Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Matters Arising
  • Published:

Reply to: An appeal to cost undermines food security risks of delayed mitigation

The Original Article was published on 30 April 2020

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout


  1. Hayek, M. N., McDermid, S. P. & Jamieson, D. W. An appeal to cost undermines food security risks of delayed mitigation. Nat. Clim. Change (2020).

  2. Hasegawa, T. et al. Risk of increased food insecurity under stringent global climate change mitigation policy. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 699–703 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Müller, C. & Robertson, R. D. Projecting future crop productivity for global economic modeling. Agric. Econ. 45, 37–50 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tai, A. P. K., Martin, M. V. & Heald, C. L. Threat to future global food security from climate change and ozone air pollution. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 817–821 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Clarke, L. et al. in IPCC Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change Change (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) Ch. 6 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).

  6. Doelman, J. C., Stehfest, E., Tabeau, A. & van Meijl, H. Making the Paris Agreement climate targets consistent with food security objectives. Glob. Food Sec. 23, 93–103 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


T.H., S.F., K.T. and J.T. acknowledge support from the Environment Research and Technology Development Fund 2-2002 of the Environmental Restoration and Conservation Agency of Japan, the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI (grant no. 19K24387) and the Sumitomo Foundation. B.L.B. received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement nos. 776479 (COACCH) and 821010 (CASCADES)).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



T.H. led the writing of this Matters Arising, and all authors contributed to the development and finalization of the text.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomoko Hasegawa.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The views expressed by the authors may not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official position of the European Commission or the other institutions involved.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Climate Change thanks Chengcheng Fei and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hasegawa, T., Fujimori, S., Havlík, P. et al. Reply to: An appeal to cost undermines food security risks of delayed mitigation. Nat. Clim. Chang. 10, 420–421 (2020).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing