Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Perspective
  • Published:

The future of Arctic sea-ice biogeochemistry and ice-associated ecosystems

Abstract

The Arctic sea-ice-scape is rapidly transforming. Increasing light penetration will initiate earlier seasonal primary production. This earlier growing season may be accompanied by an increase in ice algae and phytoplankton biomass, augmenting the emission of dimethylsulfide and capture of carbon dioxide. Secondary production may also increase on the shelves, although the loss of sea ice exacerbates the demise of sea-ice fauna, endemic fish and megafauna. Sea-ice loss may also deliver more methane to the atmosphere, but warmer ice may release fewer halogens, resulting in fewer ozone depletion events. The net changes in carbon drawdown are still highly uncertain. Despite large uncertainties in these assessments, we expect disruptive changes that warrant intensified long-term observations and modelling efforts.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Schematic of seasonal sea-ice biogeochemical processes in the Arctic Ocean.
Fig. 2: Past and predicted changes in sea-ice physical characteristics along latitudes.
Fig. 3: Map of the Arctic Ocean.
Fig. 4: Future expectations of changes in the sea-ice biogeochemical system in the Arctic.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arrigo, K. R. in Sea Ice (Ed. Thomas, D. N.) 352–369 (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2017).

  2. Steiner, N. S. et al. Impacts of the changing ocean-sea ice system on the key forage fish Arctic cod (Boreogadus saida) and subsistence fisheries in the western Canadian Arctic—evaluating linked climate, ecosystem and economic (CEE) models. Front. Mar. Sci. 6, 179 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kohlbach, D. et al. The importance of ice algae-produced carbon in the central Arctic Ocean ecosystem: food web relationships revealed by lipid and stable isotope analyses. Limnol. Oceanogr. 61, 2027–2044 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Boetius, A. et al. Export of algal biomass from the melting Arctic sea ice. Science 339, 1430–1432 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Riebesell, U., Schloss, I. & Smetacek, V. Aggregation of algae released from melting sea ice: implications for seeding and sedimentation. Polar Biol. 11, 239–248 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  6. MacGilchrist, G. A. et al. The Arctic Ocean carbon sink. Deep. Res. Part I Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 86, 39–55 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bates, N. R. & Mathis, J. T. The Arctic Ocean marine carbon cycle: evaluation of air-sea CO2 exchanges, ocean acidification impacts and potential feedbacks. Biogeosciences 6, 2433–2459 (2009).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Notz, D. & Stroeve, J. Observed Arctic sea-ice loss directly follows anthropogenic CO2 emission. Science 354, 747–750 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Meier, W. N. et al. Arctic sea ice in transformation: a review of recent observed changes and impacts on biology and human activity. Rev. Geophys. 52, 185–217 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kwok, R. Arctic sea ice thickness, volume, and multiyear ice coverage: losses and coupled variability (1958–2018). Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 105005 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Maslanik, J., Stroeve, J., Fowler, C. & Emery, W. Distribution and trends in Arctic sea ice age through spring 2011. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L13502 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stroeve, J. C., Crawford, A. D. & Stammerjohn, S. Using timing of ice retreat to predict timing of fall freeze-up in the Arctic. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 6332–6340 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Webster, M. A. et al. Interdecadal changes in snow depth on Arctic sea ice. J. Geophys. Res. Ocean. 119, 5395–5406 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Strong, C. & Rigor, I. G. Arctic marginal ice zone trending wider in summer and narrower in winter. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 4864–4868 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  15. IPCC Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) 1029–1136 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).

  16. Overland, J. E. & Wang, M. When will the summer Arctic be nearly sea ice free? Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 2097–2101 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bintanja, R. & Andry, O. Towards a rain-dominated Arctic. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 263–267 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Vancoppenolle, M. et al. Role of sea ice in global biogeochemical cycles: emerging views and challenges. Quat. Sci. Rev. 79, 207–230 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Berge, J. et al. In the dark: a review of ecosystem processes during the Arctic polar night. Prog. Oceanogr. 139, 258–271 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Leu, E. et al. Arctic spring awakening — steering principles behind the phenology of vernal ice algal blooms. Prog. Oceanogr. 139, 151–170 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Assmy, P. et al. Leads in Arctic pack ice enable early phytoplankton blooms below snow-covered sea ice. Sci. Rep. 7, 40850 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Perovich, D. K. Sea Ice (Ed. Thomas, D. N.) 110–137 (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2017).

  23. Nicolaus, M., Katlein, C., Maslanik, J. A. & Hendricks, S. Solar Radiation Over and Under Sea Ice During the POLARSTERN Cruise ARK-XXVI/3 (TransArc) in Summer 2011 (PANGAEA, 2011); https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.786717

  24. Arrigo, K. R. et al. Massive phytoplankton blooms under Arctic sea ice. Science 336, 1408 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pistone, K., Eisenman, I. & Ramanathan, V. Observational determination of albedo decrease caused by vanishing Arctic sea ice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 3322–3326 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Horvat, C. et al. The frequency and extent of sub-ice phytoplankton blooms in the Arctic Ocean. Sci. Adv. 3, e1601191 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  27. El-Sayed, S. Z., Van Dijken, G. L. & Gonzalez-Rodas, G. Effects of ultraviolet radiation on marine ecosystems. Int. J. Environ. Stud. 51, 199–216 (1996).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Elliott, A. et al. Spring production of mycosporine-like amino acids and other UV-absorbing compounds in sea ice-associated algae communities in the Canadian Arctic. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 541, 91–104 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ryan, K. G., Mcminn, A., Hegseth, E. N. & Davy, S. K. The effects of ultraviolet-b radiation on antarctic sea-ice algae. J. Phycol. 48, 74–84 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Arrigo, K. R. & van Dijken, G. L. Continued increases in Arctic Ocean primary production. Prog. Oceanogr. 136, 60–70 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Gradinger, R. Sea-ice algae: major contributors to primary production and algal biomass in the Chukchi and Beaufort Seas during May/June 2002. Deep. Res. Part II Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 56, 1201–1212 (2009).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Tremblay, J.-E. & Gagnon, J. in Influence of Climate Change on the Changing Arctic and Sub-Arctic Conditions (eds Nihoul, J. C. J. & Kostianoy, A. G.) 73–93 (Springer, 2009).

  33. Nomura, D. et al. Nutrient distributions associated with snow and sediment-laden layers in sea ice of the southern Sea of Okhotsk. Mar. Chem. 119, 1–8 (2010).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Meiners, K. M. & Michel, C. in Sea Ice (Ed. Thomas, D. N.) 415–432 (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2017).

  35. Fripiat, F. et al. Macro-nutrient concentrations in Antarctic pack ice: overall patterns and overlooked processes. Elem. Sci. Anth. 5, p13 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Tremblay, J. É. et al. Global and regional drivers of nutrient supply, primary production and CO2 drawdown in the changing Arctic Ocean. Prog. Oceanogr. 139, 171–196 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Miller, J. R. & Russell, G. L. Projected impact of climate change on the freshwater and salt budgets of the Arctic Ocean by a global climate model. Geophys. Res. Lett. 27, 1183–1186 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Peterson, B. J. et al. Increasing river discharge to the Arctic Ocean. Science 298, 2171–2173 (2002).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Rainville, L., M. Lee, C. & Woodgate, A. R. Impact of wind-driven mixing in the Arctic Ocean. Oceanography 24, 136–145 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Lamarque, J. F. et al. Multi-model mean nitrogen and sulfur deposition from the atmospheric chemistry and climate model intercomparison project (ACCMIP): evaluation of historical and projected future changes. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13, 7997–8018 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Stroeve, J. C., Markus, T., Boisvert, L., Miller, J. & Barrett, A. Changes in Arctic melt season and implications for sea ice loss. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 1216–1225 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Tedesco, L., Vichi, M. & Scoccimarro, E. Sea-ice algal phenology in a warmer Arctic. Sci. Adv. 5, eaav4830 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. van Leeuwe, M. A. et al. Microalgal community structure and primary production in Arctic and Antarctic sea ice: a synthesis. Elem. Sci. Anth. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.267 (2018).

  44. Hardge, K. et al. Sea ice origin and sea ice retreat as possible drivers of variability in Arctic marine protist composition. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 571, 43–57 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Campbell, K., Mundy, C. J., Belzile, C., Delaforge, A. & Rysgaard, S. Seasonal dynamics of algal and bacterial communities in Arctic sea ice under variable snow cover. Polar Biol. 41, 41–58 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Leu, E., Søreide, J. E., Hessen, D. O., Falk-Petersen, S. & Berge, J. Consequences of changing sea-ice cover for primary and secondary producers in the European Arctic shelf seas: timing, quantity, and quality. Prog. Oceanogr. 90, 18–32 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Fernández-Méndez, M. et al. Composition, buoyancy regulation and fate of ice algal aggregates in the Central Arctic Ocean. PLoS ONE 9, e107452 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ardyna, M. et al. Recent Arctic Ocean sea ice loss triggers novel fall phytoplankton blooms. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 6207–6212 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Wassmann, P. & Reigstad, M. Future Arctic Ocean seasonal ice zones and implications for pelagic-benthic coupling. Oceanography 24, 220–231 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Dalman, L. et al. Enhanced bottom-ice algal biomass across a tidal strait in the Kitikmeot Sea of the Canadian Arctic. Elem. Sci. Anth. 7, p22 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Williams, W. et al. Joint effects of wind and ice motion in forcing upwelling in Mackenzie Trough, Beaufort Sea. Cont. Shelf Res. 26, 2352–2366 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Ardyna, M. et al. Environmental drivers of under-ice phytoplankton bloom dynamics in the Arctic Ocean. Elem. Sci. Anth. 8, 30 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Eronen-Rasimus, E. et al. Ice formation and growth shape bacterial community structure in Baltic Sea drift ice. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 91, 1–13 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Bowman, J. S. The relationship between sea ice bacterial community structure and biogeochemistry: a synthesis of current knowledge and known unknowns. Elem. Sci. Anthr. 3, 000072 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Eronen-Rasimus, E. et al. An active bacterial community linked to high chl-a concentrations in Antarctic winter-pack ice and evidence for the development of an anaerobic sea-ice bacterial community. ISME J. 11, 2345–2355 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Kohlbach, D. et al. The importance of ice algae-produced carbon in the central Arctic Ocean ecosystem: food web relationships revealed by lipid and stable isotope analyses. Limnol. Oceanogr. 61, 2027–2044 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Fossheim, M. et al. Recent warming leads to a rapid borealization of fish communities in the Arctic. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 673–677 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Søreide, J. E., Leu, E. V. A., Berge, J., Graeve, M. & Falk-Petersen, S. Timing of blooms, algal food quality and Calanus glacialis reproduction and growth in a changing Arctic. Glob. Chang. Biol. 16, 3154–3163 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Eriksen, E., Skjoldal, H. R., Gjøsæter, H. & Primicerio, R. Spatial and temporal changes in the Barents Sea pelagic compartment during the recent warming. Prog. Oceanogr. 151, 206–226 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  60. David, C., Lange, B., Rabe, B. & Flores, H. Community structure of under-ice fauna in the Eurasian central Arctic Ocean in relation to environmental properties of sea-ice habitats. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 522, 15–32 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Melnikov, I. Recent Arctic sea-ice ecosystem: dynamics and forecast. Dokl. Earth Sci. 423, 1516–1519 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Haug, T. et al. Future harvest of living resources in the Arctic Ocean north of the Nordic and Barents Seas: a review of possibilities and constraints. Fish. Res. 188, 38–57 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Kędra, M. et al. Status and trends in the structure of Arctic benthic food webs. Polar Res. 34, 23775 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Filbee-Dexter, K., Wernberg, T., Fredriksen, S., Norderhaug, K. M. & Pedersen, M. F. Arctic kelp forests: diversity, resilience and future. Glob. Planet. Change 172, 1–14 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Murillo, F. J. et al. Sponge assemblages and predicted archetypes in the eastern Canadian Arctic. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 597, 115–135 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Hamilton, C. D., Lydersen, C., Ims, R. A. & Kovacs, K. M. Predictions replaced by facts: a keystone species’ behavioural responses to declining arctic sea-ice. Biol. Lett. 11, 20150803 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  67. O’Corry-Crowe, G. et al. Genetic profiling links changing sea-ice to shifting beluga whale migration patterns. Biol. Lett. 12, 20160404 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Descamps, S. et al. Climate change impacts on wildlife in a High Arctic archipelago — Svalbard, Norway. Glob. Chang. Biol. 23, 490–502 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Wollenburg, J. E. et al. Ballasting by cryogenic gypsum enhances carbon export in a Phaeocystis under-ice bloom. Sci. Rep. 8, 7703 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Darnis, G. & Fortier, L. Zooplankton respiration and the export of carbon at depth in the Amundsen Gulf (Arctic Ocean). J. Geophys. Res. 117, C04013 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Darnis, G. et al. From polar night to midnight sun: diel vertical migration, metabolism and biogeochemical role of zooplankton in a high Arctic fjord (Kongsfjorden, Svalbard). Limnol. Oceanogr. 62, 1586–1605 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Wiedmann, I., Reigstad, M., Sundfjord, A. & Basedow, S. Potential drivers of sinking particle’s size spectra and vertical flux of particulate organic carbon (POC): turbulence, phytoplankton, and zooplankton. J. Geophys. Res. Ocean. 119, 6900–6917 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Flores, H. et al. Sea-ice properties and nutrient concentration as drivers of the taxonomic and trophic structure of high-Arctic protist and metazoan communities. Polar Biol. 42, 1377–1395 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Belcher, A. et al. The potential role of Antarctic krill faecal pellets in efficient carbon export at the marginal ice zone of the South Orkney Islands in spring. Polar Biol. 40, 2001–2013 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Lalande, C. et al. Variability in under-ice export fluxes of biogenic matter in the Arctic Ocean. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 28, 571–583 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Miller, L. A., Carnat, G., Else, B. G. T., Sutherland, N. & Papakyriakou, T. N. Carbonate system evolution at the Arctic Ocean surface during autumn freeze-up. J. Geophys. Res. Ocean. 116, C00G04 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Dieckmann, G. S. et al. Brief Communication: ikaite (CaCO3·6H2O) discovered in Arctic sea ice. Cryosphere 4, 227–230 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Rysgaard, S. et al. Ikaite crystals in melting sea ice — implications for pCO2 and pH levels in Arctic surface waters. Cryosphere 6, 901–908 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Nomura, D. et al. CO2 flux over young and snow-covered Arctic pack ice in winter and spring. Biogeosciences 15, 3331–3343 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. König, D., Miller, L. A., Simpson, K. G. & Vagle, S. Carbon dynamics during the formation of sea ice at different growth rates. Front. Earth Sci. 6, 234 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Grimm, R., Notz, D., Glud, R. N., Rysgaard, S. & Six, K. D. Assessment of the sea-ice carbon pump: insights from a three-dimensional ocean-sea-ice-biogeochemical model (MPIOM/HAMOCC). Elem. Sci. Anthr. 4, 000136 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Rysgaard, S., Glud, R. N., Sejr, M. K., Bendtsen, J. & Christensen, P. B. Inorganic carbon transport during sea ice growth and decay: a carbon pump in polar seas. J. Geophys. Res. 112, C03016 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Manizza, M. et al. Changes in the Arctic Ocean CO2 sink (1996–2007): a regional model analysis. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 27, 1108–1118 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Mortenson, E. Modelling carbon exchange in the air, sea, and ice of the Arctic Ocean. PhD thesis, Univ. of Victoria (2019).

  85. Fransson, A. et al. Effects of sea-ice and biogeochemical processes and storms on under-ice water fCO2 during the winter-spring transition in the high Arctic Ocean: implications for sea-air CO2 fluxes. J. Geophys. Res. Ocean. 122, 5566–5587 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Mathis, J. T. et al. Storm-induced upwelling of high pCO2 waters onto the continental shelf of the western Arctic Ocean and implications for carbonate mineral saturation states. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L07606 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  87. Pipko, I. I., Semiletov, I. P., Pugach, S. P., Wählstrãm, I. & Anderson, L. G. Interannual variability of air-sea CO2 fluxes and carbon system in the East Siberian Sea. Biogeosciences 8, 1987–2007 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Steiner, N. et al. What sea-ice biogeochemical modellers need from observers. Elementa 4, 000084 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  89. Cai, W.-J. et al. Decrease in the CO2 uptake capacity in an ice-free Arctic Ocean Basin. Science 329, 556–559 (2010).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Else, B. et al. Further observations of a decreasing atmospheric CO2 uptake capacity in the Canada Basin (Arctic Ocean) due to sea ice loss. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 1132–1137 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Fransson, A. et al. CO2-system development in young sea ice and CO2 gas exchange at the ice/air interface mediated by brine and frost flowers in Kongsfjorden, Spitsbergen. Ann. Glaciol. 56, 245–257 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  92. Geilfus, N. X. et al. First estimates of the contribution of CaCO3 precipitation to the release of CO2 to the atmosphere during young sea ice growth. J. Geophys. Res. Ocean. 118, 244–255 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. Brown, K. A. et al. Inorganic carbon system dynamics in landfast Arctic sea ice during the early-melt period. J. Geophys. Res. Ocean. 120, 3542–3566 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Damm, E., Rudels, B., Schauer, U., Mau, S. & Dieckmann, G. Methane excess in Arctic surface water- triggered by sea ice formation and melting. Sci. Rep. 5, 16179 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. Kort, E. A. et al. Atmospheric observations of Arctic Ocean methane emissions up to 82° north. Nat. Geosci. 5, 318–321 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Tison, J.-L. Biogeochemical impact of snow cover and cyclonic intrusions on the winter weddell sea ice pack. J. Geophys. Res. Ocean. 122, 7291–7311 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  97. AMAP Assessment 2015: Methane as an Arctic Climate Forcer (AMAP, 2015).

  98. Zhou, J. et al. Physical and biogeochemical properties in landfast sea ice (Barrow, Alaska): insights on brine and gas dynamics across seasons. J. Geophys. Res. Ocean. 118, 3172–3189 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. Levasseur, M. Impact of Arctic meltdown on the microbial cycling of sulphur. Nat. Geosci. 6, 691–700 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Hayashida, H. et al. Implications of sea-ice biogeochemistry for oceanic production and emissions of dimethyl sulfide in the Arctic. Biogeosciences 14, 3129–3155 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. Abbatt, J. P. D. et al. Overview paper: new insights into aerosol and climate in the Arctic. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 19, 2527–2560 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  102. Galindo, V. et al. Biological and physical processes influencing sea ice, under-ice algae, and dimethylsulfoniopropionate during spring in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago. J. Geophys. Res. Ocean. 119, 3746–3766 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. Simpson, W. R. et al. Halogens and their role in polar boundary-layer ozone depletion. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 7, 4375–4418 (2007).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. Jacobi, H.-W., Morin, S. & Bottenheim, J. W. Observation of widespread depletion of ozone in the springtime boundary layer of the central Arctic linked to mesoscale synoptic conditions. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 115, 17302 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  105. Abbatt, J. P. D. et al. Halogen activation via interactions with environmental ice and snow in the polar lower troposphere and other regions. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12, 6237–6271 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  106. Frey, M. M. et al. First direct observation of sea salt aerosol production from blowing snow above sea ice. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 20, 2549–2578 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  107. Tarasick, D. W. & Bottenheim, J. W. Surface ozone depletion episodes in the Arctic and Antarctic from historical ozonesonde records. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2, 197–205 (2002).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. Kiko, R., Kern, S., Kramer, M. & Mütze, H. Colonization of newly forming Arctic sea ice by meiofauna: a case study for the future Arctic? Polar Biol. 40, 1277–1288 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  109. Steiner, N. & Stefels, J. Commentary on the outputs and future of Biogeochemical Exchange Processes at Sea-Ice Interfaces (BEPSII). Elem. Sci. Anth. 5, 81 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  110. Echeveste, P., Agustí, S. & Dachs, J. Cell size dependent toxicity thresholds of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons to natural and cultured phytoplankton populations. Environ. Pollut. 158, 299–307 (2010).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  111. Peeken, I. et al. Arctic sea ice is an important temporal sink and means of transport for microplastic. Nat. Commun. 9, 1505 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  112. Obbard, R. W. et al. Global warming releases microplastic legacy frozen in Arctic Sea ice. Earth’s Futur. 2, 315–320 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  113. Steiner, N. S., Christian, J. R., Six, K. D., Yamamoto, A. & Yamamoto-Kawai, M. Future ocean acidification in the Canada Basin and surrounding Arctic Ocean from CMIP5 earth system models. J. Geophys. Res. Ocean. 119, 332–347 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  114. Fransson, A. et al. Impact of sea-ice processes on the carbonate system and ocean acidification at the ice-water interface of the Amundsen Gulf, Arctic Ocean. J. Geophys. Res. Ocean. 118, 7001–7023 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  115. Geilfus, N.-X. et al. Estimates of ikaite export from sea ice to the underlying seawater in a sea ice–seawater mesocosm. Cryosphere 10, 2173–2189 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  116. Moreau, S. et al. Assessment of the sea-ice carbon pump: Insights from a three-dimensional ocean-sea-ice biogeochemical model (NEMO-LIM-PISCES). Elementa 4, 000122 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This Perspective is a product of the Biogeochemical Exchange Processes at Sea-Ice Interfaces (BEPSII) research community. This manuscript was first conceived at the Arctic Sea-Ice Change foresight workshop held in Davos, Switzerland, in June 2018 and is supported by the Euromarine Network.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

D.L., L.T., M. v.L., K.C., H.F., B.D., L.M. and J.S. led the design and the writing of the paper. G.C., F.F., N.S., M.V. and M.V. significantly contributed to the ‘Environmental conditions’ section. P.A., J.B., H.K., K.M., I.P., J.-M.R. and P.W. significantly contributed to the ‘Biota’ section. K.B., M.C., O.C., E.D., B.E., A.F., N.-X.G., C.J., E.J., M.K., S.M., D.N., N.S., J.-L.T. and F.v.d.L. significantly contributed to the ‘Gases’ section.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Delphine Lannuzel.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Climate Change thanks Jørgen Berge, Suhas Shetye and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 2

Historical and ‘worst-case’ RCP8.5 scenario source data.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lannuzel, D., Tedesco, L., van Leeuwe, M. et al. The future of Arctic sea-ice biogeochemistry and ice-associated ecosystems. Nat. Clim. Chang. 10, 983–992 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-00940-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-00940-4

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Microbiology

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Microbiology newsletter — what matters in microbiology research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Microbiology