Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

High climate sensitivity in CMIP6 model not supported by paleoclimate

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Model-data comparison of GMST and MTG.

Data availability

CESM1 simulation data are available in the Zenodo repository at CESM2 data can be requested from J.Z.

Code availability

CESM2 model code is available at CESM1 and CCSM4 model code is available at


  1. 1.

    Charney, J. G. et al. Carbon Dioxide and Climate: a Scientific Assessment (National Academy of Sciences, 1979).

  2. 2.

    Nat. Clim. Change 9, 727 (2019).

  3. 3.

    Zelinka, M. D. et al. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e2019GL085782 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Danabasoglu, G. et al. J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy. 12, e2019MS001916 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Gettelman, A. et al. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 8329–8337 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Lunt, D. J. et al. Geosci. Model Dev. 10, 889–901 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Hollis, C. J. et al. Geosci. Model Dev. 12, 3149–3206 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Anagnostou, E. et al. Nature 533, 380–380 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Zhu, J., Poulsen, C. J. & Tierney, J. E. Sci. Adv. 5, eaax1874 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Berry, J. & Bjorkman, O. Annu. Rev. Plant Physio. 31, 491–543 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Wing, S. L. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 18627 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Hurrell, J. W. et al. B. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 94, 1339–1360 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Gent, P. R. et al. J. Climate 24, 4973–4991 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Gettelman, A., Kay, J. E. & Shell, K. M. J. Climate 25, 1453–1469 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Fasullo, J. T. Climate Model Assessment Tool CMIP6 Analysis (CMAT-CMIP6) (2020);

  16. 16.

    Caballero, R. & Huber, M. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 14162–14167 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by Heising-Simons Foundation (grant nos. 2016-05 and 2016-12) and National Science Foundation (NSF; grant no. 2002397) to C.J.P. We acknowledge the computational resources provided by the CESM Paleoclimate Working Group for high-performance computing support from Cheyenne ( provided by the National Center for Atmospheric Research’s CISL, sponsored by NSF. The CESM project is supported primarily by the NSF. This material is based upon work supported by the National Center for Atmospheric Research, which is a major facility sponsored by the NSF under Cooperative Agreement no. 1852977.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiang Zhu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, J., Poulsen, C.J. & Otto-Bliesner, B.L. High climate sensitivity in CMIP6 model not supported by paleoclimate. Nat. Clim. Chang. 10, 378–379 (2020).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing