Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

The impact of near-real-time deforestation alerts across the tropics


Reducing deforestation to mitigate climate change necessitates monitoring of deforestation activity. However, while freely available deforestation alerts on forest loss are available, the effect of these alerts and the presence of subscribers in a particular area is unclear. Here, we show that subscriptions to alerts in 22 tropical countries decrease the probability of deforestation in Africa by 18% relative to the average 2011–2016 levels. There is no effect on other continents, and the availability of alerts does not significantly change deforestation outcomes. This decrease in Africa is higher in protected areas and concessions, suggesting that alerts either increased capacity to enforce existing deforestation policy or induced the development of more effective anti-deforestation policies. Calculated using the social cost of carbon for avoided deforestation in Africa, we estimate the alert system’s value to be between US$149 million and US$696 million.

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Timeline of GLAD rollout and study region.
Fig. 2: Impact of GLAD availability on deforestation.
Fig. 3: Spatial distribution and number of subscriptions.
Fig. 4: Impact of GLAD subscriptions on deforestation.
Fig. 5: Estimates of GLAD subscriptions in concessions and protected areas on deforestation.

Data availability

Datasets analysed for this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Code availability

The codes used to generate the figures and tables are available via Zenodo29.


  1. Baccini, A. et al. Estimated carbon dioxide emissions from tropical deforestation improved by carbon-density maps. Nat. Clim. Change 2, 182–185 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Busch, J. et al. Potential for low-cost carbon dioxide removal through tropical reforestation. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 463–466 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sims, K. R. Conservation and development: evidence from Thai protected areas. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 60, 94–114 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Alix-Garcia, J. M., Shapiro, E. N. & Sims, K. R. E. Forest conservation and slippage: evidence from Mexico’s national payments for ecosystem services program. Land Econ. 88, 613–638 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gibbs, H. K. et al. Brazil’s soy moratorium. Science 347, 377–378 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Romijn, E. et al. Assessing change in national forest monitoring capacities of 99 tropical countries. For. Ecol. Manag. 352, 109–123 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hansen, M. C. et al. Humid tropical forest disturbance alerts using Landsat data. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 34008 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Assunção, J., Gandour, C. & Rocha, R. DETERring Deforestation in the Amazon: Environmental Monitoring and Law Enforcement (Climate Policy Initiative, 2017).

  9. Hansen, M. C. et al. High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science 342, 850–854 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gibbs, H. K., Brown, S., Niles, J. O. & Foley, J. A. Monitoring and estimating tropical forest carbon stocks: making REDD a reality. Environ. Res. Lett. 2, 045023 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Howard, P. & Sylvan, D. Expert Consensus on the Economics of Climate Change (Institute for Policy Integrity, New York University School of Law, 2015);

  12. Bulletin d’Alertes GLAD du 1er Trimestre de 2018 (Republique du Cameroun, 2018);

  13. Palm Oil Progress Report 2017 (PepsiCo, 2017);

  14. Palm Oil Progress Update (Cargill, 2015).

  15. Vargas, C., Montalban, J. & Leon, A. A. Early warning tropical forest loss alerts in Peru using Landsat. Environ. Res. Commun. 1, 121002 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Finer, M. et al. Combating deforestation: from satellite to intervention. Science 360, 1303–1305 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Imbens, G. W. & Wooldridge, J. M. Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation. J. Econ. Lit. 47, 5–86 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lohr, S. Sampling: Design and Analysis 2nd edn (Cengage Learning, 2010).

  19. Margono, B. A., Potapov, P. V., Turubanova, S., Stolle, F. & Hansen, M. C. Primary forest cover loss in Indonesia over 2000–2012. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 730–735 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bwangoy, J.-R. B., Hansen, M. C., Roy, D. P., Grandi, G. D. & Justice, C. O. Remote sensing of environment wetland mapping in the Congo Basin using optical and radar remotely sensed data and derived topographical indices. Remote Sens. Environ. 114, 73–86 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Global Wetlands Map (Center for International Forestry Research, 2017);

  22. Land Surface Temperature [DAY] (1 MONTH - TERRA/MODIS) (NEO, 2020);

  23. CHIRPS: Rainfall Estimates from Rain Gauge and Satellite Observations (CHIRPS, 2019);

  24. GHSL - Global Human Settlement Layer (European Commission, 2019);

  25. NGA’s World Port Index (NGA, 2017);

  26. GEOFABRIK (Geofabrik, 2019);

  27. GADM data (GADM, 2018);

  28. World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) (IUCN and UNEP-WCMC, 2016);

  29. Moffette, F., Alix-Garcia, J., Shea, K. & H. Pickens, A. The Impact of Near-real-time Deforestation Alerts Across the Tropics (Zenodo, 2020);

Download references


We thank S. Jamilla, E. Goldman and I. Collins for creating the database. We thank K. Chomitz, T. Coger, J. Engelmann, N. Harris, H. Nembhard, F. Stolle and N. Ullery and participants at the Environmental and Resources Seminar of the University of Wisconsin-Madison and at the Applied Economics Seminar at Oregon State University for comments. We acknowledge funding from the World Resources Institute; the organization had no input into the study design nor impact on the presentation of the results.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



F.M. and J.A.-G designed research, performed econometric analyses and led the writing. K.S. managed the data compilation and contributed to the writing. A.H.P contributed to the database.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fanny Moffette.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Climate Change thanks Juliano Assunção, Johannes Reiche and Juan Robalino for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplement A GLAD availability (including summary statistics, supplementary estimation results, Tables A1–A11 and Figs. A1 and A2), Supplement B Subscriptions (including description of subscription classification, supplementary estimation results, and Tables B1–B22 and Figs. B1–B3) and Supplement C Review of other alert systems.

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moffette, F., Alix-Garcia, J., Shea, K. et al. The impact of near-real-time deforestation alerts across the tropics. Nat. Clim. Chang. 11, 172–178 (2021).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

Further reading


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing