Abstract
Following the Paris Agreement, many countries are enacting targets to achieve net-zero GHG emissions. Stringent mitigation will have clear societal benefits in the second half of this century by limiting peak warming and stabilizing climate. However, the near-term benefits of mitigation are generally thought to be less clear because forced surface temperature trends can be masked by internal variability. Here we use observationally constrained projections from the latest comprehensive climate models and a simple climate model emulator to show that pursuing stringent mitigation consistent with holding long-term warming below 1.5 °C reduces the risk of unprecedented warming rates in the next 20 years by a factor of 13 compared with a no mitigation scenario, even after accounting for internal variability. Therefore, in addition to long-term benefits, stringent mitigation offers substantial near-term benefits by offering societies and ecosystems a greater chance to adapt to and avoid the worst climate change impacts.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available at https://github.com/Priestley-Centre/Near_term_warming with the identifier https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4252506 (ref. 86). This repository includes the FaIR simulation data, the constrained CMIP6 projections, the observation-based data and the observation-based estimates of internal variability (in fully processed form only). The SSP emissions datasets used in the FaIR simulations were downloaded from https://www.rcmip.org/, and the NDCs emissions dataset was provided by J. Rogelj. The constrained CMIP6 projections are based on ref. 17 and used surface air temperature data downloaded from ESGF (4 December 2019). The raw data used to calculate the observation-based estimates of internal variability are based on ref. 19 and were provided by K. Haustein. The surface air temperature data for the CMIP6 pre-industrial control simulations were obtained from the JASMIN/CEDA archive (29 July 2020). Further details of any CMIP6 data used are given in Supplementary Table 3 (refs. 87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150,151,152,153,154,155).
Code availability
The FaIR model is available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3588880 (ref. 156). FaIR version 1.5 is used for all simulations in this paper. The code used to set up the FaIR simulations, analyse the data and produce the figures is available at https://github.com/Priestley-Centre/Near_term_warming with the identifier https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4252506 (ref. 86). Python/Matplotlib was used for all coding and data visualization; for some figures, the vector graphics editor Inkscape (available at https://inkscape.org/) was used to combine different figure parts into one file.
References
IPCC: Summary for Policymakers. in Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5 °C (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) (WMO, 2018).
Kirtman, B. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) Ch. 11 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
Tebaldi, C. & Friedlingstein, P. Delayed detection of climate mitigation benefits due to climate inertia and variability. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 17229–17234 (2013).
Marotzke, J. Quantifying the irreducible uncertainty in near‐term climate projections. WIREs Clim. Change 10, e563 (2019).
Maher, N., Lehner, F. & Marotzke, J. Quantifying the role of internal variability in the temperature we expect to observe in the coming decades. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 054014 (2020).
Samset, B. H., Fuglestvedt, J. S. & Lund, M. T. Delayed emergence of a global temperature response after emission mitigation. Nat. Commun. 11, 3261 (2020).
Challinor, A. et al. Current warming will reduce yields unless maize breeding and seed systems adapt immediately. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 954–958 (2016).
Gersonius, B. et al. Managing the flooding system’s resiliency to climate change. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Eng. Sustain. 163, 15–22 (2010).
Allen, M. R. et al. in Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5 °C (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) Ch. 1 (IPCC, WMO, 2018).
Schleussner, C.-F. et al. Science and policy characteristics of the Paris Agreement temperature goal. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 827–835 (2016).
Rogelj, J., Schleussner, C.‐F. & Hare, W. Getting it right matters: temperature goal interpretations in geoscience research. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 10662–10665 (2017).
Hawkins, E. & Sutton, R. The potential to narrow uncertainty in regional climate predictions. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 90, 1095–1108 (2009).
Lehner, F. et al. Partitioning climate projection uncertainty with multiple large ensembles and CMIP5/6. Earth Syst. Dyn. 11, 491–508 (2020).
Kosaka, Y. & Xie, S.-P. Recent global-warming hiatus tied to equatorial Pacific surface cooling. Nature 501, 403–407 (2013).
Medhaug, I., Stolpe, M. B., Fischer, E. M. & Knutti, R. Reconciling controversies about the ‘global warming hiatus’. Nature 545, 41–47 (2017).
Meinshausen, M. et al. The shared socio-economic pathway (SSP) greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions to 2500. Geosci. Model Dev. 13, 3571–3605 (2020).
Tokarska, K. B. et al. Past warming trend constrains future warming in CMIP6 models. Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz9549 (2020).
Smith, C. J. et al. FAIR v1.3: a simple emissions-based impulse response and carbon cycle model. Geosci. Model Dev. 11, 2273–2297 (2018).
Haustein, K. et al. A limited role for unforced internal variability in twentieth-century warming. J. Clim. 32, 4893–4917 (2019).
Rogelj, J. et al. Understanding the origin of Paris Agreement emission uncertainties. Nat. Commun. 8, 15748 (2017).
Rogelj, J., den Elzen, M., Huppmann, D. & Luderer, G. in Emissions Gap Report 2019 (eds Olhoff, A. & Christensen, J. M.) Ch. 3 (United Nations Environment Programme, 2019).
Vrontisi, Z. et al. Enhancing global climate policy ambition towards a 1.5 °C stabilization: a short-term multi-model assessment. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 044039 (2018).
Hausfather, Z. & Peters, G. P. Emissions—the ‘business as usual’ story is misleading. Nature 577, 618–620 (2020).
Leemans, R. & Eickhout, B. Another reason for concern: regional and global impacts on ecosystems for different levels of climate change. Glob. Environ. Change 14, 219–228 (2004).
Neilson, R. P. Transient ecotone response to climatic change: some conceptual and modelling approaches. Ecol. Appl. 3, 385–395 (1993).
Ciavarella, A., Stott, P. & Lowe, J. Early benefits of mitigation in risk of regional climate extremes. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 326–330 (2017).
Taylor, K. E., Stouffer, R. J. & Meehl, G. A. An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 93, 485–498 (2012).
Meinshausen, M. et al. The RCP greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions from 1765 to 2300. Clim. Change 109, 213–241 (2011).
Lehner, F., Deser, C. & Sanderson, B. M. Future risk of record-breaking summer temperatures and its mitigation. Clim. Change 146, 363–375 (2018).
Tebaldi, C. & Wehner, M. F. Benefits of mitigation for future heat extremes under RCP4.5 compared to RCP8.5. Clim. Change 146, 349–361 (2018).
Hoegh-Guldberg, O. et al. in Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5 °C (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) Ch. 3 (IPCC, WMO, 2018).
Mahlstein, I., Knutti, R., Solomon, S. & Portmann, R. W. Early onset of significant local warming in low latitude countries. Environ. Res. Lett. 6, 034009 (2011).
Coumou, D. & Robinson, A. Historic and future increase in the global land area affected by monthly heat extremes. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 034018 (2013).
Dosio, A., Mentaschi, L., Fischer, E. M. & Wyser, K. Extreme heat waves under 1.5 °C and 2 °C global warming. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 054006 (2018).
Seneviratne, S. I., Donat, M. G., Pitman, A. J., Knutti, R. & Wilby, R. L. Allowable CO2 emissions based on regional and impact-related climate targets. Nature 529, 477–483 (2016).
Wartenburger, R. et al. Changes in regional climate extremes as a function of global mean temperature: an interactive plotting framework. Geosci. Model Dev. 10, 3609–3634 (2017).
Seneviratne, S. I. et al. Climate extremes, land–climate feedbacks and land-use forcing at 1.5 °C. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 376, 20160450 (2018).
Schleussner, C.-F. et al. Differential climate impacts for policy-relevant limits to global warming: the case of 1.5 °C and 2 °C. Earth Syst. Dyn. 7, 327–351 (2016).
Byers, E. Global exposure and vulnerability to multi-sector development and climate change hotspots. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 055012 (2018).
Eyring, V. et al. Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization. Geosci. Model Dev. 9, 1937–1958 (2016).
IPCC Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5 °C (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) (WMO, 2018).
Dessler, A. E. & Forster, P. M. An estimate of equilibrium climate sensitivity from interannual variability. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 123, 8634–8645 (2018).
Etminan, M., Myhre, G., Highwood, E. J. & Shine, K. P. Radiative forcing of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide: a significant revision of the methane radiative forcing. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 12614–12623 (2016).
Smith, C. J. et al. Understanding rapid adjustments to diverse forcing agents. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 12023–12031 (2018).
Flato, G. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) Ch. 9 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
Pfister, P. L. & Stocker, T. F. The realized warming fraction: a multi-model sensitivity study. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 124024 (2018).
Nicholls, Z. R. et al. Reduced complexity model intercomparison project phase 1: protocol, results and initial observations. Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2019-375 (2020).
van Marle, M. J. E. et al. Historic global biomass burning emissions for CMIP6 (BB4CMIP) based on merging satellite observations with proxies and fire models (1750–2015). Geosci. Model Dev. 10, 3329–3357 (2017).
Hoesly, R. M. et al. Historical (1750–2014) anthropogenic emissions of reactive gases and aerosols from the Community Emissions Data System (CEDS). Geosci. Model Dev. 11, 369–408 (2018).
Meinshausen, M. et al. Historical greenhouse gas concentrations for climate modelling (CMIP6). Geosci. Model Dev. 10, 2057–2116 (2017).
Haustein, K. et al. A real-time global warming index. Sci. Rep. 7, 15417 (2017).
Smith, T. M., Reynolds, R. W., Peterson, T. C. & Lawrimore, J. Improvements to NOAA’s historical merged land–ocean surface temperatures analysis (1880–2006). J. Clim. 21, 2283–2296 (2008).
Vose, R. S. et al. NOAA’s merged land–ocean surface temperature analysis. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 93, 1677–1685 (2012).
Rogelj, J. et al. in Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5 °C (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) Ch. 2 (IPCC, WMO, 2018).
Millar, R. J., Nicholls, Z. R., Friedlingstein, P. & Allen, M. R. A modified impulse–response representation of the global near-surface air temperature and atmospheric concentration response to carbon dioxide emissions. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 17, 7213–7228 (2017).
Myhre, G. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) Ch. 8 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
Hodnebrog, Ø. et al. Global warming potentials and radiative efficiencies of halocarbons and related compounds: a comprehensive review. Rev. Geophys. 51, 300–378 (2013).
Stevenson, D. S. et al. Tropospheric ozone changes, radiative forcing and attribution to emissions in the Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP). Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13, 3063–3085 (2013).
Myhre, G. et al. Radiative forcing of the direct aerosol effect from AeroCom Phase II simulations. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13, 1853–1877 (2013).
Ghan, S. J. et al. A simple model of global aerosol indirect effects. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 118, 6688–6707 (2013).
Flynn, C. M. & Mauritsen, T. On the climate sensitivity and historical warming evolution in recent coupled model ensembles. Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. 20, 7829–7842 (2020).
Prather, M. et al. (eds) in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) Annex II (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
Matthes, K. et al. Solar forcing for CMIP6 (v3.2). Geosci. Model Dev. 10, 2247–2302 (2017).
Bellouin, N. et al. Bounding global aerosol radiative forcing of climate change. Rev. Geophys. 57, e2019RG000660 (2019).
Forster, P. M., Maycock, A. C., McKenna, C. M. & Smith, C. J. Latest climate models confirm need for urgent mitigation. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 7–10 (2020).
Jiménez-de-la-Cuesta, D. & Mauritsen, T. Emergent constraints on Earth’s transient and equilibrium response to doubled CO2 from post-1970s global warming. Nat. Geosci. 12, 902–905 (2019).
Nijsse, F. J. M. M., Cox, P. M. & Williamson, M. S. Emergent constraints on transient climate response (TCR) and equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) from historical warming in CMIP5 and CMIP6 models. Earth Syst. Dyn. 11, 737–750 (2020).
Morice, C. P., Kennedy, J. J., Rayner, N. A. & Jones, P. D. Quantifying uncertainties in global and regional temperature change using an ensemble of observational estimates: the HadCRUT4 dataset. J. Geophys. Res. 117, D08101 (2012).
Rohde, R. et al. A new estimate of the average Earth surface land temperature spanning 1753 to 2011. Geoinform. Geostat. Overv. 1, 1000101 (2013).
Kennedy, J. J., Rayner, N. A., Smith, R. O., Saunby, M. & Parker, D. E. Reassessing biases and other uncertainties in sea-surface temperature observations since 1850. 1. Measurement and sampling errors. J. Geophys. Res. 116, D14103 (2011).
Kennedy, J. J., Rayner, N. A., Smith, R. O., Saunby, M. & Parker, D. E. Reassessing biases and other uncertainties in sea-surface temperature observations since 1850. 2. Biases and homogenisation. J. Geophys. Res. 116, D14104 (2011).
Cowtan, K. & Way, R. G. Coverage bias in the HadCRUT4 temperature series and its impact on recent temperature trends. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 140, 1935–1944 (2014).
Cowtan, K. D. & Way, R. G. Global Temperature Reconstructions Version 2 (University of York, 2020); https://doi.org/10.15124/20ee85c3-f53c-4ab6-8e50-270b0ddd3686
Lenssen, N. et al. Improvements in the GISTEMP uncertainty model. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 124, 6307–6326 (2019).
GISTEMP Team GISS Surface Temperature Analysis (GISTEMP) Version 4 (NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, 2020); https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/
Jones, P. D. et al. Hemispheric and large-scale land surface air temperature variations: an extensive revision and an update to 2010. J. Geophys. Res. 117, D05127 (2012).
Menne, M. J., Williams, C. N., Gleason, B. E., Rennie, J. J. & Lawrimore, J. H. The global historical climatology network monthly temperature dataset, version 4. J. Clim. 31, 9835–9854 (2018).
Huang, B. et al. Extended reconstructed sea surface temperature, version 5 (ERSSTv5): upgrades, validations, and intercomparisons. J. Clim. 30, 8179–8205 (2017).
Tokarska, K. B. et al. Recommended temperature metrics for carbon budget estimates, model evaluation and climate policy. Nat. Geosci. 12, 964–971 (2019).
Cowtan, K. et al. Robust comparison of climate models with observations using blended land air and ocean sea surface temperatures. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 6526–6534 (2015).
Richardson, M., Cowtan, K. & Millar, R. J. Global temperature definition affects achievement of long-term climate goals. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 054004 (2018).
Rogelj, J., Forster, P. M., Kriegler, E., Smith, C. J. & Séférian, R. Estimating and tracking the remaining carbon budget for stringent climate targets. Nature 571, 335–342 (2019).
Kennedy, J. J., Rayner, N. A., Atkinson, C. P. & Killick, R. E. An ensemble data set of sea-surface temperature change from 1850: the Met Office Hadley Centre HadSST.4.0.0.0 data set. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 124, 7719–7763 (2019).
Titchner, H. & Rayner, N. The Met Office Hadley Centre sea ice and sea surface temperature data set, version 2. 1. Sea ice concentrations. J. Geophys. Res. 119, 2864–2889 (2014).
Donlon, C. J. et al. The operational sea surface temperature and sea ice analysis (OSTIA) system. Remote Sens. Environ. 116, 140–158 (2012).
McKenna, C. M., Forster, P. M., Maycock, A. C., Smith, C. J. & Tokarska, K. B. Priestley-Centre/Near_term_warming Version 1.2 (Zenodo, 2020); https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4252506
Dix, M. et al. CSIRO-ARCCSS ACCESS-CM2 Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 CMIP piControl Version 20200729 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2019); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.4311
Ziehn, T. et al. CSIRO ACCESS-ESM1.5 Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 CMIP piControl Version 20200729 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2019); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.4312
Semmler, T. et al. AWI AWI-CM1.1MR Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 CMIP piControl Version 20200729 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2018); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.2777
Danek, C. et al. AWI AWI-ESM1.1LR Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 CMIP piControl Version 20200729 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2020); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.9335
Wu, T. et al. BCC BCC-CSM2MR Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 CMIP piControl Version 20200729 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2018); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.3016
Xin, X. et al. BCC BCC-CSM2MR Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 ScenarioMIP Version 20191204 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2019); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.1732
Zhang, J. et al. BCC BCC-ESM1 Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 CMIP piControl Version 20200729 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2018); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.3017
Rong, X. CAMS CAMS_CSM1.0 Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 CMIP piControl Version 20200729 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2019); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.9797
Rong, X. CAMS CAMS-CSM1.0 Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 ScenarioMIP Version 20191204 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2019); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.11004
Swart, N. C. et al. CCCma CanESM5 Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 CMIP piControl Version 20200729 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2019); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.3673
Swart, N. C. et al. CCCma CanESM5 Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 ScenarioMIP Version 20191204 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2019); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.1317
Danabasoglu, G., Lawrence, D., Lindsay, K., Lipscomb, W. & Strand, G. NCAR CESM2 Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 CMIP piControl Version 20200729 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2019); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.7733
Danabasoglu, G. NCAR CESM2 Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 ScenarioMIP Version 20191204 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2019); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.2201
Danabasoglu, G. NCAR CESM2-FV2 Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 CMIP piControl Version 20200729 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2019); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.11301
Danabasoglu, G. NCAR CESM2-WACCM Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 CMIP piControl Version 20200729 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2019); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.10094
Danabasoglu, G. NCAR CESM2-WACCM Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 ScenarioMIP Version 20191204 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2019); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.10026
Danabasoglu, G. NCAR CESM2-WACCM-FV2 Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 CMIP piControl Version 20200729 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2019); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.11302
Voldoire, A. CMIP6 Simulations of the CNRM-CERFACS Based on CNRM-CM6-1 Model for CMIP Experiment piControl Version 20200729 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2018); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.4163
Voldoire, A. CNRM-CERFACS CNRM-CM6-1 Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 ScenarioMIP Version 20191204 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2019); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.1384
Voldoire, A. CNRM-CERFACS CNRM-CM6-1-HR Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 CMIP piControl Version 20200729 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2019); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.4164
Seferian, R. CNRM-CERFACS CNRM-ESM2-1 Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 CMIP piControl Version 20200729 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2018); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.4165
Seferian, R. CNRM-CERFACS CNRM-ESM2-1 Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 ScenarioMIP Version 20191204 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2019); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.1395
Bader, D. C., Leung, R., Taylor, M. & McCoy, R. B. E3SM-Project E3SM1.0 Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 CMIP piControl Version 20200729 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2019); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.4499 (2018).
Bader, D. C., Leung, R., Taylor, M. & McCoy, R. B. E3SM-Project E3SM1.1 Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 CMIP piControl. Version 20200729. Earth System Grid Federation. https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.11489
Bader, D. C., Leung, R., Taylor, M. & McCoy, R. B. E3SM-Project E3SM1.1ECA Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 CMIP piControl Version 20200729 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2019); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.11490
EC-Earth Consortium (EC-Earth) EC-Earth-Consortium EC-Earth3 Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 ScenarioMIP Version 20191204 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2019); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.251
EC-Earth Consortium (EC-Earth) EC-Earth-Consortium EC-Earth3-Veg Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 ScenarioMIP Version 20191204 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2019); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.727
Yu, Y. CAS FGOALS-f3-L Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 CMIP piControl Version 20200729 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2019); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.3447
Yu, Y. CAS FGOALS-f3-L Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 ScenarioMIP Version 20191204 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2019); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.2046
Li, L. CAS FGOALS-g3 Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 CMIP piControl Version 20200729 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2019); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.3448
Song, Z. et al. FIO-QLNM FIO-ESM2.0 Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 CMIP piControl Version 20200729 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2019); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.9205
Guo, H. et al. NOAA-GFDL GFDL-CM4 Model Output piControl Version 20200729 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2018); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.8666
Guo, H. et al. NOAA-GFDL GFDL-CM4 Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 ScenarioMIP Version 20191204 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2018); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.9242
Krasting, J. P. et al. NOAA-GFDL GFDL-ESM4 Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 CMIP piControl Version 20200729 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2018); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.8669
John, J. G. et al. NOAA-GFDL GFDL-ESM4 Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 ScenarioMIP Version 20191204 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2018); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.1414
NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies (NASA/GISS) NASA-GISS GISS-E2.1G Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 CMIP piControl Version 20200729 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2018); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.7380
NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies (NASA/GISS) NASA-GISS GISS-E2-1-G-CC Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 CMIP piControl Version 20200729 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2019); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.11856
NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies (NASA/GISS) NASA-GISS GISS-E2.1H Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 CMIP piControl Version 20200729 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2018); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.7381
NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies (NASA/GISS) NASA-GISS GISS-E2-2-G Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 CMIP piControl Version 20200729 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2019); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.7382
Ridley, J., Menary, M., Kuhlbrodt, T., Andrews, M. & Andrews, T. MOHC HadGEM3-GC31-LL Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 CMIP piControl Version 20200729 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2018); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.6294
Ridley, J., Menary, M., Kuhlbrodt, T., Andrews, M. & Andrews, T. MOHC HadGEM3-GC31-MM Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 CMIP piControl Version 20200729 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2019); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.6297
Raghavan, K. & Panickal, S. CCCR-IITM IITM-ESM Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 CMIP piControl Version 20200729 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2019); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.3710
Volodin, E. et al. INM INM-CM4-8 Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 CMIP piControl Version 20200729 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2019); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.5080
Volodin, E. et al. INM INM-CM4-8 Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 ScenarioMIP Version 20191204 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2019); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.12321
Volodin, E. et al. INM INM-CM5-0 Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 CMIP piControl Version 20200729 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2019); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.5081
Volodin, E. et al. INM INM-CM5-0 Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 ScenarioMIP Version 20191204 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2019); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.12322
Boucher, O., Denvil, S., Caubel, A. & Foujols, M. A. IPSL IPSL-CM6A-LR Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 CMIP piControl Version 20200729 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2018); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.5251
Boucher, O., Denvil, S., Caubel, A. & Foujols, M. A. IPSL IPSL-CM6A-LR Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 ScenarioMIP Version 20191204 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2019); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.1532
Stouffer, R. UA MCM-UA-1-0 Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 CMIP piControl (Earth System Grid Federation, 2019); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.8890
Hajima, T. et al. MIROC MIROC-ES2L Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 CMIP piControl Version 20200729 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2019); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.5710
Tachiiri, K. et al. MIROC MIROC-ES2L Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 ScenarioMIP Version 20191204 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2019); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.936
Tatebe, H. & Watanabe, M. MIROC MIROC6 Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 CMIP piControl Version 20200729 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2018); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.5711
Shiogama, H., Abe, M. & Tatebe, H. MIROC MIROC6 Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 ScenarioMIP Version 20191204 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2019); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.898
Neubauer, D. et al. HAMMOZ-Consortium MPI-ESM1.2-HAM Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 CMIP piControl Version 20200729 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2019); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.5037
Jungclaus, J. et al. MPI-M MPI-ESM1.2-HR Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 CMIP piControl Version 20200729 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2019); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.6674
Schupfner, M. et al. DKRZ MPI-ESM1.2-HR Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 ScenarioMIP Version 20191204 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2019); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.2450
Wieners, K.-H. et al. MPI-M MPI-ESM1.2-LR Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 CMIP piControl Version 20200729 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2019); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.6675
Yukimoto, S. et al. MRI MRI-ESM2.0 Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 CMIP piControl Version 20200729 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2019); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.6900
Yukimoto, S. et al. MRI MRI-ESM2.0 Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 ScenarioMIP Version 20191204 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2019); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.638.
Cao, J. & Wang, B. NUIST NESMv3 Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 CMIP piControl Version 20200729 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2019); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.8776
Cao, J. NUIST NESMv3 Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 ScenarioMIP Version 20191204 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2019); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.2027
Bethke, I. et al. NCC NorCPM1 Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 CMIP piControl Version 20200729 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2019); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.10896
Guo, C. et al. NCC NorESM1-F Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 CMIP piControl Version 20200729 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2019); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.11595
Seland, Ø. et al. NCC NorESM2-LM Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 CMIP piControl Version 20200729 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2019); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.8217
Bentsen, M. et al. NCC NorESM2-MM Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 CMIP piControl Version 20200729 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2019); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.8221
Park, S. & Shin, J. SNU SAM0-UNICON Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 CMIP piControl Version 20200729 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2019); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.7791
Lee, W.-L. & Liang, H.-C. AS-RCEC TaiESM1.0 Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 CMIP piControl (Earth System Grid Federation, 2020); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.9798
Tang, Y. et al. MOHC UKESM1.0-LL Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 CMIP piControl (Earth System Grid Federation, 2019); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.6298
Good, P. et al. MOHC UKESM1.0-LL Model Output Prepared for CMIP6 ScenarioMIP Version 20191204 (Earth System Grid Federation, 2019); https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.1567
chrisroadmap, Gieseke, R. & Nicholls, Z. OMS-NetZero/FAIR: RCMIP Phase 1 Version 1.5 (Zenodo, 2019); https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3588880
Acknowledgements
We thank J. Rogelj for providing the NDC scenario data and K. Haustein for providing the data used to calculate the observation-based estimates of internal variability. C.M.M., A.C.M., P.M.F., C.J.S. and K.B.T. were supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement no. 820829 (CONSTRAIN project). A.C.M. was supported by the Natural Environment Research Council (grant no. NE/M018199/1) and Leverhulme Trust. C.J.S. was supported by a NERC/IIASA Collaborative Research Fellowship (no. NE/T009381/1). We acknowledge the World Climate Research Programme, which, through its Working Group on Coupled Modelling, coordinated and promoted CMIP6. We thank the climate modelling groups for producing and making available their model output, the Earth System Grid Federation (ESGF) for archiving the data and providing access, and the multiple funding agencies who support CMIP6 and ESGF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
P.M.F. and A.C.M. designed the study. C.M.M. performed the analysis and produced the figures. C.J.S. performed the FaIR simulations. K.B.T. provided the constrained CMIP6 projections. All authors contributed to writing the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Peer review information Nature Climate Change thanks Daniel Huppmann, Giacomo Marangoni and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Figs. 1–8 and Tables 1–3.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McKenna, C.M., Maycock, A.C., Forster, P.M. et al. Stringent mitigation substantially reduces risk of unprecedented near-term warming rates. Nat. Clim. Chang. 11, 126–131 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-00957-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-00957-9
This article is cited by
-
Steady global surface warming from 1973 to 2022 but increased warming rate after 1990
Communications Earth & Environment (2023)
-
Earlier emergence of a temperature response to mitigation by filtering annual variability
Nature Communications (2022)
-
Uncertainty in near-term temperature evolution must not obscure assessments of climate mitigation benefits
Nature Communications (2022)
-
Deep mitigation of CO2 and non-CO2 greenhouse gases toward 1.5 °C and 2 °C futures
Nature Communications (2021)
-
Projected land ice contributions to twenty-first-century sea level rise
Nature (2021)