From incremental to transformative adaptation in individual responses to climate-exacerbated hazards

Abstract

Building societal resilience to climate change depends on increased adaptation. In this Review of scholarship on behavioural adaptation, we find that most empirical studies focus on the affective and cognitive drivers of behaviours with largely private benefits. Few examine behaviours with collective benefits or explore the moderating role of social factors on affective and cognitive cues. We point to cultural evolution and complex adaptive systems as frameworks that can improve our understanding of behaviours that lead to greater societal resilience in the long term. Integrating such research traditions with the socio-psychological perspectives that dominate the literature will ensure that future studies better distinguish the drivers of incremental coping from transformative adaptation.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Number of interpersonal and intrapersonal factors researched in reviewed empirical paper.
Fig. 2: Proportion of reviewed papers investigating the collective versus private benefits of adaptation.
Fig. 3: Typology of adaptation behaviours.

References

  1. 1.

    IPCC: Summary for Policymakers. In Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report (eds Core Writing Team, Pachauri, R. K. & Meyer, L. A.) (IPCC, 2014).

  2. 2.

    2009 UNISDR Terminology on Disaster Risk Reduction, 1–30 (UNISDR, 2009).

  3. 3.

    Folke, C. Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Glob. Environ. Change 16, 253–267 (2006).

  4. 4.

    Wisner, B., Blaikie, P., Cannon, T. & Davis, I. At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability and Disasters. (Routledge, 2014).

  5. 5.

    Adger, W. N., Barnett, J., Brown, K., Marshall, N. & O’Brien, K. Cultural dimensions of climate change impacts and adaptation. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 112–117 (2013). Identifies the roles of culture, identity, cohesion and place in mediating environmental and societal change.

  6. 6.

    Pelling, M. Adaptation to Climate Change: From Resilience to Transformation (Routledge, 2010).

  7. 7.

    O’Brien, K. Global environmental change II: from adaptation to deliberate transformation. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 36, 667–676 (2012). Argues for a science of deliberative transformation and provides a critical review of multiple perspectives on transformative adaptation.

  8. 8.

    Nelson, D. R., Adger, W. N. & Brown, K. Adaptation to environmental change: contributions of a resilience framework. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 32, 395–419 (2007). Defines transformative action through a focus on system characteristics, social capital and institutional learning.

  9. 9.

    Kates, R. W., Travis, W. R. & Wilbanks, T. J. Transformational adaptation when incremental adaptations to climate change are insufficient. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 7156–7161 (2012).

  10. 10.

    Kleindorfer, P. R. in Better Environmental Decisions: Strategies for Governments, Businesses, and Communities (eds Sexton, K. et al.) 37–56 (Island, 1999).

  11. 11.

    Park, S. E. et al. Informing adaptation responses to climate change through theories of transformation. Glob. Environ. Change 22, 115–126 (2012).

  12. 12.

    Fischer, A. P. Adapting and coping with climate change in temperate forests. Glob. Environ. Change 54, 160–171 (2019).

  13. 13.

    Wise, R. M. et al. Reconceptualising adaptation to climate change as part of pathways of change and response. Glob. Environ. Change 28, 325–336 (2014).

  14. 14.

    Gifford, R. The dragons of inaction: psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. Am. Psychol. 66, 290–302 (2011).

  15. 15.

    Wamsler, C. & Brink, E. The role of individual adaptive practices for sustainable adaptation. Int. J. Disaster Resil. Built Environ. 6, 6–29 (2015).

  16. 16.

    Smit, B. & Skinner, M. W. Adaptation options in agriculture to climate change: a typology. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Change 7, 85–114 (2002).

  17. 17.

    Cutter, S. L. et al. A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Glob. Environ. Change 18, 598–606 (2008).

  18. 18.

    Biagini, B., Bierbaum, R., Stults, M., Dobardzic, S. & McNeeley, S. M. A typology of adaptation actions: a global look at climate adaptation actions financed through the global environment facility. Glob. Environ. Change 25, 97–108 (2014).

  19. 19.

    Hamilton, M., Fischer, A. P., Guikema, S. D. & Keppel‐Aleks, G. Behavioral adaptation to climate change in wildfire‐prone forests. WIRes Clim. Change 9, e553 (2018).

  20. 20.

    Wamsler, C. & Brink, E. Moving beyond short-term coping and adaptation. Environ. Urban. 26, 86–111 (2014).

  21. 21.

    Wolf, J. in Climate Change Adaptation in Developed Nations (eds Ford, J. & Berrang-Ford, L.) 21–32 (Springer, 2011).

  22. 22.

    Reser, J. P. & Swim, J. K. Adapting to and coping with the threat and impacts of climate change. Am. Psychol. 66, 277–289 (2011). Provides an integrative socio-psychological framework for understanding stress and coping responses to climate change.

  23. 23.

    Tompkins, E. L. et al. Observed adaptation to climate change: UK evidence of transition to a well-adapting society. Glob. Environ. Change 20, 627–635 (2010).

  24. 24.

    Smith, B., Burton, I., Klein, R. J. T. & Wandel, J. An anatomy of adaptation to climate change and variability. Clim. Change 45, 223–251 (2000).

  25. 25.

    Millock, K. & Nauges, C. Household adoption of water-efficient equipment: the role of socio-economic factors, environmental attitudes and policy. Environ. Resour. Econ. 46, 539–565 (2010).

  26. 26.

    Clayton, S. et al. Psychological research and global climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 640–646 (2015). A review of the role of psychology in addressing climate change.

  27. 27.

    The Impacts of Climate Change on Human Health in the United States: A Scientific Assessment. (USGCRP, 2016).

  28. 28.

    Berry, H. L., Bowen, K. & Kjellstrom, T. Climate change and mental health: a causal pathways framework. Int. J. Public Health 55, 123–132 (2010).

  29. 29.

    Fankhauser, S. Adaptation to climate change. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 9, 209–230 (2017).

  30. 30.

    Zilberman, D., Zhao, J. & Heiman, A. Adoption versus adaptation, with emphasis on climate change. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 4, 27–53 (2012).

  31. 31.

    Grothmann, T. & Patt, A. Adaptive capacity and human cognition: the process of individual adaptation to climate change. Glob. Environ. Change 15, 199–213 (2005). Presents a proposed socio-cognitive MPPACC.

  32. 32.

    Eisenack, K. et al. Explaining and overcoming barriers to climate change adaptation. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 867–872 (2014).

  33. 33.

    Moser, S. C. & Ekstrom, J. A. A framework to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 22026–22031 (2010). Identifies barriers and points of intervention at all levels of decision making to support planned adaptation.

  34. 34.

    van der Linden, S. The social-psychological determinants of climate change risk perceptions: towards a comprehensive model. J. Environ. Psychol. 41, 112–124 (2015).

  35. 35.

    van Valkengoed, A. M. & Steg, L. Meta-analyses of factors motivating climate change adaptation behaviour. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 158–163 (2019). A quantitative review of how 13 motivational factors influence behavioural adaptation.

  36. 36.

    Shome, D. et al. The Psychology of Climate Change Communication: A Guide for Scientists, Journalists, Educators, Political Aides, and the Interested Public (Center for Research on Environmental Decisions, 2009).

  37. 37.

    Swim, J. K. et al. Psychology’s contributions to understanding and addressing global climate change. Am. Psychol. 66, 241–250 (2011).

  38. 38.

    Tannenbaum, M. B. et al. Appealing to fear: a meta-analysis of fear appeal effectiveness and theories. Psychol. Bull. 141, 1178–1204 (2015).

  39. 39.

    Maloney, E. K., Lapinski, M. K. & Witte, K. Fear appeals and persuasion: a review and update of the extended parallel process model. Soc. Personal. Psychol. Compass 5, 206–219 (2011).

  40. 40.

    Lindell, M. K. & Perry, R. W. The protective action decision model: theoretical modifications and additional evidence. Risk Anal. 32, 616–632 (2012).

  41. 41.

    Slovic, P. Perception of risk. Science 236, 280–285 (1987).

  42. 42.

    Leviston, Z., Price, J. & Bishop, B. Imagining climate change: the role of implicit associations and affective psychological distancing in climate change responses. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 44, 441–454 (2014).

  43. 43.

    Eriksen, C. & Prior, T. The art of learning: wildfire, amenity migration and local environmental knowledge. Int. J. Wildl. Fire 20, 612–624 (2011).

  44. 44.

    Burningham, K., Fielding, J. & Thrush, D. ‘It’ll never happen to me’: understanding public awareness of local flood risk. Disasters 32, 216–238 (2008).

  45. 45.

    Dittrich, R., Wreford, A., Butler, A. & Moran, D. The impact of flood action groups on the uptake of flood management measures. Climatic Change 138, 471–489 (2016).

  46. 46.

    Swim, J. et al. Psychology and Global Climate Change: Addressing a Multi-faceted Phenomenon and Set of Challenges. Report of the American Psychological Association Task Force on the Interface Between Psychology and Global Climate Change (APA, 2009).

  47. 47.

    Blennow, K., Persson, J., Tomé, M. & Hanewinkel, M. Climate change: believing and seeing implies adapting. PLoS One 7, e50182 (2012).

  48. 48.

    Martin, I. M., Bender, H. & Raish, C. What motivates individuals to protect themselves from risks: the case of wildland fires. Risk Anal. 27, 887–900 (2007).

  49. 49.

    Demski, C., Capstick, S., Pidgeon, N., Sposato, R. G. & Spence, A. Experience of extreme weather affects climate change mitigation and adaptation responses. Climatic Change 140, 149–164 (2017).

  50. 50.

    Spence, A., Poortinga, W. & Pidgeon, N. The psychological distance of climate change. Risk Anal. 32, 957–972 (2012).

  51. 51.

    McDonald, R. I., Chai, H. Y. & Newell, B. R. Personal experience and the ‘psychological distance’ of climate change: an integrative review. J. Environ. Psychol. 44, 109–118 (2015).

  52. 52.

    Weber, E. U. What shapes perceptions of climate change? WIRes Clim. Change 1, 332–342 (2010).

  53. 53.

    Haden, V. R., Niles, M. T., Lubell, M., Perlman, J. & Jackson, L. E. Global and local concerns: what attitudes and beliefs motivate farmers to mitigate and adapt to climate change? PLoS One 7, e52882 (2012).

  54. 54.

    Whitmarsh, L. Are flood victims more concerned about climate change than other people? The role of direct experience in risk perception and behavioural response. J. Risk Res. 11, 351–374 (2008).

  55. 55.

    Grothmann, T. & Reusswig, F. People at risk of flooding: why some residents take precautionary action while others do not. Nat. Hazards 38, 101–120 (2006).

  56. 56.

    McCaffrey, S. Thinking of wildfire as a natural hazard. Soc. Nat. Resour. 17, 509–516 (2004).

  57. 57.

    Kalkstein, A. J. & Sheridan, S. C. The social impacts of the heat-health watch/warning system in Phoenix, Arizona: assessing the perceived risk and response of the public. Int. J. Biometeorol. 52, 43–55 (2007).

  58. 58.

    Taylor, A., de Bruin, W. B. & Dessai, S. Climate change beliefs and perceptions of weather-related changes in the United Kingdom. Risk Anal. 34, 1995–2004 (2014).

  59. 59.

    Trumbo, C., Meyer, M. A., Marlatt, H., Peek, L. & Morrissey, B. An assessment of change in risk perception and optimistic bias for hurricanes among Gulf Coast residents. Risk Anal. 34, 1013–1024 (2014).

  60. 60.

    Bubeck, P., Botzen, W. J. & Aerts, J. C. A review of risk perceptions and other factors that influence flood mitigation behavior. Risk Anal. 32, 1481–1495 (2012).

  61. 61.

