Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

From incremental to transformative adaptation in individual responses to climate-exacerbated hazards

Abstract

Building societal resilience to climate change depends on increased adaptation. In this Review of scholarship on behavioural adaptation, we find that most empirical studies focus on the affective and cognitive drivers of behaviours with largely private benefits. Few examine behaviours with collective benefits or explore the moderating role of social factors on affective and cognitive cues. We point to cultural evolution and complex adaptive systems as frameworks that can improve our understanding of behaviours that lead to greater societal resilience in the long term. Integrating such research traditions with the socio-psychological perspectives that dominate the literature will ensure that future studies better distinguish the drivers of incremental coping from transformative adaptation.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Number of interpersonal and intrapersonal factors researched in reviewed empirical paper.
Fig. 2: Proportion of reviewed papers investigating the collective versus private benefits of adaptation.
Fig. 3: Typology of adaptation behaviours.

References

  1. 1.

    IPCC: Summary for Policymakers. In Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report (eds Core Writing Team, Pachauri, R. K. & Meyer, L. A.) (IPCC, 2014).

  2. 2.

    2009 UNISDR Terminology on Disaster Risk Reduction, 1–30 (UNISDR, 2009).

  3. 3.

    Folke, C. Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Glob. Environ. Change 16, 253–267 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Wisner, B., Blaikie, P., Cannon, T. & Davis, I. At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability and Disasters. (Routledge, 2014).

  5. 5.

    Adger, W. N., Barnett, J., Brown, K., Marshall, N. & O’Brien, K. Cultural dimensions of climate change impacts and adaptation. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 112–117 (2013). Identifies the roles of culture, identity, cohesion and place in mediating environmental and societal change.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Pelling, M. Adaptation to Climate Change: From Resilience to Transformation (Routledge, 2010).

  7. 7.

    O’Brien, K. Global environmental change II: from adaptation to deliberate transformation. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 36, 667–676 (2012). Argues for a science of deliberative transformation and provides a critical review of multiple perspectives on transformative adaptation.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Nelson, D. R., Adger, W. N. & Brown, K. Adaptation to environmental change: contributions of a resilience framework. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 32, 395–419 (2007). Defines transformative action through a focus on system characteristics, social capital and institutional learning.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Kates, R. W., Travis, W. R. & Wilbanks, T. J. Transformational adaptation when incremental adaptations to climate change are insufficient. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 7156–7161 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Kleindorfer, P. R. in Better Environmental Decisions: Strategies for Governments, Businesses, and Communities (eds Sexton, K. et al.) 37–56 (Island, 1999).

  11. 11.

    Park, S. E. et al. Informing adaptation responses to climate change through theories of transformation. Glob. Environ. Change 22, 115–126 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Fischer, A. P. Adapting and coping with climate change in temperate forests. Glob. Environ. Change 54, 160–171 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Wise, R. M. et al. Reconceptualising adaptation to climate change as part of pathways of change and response. Glob. Environ. Change 28, 325–336 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Gifford, R. The dragons of inaction: psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. Am. Psychol. 66, 290–302 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Wamsler, C. & Brink, E. The role of individual adaptive practices for sustainable adaptation. Int. J. Disaster Resil. Built Environ. 6, 6–29 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Smit, B. & Skinner, M. W. Adaptation options in agriculture to climate change: a typology. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Change 7, 85–114 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Cutter, S. L. et al. A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Glob. Environ. Change 18, 598–606 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Biagini, B., Bierbaum, R., Stults, M., Dobardzic, S. & McNeeley, S. M. A typology of adaptation actions: a global look at climate adaptation actions financed through the global environment facility. Glob. Environ. Change 25, 97–108 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Hamilton, M., Fischer, A. P., Guikema, S. D. & Keppel‐Aleks, G. Behavioral adaptation to climate change in wildfire‐prone forests. WIRes Clim. Change 9, e553 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Wamsler, C. & Brink, E. Moving beyond short-term coping and adaptation. Environ. Urban. 26, 86–111 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Wolf, J. in Climate Change Adaptation in Developed Nations (eds Ford, J. & Berrang-Ford, L.) 21–32 (Springer, 2011).

  22. 22.

    Reser, J. P. & Swim, J. K. Adapting to and coping with the threat and impacts of climate change. Am. Psychol. 66, 277–289 (2011). Provides an integrative socio-psychological framework for understanding stress and coping responses to climate change.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Tompkins, E. L. et al. Observed adaptation to climate change: UK evidence of transition to a well-adapting society. Glob. Environ. Change 20, 627–635 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Smith, B., Burton, I., Klein, R. J. T. & Wandel, J. An anatomy of adaptation to climate change and variability. Clim. Change 45, 223–251 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Millock, K. & Nauges, C. Household adoption of water-efficient equipment: the role of socio-economic factors, environmental attitudes and policy. Environ. Resour. Econ. 46, 539–565 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Clayton, S. et al. Psychological research and global climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 640–646 (2015). A review of the role of psychology in addressing climate change.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    The Impacts of Climate Change on Human Health in the United States: A Scientific Assessment. (USGCRP, 2016).

  28. 28.

    Berry, H. L., Bowen, K. & Kjellstrom, T. Climate change and mental health: a causal pathways framework. Int. J. Public Health 55, 123–132 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Fankhauser, S. Adaptation to climate change. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 9, 209–230 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Zilberman, D., Zhao, J. & Heiman, A. Adoption versus adaptation, with emphasis on climate change. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 4, 27–53 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Grothmann, T. & Patt, A. Adaptive capacity and human cognition: the process of individual adaptation to climate change. Glob. Environ. Change 15, 199–213 (2005). Presents a proposed socio-cognitive MPPACC.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Eisenack, K. et al. Explaining and overcoming barriers to climate change adaptation. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 867–872 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Moser, S. C. & Ekstrom, J. A. A framework to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 22026–22031 (2010). Identifies barriers and points of intervention at all levels of decision making to support planned adaptation.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    van der Linden, S. The social-psychological determinants of climate change risk perceptions: towards a comprehensive model. J. Environ. Psychol. 41, 112–124 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    van Valkengoed, A. M. & Steg, L. Meta-analyses of factors motivating climate change adaptation behaviour. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 158–163 (2019). A quantitative review of how 13 motivational factors influence behavioural adaptation.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Shome, D. et al. The Psychology of Climate Change Communication: A Guide for Scientists, Journalists, Educators, Political Aides, and the Interested Public (Center for Research on Environmental Decisions, 2009).

  37. 37.

    Swim, J. K. et al. Psychology’s contributions to understanding and addressing global climate change. Am. Psychol. 66, 241–250 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Tannenbaum, M. B. et al. Appealing to fear: a meta-analysis of fear appeal effectiveness and theories. Psychol. Bull. 141, 1178–1204 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Maloney, E. K., Lapinski, M. K. & Witte, K. Fear appeals and persuasion: a review and update of the extended parallel process model. Soc. Personal. Psychol. Compass 5, 206–219 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Lindell, M. K. & Perry, R. W. The protective action decision model: theoretical modifications and additional evidence. Risk Anal. 32, 616–632 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Slovic, P. Perception of risk. Science 236, 280–285 (1987).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Leviston, Z., Price, J. & Bishop, B. Imagining climate change: the role of implicit associations and affective psychological distancing in climate change responses. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 44, 441–454 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Eriksen, C. & Prior, T. The art of learning: wildfire, amenity migration and local environmental knowledge. Int. J. Wildl. Fire 20, 612–624 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Burningham, K., Fielding, J. & Thrush, D. ‘It’ll never happen to me’: understanding public awareness of local flood risk. Disasters 32, 216–238 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Dittrich, R., Wreford, A., Butler, A. & Moran, D. The impact of flood action groups on the uptake of flood management measures. Climatic Change 138, 471–489 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Swim, J. et al. Psychology and Global Climate Change: Addressing a Multi-faceted Phenomenon and Set of Challenges. Report of the American Psychological Association Task Force on the Interface Between Psychology and Global Climate Change (APA, 2009).

  47. 47.

