition towards the Sahel Syndrome with respect to climate. Environ. Model. Assess. 4, 315–326 (1999).
Hansfort, S. L. & Mertz, O. Challenging the woodfuel crisis in West African woodlands. Hum. Ecol. 39, 583 (2011).
Andela, N. et al. A human-driven decline in global burned area. Science 356, 1356–1362 (2017).
Wei, F. et al. Nonlinear dynamics of fires in Africa over recent decades controlled by precipitation. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 4495–4505 (2020).
Jones, B. & O’Neill, B. C. Spatially explicit global population scenarios consistent with the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 084003 (2016).
Riahi, K. et al. The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: an overview. Glob. Environ. Change 42, 153–168 (2017).
Potapov, P. et al. Mapping the World’s intact forest landscapes by remote sensing. Ecol. Soc. 13, 2 (2008).
Herold, M., Mayaux, P., Woodcock, C. E., Baccini, A. & Schmullius, C. Some challenges in global land cover mapping: an assessment of agreement and accuracy in existing 1 km datasets. Remote Sens. Environ. 112, 2538–2556 (2008).
Martens, C. et al. Large uncertainties in future biome changes in Africa call for flexible climate adaptation strategies. Glob. Change Biol. 27, 340–358 (2021).
Smith, W. K. et al. Large divergence of satellite and Earth system model estimates of global terrestrial CO2 fertilization. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 306–310 (2016).
Reich, P. B., Hobbie, S. E. & Lee, T. D. Plant growth enhancement by elevated CO2 eliminated by joint water and nitrogen limitation. Nat. Geosci. 7, 920–924 (2014).
Wieder, W. R., Cleveland, C. C., Smith, W. K. & Todd-Brown, K. Future productivity and carbon storage limited by terrestrial nutrient availability. Nat. Geosci. 8, 441–444 (2015).
Körner, C. A matter of tree longevity. Science 355, 130–131 (2017).
Olson, D. M. & Dinerstein, E. The Global 200: priority ecoregions for global conservation. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 89, 199–224 (2002).
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2019).
Liaw, A. & Wiener, M. Classification and regression by randomForest. R News 2, 18–22 (2002).
Breiman, L. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45, 5–32 (2001).
Massey, F. J. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for goodness of fit. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 46, 68–78 (1951).
Jarvis, A., Reuter, H. I., Nelson, A. & Guevara, E. Hole-filled SRTM for the globe: version 4: data grid (CGIAR Consortium for Spatial Information, 2008).
Ross, C. W. et al. Global Hydrologic Soil Groups (HYSOGs250m) for Curve Number-Based Runoff Modeling (ORNL DAAC, 2018); https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1566
Simard, M., Pinto, N., Fisher, J. B. & Baccini, A. Mapping forest canopy height globally with spaceborne lidar. J. Geophys. Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JG001708 (2011).
Jucker, T. et al. Allometric equations for integrating remote sensing imagery into forest monitoring programmes. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 177–190 (2017).
Sanderson, E. W. et al. The human footprint and the last of the wild. BioScience 52, 891–904 (2002).
Molnar, C., Bischl, B. & Casalicchio, G. iml: an R package for interpretable machine learning. J. Open Source Softw. 3, 786 (2018).
Wickham, H. tidyverse: Easily Install and Load the ‘Tidyverse’ (CRAN, 2017).
Hijmans, R. J. et al. raster: Geographic Data Analysis and Modeling (CRAN, 2016).
Perpiñán, O. & Hijmans, R. rasterVis (CRAN, 2018).
Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (Springer, 2016).
Zeileis, A. et al. colorspace: A toolbox for manipulating and assessing colors and palettes. J. Stat. Soft. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v096.i01 (2020).
Neuwirth, E. RColorBrewer: ColorBrewer Palettes (CRAN, 2014).
Auguie, B. gridExtra: Miscellaneous Functions for ‘Grid’ Graphics (CRAN, 2017).
Pebesma, E. Simple features for R: standardized support for spatial vector data. R J. 10, 439–446 (2018).
Ross, C. W., Hanan, N. P. & Prihodko, L. Prediction Maps: Woody-Biomass Projections and Drivers of Change in Sub-Saharan Africa (Figshare, 2021); https://doi.org/10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.14150210.V2
Ross, C. W. R Code for Woody-Biomass Projections and Drivers of Change in Sub-Saharan Africa (Figshare, 2021); https://doi.org/10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.14143799.V1
This research was supported by the US National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) as part of the NASA Carbon Cycle Science program (Grant no. NNX17AI49G). We thank S. Kumar, B. Lind, H. Omari, C. Toth, P. J. Burch Stickel and R. Wojcikiewicz for their contributions to this analysis.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information Nature Climate Change thanks Martin Brandt, Zhihua Liu and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
a, Long-term mean-annual aridity based on the historical data12 (1981–2010) and (b) climate zones, with H.A., hyper-arid; A., arid; S.A., semi-arid; S.H., Sub-humid; H., humid. c, Satellite-derived estimates of mean annual (2003–2015) burned-area (%)30. d, Digital elevation model49. e, The contemporary human footprint index31. f) Hydrologic soil groups32, with A corresponds to low runoff-potential soils (for example, sands); B, moderately low runoff-potential; C, moderately high runoff-potential; D, high runoff-potential (for example, clays).
a, Population density (people per km-2) for 2010 and (b) projected population density for 2100 under the ‘middle of the road’ Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSP2)37.
a, Satellite-derived estimates of above-ground woody biomass24. b, Predicted above-ground biomass representing the baseline (that is, contemporary) estimates. c, End of century empirical projection of woody biomass in response to RCP 4.5 and assumptions regarding population growth and fire regime changes. d, End of century empirical projection of woody biomass in response to RCP 8.5 and assumptions regarding population growth and fire regime changes. Data are available for download65 as GeoTiffs.
About this article
Cite this article
Ross, C.W., Hanan, N.P., Prihodko, L. et al. Woody-biomass projections and drivers of change in sub-Saharan Africa. Nat. Clim. Chang. 11, 449–455 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01034-5