    Wachinger, G., Renn, O., Begg, C. & Kuhlicke, C. The risk perception paradox—implications for governance and communication of natural hazards. Risk Anal. 33, 1049–1065 (2013).

  62. 62.

    Bichard, E. & Kazmierczak, A. Are homeowners willing to adapt to and mitigate the effects of climate change? Climatic Change 112, 633–654 (2012).

  63. 63.

    Nelson, K. C., Monroe, M. C., Johnson, J. F. & Bowers, A. Living with fire: homeowner assessment of landscape values and defensible space in Minnesota and Florida, USA. Int. J. Wildl. Fire 13, 413–425 (2004).

  64. 64.

    Martin, W. E., Martin, I. M. & Kent, B. The role of risk perceptions in the risk mitigation process: the case of wildfire in high risk communities. J. Environ. Manage. 91, 489–498 (2009).

  65. 65.

    Collins, T. What influences hazard mitigation? Household decision making about wildfire risks in Arizona’s white mountains. Prof. Geogr. 60, 508–526 (2008).

  66. 66.

    Hall, T. E. & Slothower, M. Cognitive factors affecting homeowners’ reactions to defensible space in the Oregon Coast Range. Soc. Nat. Resour. 22, 95–110 (2009).

  67. 67.

    Carlton, J. S. et al. The effects of extreme drought on climate change beliefs, risk perceptions, and adaptation attitudes. Climatic Change 135, 211–226 (2016).

  68. 68.

    Poussin, J. K., Botzen, W. J. W. & Aerts, J. C. J. H. Factors of influence on flood damage mitigation behaviour by households. Environ. Sci. Policy 40, 69–77 (2014).

  69. 69.

    Kievik, M. & Gutteling, J. M. Yes, we can: motivate Dutch citizens to engage in self-protective behavior with regard to flood risks. Nat. Hazards 59, 1475–1490 (2011).

  70. 70.

    Ashida, S., Robinson, E. L., Gay, J. & Ramirez, M. Motivating rural older residents to prepare for disasters: moving beyond personal benefits. Ageing Soc. 36, 2117–2140 (2016).

  71. 71.

    Bandura, A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol. Rev. 84, 191–215 (1977).

  72. 72.

    Wheeler, S., Zuo, A. & Bjornlund, H. Farmers’ climate change beliefs and adaptation strategies for a water scarce future in Australia. Glob. Environ. Change 23, 537–547 (2013).

  73. 73.

    Niles, M. T., Brown, M. & Dynes, R. Farmer’s intended and actual adoption of climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies. Climatic Change 135, 277–295 (2016).

  74. 74.

    Vulturius, G. et al. The relative importance of subjective and structural factors for individual adaptation to climate change by forest owners in Sweden. Reg. Environ. Change 18, 511–520 (2018).

  75. 75.

    Winter, G. & Fried, J. S. Homeowner perspectives on fire hazard, responsibility, and management strategies at the wildland–urban interface. Soc. Nat. Resour. 13, 33–49 (2000).

  76. 76.

    Terpstra, T. Emotions, trust, and perceived risk: affective and cognitive routes to flood preparedness behavior. Risk Anal. 31, 1658–1675 (2011).

  77. 77.

    Hine, D. W. et al. Preaching to different choirs: how to motivate dismissive, uncommitted, and alarmed audiences to adapt to climate change? Glob. Environ. Change 36, 1–11 (2016).

  78. 78.

    Zaalberg, R., Midden, C., Meijnders, A. & McCalley, T. Prevention, adaptation, and threat denial: flooding experiences in the Netherlands. Risk Anal. 29, 1759–1778 (2009).

  79. 79.

    Harries, T. The anticipated emotional consequences of adaptive behaviour: impacts on the take-up of household flood-protection measures. Environ. Plan. A 44, 649–668 (2012).

  80. 80.

    Soane, E. et al. Flood perception and mitigation: the role of severity, agency, and experience in the purchase of flood protection, and the communication of flood information. Environ. Plan. A 42, 3023–3038 (2010).

  81. 81.

    Lawrence, J., Quade, D. & Becker, J. Integrating the effects of flood experience on risk perception with responses to changing climate risk. Nat. Hazards 74, 1773–1794 (2014).

  82. 82.

    Cohn, P. J., Williams, D. R. & Carroll, M. S. in Wildfire Risk: Human Perceptions and Management Implications (eds Martin, W. E. et al.) 23–43 (Resources for the Future, 2007).

  83. 83.

    Terpstra, T. & Gutteling, J. M. Households’ perceived responsibilities in flood risk management in the Netherlands. Int. J. Water Resour. Dev. 24, 555–565 (2008).

  84. 84.

    Harvatt, J., Petts, J. & Chilvers, J. Understanding householder responses to natural hazards: flooding and sea-level rise comparisons. J. Risk Res. 14, 63–83 (2011).

  85. 85.

    McKee, M., Berrens, R. P., Jones, M., Helton, R. & Talberth, J. Using experimental economics to examine wildfire insurance and averting decisions in the wildland–urban interface. Soc. Nat. Resour. 17, 491–507 (2004).

  86. 86.

    Little, J. M., Prante, T., Jones, M. L., McKee, M. & Berrens, R. P. in The WSPC Reference on Natural Resources and Environmental Policy in the Era of Global Change (eds Little, J. M. et al.) 71–94 (World Scientific, 2016).

  87. 87.

    Scolobig, A., Prior, T., Schröter, D., Jörin, J. & Patt, A. Towards people-centred approaches for effective disaster risk management: balancing rhetoric with reality. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 12, 202–212 (2015).

  88. 88.

    Fischer, A. P. & Charnley, S. Risk and cooperation: managing hazardous fuel in mixed ownership landscapes. Environ. Manage. 49, 1192–1207 (2012).

  89. 89.

    Adger, W. N., Quinn, T., Lorenzoni, I., Murphy, C. & Sweeney, J. Changing social contracts in climate-change adaptation. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 330–333 (2013).

  90. 90.

    Eriksen, S. & Selboe, E. The social organisation of adaptation to climate variability and global change: the case of a mountain farming community in Norway. Appl. Geogr. 33, 159–167 (2012).

  91. 91.

    Adger, W. N., Huq, S., Brown, K., Conway, D. & Hulme, M. Adaptation to climate change in the developing world. Prog. Dev. Stud. 3, 179–195 (2003).

  92. 92.

    Ostrom, E. Constituting social capital and collective action. J. Theor. Polit. 6, 527–562 (1994).

  93. 93.

    Adler, P. S. & Kwon, S. W. Social capital: prospects for a new concept. Acad. Manag. Rev. 27, 17–40 (2002).

  94. 94.

    Pretty, J. & Ward, H. Social capital and the environment. World Dev. 29, 209–227 (2001).

  95. 95.

    Aldrich, D. P. & Meyer, M. A. Social capital and community resilience. Am. Behav. Sci. 59, 254–269 (2015).

  96. 96.

    Cutter, S. L., Boruff, B. J. & Shirley, W. Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Soc. Sci. Q. 84, 242–261 (2003).

  97. 97.

    Pelling, M. & High, C. Understanding adaptation: what can social capital offer assessments of adaptive capacity? Glob. Environ. Change 15, 308–319 (2005). Defines the advantages and disadvantages of incorporating social capital into adaptation research.

  98. 98.

    Ostrom, E. Coping with tragedies of the commons. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 2, 493–535 (1999).

  99. 99.

    Putnam, R. D. in Culture and Politics 223–234 (Palgrave Macmillan, 2000).

  100. 100.

    Adger, W. N. in Der Klimawandel 327–345 (VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2010).

  101. 101.

    Lereboullet, A.-L., Beltrando, G. & Bardsley, D. K. Socio-ecological adaptation to climate change: a comparative case study from the Mediterranean wine industry in France and Australia. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 164, 273–285 (2013).

  102. 102.

    Wolf, J., Adger, W. N., Lorenzoni, I., Abrahamson, V. & Raine, R. Social capital, individual responses to heat waves and climate change adaptation: an empirical study of two UK cities. Glob. Environ. Change 20, 44–52 (2010).

  103. 103.

    Smith, J. W., Anderson, D. H. & Moore, R. L. Social capital, place meanings, and perceived resilience to climate change. Rural Sociol. 77, 380–407 (2012).

  104. 104.

    Mase, A. S. & Prokopy, L. S. Unrealized potential: a review of perceptions and use of weather and climate information in agricultural decision making. Weather Clim. Soc. 6, 47–61 (2014).

  105. 105.

    Vásquez-León, M. Hispanic farmers and farmworkers: social networks, institutional exclusion, and climate vulnerability in southeastern Arizona. Am. Anthropol. 111, 289–301 (2009).

  106. 106.

    Marshall, N. A., Gordon, I. J. & Ash, A. J. The reluctance of resource-users to adopt seasonal climate forecasts to enhance resilience to climate variability on the rangelands. Climatic Change 107, 511–529 (2011).

  107. 107.

    Hu, Q. et al. Understanding farmer’s forecast use from their beliefs, values, social norms, and perceived obstacles. J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol. 45, 1190–1201 (2006).

  108. 108.

    Abramson, D. M. et al. The resilience activation framework: a conceptual model of how access to social resources promotes adaptation and rapid recovery in post-disaster settings. J. Behav. Heal. Serv. Res. 42, 42–57 (2014).

  109. 109.

    Prior, T. & Eriksen, C. Wildfire preparedness, community cohesion and social-ecological systems. Glob. Environ. Change 23, 1575–1586 (2013).

  110. 110.

    Frank, E., Eakin, H. & López-Carr, D. Social identity, perception and motivation in adaptation to climate risk in the coffee sector of Chiapas, Mexico. Glob. Environ. Change 21, 66–76 (2011).

  111. 111.

    Truelove, H. B., Carrico, A. R. & Thabrew, L. A socio-psychological model for analyzing climate change adaptation: a case study of Sri Lankan paddy farmers. Glob. Environ. Change 31, 85–97 (2015).

  112. 112.

    Prior, T. & Eriksen, C. in Wildfire and Community: Facilitating Preparedness and Resilience (eds Paton, D. & Tedim, F.) 190–206 (Thomas, 2012).

  113. 113.

    Feng, X., Liu, M., Huo, X. & Ma, W. What motivates farmers’ adaptation to climate change? The case of apple farmers of Shaanxi in China. Sustainability 9, 519 (2017).

  114. 114.

    Uphoff, E. P., Pickett, K. E., Cabieses, B., Small, N. & Wright, J. A systematic review of the relationships between social capital and socioeconomic inequalities in health: a contribution to understanding the psychosocial pathway of health inequalities. Int. J. Equity Health 12, 54 (2013).

  115. 115.

    Fehr, E. & Fischbacher, U. Social norms and human cooperation. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 185–190 (2004).

  116. 116.

    Ostrom, E. Collective action and the evolution of social norms. J. Econ. Perspect. 14, 137–158

  117. 117.

    Nolan, J. M., Schultz, P. W., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J. & Griskevicius, V. Normative social influence is underdetected. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 34, 913–923 (2008).

  118. 118.

    Farrow, K., Grolleau, G. & Ibanez, L. Social norms and pro-environmental behavior: a review of the evidence. Ecol. Econ. 140, 1–13 (2017).

  119. 119.

    Norgaard, K. M. Living in Denial: Climate Change, Emotions, and Everyday Life (MIT Press, 2011).

  120. 120.

    Lo, A. Y. The role of social norms in climate adaptation: mediating risk perception and flood insurance purchase. Glob. Environ. Change 23, 1249–1257 (2013).

  121. 121.

    Tarnoczi, T. J. & Berkes, F. Sources of information for farmers’ adaptation practices in Canada’s Prairie agro-ecosystem. Climatic Change 98, 299–305 (2009).

  122. 122.

    Uren, H. V., Dzidic, P. L. & Bishop, B. J. Exploring social and cultural norms to promote ecologically sensitive residential garden design. Landsc. Urban Plan. 137, 76–84 (2015).

  123. 123.

    Grove, J. M., Locke, D. H. & O’Neil-Dunne, J. P. M. An ecology of prestige in New York City: examining the relationships among population density, socio-economic status, group identity, and residential canopy cover. Environ. Manage. 54, 402–419 (2014).

  124. 124.

    Schill, C. et al. A more dynamic understanding of human behaviour for the Anthropocene. Nat. Sustain. 2, 1075–1082 (2019). Expands on dominant behavioural perspectives to propose a dynamic understanding of behaviour as co-evolving with context.

  125. 125.

    Tzoulas, K. et al. Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using green infrastructure: a literature review. Landsc. Urban Plan. 81, 167–178 (2007).

  126. 126.

    Abraham, A., Sommerhalder, K. & Abel, T. Landscape and well-being: a scoping study on the health-promoting impact of outdoor environments. Int. J. Public Health 55, 59–69 (2010).

  127. 127.

    Koerth, J., Vafeidis, A. T., Carretero, S., Sterr, H. & Hinkel, J. A typology of household-level adaptation to coastal flooding and its spatio-temporal patterns. Springerplus 3, 466 (2014).

  128. 128.

    Hegger, D. L. T., Mees, H. L. P., Driessen, P. P. J. & Runhaar, H. A. C. The roles of residents in climate adaptation: a systematic review in the case of the Netherlands. Environ. Policy Gov. 27, 336–350 (2017).

  129. 129.

    North, M., Collins, B. M. & Stephens, S. Using fire to increase the scale, benefits, and future maintenance of fuels treatments. J. For. 110, 392–401 (2012).

  130. 130.

    Charnley, S. et al. A burning problem: social dynamics of disaster risk reduction through wildfire mitigation. Hum. Organ. 74, 329–340 (2015).

  131. 131.

    Waring, T. M. et al. A multilevel evolutionary framework for sustainability analysis. Ecol. Soc. 20, 1–34 (2015).

  132. 132.

    Beddoe, R. et al. Overcoming systemic roadblocks to sustainability: the evolutionary redesign of worldviews, institutions, and technologies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 2483–2489 (2009).

  133. 133.

    Brooks, J., Reyes-García, V. & Burnside, W. Re-examining Balinese subaks through the lens of cultural multilevel selection. Sustain. Sci. 13, 35–47 (2018).

  134. 134.

    Wolf, J., Adger, W. N. & Lorenzoni, I. Heat waves and cold spells: an analysis of policy response and perceptions of vulnerable populations in the UK. Environ. Plan. A 42, 2721–2734 (2010).

  135. 135.

    Henrich, J. Cultural group selection, coevolutionary processes and large-scale cooperation. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 53, 3–35 (2004).

  136. 136.

    Keuschnigg, M. & Kratz, F. Thou shalt recycle: how social norms of environmental protection narrow the scope of the low-cost hypothesis. Environ. Behav. 1–33 (2017).

  137. 137.

    Hillis, V., Bell, A., Brandt, J. & Brooks, J. S. Applying a cultural multilevel selection framework to the adoption of sustainable management practices in California viticulture. Sustain. Sci. 13, 71–80 (2018).

  138. 138.

    Adger, W. N., Quinn, T., Lorenzoni, I. & Murphy, C. Sharing the pain: perceptions of fairness affect private and public response to hazards. Ann. Am. Assoc. Geogr. 106, 1079–1096 (2016).

  139. 139.

    Adamson, G. C. D., Hannaford, M. J. & Rohland, E. J. Re-thinking the present: the role of a historical focus in climate change adaptation research. Glob. Environ. Change 48, 195–205 (2018).

  140. 140.

    Levin, S. et al. Social-ecological systems as complex adaptive systems: modeling and policy implications. Environ. Dev. Econ. 18, 111–132 (2013).

  141. 141.

    Folke, C., Biggs, R., Norström, A. V., Reyers, B. & Rockström, J. Social-ecological resilience and biosphere-based sustainability science. Ecol. Soc. 21, art41 (2016).

  142. 142.

    O’Brien, K. Is the 1.5 °C target possible? Exploring the three spheres of transformation. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 31, 153–160 (2018).

  143. 143.

    Henrich, J., Heine, S. J. & Norenzayan, A. Most people are not WEIRD. Nature 466, 29–29 (2010).

  144. 144.

    Pyhälä, A. et al. Global environmental change: local perceptions, understandings, and explanations. Ecol. Soc. 21, art25 (2016).

  145. 145.

    Veland, S. et al. Narrative matters for sustainability: the transformative role of storytelling in realizing 1.5 °C futures. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 31, 41–47 (2018).

  146. 146.

    Elrick-Barr, C. E., Smith, T. F., Preston, B. L., Thomsen, D. C. & Baum, S. How are coastal households responding to climate change? Environ. Sci. Policy 63, 177–186 (2016).

  147. 147.

    Kreibich, H. Do perceptions of climate change influence precautionary measures? Int. J. Clim. Change Strateg. Manag. 3, 189–199 (2011).

  148. 148.

    Tompkins, E. L. & Eakin, H. Managing private and public adaptation to climate change. Glob. Environ. Change 22, 3–11 (2012).

  149. 149.

    Eriksen, S. et al. When not every response to climate change is a good one: identifying principles for sustainable adaptation. Clim. Dev. 3, 7–20 (2011).

  150. 150.

    Bisaro, A. & Hinkel, J. Governance of social dilemmas in climate change adaptation. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 354–359 (2016).

  151. 151.

    Agrawala, S. Contributing to the common good. Nat. Clim. Change 1, 447 (2011).

  152. 152.

    Atteridge, A. & Remling, E. Is adaptation reducing vulnerability or redistributing it? WIRes Clim. Change 9, e500 (2018).

  153. 153.

    Toole, S., Klocker, N. & Head, L. Re-thinking climate change adaptation and capacities at the household scale. Climatic Change 135, 203–209 (2016).

  154. 154.

    Pielke, R., Prins, G., Rayner, S. & Sarewitz, D. Lifting the taboo on adaptation. Nature 445, 597–598 (2007).

  155. 155.

    Brenkert-Smith, H., Meldrum, J. R. & Champ, P. A. Climate change beliefs and hazard mitigation behaviors: homeowners and wildfire risk. Environ. Hazards 14, 341–360 (2015).

  156. 156.

    Kahn, M. E. The climate change adaptation literature. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 10, 166–178 (2016).

  157. 157.

    Wamsler, C. & Brink, E. Interfacing citizens’ and institutions’ practice and responsibilities for climate change adaptation. Urban Clim. 7, 64–91 (2014).

  158. 158.

    King, D. et al. Voluntary relocation as an adaptation strategy to extreme weather events. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 8, 83–90 (2014).

  159. 159.

    Marshall, N. A., Park, S. E., Adger, W. N., Brown, K. & Howden, S. M. Transformational capacity and the influence of place and identity. Environ. Res. Lett. 7, 034022 (2012).

  160. 160.

    Pelling, M., O’Brien, K. & Matyas, D. Adaptation and transformation. Climatic Change 133, 113–127 (2015).

  161. 161.

    McFarlane, B. L., McGee, T. K. & Faulkner, H. Complexity of homeowner wildfire risk mitigation: an integration of hazard theories. Int. J. Wildl. Fire 20, 921–931 (2011).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank P. Stern and E. Weber for their insights during an early review of the paper prior to submission.

Author information

R.S.W. and A.H. developed the original outline for the paper. R.S.W., A.H., M.H. and J.S.B. contributed equally to the final literature review and writing of the manuscript.

Correspondence to Robyn S. Wilson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Climate Change thanks Morgan Scoville-Simonds and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wilson, R.S., Herziger, A., Hamilton, M. et al. From incremental to transformative adaptation in individual responses to climate-exacerbated hazards. Nat. Clim. Chang. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0691-6

Download citation