    Blennow, K., Persson, J., Tomé, M. & Hanewinkel, M. Climate change: believing and seeing implies adapting. PLoS One 7, e50182 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Martin, I. M., Bender, H. & Raish, C. What motivates individuals to protect themselves from risks: the case of wildland fires. Risk Anal. 27, 887–900 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Demski, C., Capstick, S., Pidgeon, N., Sposato, R. G. & Spence, A. Experience of extreme weather affects climate change mitigation and adaptation responses. Climatic Change 140, 149–164 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Spence, A., Poortinga, W. & Pidgeon, N. The psychological distance of climate change. Risk Anal. 32, 957–972 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    McDonald, R. I., Chai, H. Y. & Newell, B. R. Personal experience and the ‘psychological distance’ of climate change: an integrative review. J. Environ. Psychol. 44, 109–118 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Weber, E. U. What shapes perceptions of climate change? WIRes Clim. Change 1, 332–342 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Haden, V. R., Niles, M. T., Lubell, M., Perlman, J. & Jackson, L. E. Global and local concerns: what attitudes and beliefs motivate farmers to mitigate and adapt to climate change? PLoS One 7, e52882 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Whitmarsh, L. Are flood victims more concerned about climate change than other people? The role of direct experience in risk perception and behavioural response. J. Risk Res. 11, 351–374 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Grothmann, T. & Reusswig, F. People at risk of flooding: why some residents take precautionary action while others do not. Nat. Hazards 38, 101–120 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    McCaffrey, S. Thinking of wildfire as a natural hazard. Soc. Nat. Resour. 17, 509–516 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Kalkstein, A. J. & Sheridan, S. C. The social impacts of the heat-health watch/warning system in Phoenix, Arizona: assessing the perceived risk and response of the public. Int. J. Biometeorol. 52, 43–55 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Taylor, A., de Bruin, W. B. & Dessai, S. Climate change beliefs and perceptions of weather-related changes in the United Kingdom. Risk Anal. 34, 1995–2004 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Trumbo, C., Meyer, M. A., Marlatt, H., Peek, L. & Morrissey, B. An assessment of change in risk perception and optimistic bias for hurricanes among Gulf Coast residents. Risk Anal. 34, 1013–1024 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Bubeck, P., Botzen, W. J. & Aerts, J. C. A review of risk perceptions and other factors that influence flood mitigation behavior. Risk Anal. 32, 1481–1495 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Wachinger, G., Renn, O., Begg, C. & Kuhlicke, C. The risk perception paradox—implications for governance and communication of natural hazards. Risk Anal. 33, 1049–1065 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Bichard, E. & Kazmierczak, A. Are homeowners willing to adapt to and mitigate the effects of climate change? Climatic Change 112, 633–654 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Nelson, K. C., Monroe, M. C., Johnson, J. F. & Bowers, A. Living with fire: homeowner assessment of landscape values and defensible space in Minnesota and Florida, USA. Int. J. Wildl. Fire 13, 413–425 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Martin, W. E., Martin, I. M. & Kent, B. The role of risk perceptions in the risk mitigation process: the case of wildfire in high risk communities. J. Environ. Manage. 91, 489–498 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Collins, T. What influences hazard mitigation? Household decision making about wildfire risks in Arizona’s white mountains. Prof. Geogr. 60, 508–526 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Hall, T. E. & Slothower, M. Cognitive factors affecting homeowners’ reactions to defensible space in the Oregon Coast Range. Soc. Nat. Resour. 22, 95–110 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Carlton, J. S. et al. The effects of extreme drought on climate change beliefs, risk perceptions, and adaptation attitudes. Climatic Change 135, 211–226 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Poussin, J. K., Botzen, W. J. W. & Aerts, J. C. J. H. Factors of influence on flood damage mitigation behaviour by households. Environ. Sci. Policy 40, 69–77 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Kievik, M. & Gutteling, J. M. Yes, we can: motivate Dutch citizens to engage in self-protective behavior with regard to flood risks. Nat. Hazards 59, 1475–1490 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Ashida, S., Robinson, E. L., Gay, J. & Ramirez, M. Motivating rural older residents to prepare for disasters: moving beyond personal benefits. Ageing Soc. 36, 2117–2140 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Bandura, A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol. Rev. 84, 191–215 (1977).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Wheeler, S., Zuo, A. & Bjornlund, H. Farmers’ climate change beliefs and adaptation strategies for a water scarce future in Australia. Glob. Environ. Change 23, 537–547 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Niles, M. T., Brown, M. & Dynes, R. Farmer’s intended and actual adoption of climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies. Climatic Change 135, 277–295 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Vulturius, G. et al. The relative importance of subjective and structural factors for individual adaptation to climate change by forest owners in Sweden. Reg. Environ. Change 18, 511–520 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Winter, G. & Fried, J. S. Homeowner perspectives on fire hazard, responsibility, and management strategies at the wildland–urban interface. Soc. Nat. Resour. 13, 33–49 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Terpstra, T. Emotions, trust, and perceived risk: affective and cognitive routes to flood preparedness behavior. Risk Anal. 31, 1658–1675 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Hine, D. W. et al. Preaching to different choirs: how to motivate dismissive, uncommitted, and alarmed audiences to adapt to climate change? Glob. Environ. Change 36, 1–11 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Zaalberg, R., Midden, C., Meijnders, A. & McCalley, T. Prevention, adaptation, and threat denial: flooding experiences in the Netherlands. Risk Anal. 29, 1759–1778 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Harries, T. The anticipated emotional consequences of adaptive behaviour: impacts on the take-up of household flood-protection measures. Environ. Plan. A 44, 649–668 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Soane, E. et al. Flood perception and mitigation: the role of severity, agency, and experience in the purchase of flood protection, and the communication of flood information. Environ. Plan. A 42, 3023–3038 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Lawrence, J., Quade, D. & Becker, J. Integrating the effects of flood experience on risk perception with responses to changing climate risk. Nat. Hazards 74, 1773–1794 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Cohn, P. J., Williams, D. R. & Carroll, M. S. in Wildfire Risk: Human Perceptions and Management Implications (eds Martin, W. E. et al.) 23–43 (Resources for the Future, 2007).

  83. 83.

    Terpstra, T. & Gutteling, J. M. Households’ perceived responsibilities in flood risk management in the Netherlands. Int. J. Water Resour. Dev. 24, 555–565 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Harvatt, J., Petts, J. & Chilvers, J. Understanding householder responses to natural hazards: flooding and sea-level rise comparisons. J. Risk Res. 14, 63–83 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    McKee, M., Berrens, R. P., Jones, M., Helton, R. & Talberth, J. Using experimental economics to examine wildfire insurance and averting decisions in the wildland–urban interface. Soc. Nat. Resour. 17, 491–507 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Little, J. M., Prante, T., Jones, M. L., McKee, M. & Berrens, R. P. in The WSPC Reference on Natural Resources and Environmental Policy in the Era of Global Change (eds Little, J. M. et al.) 71–94 (World Scientific, 2016).

  87. 87.

    Scolobig, A., Prior, T., Schröter, D., Jörin, J. & Patt, A. Towards people-centred approaches for effective disaster risk management: balancing rhetoric with reality. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 12, 202–212 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Fischer, A. P. & Charnley, S. Risk and cooperation: managing hazardous fuel in mixed ownership landscapes. Environ. Manage. 49, 1192–1207 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Adger, W. N., Quinn, T., Lorenzoni, I., Murphy, C. & Sweeney, J. Changing social contracts in climate-change adaptation. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 330–333 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Eriksen, S. & Selboe, E. The social organisation of adaptation to climate variability and global change: the case of a mountain farming community in Norway. Appl. Geogr. 33, 159–167 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Adger, W. N., Huq, S., Brown, K., Conway, D. & Hulme, M. Adaptation to climate change in the developing world. Prog. Dev. Stud. 3, 179–195 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Ostrom, E. Constituting social capital and collective action. J. Theor. Polit. 6, 527–562 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Adler, P. S. & Kwon, S. W. Social capital: prospects for a new concept. Acad. Manag. Rev. 27, 17–40 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Pretty, J. & Ward, H. Social capital and the environment. World Dev. 29, 209–227 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Aldrich, D. P. & Meyer, M. A. Social capital and community resilience. Am. Behav. Sci. 59, 254–269 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Cutter, S. L., Boruff, B. J. & Shirley, W. Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Soc. Sci. Q. 84, 242–261 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Pelling, M. & High, C. Understanding adaptation: what can social capital offer assessments of adaptive capacity? Glob. Environ. Change 15, 308–319 (2005). Defines the advantages and disadvantages of incorporating social capital into adaptation research.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Ostrom, E. Coping with tragedies of the commons. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 2, 493–535 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Putnam, R. D. in Culture and Politics 223–234 (Palgrave Macmillan, 2000).

