Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

The evolution of ideas in global climate policy

Abstract

From carbon pricing to green industrial policy, economic ideas have shaped climate policy. Drawing on a new dataset of policy reports, we show how economic ideas influenced climate policy advice by major international organizations, including the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development and the World Bank, from 1990 to 2017. In the 1990s, the neoclassical notion of weak complementarity between environmental protection and growth dominated debates on sustainable development. In the mid-2000s, economic thought on the environment diversified, as the idea of strong complementarity between environmental protection and growth emerged in the green growth discourse. Adaptations of Schumpeterian and Keynesian economics identified investment in energy innovation and infrastructure as drivers of growth. We thus identify a major transformation from a neoclassical paradigm to a diversified policy discourse, suggesting that climate policy has entered a postparadigmatic period. The diversification of ideas broadened policy advice from market-based policy to green industrial policy, including deployment subsidies and regulation.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Economic schools of thought on the environment.
Fig. 2: The rise of green growth in global environmental discourse.
Fig. 3: The rise of clean energy subsidies and infrastructure investments.
Fig. 4: The shifting problem focus.

Data availability

The data are available in the Supplementary Data. The source data for Figs. 14 are also available as supplementary files.

References

  1. 1.

    Bernstein, S. The Compromise of Liberal Environmentalism (Columbia Univ. Press, 2001).

  2. 2.

    Jacobs, M. in The Handbook of Global Climate and Environmental Policy (ed. Falkner, R.) 197–214 (John Wiley & Sons, 2013).

  3. 3.

    Tienhaara, K. Varieties of green capitalism: economy and environment in the wake of the global financial crisis. Environ. Polit. 23, 187–204 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Bäckstrand, K. & Lövbrand, E. The road to Paris: contending climate governance discourses in the post-Copenhagen era. J. Environ. Policy Plan. 21, 519–532 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Lövbrand, E. & Stripple, J. Making climate change governable: accounting for carbon as sinks, credits and personal budgets. Crit. Policy Stud. 5, 187–200 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Stripple, J. & Bulkeley, H. New Approaches to Rationality, Power and Politics (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).

  7. 7.

    Pearce, D., Markandya, A. & Barbier, E. B. Blueprint for a Green Economy (Earthscan, 1989).

  8. 8.

    Antal, M. & Karhunmaa, K. The German energy transition in the British, Finnish and Hungarian news media. Nat. Energy 3, 994–1001 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Thornberg, R. & Charmaz, K. in The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Content Analysis (ed. Flick, U.) 153–169 (Sage, 2014).

  10. 10.

    Schreier, M. in The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Content Analysis (ed. Flick, U.) 170–183 (Sage, 2014).

  11. 11.

    Bina, O. The green economy and sustainable development: an uneasy balance? Environ. Plan. C 31, 1023–1047 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Ferguson, P. The green economy agenda: business as usual or transformational discourse? Environ. Polit. 24, 17–37 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Death, C. Four discourses of the green economy in the global South. Third World Q. 36, 2207–2224 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Stevenson, H. Contemporary discourses of green political economy: a Q method analysis. J. Environ. Policy Plan. 21, 533–548 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Georgeson, L., Maslin, M. & Poessinouw, M. The global green economy: a review of concepts, definitions, measurement methodologies and their interactions. Geo 4, e00036 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Borel-Saladin, J. M. & Turok, I. N. The green economy: incremental change or transformation? Environ. Policy Gov. 23, 209–220 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Nordhaus, W. D. Resources as a constraint on growth. Am. Econ. Rev. 64, 22–26 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Hartwick, J. M. Intergenerational equity and the investing of rents from exhaustible resources. Am. Econ. Rev. 66, 253–256 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Solow, R. M. The economics of resources or theresources of conomics. Am. Econ. Rev. 64, 1–14 (1974).

  20. 20.

    1991 UNDP Annual Report: The Challenge of the Environment (UNDP, 1992).

  21. 21.

    Informal Meeting of the G7 Environment Ministers (G7, 1994).

  22. 22.

    The World Bank Annual Report 1995 (World Bank, 1995).

  23. 23.

    Hajer, M. A. The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process (Clarendon, 1995).

  24. 24.

    The Global Environmental Facility: A Self-Assessment (World Bank, 1996).

  25. 25.

    Newell, P. & Paterson, M. Climate Capitalism: Global Warming and the Transformation of the Global Economy (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2010).

  26. 26.

    Ciplet, D., Roberts, J. T. & Khan, M. R. Power in a Warming World (MIT Press, 2015).

  27. 27.

    World Bank World Development Report 1992: Development and the Environment (Oxford Univ. Press, 1992).

  28. 28.

    IPCC Climate Change 1995: Synthesis Report (eds Bolin, B. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1996).

  29. 29.

    Michaelowa, A. & Michaelowa, K. Climate business for poverty reduction? The role of the World Bank. Rev. Int. Organ. 6, 259–286 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Skovgaard, J. EU climate policy after the crisis. Environ. Polit. 23, 1–17 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Gravey, V. & Jordan, A. Does the European Union have a reverse gear? Policy dismantling in a hyperconsensual polity. J. Eur. Public Policy 23, 1180–1198 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Stern, N. Lionel Robbins Memorial Lecture Series: How We Can Respond and Prosper: The New Energy–Industrial Revolution (LSE, 2012).

  33. 33.

    Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P., Bursztyn, L. & Hemous, D. The environment and directed technical change. Am. Econ. Rev. 102, 131–166 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Acemoglu, D., Akcigit, U., Hanley, D. & Kerr, W. Transition to clean technology. J. Polit. Econ. 124, 52–104 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Barbier, E. B. A Global Green New Deal: Rethinking the Economic Recovery (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2010).

  36. 36.

    Edenhofer, O. & Stern, N. Towards a Global Green Recovery (PIK and LSE, 2009).

  37. 37.

    Bowen, A. & Stern, N. Environmental policy and the economic downturn. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 26, 137–163 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Annual Report 2006 (OECD, 2006).

  39. 39.

    Green Growth: Overcoming the Crisis and Beyond (OECD, 2009).

  40. 40.

    UNEP Climate Change Strategy (UNEP, 2009).

  41. 41.

    UNEP Annual Report 2011 (UNEP, 2012).

  42. 42.

    Secretary-General’s Report to Ministers 2016 (OECD, 2016).

  43. 43.

    G7 Environment Ministers Meeting Communiqué (G7, 2016).

  44. 44.

    Farrell, H. & Quiggin, J. Consensus, dissensus, and economic ideas: economic crisis and the rise and fall of Keynesianism. Int. Stud. Q. 61, 269–283 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    A Global Green New Deal: Policy Brief (UNEP, 2009).

  46. 46.

    Barbier, E. B. Rethinking the Economic Recovery: A Global Green New Deal (UNEP, 2009).

  47. 47.

    Annual Report 2011/2012: The Sustainable Future We Want (UNDP, 2012).

  48. 48.

    Report of the Conference of the Parties on Its Seventeenth Session (UNFCCC, 2011).

  49. 49.

    Dimitrov, R. S. The Paris Agreement on climate change: behind closed doors. Glob. Environ. Polit. 16, 1–11 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Report of the Conference of the Parties on Its Twenty-First Session (UNFCCC, 2015).

  51. 51.

    Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J. & Behrens III, W. W. The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind (Universe Books, 1972).

  52. 52.

    Daly, H. E. The economics of the steady state. Am. Econ. Rev. 64, 15–21 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Policies to Promote Technologies for Cleaner Production and Products: Guide for Government Self-Assessment (OECD, 1995).

  54. 54.

    Annual Report 2001 (OECD, 2001).

  55. 55.

    Bernstein, S. in Encyclopedia of Global Environmental Governance and Politics (eds. Pattberg, P. H. and Zelli, F.) 45–52 (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2015).

  56. 56.

    Hale, T. Catalytic Cooperation Blavatnik School of Government Working Paper BSG-WP-2018/026 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2018).

  57. 57.

    Falkner, R. The Paris Agreement and the new logic of international climate politics. Int. Aff. 92, 1107–1125 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Hall, P. A. Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comp. Polit. 25, 275–296 (1993).

  59. 59.

    Hogan, J. & Howlett, M. in Policy Paradigms in Theory and Practice: Discourses, Ideas and Anomalies in Public Policy Dynamics (eds Hogan, J. & Howlett, M.) 3–18 (Palgrave Macmillan, 2015).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank A. Agopian, M. Conner, R. Jacobson and Z. Woogen for research assistance. We thank S. Bernstein, M. Kocher and M. Paterson for excellent comments.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Both authors contributed equally to all steps of the analysis and writing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonas Meckling.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Climate Change thanks Miklos Antal, Angela Oels and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Tables 1 and 2, Notes 1 and 2 and references.

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Data

Complete data as an Excel spreadsheet. The spreadsheet includes 8 worksheets: 1 for each of the 6 IOs, 1 that aggregates the data and 1 that organizes the data into clusters for the figures (per Supplementary Table 2). The figures are also reproduced in the last worksheet.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1

Source data for Fig. 1.

Source Data Fig. 2

Source data for Fig. 2.

Source Data Fig. 3

Source data for Fig. 3.

Source Data Fig. 4

Source data for Fig. 4.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meckling, J., Allan, B.B. The evolution of ideas in global climate policy. Nat. Clim. Chang. 10, 434–438 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0739-7

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing