Gender has a powerful influence on people’s experience of, and resilience to, climate change. Global climate change policy is committed to tackling gender inequalities in mitigation and adaptation. However, progress is hindered by numerous challenges, including an enduring set of gender assumptions: women are caring and connected to the environment, women are a homogenous and vulnerable group, gender equality is a women’s issue and gender equality is a numbers game. We provide an overview of how these assumptions essentialize women’s and men’s characteristics, narrowly diagnose the causes of gender inequality, and thereby propel strategies that have unintended and even counterproductive consequences. We offer four suggestions for a more informed pursuit of gender equality in climate change policy and practice.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Open Access articles citing this article.
Connecting gender norms and economic performance reveals gendered inequities in Malawian small-scale fish trade
Maritime Studies Open Access 10 October 2023
Low-cost adaptation options to support green growth in agriculture, water resources, and coastal zones
Scientific Reports Open Access 25 October 2022
Ambio Open Access 20 September 2022
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Cohen, P. et al. Understanding adaptive capacity and capacity to innovate in social–ecological systems: applying a gender lens. Ambio 45, 309–321 (2016).
Terry, G. No climate justice without gender justice: an overview of the issues. Gend. Dev. 17, 5–18 (2009). Article outlining gender-specific vulnerabilities and barriers to mitigating, coping with and adapting to climate change.
Van Aelst, K. & Holvoet, N. Intersections of gender and marital status in accessing climate change adaptation: evidence from rural Tanzania. World Dev. 79, 40–50 (2016).
Rao, N., Lawson, E. T., Raditloaneng, W. N., Solomon, D. & Angula, M. N. Gendered vulnerabilities to climate change: insights from the semi-arid regions of Africa and Asia. Clim. Dev. 11, 14–26 (2019).
Jerneck, A. Taking gender seriously in climate change adaptation and sustainability science research: views from feminist debates and sub-Saharan small-scale agriculture. Sustain. Sci. 13, 403–416 (2018).
de Sherbinin, A. Climate change hotspots mapping: what have we learned? Climatic Change 123, 23–37 (2014).
Szabo, S. et al. Making SDGs work for climate change hotspots. Environment 58, 24–33 (2016).
Rao, N. et al. A qualitative comparative analysis of women’s agency and adaptive capacity in climate change hotspots in Asia and Africa. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 964–971 (2019). Study of how women’s agency contributes to adaptation responses across 25 case studies in climate change hotspots.
Ravera, F., Iniesta-Arandia, I., Martín-López, B., Pascual, U. & Bose, P. Gender perspectives in resilience, vulnerability and adaptation to global environmental change. Ambio 45, 235–247 (2016).
Ylipaa, J., Gabrielsson, S. & Jerneck, A. Climate change adaptation and gender inequality: insights from rural Vietnam. Sustainability 11, 2805 (2019).
Carr, E. R. & Onzere, S. N. Really effective (for 15% of the men): lessons in understanding and addressing user needs in climate services from Mali. Clim. Risk Manag. 22, 82–95 (2018). Study that examines how gender and age shape climate services needs.
McOmber, C., Audia, C. & Crowley, F. Building resilience by challenging social norms: integrating a transformative approach within the BRACED consortia. Disasters 43, S271–S294 (2019).
Larson, A. M. et al. Gender lessons for climate initiatives: a comparative study of REDD+ impacts on subjective wellbeing. World Dev. 108, 86–102 (2018). Longitudinal study on the gendered impacts of REDD+ programmes on subjective wellbeing across six countries.
Rao, N. et al. Managing risk, changing aspirations and household dynamics: implications for wellbeing and adaptation in semi-arid Africa and India. World Dev. 125, 104667 (2020).
ABC of Women Workers’ Rights and Gender Equality (International Labour Office, 2007).
Rao, N. Assets, agency and legitimacy: towards a relational understanding of gender equality policy and practice. World Dev. 95, 43–54 (2017).
Adoption of the Paris Agreement Report FCCC/CP/2015/L.9 (UNFCCC, 2015).
Resurreccion, B. et al. Gender-Transformative Climate Change Adaptation: Advancing Social Equity (Global Commission on Adaptation, 2019).
Progress Report on the GEF Gender Implementation Strategy Report GEF/C.56/Inf.03 (GEF, 2020).
Report of the Global Environment Facility to the Twenty-Sixth Session of the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Report FCCC/CP/2020/4 (UNFCCC, 2020).
Pacific Gender and Climate Change Toolkit: Tools for Practitioners (UN Women, 2015).
Kato-Wallace, J. et al. Men, Masculinities & Climate Change: A Discussion Paper (MenEngage Alliance, 2019).
Baćanović, V. & Murić, J. Gender and Climate Change - Training Handbook (UN Women, 2018).
Gender in conservation and climate policy. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 255 (2019).
Bee, B. A. & Basnett, B. S. Engendering social and environmental safeguards in REDD+: lessons from feminist and development research. Third World Q. 38, 787–804 (2017).
Khadka, M., Karki, S., Karky, B. S., Kotru, R. & Darjee, K. B. Gender equality challenges to the REDD+ initiative in Nepal. Mt. Res. Dev. 34, 197–207 (2014).
Samndong, R. A. & Kjosavik, D. J. Gendered forests: exploring gender dimensions in forest governance and REDD+ in Équateur province, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). Ecol. Soc. 22, 34 (2017).
Gonda, N. Climate change, “technology” and gender: “adapting women” to climate change with cooking stoves and water reservoirs. Gend. Technol. Dev. 20, 149–168 (2016).
Pelling, M. & Garschagen, M. Put equity first in climate adaptation. Nature 569, 7–9 (2019).
Leach, M. Earth Mother myths and other ecofeminist fables: how a strategic notion rose and fell. Dev. Change 38, 67–85 (2007).
Doss, C., Meinzen-Dick, R., Quisumbing, A. & Theis, S. Women in agriculture: four myths. Glob. Food Secur. 16, 69–74 (2018). Perspective piece reviewing evidence of empirical claims perpetuating gender myths and consequences in agriculture.
Kristjanson, P. et al. Addressing gender in agricultural research for development in the face of a changing climate: where are we and where should we be going? Int. J. Agric. Sustain. 15, 482–500 (2017).
Sunderland, T. et al. Challenging perceptions about men, women, and forest product use: a global comparative study. World Dev. 64, 56–66 (2014).
Cook, N. J., Grillos, T. & Andersson, K. P. Gender quotas increase the equality and effectiveness of climate policy interventions. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 330–334 (2019).
MacRae, H. Women and caring: constructing self through others. J. Women Aging 7, 145–167 (1995).
Marcus, R. The Norms Factor: Recent Research on Gender, Social Norms, and Women’s Economic Empowerment (International Development Research Centre, 2018).
Gonda, N. Re-politicizing the gender and climate change debate: the potential of feminist political ecology to engage with power in action in adaptation policies and projects in Nicaragua. Geoforum 106, 87–96 (2019). Feminist political ecology study of project and policy approaches to gender and climate change in Nicaragua.
Ampaire, E. L. et al. Gender in climate change, agriculture, and natural resource policies: insights from East Africa. Climatic Change 158, 43–60 (2020). Study on gender integration in national policies and district budgets in Uganda and Tanzania.
Westholm, L. & Arora-Jonsson, S. Defining solutions, finding problems: deforestation, gender, and REDD+ in Burkina Faso. Conserv. Soc. 13, 189–199 (2015).
Kaijser, A. & Kronsell, A. Climate change through the lens of intersectionality. Environ. Polit. 23, 417–433 (2014).
Garcia, A., Tschakert, P. & Karikari, N. A. ‘Less able’: how gendered subjectivities warp climate change adaptation in Ghana’s Central Region. Gend. Place Cult. 27, 1602–1627 (2020).
Jost, C. et al. Understanding gender dimensions of agriculture and climate change in smallholder farming communities. Clim. Dev. 8, 133–144 (2016).
Penderis, S. Theorizing participation: from tyranny to emancipation. J. Afr. Asian Local Gov. Stud. 1, 1–28 (2012).
Guérin, I., Kumar, S. & Agier, I. Women’s empowerment: power to act or power over other women? Lessons from Indian microfinance. Oxf. Dev. Stud. 41, S76–S94 (2013).
Chant, S. The ‘feminisation of poverty’ and the ‘feminisation’ of anti-poverty programmes: room for revision? J. Dev. Stud. 44, 165–197 (2008).
Clissold, R., Westoby, R. & McNamara, K. E. Women as recovery enablers in the face of disasters in Vanuatu. Geoforum 113, 101–110 (2020).
O’Hara, C. & Clement, F. Power as agency: a critical reflection on the measurement of women’s empowerment in the development sector. World Dev. 106, 111–123 (2018).
Jackson, C. Environmentalisms and gender interests in the Third World. Dev. Change 24, 649–677 (1993).
Molyneux, M. Socialist societies old and new: progress towards women’s emancipation? Fem. Rev. 8, 1–34 (1981).
Escobar, A. Whose knowledge, whose nature? Biodiversity, conservation, and the political ecology of social movements. J. Polit. Ecol. 5, 53–82 (1998).
Murage, A. W., Pittchar, J. O., Midega, C. A. O., Onyango, C. O. & Khan, Z. R. Gender specific perceptions and adoption of the climate-smart push-pull technology in eastern Africa. Crop Prot. 76, 83–91 (2015).
Mittal, S. Role of mobile phone-enabled climate information services in gender-inclusive agriculture. Gend. Technol. Dev. 20, 200–217 (2016).
Kent, R. “Helping” or “appropriating”? Gender relations in shea nut production in northern Ghana. Soc. Nat. Resour. 31, 367–381 (2018).
Bryan, E., Bernier, Q., Espinal, M. & Ringler, C. Making climate change adaptation programmes in sub-Saharan Africa more gender responsive: insights from implementing organizations on the barriers and opportunities. Clim. Dev. 10, 417–431 (2018).
Agarwal, B. The power of numbers in gender dynamics: illustrations from community forestry groups. J. Peasant Stud. 42, 1–20 (2014).
Hariharan, V. K. et al. Does climate-smart village approach influence gender equality in farming households? A case of two contrasting ecologies in India. Climatic Change 158, 77–90 (2018).
Cornwall, A. Whose voices? Whose choices? Reflections on gender and participatory development. World Dev. 31, 1325–1342 (2003).
Behrman, J. et al. in Gender in Agriculture: Closing the Knowledge Gap (eds Quisumbing, A. et al.) 31–53 (Springer, 2014).
Giri, K. & Darnhofer, I. Nepali women using community forestry as a platform for social change. Soc. Nat. Resour. 23, 1216–1229 (2010).
Cummins, D. The problem of gender quotas: women’s representatives on Timor-Leste’s suku councils. Dev. Pract. 21, 85–95 (2011).
Franceschet, S. & Piscopo, J. Gender quotas and women’s substantive representation: lessons from Argentina. Polit. Gender 4, 393–425 (2008).
Devlin, C. & Elgie, R. The effect of increased women’s representation in parliament: the case of Rwanda. Parliament. Aff. 62, 237–254 (2008).
Clayton, A., Josefsson, C. & Wang, V. Quotas and women’s substantive representation: evidence from a content analysis of Ugandan plenary debates. Polit. Gender 13, 273–304 (2017).
Zegenhagen, S., Ranganathan, M. & Maria, A. Household decision-making and its association with intimate partner violence: examining differences in men’s and women’s perceptions in Uganda. SSM Popul. Health 8, 100442 (2019).
Carnegie, M. Creating community-based indicators of gender equity: a methodology. Asia Pac. Viewp. 60, 252–266 (2019).
Murshid, N., Akincigil, A. & Zippay, A. Microfinance participation and domestic violence in Bangladesh: results from a nationally representative survey. J. Interpers. Violence 31, 1279–1596 (2016).
Beaman, L., Duflo, E., Pande, R. & Topalova, P. Female leadership raises aspirations and educational attainment for girls: a policy experiment in India. Science 335, 582–586 (2012).
Devkota, B. P. & Mustalahti, I. Complexities in accessing REDD+ benefits in community forestry: evidence from Nepal’s Terai region. Int. For. Rev. 20, 332–345 (2018).
Rao, N. From abandonment to autonomy: gendered strategies for coping with climate change, Isiolo County, Kenya. Geoforum 102, 27–37 (2019).
Schill, C. et al. A more dynamic understanding of human behaviour for the Anthropocene. Nat. Sustain. 2, 1075–1082 (2019).
Johnson, N. et al. How do agricultural development projects empower women? Linking strategies with expected outcomes. J. Gend. Agric. Food Secur. 3, 1–19 (2018). Article presents a practical framework for assessing the objectives of development projects according to those that seek to ‘reach’, ‘benefit’ or ‘empower’ women.
Cornwall, A. Women’s empowerment: what works? J. Int. Dev. 28, 342–359 (2016).
Cornwall, A. & Rivas, A. From ‘gender equality’ and ‘women’s empowerment’ to global justice: reclaiming a transformative agenda for gender and development. Third World Q. 36, 396–425 (2015).
Sent, E. M. & van Staveren, I. A feminist review of behavioral economic research on gender differences. Fem. Econ. 25, 1–35 (2019).
Acosta, M. et al. Discursive translations of gender mainstreaming norms: the case of agricultural and climate change policies in Uganda. Womens Stud. Int. Forum 74, 9–19 (2019).
Lawless, S., Song, A. M., Cohen, P. J. & Morrison, T. H. Rights, equity and justice: a diagnostic for social meta-norm diffusion in environmental governance. Earth Syst. Gov. 6, 100052 (2020).
Tannenbaum, C., Ellis, R. P., Eyssel, F., Zou, J. & Schiebinger, L. Sex and gender analysis improves science and engineering. Nature 575, 137–146 (2019).
Gupta, S., Vemireddy, V., Singh, D. & Pingali, P. Adapting the Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Index to specific country context: insights and critiques from fieldwork in India. Glob. Food Secur. 23, 245–255 (2019). Study adapts the Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Index to an Indian context, based on analysis of 3,600 households.
Alkire, S. et al. The Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Index. World Dev. 52, 71–91 (2013).
Bessell, S. The individual deprivation measure: measuring poverty as if gender and inequality matter. Gend. Dev. 23, 223–240 (2015).
Petesch, P., Camfield, L., Feldman, S., Prain, G. & Kantor, P. Qualitative, comparative, and collaborative research at large scale: the GENNOVATE field methodology. J. Gend. Agric. Food Secur. 3, 28–53 (2018).
de Jong, S. & Kimm, S. The co-optation of feminisms: a research agenda. Int. Fem. J. Polit. 19, 185–200 (2017).
Lawless, S., Cohen, P. J., Mangubhai, S., Kleiber, D. & Morrison, T. H. Gender equality is diluted in commitments made to small-scale fisheries. World Dev. 140, 105348 (2021).
Bradshaw, S. Sex disaggregation alone will not energize equality. Nat. Energy 3, 813–815 (2018).
Gumucio, T., Hansen, J., Huyer, S. & van Huysen, T. Gender-responsive rural climate services: a review of the literature. Clim. Dev. 12, 241–254 (2019).
Rathgeber, E. WID, WAD, GAD; trends in research and practice. J. Dev. Areas 24, 489–502 (1990).
Singh, S. Deconstructing ‘gender and development’ for ‘identities of women’. Int. J. Soc. Welf. 16, 100–109 (2007).
Chua, P., Bhavnani, K. K. & Foran, J. Women, culture, development: a new paradigm for development studies? Ethnic Racial Stud. 23, 820–841 (2000).
Evaluation of Gender Mainstreaming in the GEF (GEF Independent Evaluation Office, 2018).
Lombardo, E., Meier, P. & Verloo, M. Discursive dynamics in gender equality politics: what about ‘feminist taboos’? Eur. J. Womens Stud. 17, 105–123 (2010).
Lahousen, V. & Popovic, N. Gender Equality Capacity Assessment Tool (2016).
Lips, H. Sex and Gender: An Introduction (Waveland Press, 2020).
Ellemers, N. Gender stereotypes. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 69, 275–298 (2018).
Nelson, J. A. The power of stereotyping and confirmation bias to overwhelm accurate assessment: the case of economics, gender, and risk aversion. J. Econ. Methodol. 21, 211–231 (2014).
Resurreccion, B. P. & Elmhirst, R. Gender and Natural Resource Management: Livelihoods, Mobility and Interventions (Earthscan, 2008).
Rocheleau, D., Thomas-Slayter, B. P. & Wangari, E. Feminist Political Ecology: Global Issues and Local Experience (Routledge, 1996).
MacGregor, S. Routledge Handbook of Gender and Environment (Routledge, 2017).
Kleiber, D., Harris, L. M. & Vincent, A. C. J. Gender and small-scale fisheries: a case for counting women and beyond. Fish Fish. 16, 547–562 (2014).
Fisher, M. & Carr, E. R. The influence of gendered roles and responsibilities on the adoption of technologies that mitigate drought risk: the case of drought-tolerant maize seed in eastern Uganda. Glob. Environ. Change 35, 82–92 (2015).
Cramer, L., Förch, W., Mutie, I. & Thornton, P. K. Connecting women, connecting men: how communities and organizations interact to strengthen adaptive capacity and food security in the face of climate change. Gend. Technol. Dev. 20, 169–199 (2016).
MacGregor, S. ‘Gender and climate change’: from impacts to discourses. J. Indian Ocean Reg. 6, 223–238 (2010).
Brashaw, S., Linnerker, B., Nussey, C. & Sanders-McDonagh, E. Gender Evidence Synthesis Research Award (ESRA) (ESRC-DFID Joint Fund for Poverty Alleviation Research and Middlesex Univ., 2015).
All authors acknowledge support from the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University. This research was supported by the CGIAR Research Program on Fish Agri-Food Systems (FISH) led by WorldFish. The programme is supported by contributions from the CGIAR Trust Fund.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information Nature Climate Change thanks Beth Bee, Anne Jerneck and Annet Mulema for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Lau, J.D., Kleiber, D., Lawless, S. et al. Gender equality in climate policy and practice hindered by assumptions. Nat. Clim. Chang. 11, 186–192 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-00999-7
This article is cited by
Investigating the impacts of rainfall, armed conflict, and COVID-19 shocks on women’s household decision-making among partnered women in Burkina Faso
Population and Environment (2023)
Gender Perspectives of Responses to Climate Variability and Change among Farm Households in Southeast Nigeria
Environmental Management (2023)
Connecting gender norms and economic performance reveals gendered inequities in Malawian small-scale fish trade
Maritime Studies (2023)
A bibliometric and content analysis of technological advancement applications in agricultural e-commerce
Electronic Commerce Research (2023)
An approach for analysing and segmenting messages about the SDGs on Twitter from the perspective of social marketing
International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing (2023)