  100. 100.

    Adger, W. N. in Der Klimawandel 327–345 (VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2010).

  101. 101.

    Lereboullet, A.-L., Beltrando, G. & Bardsley, D. K. Socio-ecological adaptation to climate change: a comparative case study from the Mediterranean wine industry in France and Australia. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 164, 273–285 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Wolf, J., Adger, W. N., Lorenzoni, I., Abrahamson, V. & Raine, R. Social capital, individual responses to heat waves and climate change adaptation: an empirical study of two UK cities. Glob. Environ. Change 20, 44–52 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Smith, J. W., Anderson, D. H. & Moore, R. L. Social capital, place meanings, and perceived resilience to climate change. Rural Sociol. 77, 380–407 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Mase, A. S. & Prokopy, L. S. Unrealized potential: a review of perceptions and use of weather and climate information in agricultural decision making. Weather Clim. Soc. 6, 47–61 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Vásquez-León, M. Hispanic farmers and farmworkers: social networks, institutional exclusion, and climate vulnerability in southeastern Arizona. Am. Anthropol. 111, 289–301 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Marshall, N. A., Gordon, I. J. & Ash, A. J. The reluctance of resource-users to adopt seasonal climate forecasts to enhance resilience to climate variability on the rangelands. Climatic Change 107, 511–529 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Hu, Q. et al. Understanding farmer’s forecast use from their beliefs, values, social norms, and perceived obstacles. J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol. 45, 1190–1201 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Abramson, D. M. et al. The resilience activation framework: a conceptual model of how access to social resources promotes adaptation and rapid recovery in post-disaster settings. J. Behav. Heal. Serv. Res. 42, 42–57 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Prior, T. & Eriksen, C. Wildfire preparedness, community cohesion and social-ecological systems. Glob. Environ. Change 23, 1575–1586 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Frank, E., Eakin, H. & López-Carr, D. Social identity, perception and motivation in adaptation to climate risk in the coffee sector of Chiapas, Mexico. Glob. Environ. Change 21, 66–76 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Truelove, H. B., Carrico, A. R. & Thabrew, L. A socio-psychological model for analyzing climate change adaptation: a case study of Sri Lankan paddy farmers. Glob. Environ. Change 31, 85–97 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Prior, T. & Eriksen, C. in Wildfire and Community: Facilitating Preparedness and Resilience (eds Paton, D. & Tedim, F.) 190–206 (Thomas, 2012).

  113. 113.

    Feng, X., Liu, M., Huo, X. & Ma, W. What motivates farmers’ adaptation to climate change? The case of apple farmers of Shaanxi in China. Sustainability 9, 519 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. 114.

    Uphoff, E. P., Pickett, K. E., Cabieses, B., Small, N. & Wright, J. A systematic review of the relationships between social capital and socioeconomic inequalities in health: a contribution to understanding the psychosocial pathway of health inequalities. Int. J. Equity Health 12, 54 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    Fehr, E. & Fischbacher, U. Social norms and human cooperation. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 185–190 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. 116.

    Ostrom, E. Collective action and the evolution of social norms. J. Econ. Perspect. 14, 137–158

  117. 117.

    Nolan, J. M., Schultz, P. W., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J. & Griskevicius, V. Normative social influence is underdetected. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 34, 913–923 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. 118.

    Farrow, K., Grolleau, G. & Ibanez, L. Social norms and pro-environmental behavior: a review of the evidence. Ecol. Econ. 140, 1–13 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  119. 119.

    Norgaard, K. M. Living in Denial: Climate Change, Emotions, and Everyday Life (MIT Press, 2011).

  120. 120.

    Lo, A. Y. The role of social norms in climate adaptation: mediating risk perception and flood insurance purchase. Glob. Environ. Change 23, 1249–1257 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. 121.

    Tarnoczi, T. J. & Berkes, F. Sources of information for farmers’ adaptation practices in Canada’s Prairie agro-ecosystem. Climatic Change 98, 299–305 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  122. 122.

    Uren, H. V., Dzidic, P. L. & Bishop, B. J. Exploring social and cultural norms to promote ecologically sensitive residential garden design. Landsc. Urban Plan. 137, 76–84 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  123. 123.

    Grove, J. M., Locke, D. H. & O’Neil-Dunne, J. P. M. An ecology of prestige in New York City: examining the relationships among population density, socio-economic status, group identity, and residential canopy cover. Environ. Manage. 54, 402–419 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  124. 124.

    Schill, C. et al. A more dynamic understanding of human behaviour for the Anthropocene. Nat. Sustain. 2, 1075–1082 (2019). Expands on dominant behavioural perspectives to propose a dynamic understanding of behaviour as co-evolving with context.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  125. 125.

    Tzoulas, K. et al. Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using green infrastructure: a literature review. Landsc. Urban Plan. 81, 167–178 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  126. 126.

    Abraham, A., Sommerhalder, K. & Abel, T. Landscape and well-being: a scoping study on the health-promoting impact of outdoor environments. Int. J. Public Health 55, 59–69 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  127. 127.

    Koerth, J., Vafeidis, A. T., Carretero, S., Sterr, H. & Hinkel, J. A typology of household-level adaptation to coastal flooding and its spatio-temporal patterns. Springerplus 3, 466 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  128. 128.

    Hegger, D. L. T., Mees, H. L. P., Driessen, P. P. J. & Runhaar, H. A. C. The roles of residents in climate adaptation: a systematic review in the case of the Netherlands. Environ. Policy Gov. 27, 336–350 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  129. 129.

    North, M., Collins, B. M. & Stephens, S. Using fire to increase the scale, benefits, and future maintenance of fuels treatments. J. For. 110, 392–401 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  130. 130.

    Charnley, S. et al. A burning problem: social dynamics of disaster risk reduction through wildfire mitigation. Hum. Organ. 74, 329–340 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  131. 131.

    Waring, T. M. et al. A multilevel evolutionary framework for sustainability analysis. Ecol. Soc. 20, 1–34 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  132. 132.

    Beddoe, R. et al. Overcoming systemic roadblocks to sustainability: the evolutionary redesign of worldviews, institutions, and technologies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 2483–2489 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  133. 133.

    Brooks, J., Reyes-García, V. & Burnside, W. Re-examining Balinese subaks through the lens of cultural multilevel selection. Sustain. Sci. 13, 35–47 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  134. 134.

    Wolf, J., Adger, W. N. & Lorenzoni, I. Heat waves and cold spells: an analysis of policy response and perceptions of vulnerable populations in the UK. Environ. Plan. A 42, 2721–2734 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  135. 135.

    Henrich, J. Cultural group selection, coevolutionary processes and large-scale cooperation. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 53, 3–35 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  136. 136.

    Keuschnigg, M. & Kratz, F. Thou shalt recycle: how social norms of environmental protection narrow the scope of the low-cost hypothesis. Environ. Behav. 1–33 (2017).

  137. 137.

    Hillis, V., Bell, A., Brandt, J. & Brooks, J. S. Applying a cultural multilevel selection framework to the adoption of sustainable management practices in California viticulture. Sustain. Sci. 13, 71–80 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  138. 138.

    Adger, W. N., Quinn, T., Lorenzoni, I. & Murphy, C. Sharing the pain: perceptions of fairness affect private and public response to hazards. Ann. Am. Assoc. Geogr. 106, 1079–1096 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  139. 139.

    Adamson, G. C. D., Hannaford, M. J. & Rohland, E. J. Re-thinking the present: the role of a historical focus in climate change adaptation research. Glob. Environ. Change 48, 195–205 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  140. 140.

    Levin, S. et al. Social-ecological systems as complex adaptive systems: modeling and policy implications. Environ. Dev. Econ. 18, 111–132 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  141. 141.

    Folke, C., Biggs, R., Norström, A. V., Reyers, B. & Rockström, J. Social-ecological resilience and biosphere-based sustainability science. Ecol. Soc. 21, art41 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  142. 142.

    O’Brien, K. Is the 1.5 °C target possible? Exploring the three spheres of transformation. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 31, 153–160 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  143. 143.

    Henrich, J., Heine, S. J. & Norenzayan, A. Most people are not WEIRD. Nature 466, 29–29 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  144. 144.

    Pyhälä, A. et al. Global environmental change: local perceptions, understandings, and explanations. Ecol. Soc. 21, art25 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  145. 145.

    Veland, S. et al. Narrative matters for sustainability: the transformative role of storytelling in realizing 1.5 °C futures. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 31, 41–47 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  146. 146.

    Elrick-Barr, C. E., Smith, T. F., Preston, B. L., Thomsen, D. C. & Baum, S. How are coastal households responding to climate change? Environ. Sci. Policy 63, 177–186 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  147. 147.

    Kreibich, H. Do perceptions of climate change influence precautionary measures? Int. J. Clim. Change Strateg. Manag. 3, 189–199 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  148. 148.

    Tompkins, E. L. & Eakin, H. Managing private and public adaptation to climate change. Glob. Environ. Change 22, 3–11 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  149. 149.

    Eriksen, S. et al. When not every response to climate change is a good one: identifying principles for sustainable adaptation. Clim. Dev. 3, 7–20 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  150. 150.

    Bisaro, A. & Hinkel, J. Governance of social dilemmas in climate change adaptation. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 354–359 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  151. 151.

    Agrawala, S. Contributing to the common good. Nat. Clim. Change 1, 447 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  152. 152.

    Atteridge, A. & Remling, E. Is adaptation reducing vulnerability or redistributing it? WIRes Clim. Change 9, e500 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  153. 153.

    Toole, S., Klocker, N. & Head, L. Re-thinking climate change adaptation and capacities at the household scale. Climatic Change 135, 203–209 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  154. 154.

    Pielke, R., Prins, G., Rayner, S. & Sarewitz, D. Lifting the taboo on adaptation. Nature 445, 597–598 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  155. 155.

    Brenkert-Smith, H., Meldrum, J. R. & Champ, P. A. Climate change beliefs and hazard mitigation behaviors: homeowners and wildfire risk. Environ. Hazards 14, 341–360 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  156. 156.

    Kahn, M. E. The climate change adaptation literature. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 10, 166–178 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  157. 157.

    Wamsler, C. & Brink, E. Interfacing citizens’ and institutions’ practice and responsibilities for climate change adaptation. Urban Clim. 7, 64–91 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  158. 158.

    King, D. et al. Voluntary relocation as an adaptation strategy to extreme weather events. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 8, 83–90 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  159. 159.

    Marshall, N. A., Park, S. E., Adger, W. N., Brown, K. & Howden, S. M. Transformational capacity and the influence of place and identity. Environ. Res. Lett. 7, 034022 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  160. 160.

    Pelling, M., O’Brien, K. & Matyas, D. Adaptation and transformation. Climatic Change 133, 113–127 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  161. 161.

    McFarlane, B. L., McGee, T. K. & Faulkner, H. Complexity of homeowner wildfire risk mitigation: an integration of hazard theories. Int. J. Wildl. Fire 20, 921–931 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank P. Stern and E. Weber for their insights during an early review of the paper prior to submission.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

R.S.W. and A.H. developed the original outline for the paper. R.S.W., A.H., M.H. and J.S.B. contributed equally to the final literature review and writing of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robyn S. Wilson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Climate Change thanks Morgan Scoville-Simonds and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wilson, R.S., Herziger, A., Hamilton, M. et al. From incremental to transformative adaptation in individual responses to climate-exacerbated hazards. Nat. Clim. Chang. 10, 200–208 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0691-6

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing