Many recently updated climate models show greater future warming than previously. Separate lines of evidence suggest that their warming rates may be unrealistically high, but the risk of such eventualities only emphasizes the need for rapid and deep reductions in emissions.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Climate of Syria Based on Cordex Simulations: Present and Future
Earth Systems and Environment Open Access 11 September 2023
-
Drivers of low-frequency Sahel precipitation variability: comparing CMIP5 and CMIP6 ensemble means with observations
Climate Dynamics Open Access 10 May 2023
-
Trends in the atmospheric jet streams are emerging in observations and could be linked to tropical warming
Communications Earth & Environment Open Access 19 April 2023
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Data availability
Data for Fig. 2, and additional figures comparing SSPs and RCPs, are available from https://github.com/Priestley-Centre/CMIP5_CMIP6_FaIR_gsat_data.
References
Collins, M. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) 1029–1136 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
Knutti, R., Rugenstein, M. A. A. & Hegerl, G. C. Nat. Geosci. 10, 727–736 (2017).
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2019/11/sensitive-but-unclassified/
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2019/04/new-climate-models-predict-warming-surge
Why results from the next generation of climate models matter. https://go.nature.com/2rU3E65
Bodas‐Salcedo, A. et al. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 11, 1735–1758 (2019).
Sellar, A. A. et al. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001739 (2019).
Meinshausen, M., Raper, S. C. B. & Wigley, T. M. L. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11, 1417–1456 (2011).
Smith, C. J. et al. Geosci. Model Dev. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2273-2018 (2018).
Grose, M. R., Gregory, J., Colman, R. & Andrews, T. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 1559–1566 (2018).
Sutton, R. T. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 100, 1637–1642 (2019).
Swart, N. C. et al. Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2019-177 (2019).
Rogelj, J., Forster, P. M., Kriegler, E., Smith, C. J. & Séférian, R. Nature 571, 335–342 (2019).
Herger, N. et al. Earth Syst. Dynam. 9, 135–151 (2018).
Eyring, V. et al. Geosci. Model Dev. 9, 1747–1802 (2016).
Acknowledgements
We thank C. Jones, K. Tokarska, T. Mauritsen, A. Klein Tank, A. Gettelman, V. Eyring, C. Schleussner, J. Rogelj and J. Marotzke for discussions. Funding was provided by European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under grant agreement no. 820829 (CONSTRAIN) and UKRI NERC grant NE/N006038/1 (SMURPHS). We acknowledge the World Climate Research Programme, which, through its Working Group on Coupled Modelling, coordinated and promoted CMIP6. We thank the climate modelling groups for producing and making available their model output, the Earth System Grid Federation (ESGF) for archiving the data and providing access, and the multiple funding agencies who support CMIP6 and ESGF. M. Schlund is thanked for providing CMIP ECS data.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
P.M.F. conceived of the work and wrote the comment, with extensive contributions to both writing and ideas from A.C.M. C.M.M. provided the analysis of CMIP6 projections, made Fig. 2 and commented on the paper. C.J.S. provided the FaIR analysis and made Fig. 3.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Forster, P.M., Maycock, A.C., McKenna, C.M. et al. Latest climate models confirm need for urgent mitigation. Nat. Clim. Chang. 10, 7–10 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0660-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0660-0
This article is cited by
-
Projected changes of compound droughts and heatwaves in China under 1.5 °C, 2 °C, and 3 °C of global warming
Climate Dynamics (2024)
-
A CMIP6 multi-model ensemble-based analysis of potential climate change impacts on irrigation water demand and supply using SWAT and CROPWAT models: a case study of Akmese Dam, Turkey
Theoretical and Applied Climatology (2024)
-
Estimating Soil Carbon Sequestration of Jatropha for Sustainable Aviation Fuel Pathway
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution (2024)
-
Trends in the atmospheric jet streams are emerging in observations and could be linked to tropical warming
Communications Earth & Environment (2023)
-
Evaluation of bias correction techniques for generating high-resolution daily temperature projections from CMIP6 models
Climate Dynamics (2023)