Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Gender equality in climate policy and practice hindered by assumptions

Nature Climate Change volume 11, pages 186–192 (2021)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Gender has a powerful influence on people’s experience of, and resilience to, climate change. Global climate change policy is committed to tackling gender inequalities in mitigation and adaptation. However, progress is hindered by numerous challenges, including an enduring set of gender assumptions: women are caring and connected to the environment, women are a homogenous and vulnerable group, gender equality is a women’s issue and gender equality is a numbers game. We provide an overview of how these assumptions essentialize women’s and men’s characteristics, narrowly diagnose the causes of gender inequality, and thereby propel strategies that have unintended and even counterproductive consequences. We offer four suggestions for a more informed pursuit of gender equality in climate change policy and practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Cohen, P. et al. Understanding adaptive capacity and capacity to innovate in social–ecological systems: applying a gender lens. Ambio 45, 309–321 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Terry, G. No climate justice without gender justice: an overview of the issues. Gend. Dev. 17, 5–18 (2009). Article outlining gender-specific vulnerabilities and barriers to mitigating, coping with and adapting to climate change.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Van Aelst, K. & Holvoet, N. Intersections of gender and marital status in accessing climate change adaptation: evidence from rural Tanzania. World Dev. 79, 40–50 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rao, N., Lawson, E. T., Raditloaneng, W. N., Solomon, D. & Angula, M. N. Gendered vulnerabilities to climate change: insights from the semi-arid regions of Africa and Asia. Clim. Dev. 11, 14–26 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jerneck, A. Taking gender seriously in climate change adaptation and sustainability science research: views from feminist debates and sub-Saharan small-scale agriculture. Sustain. Sci. 13, 403–416 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. de Sherbinin, A. Climate change hotspots mapping: what have we learned? Climatic Change 123, 23–37 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Szabo, S. et al. Making SDGs work for climate change hotspots. Environment 58, 24–33 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rao, N. et al. A qualitative comparative analysis of women’s agency and adaptive capacity in climate change hotspots in Asia and Africa. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 964–971 (2019). Study of how women’s agency contributes to adaptation responses across 25 case studies in climate change hotspots.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ravera, F., Iniesta-Arandia, I., Martín-López, B., Pascual, U. & Bose, P. Gender perspectives in resilience, vulnerability and adaptation to global environmental change. Ambio 45, 235–247 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ylipaa, J., Gabrielsson, S. & Jerneck, A. Climate change adaptation and gender inequality: insights from rural Vietnam. Sustainability 11, 2805 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Carr, E. R. & Onzere, S. N. Really effective (for 15% of the men): lessons in understanding and addressing user needs in climate services from Mali. Clim. Risk Manag. 22, 82–95 (2018). Study that examines how gender and age shape climate services needs.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. McOmber, C., Audia, C. & Crowley, F. Building resilience by challenging social norms: integrating a transformative approach within the BRACED consortia. Disasters 43, S271–S294 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Larson, A. M. et al. Gender lessons for climate initiatives: a comparative study of REDD+ impacts on subjective wellbeing. World Dev. 108, 86–102 (2018). Longitudinal study on the gendered impacts of REDD+ programmes on subjective wellbeing across six countries.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rao, N. et al. Managing risk, changing aspirations and household dynamics: implications for wellbeing and adaptation in semi-arid Africa and India. World Dev. 125, 104667 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. ABC of Women Workers’ Rights and Gender Equality (International Labour Office, 2007).

  16. Rao, N. Assets, agency and legitimacy: towards a relational understanding of gender equality policy and practice. World Dev. 95, 43–54 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Adoption of the Paris Agreement Report FCCC/CP/2015/L.9 (UNFCCC, 2015).

  18. Resurreccion, B. et al. Gender-Transformative Climate Change Adaptation: Advancing Social Equity (Global Commission on Adaptation, 2019).

  19. Progress Report on the GEF Gender Implementation Strategy Report GEF/C.56/Inf.03 (GEF, 2020).

  20. Report of the Global Environment Facility to the Twenty-Sixth Session of the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Report FCCC/CP/2020/4 (UNFCCC, 2020).

  21. Pacific Gender and Climate Change Toolkit: Tools for Practitioners (UN Women, 2015).

  22. Kato-Wallace, J. et al. Men, Masculinities & Climate Change: A Discussion Paper (MenEngage Alliance, 2019).

  23. Baćanović, V. & Murić, J. Gender and Climate Change - Training Handbook (UN Women, 2018).

  24. Gender in conservation and climate policy. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 255 (2019).

  25. Bee, B. A. & Basnett, B. S. Engendering social and environmental safeguards in REDD+: lessons from feminist and development research. Third World Q. 38, 787–804 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Khadka, M., Karki, S., Karky, B. S., Kotru, R. & Darjee, K. B. Gender equality challenges to the REDD+ initiative in Nepal. Mt. Res. Dev. 34, 197–207 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Samndong, R. A. & Kjosavik, D. J. Gendered forests: exploring gender dimensions in forest governance and REDD+ in Équateur province, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). Ecol. Soc. 22, 34 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gonda, N. Climate change, “technology” and gender: “adapting women” to climate change with cooking stoves and water reservoirs. Gend. Technol. Dev. 20, 149–168 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pelling, M. & Garschagen, M. Put equity first in climate adaptation. Nature 569, 7–9 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Leach, M. Earth Mother myths and other ecofeminist fables: how a strategic notion rose and fell. Dev. Change 38, 67–85 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Doss, C., Meinzen-Dick, R., Quisumbing, A. & Theis, S. Women in agriculture: four myths. Glob. Food Secur. 16, 69–74 (2018). Perspective piece reviewing evidence of empirical claims perpetuating gender myths and consequences in agriculture.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kristjanson, P. et al. Addressing gender in agricultural research for development in the face of a changing climate: where are we and where should we be going? Int. J. Agric. Sustain. 15, 482–500 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sunderland, T. et al. Challenging perceptions about men, women, and forest product use: a global comparative study. World Dev. 64, 56–66 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Cook, N. J., Grillos, T. & Andersson, K. P. Gender quotas increase the equality and effectiveness of climate policy interventions. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 330–334 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. MacRae, H. Women and caring: constructing self through others. J. Women Aging 7, 145–167 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Marcus, R. The Norms Factor: Recent Research on Gender, Social Norms, and Women’s Economic Empowerment (International Development Research Centre, 2018).

  37. Gonda, N. Re-politicizing the gender and climate change debate: the potential of feminist political ecology to engage with power in action in adaptation policies and projects in Nicaragua. Geoforum 106, 87–96 (2019). Feminist political ecology study of project and policy approaches to gender and climate change in Nicaragua.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ampaire, E. L. et al. Gender in climate change, agriculture, and natural resource policies: insights from East Africa. Climatic Change 158, 43–60 (2020). Study on gender integration in national policies and district budgets in Uganda and Tanzania.

  39. Westholm, L. & Arora-Jonsson, S. Defining solutions, finding problems: deforestation, gender, and REDD+ in Burkina Faso. Conserv. Soc. 13, 189–199 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kaijser, A. & Kronsell, A. Climate change through the lens of intersectionality. Environ. Polit. 23, 417–433 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Garcia, A., Tschakert, P. & Karikari, N. A. ‘Less able’: how gendered subjectivities warp climate change adaptation in Ghana’s Central Region. Gend. Place Cult. 27, 1602–1627 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Jost, C. et al. Understanding gender dimensions of agriculture and climate change in smallholder farming communities. Clim. Dev. 8, 133–144 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Penderis, S. Theorizing participation: from tyranny to emancipation. J. Afr. Asian Local Gov. Stud. 1, 1–28 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Guérin, I., Kumar, S. & Agier, I. Women’s empowerment: power to act or power over other women? Lessons from Indian microfinance. Oxf. Dev. Stud. 41, S76–S94 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Chant, S. The ‘feminisation of poverty’ and the ‘feminisation’ of anti-poverty programmes: room for revision? J. Dev. Stud. 44, 165–197 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Clissold, R., Westoby, R. & McNamara, K. E. Women as recovery enablers in the face of disasters in Vanuatu. Geoforum 113, 101–110 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. O’Hara, C. & Clement, F. Power as agency: a critical reflection on the measurement of women’s empowerment in the development sector. World Dev. 106, 111–123 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Jackson, C. Environmentalisms and gender interests in the Third World. Dev. Change 24, 649–677 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Molyneux, M. Socialist societies old and new: progress towards women’s emancipation? Fem. Rev. 8, 1–34 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Escobar, A. Whose knowledge, whose nature? Biodiversity, conservation, and the political ecology of social movements. J. Polit. Ecol. 5, 53–82 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Murage, A. W., Pittchar, J. O., Midega, C. A. O., Onyango, C. O. & Khan, Z. R. Gender specific perceptions and adoption of the climate-smart push-pull technology in eastern Africa. Crop Prot. 76, 83–91 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Mittal, S. Role of mobile phone-enabled climate information services in gender-inclusive agriculture. Gend. Technol. Dev. 20, 200–217 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Kent, R. “Helping” or “appropriating”? Gender relations in shea nut production in northern Ghana. Soc. Nat. Resour. 31, 367–381 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Bryan, E., Bernier, Q., Espinal, M. & Ringler, C. Making climate change adaptation programmes in sub-Saharan Africa more gender responsive: insights from implementing organizations on the barriers and opportunities. Clim. Dev. 10, 417–431 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Agarwal, B. The power of numbers in gender dynamics: illustrations from community forestry groups. J. Peasant Stud. 42, 1–20 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Hariharan, V. K. et al. Does climate-smart village approach influence gender equality in farming households? A case of two contrasting ecologies in India. Climatic Change 158, 77–90 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Cornwall, A. Whose voices? Whose choices? Reflections on gender and participatory development. World Dev. 31, 1325–1342 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Behrman, J. et al. in Gender in Agriculture: Closing the Knowledge Gap (eds Quisumbing, A. et al.) 31–53 (Springer, 2014).

  59. Giri, K. & Darnhofer, I. Nepali women using community forestry as a platform for social change. Soc. Nat. Resour. 23, 1216–1229 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Cummins, D. The problem of gender quotas: women’s representatives on Timor-Leste’s suku councils. Dev. Pract. 21, 85–95 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Franceschet, S. & Piscopo, J. Gender quotas and women’s substantive representation: lessons from Argentina. Polit. Gender 4, 393–425 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Devlin, C. & Elgie, R. The effect of increased women’s representation in parliament: the case of Rwanda. Parliament. Aff. 62, 237–254 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Clayton, A., Josefsson, C. & Wang, V. Quotas and women’s substantive representation: evidence from a content analysis of Ugandan plenary debates. Polit. Gender 13, 273–304 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Zegenhagen, S., Ranganathan, M. & Maria, A. Household decision-making and its association with intimate partner violence: examining differences in men’s and women’s perceptions in Uganda. SSM Popul. Health 8, 100442 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Carnegie, M. Creating community-based indicators of gender equity: a methodology. Asia Pac. Viewp. 60, 252–266 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Murshid, N., Akincigil, A. & Zippay, A. Microfinance participation and domestic violence in Bangladesh: results from a nationally representative survey. J. Interpers. Violence 31, 1279–1596 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Beaman, L., Duflo, E., Pande, R. & Topalova, P. Female leadership raises aspirations and educational attainment for girls: a policy experiment in India. Science 335, 582–586 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Devkota, B. P. & Mustalahti, I. Complexities in accessing REDD+ benefits in community forestry: evidence from Nepal’s Terai region. Int. For. Rev. 20, 332–345 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Rao, N. From abandonment to autonomy: gendered strategies for coping with climate change, Isiolo County, Kenya. Geoforum 102, 27–37 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Schill, C. et al. A more dynamic understanding of human behaviour for the Anthropocene. Nat. Sustain. 2, 1075–1082 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Johnson, N. et al. How do agricultural development projects empower women? Linking strategies with expected outcomes. J. Gend. Agric. Food Secur. 3, 1–19 (2018). Article presents a practical framework for assessing the objectives of development projects according to those that seek to ‘reach’, ‘benefit’ or ‘empower’ women.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Cornwall, A. Women’s empowerment: what works? J. Int. Dev. 28, 342–359 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Cornwall, A. & Rivas, A. From ‘gender equality’ and ‘women’s empowerment’ to global justice: reclaiming a transformative agenda for gender and development. Third World Q. 36, 396–425 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Sent, E. M. & van Staveren, I. A feminist review of behavioral economic research on gender differences. Fem. Econ. 25, 1–35 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Acosta, M. et al. Discursive translations of gender mainstreaming norms: the case of agricultural and climate change policies in Uganda. Womens Stud. Int. Forum 74, 9–19 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Lawless, S., Song, A. M., Cohen, P. J. & Morrison, T. H. Rights, equity and justice: a diagnostic for social meta-norm diffusion in environmental governance. Earth Syst. Gov. 6, 100052 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Tannenbaum, C., Ellis, R. P., Eyssel, F., Zou, J. & Schiebinger, L. Sex and gender analysis improves science and engineering. Nature 575, 137–146 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Gupta, S., Vemireddy, V., Singh, D. & Pingali, P. Adapting the Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Index to specific country context: insights and critiques from fieldwork in India. Glob. Food Secur. 23, 245–255 (2019). Study adapts the Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Index to an Indian context, based on analysis of 3,600 households.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Alkire, S. et al. The Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Index. World Dev. 52, 71–91 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Bessell, S. The individual deprivation measure: measuring poverty as if gender and inequality matter. Gend. Dev. 23, 223–240 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Petesch, P., Camfield, L., Feldman, S., Prain, G. & Kantor, P. Qualitative, comparative, and collaborative research at large scale: the GENNOVATE field methodology. J. Gend. Agric. Food Secur. 3, 28–53 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  82. de Jong, S. & Kimm, S. The co-optation of feminisms: a research agenda. Int. Fem. J. Polit. 19, 185–200 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Lawless, S., Cohen, P. J., Mangubhai, S., Kleiber, D. & Morrison, T. H. Gender equality is diluted in commitments made to small-scale fisheries. World Dev. 140, 105348 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Bradshaw, S. Sex disaggregation alone will not energize equality. Nat. Energy 3, 813–815 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Gumucio, T., Hansen, J., Huyer, S. & van Huysen, T. Gender-responsive rural climate services: a review of the literature. Clim. Dev. 12, 241–254 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Rathgeber, E. WID, WAD, GAD; trends in research and practice. J. Dev. Areas 24, 489–502 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  87. Singh, S. Deconstructing ‘gender and development’ for ‘identities of women’. Int. J. Soc. Welf. 16, 100–109 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Chua, P., Bhavnani, K. K. & Foran, J. Women, culture, development: a new paradigm for development studies? Ethnic Racial Stud. 23, 820–841 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Evaluation of Gender Mainstreaming in the GEF (GEF Independent Evaluation Office, 2018).

  90. Lombardo, E., Meier, P. & Verloo, M. Discursive dynamics in gender equality politics: what about ‘feminist taboos’? Eur. J. Womens Stud. 17, 105–123 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Lahousen, V. & Popovic, N. Gender Equality Capacity Assessment Tool (2016).

  92. Lips, H. Sex and Gender: An Introduction (Waveland Press, 2020).

  93. Ellemers, N. Gender stereotypes. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 69, 275–298 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Nelson, J. A. The power of stereotyping and confirmation bias to overwhelm accurate assessment: the case of economics, gender, and risk aversion. J. Econ. Methodol. 21, 211–231 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Resurreccion, B. P. & Elmhirst, R. Gender and Natural Resource Management: Livelihoods, Mobility and Interventions (Earthscan, 2008).

  96. Rocheleau, D., Thomas-Slayter, B. P. & Wangari, E. Feminist Political Ecology: Global Issues and Local Experience (Routledge, 1996).

  97. MacGregor, S. Routledge Handbook of Gender and Environment (Routledge, 2017).

  98. Kleiber, D., Harris, L. M. & Vincent, A. C. J. Gender and small-scale fisheries: a case for counting women and beyond. Fish Fish. 16, 547–562 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Fisher, M. & Carr, E. R. The influence of gendered roles and responsibilities on the adoption of technologies that mitigate drought risk: the case of drought-tolerant maize seed in eastern Uganda. Glob. Environ. Change 35, 82–92 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Cramer, L., Förch, W., Mutie, I. & Thornton, P. K. Connecting women, connecting men: how communities and organizations interact to strengthen adaptive capacity and food security in the face of climate change. Gend. Technol. Dev. 20, 169–199 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. MacGregor, S. ‘Gender and climate change’: from impacts to discourses. J. Indian Ocean Reg. 6, 223–238 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Brashaw, S., Linnerker, B., Nussey, C. & Sanders-McDonagh, E. Gender Evidence Synthesis Research Award (ESRA) (ESRC-DFID Joint Fund for Poverty Alleviation Research and Middlesex Univ., 2015).

Download references

Acknowledgements

All authors acknowledge support from the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University. This research was supported by the CGIAR Research Program on Fish Agri-Food Systems (FISH) led by WorldFish. The programme is supported by contributions from the CGIAR Trust Fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia

    Jacqueline D. Lau, Danika Kleiber, Sarah Lawless & Philippa J. Cohen

  2. WorldFish, Bayan Lepas, Penang, Malaysia

    Jacqueline D. Lau, Danika Kleiber, Sarah Lawless & Philippa J. Cohen

Authors
  1. Jacqueline D. Lau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Danika Kleiber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sarah Lawless
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Philippa J. Cohen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J.D.L., D.K. and S.L. analysed literature. J.D.L., D.K., S.L. and P.J.C. conceptualized, wrote and edited the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacqueline D. Lau.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Climate Change thanks Beth Bee, Anne Jerneck and Annet Mulema for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lau, J.D., Kleiber, D., Lawless, S. et al. Gender equality in climate policy and practice hindered by assumptions. Nat. Clim. Chang. 11, 186–192 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-00999-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-00999-7

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing