Concern about the carbon footprint of Bitcoin is not holding back blockchain developers from leveraging the technology for action on climate change. Although blockchain technology is enabling individuals and businesses to manage their carbon emissions, the social and environmental costs and benefits of doing so remain unclear.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Economic estimation of Bitcoin mining’s climate damages demonstrates closer resemblance to digital crude than digital gold
Scientific Reports Open Access 29 September 2022
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Statistics: Total Primary Energy Supply (TPES) by Source, World 1990–2016 (IEA, accessed 3 July 2019); https://go.nature.com/318uBiG
de Vries, A. Joule 2, 801–805 (2018).
Narayanan, A., Bonneau, J., Felten, E., Miller, A. & Goldfeder, S. Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency Technologies (Princeton Univ. Press, 2016).
Mora, C. et al. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 931–933 (2018).
Bendiksen, C. & Gibbons, S. The Bitcoin Mining Network: Trends, Average Creation Costs, Electricity Consumption & Sources (CoinShares Research, 2019); https://go.nature.com/2LQMHm0
Krause, M. J. & Tolaymat, T. Nat. Sustain. 1, 711–718 (2018).
Stoll, C., Klaaßen, L. & Gallersdörfer, U. Joule 3, 1647–1661 (2019).
Howson, P., Oakes, S., Baynham-Herd, Z. & Swords, J. Geoforum 100, 1–9 (2019).
Huckle, S. & White, M. Future Internet 8, 49–64 (2016).
Gil-Pulger, J. ‘Ethereum 2.0’ PoS blockchain aims to cut energy use by 99% Bitcoinist (4 January 2019); https://bitcoinist.com/ethereum-pos-blockchain-cut-energy/
The Solution (Poseidon, 2019); https://poseidon.eco/solution.html
Lang, C. Can buying Ben & Jerry’s ice cream save the Cordillera Azul National Park in Peru? REDD-Monitor (9 November 2018); https://go.nature.com/2MuOoEX
Enrici, A. & Hubacek, K. Ecol. Soc. 23, 7 (2018).
Carbon offsets are not our get-out-of-jail free card UNEP (10 June 2019); https://go.nature.com/2ysg9Gi
Booman, G. et al. Regen Network Whitepaper (accessed 3 June 2018); https://www.regen.network/whitepaper.pdf
Howson, P. Conserv. Soc. 15, 125–135 (2017).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Howson, P. Tackling climate change with blockchain. Nat. Clim. Chang. 9, 644–645 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0567-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0567-9
This article is cited by
-
Economic estimation of Bitcoin mining’s climate damages demonstrates closer resemblance to digital crude than digital gold
Scientific Reports (2022)
-
An implementation framework of blockchain-based hazardous waste transfer management system
Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2022)
-
Energy Consumption and Bitcoin Market
Asia-Pacific Financial Markets (2022)