Understanding how snowstorms may change in the future is critical for estimating impacts on water resources and the Earth and socioeconomic systems that depend on them. Here we use snowstorms as a marker to assess the mesoscale fingerprint of climate change, providing a description of potential changes in winter weather event occurrence, character and variability in central and eastern North America under a high anthropogenic emissions pathway. Snowstorms are segmented and tracked using high-resolution, snow water equivalent output from dynamically downscaled simulations which, unlike global climate models, can resolve important mesoscale features such as banded snow. Significant decreases are found in the frequency and size of snowstorms in a pseudo-global warming simulation, including those events that produce the most extreme snowfall accumulations. Early and late boreal winter months show particularly robust proportional decreases in snowstorms and snow water equivalent accumulations.
This is a preview of subscription content
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $8.25 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
The dynamically downscaled simulation output is available from NCAR’s Research Data Archive40.
Changnon, S. A. & Changnon, D. A spatial and temporal analysis of damaging snowstorms in the United States. Nat. Hazards 37, 373–389 (2006).
Squires, M. F. et al. The regional snowfall index. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 95, 1835–1848 (2014).
Coleman, J. S. M. & Schwartz, R. M. An updated blizzard climatology of the contiguous United States (1959–2014): an examination of spatiotemporal trends. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol. 56, 173–187 (2017).
Kunkel, K. E. et al. Trends in 20th century U.S. snowfall using a quality-controlled data set. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol. 26, 33–44 (2009).
Kunkel, K. E. et al. Monitoring and understanding trends in extreme storms: state of knowledge. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 94, 499–514 (2013).
Kunkel, K. E. et al. Trends and extremes in Northern Hemisphere snow characteristics. Curr. Clim. Change Rep. 2, 65–73 (2016).
Krasting, J. P., Broccoli, A. J., Dixon, K. W. & Lanzante, J. R. Future changes in Northern Hemisphere snowfall. J. Clim. 26, 7813–7828 (2013).
O’Gorman, P. A. Contrasting responses of mean and extreme snowfall to climate change. Nature 512, 416–418 (2014).
Diffenbaugh, N. S., Scherer, M. & Ashfaq, M. Response of snow-dependent hydrologic extremes to continued global warming. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 379–384 (2012).
Kapnick, S. B. & Delworth, T. L. Controls of global snow under a changed climate. J. Clim. 26, 5537–5562 (2013).
Notaro, M., Lorenz, D., Hoving, C. & Schummer, M. Twenty-first-century projections of snowfall and winter severity across Central-Eastern North America. J. Clim. 27, 6526–6550 (2014).
Danco, J. F., DeAngelis, A. M., Raney, B. K. & Broccoli, A. J. Effects of a warming climate on daily snowfall events in the Northern Hemisphere. J. Clim. 29, 6295–6318 (2016).
Janoski, T. P., Broccoli, A. J., Kapnick, S. B. & Johnson, N. C. Effects of climate change on wind-driven heavy-snowfall events over eastern North America. J. Clim. 31, 9037–9054 (2018).
Zarzycki, C. M. Projecting changes in societally impactful northeastern U.S. snowstorms. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 12067–12075 (2018).
Liu, C. et al. Continental-scale convection-permitting modeling of the current and future climate of North America. Clim. Dynam. 49, 71–95 (2017).
Rasmussen, R. et al. High-resolution coupled climate runoff simulations of seasonal snowfall over Colorado: a process study of current and warmer climate. J. Clim. 24, 3015–3048 (2011).
Prein, A. F. et al. Simulating North American mesoscale convective systems with a convection-permitting climate model. Clim. Dynam. 1432-0894, 1–16 (2017).
Notaro, M., Bennington, V. & Vavrus, S. Dynamically downscaled projections of lake-effect snow in the Great Lakes basin. J. Clim. 28, 1661–1684 (2015).
Cohen, J., Pfeiffer, K. & Francis, J. A. Warm arctic episodes linked with increased frequency of extreme winter weather in the United States. Nat. Commun. 9, 869 (2018).
Chang, E. K. M. CMIP5 projection of significant reduction in extratropical cyclone activity over North America. J. Clim. 26, 9903–9922 (2013).
Eichler, T. P., Gaggini, N. & Pan, Z. Impacts of global warming on Northern Hemisphere winter storm tracks in the CMIP5 model suite. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 118, 3919–3932 (2013).
Tamarin-Brodsky, T. & Kaspi, Y. Enhanced poleward propagation of storms under climate change. Nat. Geosci. 10, 908–913 (2017).
Vaughan, D.G. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) Ch. 4 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
Suriano, Z. J. & Leathers, D. J. Twenty-first century snowfall projections within the eastern Great Lakes region: detecting the presence of a lake-induced snowfall signal in GCMs. Int. J. Climatol. 36, 2200–2209 (2016).
Brown, R. D. & Robinson, D. A. Northern Hemisphere spring snow cover variability and change over 1922–2010 including an assessment of uncertainty. Cryosphere 5, 219–229 (2011).
Collins, M. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) Ch. 12 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
Déry, S. J. & Brown, R. D. Recent Northern Hemisphere snow cover extent trends and implications for the snow-albedo feedback. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, L22504 (2007).
Choi, G., Robinson, D. A. & Kang, S. Changing Northern Hemisphere snow seasons. J. Clim. 23, 5305–5310 (2010).
Brown, R. D. & Mote, P. W. The response of Northern Hemisphere snow cover to a changing climate. J. Clim. 22, 2124–2145 (2009).
Brutel-Vuilmet, C., Ménégoz, M. & Krinner, G. An analysis of present and future seasonal Northern Hemisphere land snow cover simulated by CMIP5 coupled climate models. Cryosphere Discuss. 6, 3317–3348 (2012).
Colle, B. A. et al. Historical evaluation and future prediction of eastern North American and western Atlantic extratropical cyclones in the CMIP5 models during the cool season. J. Clim. 26, 6882–6903 (2013).
Ma, C.-G. & Chang, E. K. M. Impacts of storm-track variations on wintertime extreme weather events over the continental United States. J. Clim. 30, 4601–4624 (2017).
Zhou, B., Wang, Z., Shi, Y., Xu, Y. & Han, Z. Historical and future changes of snowfall events in China under a warming background. J. Clim. 31, 5873–5889 (2018).
IPCC Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability (eds Field, C. B. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).
Mankin, J. S. et al. The potential for snow to supply human water demand in the present and future. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 114016 (2015).
Impacts, Risks, and Adaptation in the United States: Fourth National Climate Assessment Vol. II (eds Reidmiller, D. R. et al.) 24–32 (USGCRP, 2018).
Trenberth, K. E. Changes in precipitation with climate change. Clim. Res. 47, 123–138 (2011).
Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
Climate Science Special Report: Fourth National Climate Assessment Vol. I (eds Wuebbles, D. J. et al.) (USGCRP, 2017).
High Resolution WRF Simulations of the Current and Future Climate of North America (NCAR, accessed 1 April 2018); https://rda.ucar.edu/datasets/ds612.0/
Prein, A. F. et al. Increased rainfall volume from future convective storms in the U.S. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 880 (2017).
Déqué, M. et al. An intercomparison of regional climate simulations for Europe: assessing uncertainties in model projections. Clim. Change 81, 53–70 (2007).
Michaelis, A. C., Willison, J., Lackmann, G. M. & Robinson, W. A. Changes in winter North Atlantic extratropical cyclones in high-resolution regional pseudo-global warming simulations. J. Clim. 30, 6905–6925 (2017).
Musselman, K. N. et al. Projected increases and shifts in rain-on-snow flood risk over western North America. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 808–812 (2018).
Michaelis, A. C. & Lackmann, G. M. Climatological changes in the extratropical transition of tropical cyclones in high-resolution global simulations. J. Clim. 32, 8733–8753 (2019).
Scaff, L. et al. Simulating the convective precipitation diurnal cycle in North America’s current and future climate. Clim. Dynam. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-04754-9 (2019).
Dee, D. P. et al. The era-interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 137, 553–597 (2011).
Powers, J. G. et al. The weather research and forecasting model: overview, system efforts, and future directions. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 98, 1717–1737 (2017).
Rasmussen, K., Prein, A., Rasmussen, R., Ikeda, K. & Liu, C. Changes in the convective population and thermodynamic environments in convection-permitting regional climate simulations over the United States. Clim. Dynam. 0930–7575, 1–26 (2017).
Meinshausen, M. et al. The RCP greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions from 1765 to 2300. Clim. Change 109, 213–241 (2011).
Carroll, T. et al. NOHRSC Operations and the Simulation of Snow Cover Properties for the Conterminous U.S. (NOAA, 2001); http://snobear.colorado.edu/WSC/WSC_2001/PDF/WSC2001CarrollEtAl.PDF
Barrett, A. National Operational Hydrologic Remote Sensing Center Snow Data Assimilation System (SNODAS) Products at NSIDC (NSIDC, 2003); https://nsidc.org/sites/nsidc.org/files/files/nsidc_special_report_11.pdf
Snow Data Assimilation System (SNODAS) Data Products at NSIDC Version 1 (NSIDC, accessed 5 December 2019); https://doi.org/10.7265/N5TB14TC
Clow, D. W., Nanus, L., Verdin, K. L. & Schmidt, J. Evaluation of SNODAS snow depth and snow water equivalent estimates for the Colorado Rocky Mountains, USA. Hydrol. Process. 26, 2583–2591 (2012).
Markowski, P. & Richardson, Y. Mesoscale Meteorology in Midlatitudes Ch. 1 (John Wiley & Sons, 2010).
Haberlie, A. M. ahaberlie/Future_Snow: 2020.2 (Zenodo, 2020); https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3674139
We thank K. Ikeda and A. Prein for their assistance in accessing and interpreting the Liu et al.15 output. This research was supported by National Science Foundation grant no. ATM-1637225.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information Nature Climate Change thanks Martin Baxter, Anthony Broccoli and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
October–April 2003–2013 a) SNODAS average SWE (mm) and b) the absolute difference between WRF-CTRL and SNODAS mean SWE shown as a per cent of the total mean SNODAS SWE. As discussed in the manuscript, 2004–05 season was omitted from analysis due to missing WRF data. Hatched areas on both figures indicate locations where SNODAS data were not available or both WRF-CTRL and SNODAS did not record any SWE during the analysis period.
Demonstration of the various sources of climatological calculations from CTRL, namely, a) total accumulation of snow (liquid water equivalent) from January 13th 2001 to January 16th 2001, b) a ‘slice’ within a qualifying swath with the lowest (0.1mm / 3-hr), 50th percentile (0.46mm / 3-hr), and 90th percentile (2.08mm / 3-hr) snowfall totals (liquid water equivalent) denoted by the colour fill. The black outline is the spatial extent of the swath (that is, where the swath produced at least 0.1mm / 3-hr liquid water equivalent totals), c) the spatial extent of the occurrence of 3-hr liquid water equivalent snowfall totals exceeding the 50th percentile within this swath, and d) the spatial extent of the occurrence of 3-hr liquid water equivalent snowfall totals exceeding the 90th percentile within this swath.
Mean seasonal SWE accumulations (2004–2005 excluded) for (a) CTRL, (b) PGW, and accumulated SWE (c) differences and (d) per cent differences.
Mean annual (a, b) swath counts, and (c) swath count difference and (d) per cent difference between (a) CTRL and (b) PGW for only 90th percentile snow events. The areas in grey experienced no qualifying swaths during the study period.
Per cent difference in (a) 50th and (b) 90th percentile swath event counts between CTRL and PGW for the months of January and February.
Data used in construction of seasonal comparisons between CTRL and PGW.
Data used in construction of seasonal and subseasonal variability in swath counts and snow water equivalent (SWE) per season (October–April) for CTRL and PGW, panels a–d.
Data used in construction of weekly per cent difference between the two epochs.
About this article
Cite this article
Ashley, W.S., Haberlie, A.M. & Gensini, V.A. Reduced frequency and size of late-twenty-first-century snowstorms over North America. Nat. Clim. Chang. 10, 539–544 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0774-4
Plant–rodent interactions after a heavy snowfall decrease plant regeneration and soil carbon emission in an old-growth forest
Forest Ecosystems (2021)
Scientific Reports (2021)
Nature Climate Change (2020)