Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Large loss of CO2 in winter observed across the northern permafrost region

An Author Correction to this article was published on 08 November 2019

This article has been updated


Recent warming in the Arctic, which has been amplified during the winter1,2,3, greatly enhances microbial decomposition of soil organic matter and subsequent release of carbon dioxide (CO2)4. However, the amount of CO2 released in winter is not known and has not been well represented by ecosystem models or empirically based estimates5,6. Here we synthesize regional in situ observations of CO2 flux from Arctic and boreal soils to assess current and future winter carbon losses from the northern permafrost domain. We estimate a contemporary loss of 1,662 TgC per year from the permafrost region during the winter season (October–April). This loss is greater than the average growing season carbon uptake for this region estimated from process models (−1,032 TgC per year). Extending model predictions to warmer conditions up to 2100 indicates that winter CO2 emissions will increase 17% under a moderate mitigation scenario—Representative Concentration Pathway 4.5—and 41% under business-as-usual emissions scenario—Representative Concentration Pathway 8.5. Our results provide a baseline for winter CO2 emissions from northern terrestrial regions and indicate that enhanced soil CO2 loss due to winter warming may offset growing season carbon uptake under future climatic conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it


Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Distribution of in situ data included in this winter CO2 flux synthesis.
Fig. 2: Effect of soil temperature on CO2 release from soils.
Fig. 3: Pan-Arctic winter CO2 emissions under current and future climate scenarios.
Fig. 4: Projected annual CO2 emissions during the winter for the northern permafrost region.

Data availability

Data are archived and freely available at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory Distributed Active Archive Center. The synthesis dataset is available at Monthly carbon flux maps (25 km, October–April, 2003–2018; 2018–2100 for RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5) are available at

Change history

  • 08 November 2019

    An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.


  1. Huang, J. Recently amplified Arctic warming has contributed to a continual global warming trend. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 875–879 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Koenigk, T. et al. Arctic Climate Change in 21st century CMIP5 simulations with EC-Earth. Clim. Dynam. 40, 2719–2743 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen, J. et al. Recent Arctic amplification and extreme mid-latitude weather. Nat. Geosci. 7, 627–637 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Schadel, C. et al. Potential carbon emissions dominated by carbon dioxide from thawed permafrost soils. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 950–953 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fisher, J. B. et al. Carbon cycle uncertainty in the Alaskan Arctic. Biogeosciences 11, 4271–4288 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Commane, R. et al. Carbon dioxide sources from Alaska driven by increasing early winter respiration from Arctic tundra. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 5361–5366 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Elberling, B. & Brandt, K. K. Uncoupling of microbial CO2 production and release in frozen soil and its implications for field studies of Arctic C cycling. Soil Biol. Biochem. 35, 263–272 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Schuur, E. A. G. et al. Climate change and the permafrost carbon feedback. Nature 520, 171–179 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Belshe, E. F., Schuur, E. A. G. & Bolker, B. M. Tundra ecosystems observed to be CO2 sources due to differential amplification of the carbon cycle. Ecol. Lett. 16, 1307–1315 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. McGuire, A. D. et al. An assessment of the carbon balance of Arctic tundra: comparisons among observations, process models, and atmospheric inversions. Biogeosciences 9, 3185–3204 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schimel, D. et al. Observing terrestrial ecossytems and the carbon cycle from space. Glob. Change Biol. 21, 1762–1776 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Parazoo, N., Commane, R., Wofsy, S. C. & Koven, C. D. Detecting regional patterns of changing CO2 flux in Alaska. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 7733–7738 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Grogan, P. Cold season respiration across a low Arctic landscape: the influence of vegetation type, snow depth, and interannual climatic variation. Arct. Antarct. Alp. Res. 44, 446–456 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Michaelson, G. J. & Ping, C. L. Soil organic carbon and CO2 respiration at subzero temperature in soils of Arctic Alaska. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 108(D2), 8164 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rogers, M. C., Sullivan, P. F. & Welker, J. M. Evidence of nonlinearity in the response of net ecosystem CO2 exchange to increasing levels of winter snow depth in the high Arctic of Northwestern Greenland. Arct. Antarct. Alp. Res. 43, 95–106 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang, T. et al. Controls on winter ecosystem respiration in temperate and boreal ecosystems. Biogeosciences 8, 2009–2025 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Zona, D. et al. Cold season emissions dominate the Arctic tundra methane budget. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 40–45 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Schaefer, K. & Jafarov, E. A parameterization of respiration in frozen soils based on substrate availability. Biogeosciences 13, 1991–2001 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Monson, R. et al. Winter forest soil respiration controlled by climate and microbial community composition. Nature 439, 711–714 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Welker, J. M., Fahnestock, J. T. & Jones, M. H. Annual CO2 flux in dry and moist Arctic tundra: field responses to increases in summer temperatures and winter snow depth. Climatic Change 44, 139–150 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Natali, S. M. et al. Effects of experimental warming of air, soil and permafrost on carbon balance in Alaskan tundra. Glob. Change Biol. 17, 1394–1407 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Webb, E. E. et al. Increased wintertime CO2 loss as a result of sustained tundra warming. Biogeosciences 121, 1–17 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Christiansen, C. T., Schmidt, N. M. & Michelsen, A. High Arctic dry heath CO2 exchange during the early cold season. Ecosystems 15, 1083–1092 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Knutti, R., Masson, D. & Gettelman, A. Climate model genealogy: generation CMIP5 and how we got there. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 1194–1199 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Forkel, M. et al. Enhanced seasonal CO2 exchange caused by amplified plant productivity in northern ecosystems. Science 351, 696–699 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Tucker, C. Reduction of air- and liquid water-filled soil pore space with freezing explains high temperature sensitivity of soil respiration below 0 °C. Soil Biol. Biochem. 78, 90–96 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Loranty, M. M. et al. Reviews and syntheses: changing ecosystem influences on soil thermal regimes in northern high-latitude permafrost regions. Biogeosciences 15, 5287–5313 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Witze, A. Snow-sensing fleet to unlock water’s icy secrets. Nature 532, 17 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Natali, S. M. et al. Permafrost thaw and soil moisture driving CO2 and CH4 release from upland tundra. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 120, 525–537 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Euskirchen, E. S., Bret-Harte, M. S., Shaver, G. R., Edgar, C. W. & Romanovsky, V. E. Long-term release of carbon dioxide from Arctic tundra ecosystems in Alaska. Ecosystems 20, 960–974 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Tramontana, G. et al. Predicting carbon dioxide and energy fluxes across global FLUXNET sites with regression algorithms. Biogeosciences 13, 4291–4313 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Koven, C. D. et al. Permafrost carbon-climate feedbacks accelerate global warming. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 14769–14774 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Slater, A. G. & Lawrence, D. M. Diagnosing present and future permafrost from climate models. J. Clim. 26, 5608–5623 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Vanhala, P. et al. Temperature sensitivity of soil organic matter decomposition in southern and northern areas of the boreal forest zone. Soil Biol. Biochem. 40, 1758–1764 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Hugelius, G. E. A. Estimated stocks of circumpolar permafrost carbon with quantified uncertainty ranges and identified data gaps. Biogeosciences 11, 6573–6593 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. McGuire, A. D. et al. Dependence of the evolution of carbon dynamics in the northern permafrost region on the trajectory of climate change. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 3882–3887 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Qian, H., Joseph, R. & Zeng, N. Enhanced terrestrial carbon uptake in the northern high latitudes in the 21st century from the Coupled Carbon Climate Model Intercomparison Project model projections. Glob. Change Biol. 16, 641–656.

  38. Starr, G. O. et al. Photosynthesis of Arctic evergreens under snow: implications for tundra ecosystem carbon balance. Ecology 84, 1415–1420 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Treat, C. C., Bloom, A. A. & Marushchak, M. E. Nongrowing season methane emissions: a significant component of annual emissions across northern ecosystems. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 3331–3343 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Walter Anthony, K. et al. 21st-century modeled permafrost carbon emissions accelerated by abrupt thaw beneath lakes. Nat. Commun. 9, 3262 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Circum-Arctic Map of Permafrost and Ground-Ice Conditions, Version 2 (National Snow & Ice Data Center, 2002);

  42. Brodzik, M. J., Billingsley, B., Haran, T., Raup, B. & Savoie, M. H. EASE-Grid 2.0: incremental but significant improvements for Earth-gridded data sets. ISPRS Int. J. Geoinf. 1, 32–45 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. R Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2016).

  44. Ridgeway, G. Generalized Boosted Models: A guide to the gbm package. R version 2.1.5 (2007).

  45. Elith, J., Leathwick, J. R. & Hastie, T. A working guide to boosted regression trees. J. Anim. Ecol. 77, 802–813 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Hijmans, R. J., Phillips, S., Leathwick, J. & Elith, J. Dismo: Species distribution modelling. R version 1.1-4 (2017).

  47. Bronaugh, D. W. Zyp: Zhang + Yue-Pilon trends package. R version 0.10-1.1 (2017).

  48. Rogers, B. M., et. al. Impacts of climate change on fire regimes and carbon stocks of the US Pacific Northwest. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 116, G03037 (2011).

  49. Leathwick, J. R., Elith, J., Francis, M. P., Hastie, T. & Taylor, P. Variation in demersal fish species richness in the oceans surrounding New Zealand: an analysis using boosted regression trees. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 321, 267–281 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This study was supported by funding from NASA’s Arctic-Boreal Vulnerability Experiment (ABoVE; grant no. NNX15AT81A to S.M.N.), with additional funding from NASA New Investigator Program (grant no. NNX17AF16G to J.D.W.), National Science Foundation (grant nos. 955713 and 1331083 to E.A.G.S.; no. 1503559 to E.E.J.), the Next-Generation Ecosystem Experiments Arctic Project, Department of Energy Office of Science to E.E.J., Department of Energy Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research to J.D.J and R.M. (grant no. DE-AC02-06CH11357), National Research Foundation of Korea (grant nos. NRF-2016M1A5A1901769 and KOPRI-PN-19081 to B.-Y.L. and Y.K.), and funds that supported the data included in this synthesis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



S.M.N., J.D.W. and B.M.R conceived the work. B.W.A., G.C., C.T.C., H.G., E.E.J., M.M.L., S.M.L., M.L., A.M., C.M., S.M.N., F.R., B.M.R., K.S., A.-K.S., C.C.T., Y.W. and X.X. extracted unpublished data. K.A.A, M.P.B, G.C, T.R.C, E.J.C, C.T.C., S.D., J.D., J.E.E., B.E., E.S.E., T.F., M.G., J.P.G., P.G., M.H., J.D.J., A.A.M.K., Y.K., L.K., K.S.L., M.L., R.M., J.M., A.M., S.M.N., W.C.O., F.-J.W.P., N.P., W.Q., D.R., T.S., N.M.S., E.A.G.S, P.R.S., O.S., P.F.S., M.P.W., C.W. and D.Z. provided unpublished or raw data. L.B., A.A.B., J.D., J.S.K., Z.L., N.M., A.D.M., B.P. and Z.Z. provided modelled data and results. S.M.L., C.M., S.M.N., S.P. and J.D.W. prepared tables and figures. G.C., H.G., M.J.L., M.M.L., S.M.L, S.M.N., S.P., B.M.R., P.F.S. and J.D.W. performed statistical analyses, including BRT modelling. S.P., B.M.R. and J.W. led the BRT upscaling or projection analyses. All authors contributed to data interpretation and preparation of manuscript text.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan M. Natali.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Climate Change thanks John Campbell and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary methods, Figs. 1–6, Tables 1–8 and references.

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Natali, S.M., Watts, J.D., Rogers, B.M. et al. Large loss of CO2 in winter observed across the northern permafrost region. Nat. Clim. Chang. 9, 852–857 (2019).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing