Why setting a climate deadline is dangerous

The publication of the IPCC Special Report on global warming of 1.5 oC paved the way for the rise of the political rhetoric of setting a fixed deadline for decisive actions on climate change. However, the dangers of such deadline rhetoric suggest the need for the IPCC to take responsibility for its report and openly challenge the credibility of such a deadline.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    IPCC. Special Report: Global Warming of 1.5 °C (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) (IPCC, 2018).

  2. 2.

    Watts, J. We have 12 years to limit climate change catastrophe, warns UN. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/oct/08/global-warming-must-not-exceed-15c-warns-landmark-un-report (2018).

  3. 3.

    United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC, 1992).

  4. 4.

    Leemans, R. & Vellinga, P. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 26–27, 134–142 (2017).

  5. 5.

    Morseletto, P., Biermann, F. & Pattberg, P. Int. Environ. Agreements Polit. Law Econ. 17, 655–676 (2017).

  6. 6.

    Knutti, R., Rogelj, J., Sedlácek, J. & Fischer, E. Nat. Geosci. 9, 13–18 (2016).

  7. 7.

    Schleussner, C.-F. et al. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 827–835 (2016).

  8. 8.

    MacDougall, A. Curr. Clim. Change Rep. 2, 39–47 (2016).

  9. 9.

    Millar, R., Allen, M., Rogelj, J. & Friedlingstein, P. Oxford Rev. Econ. Policy 32, 323–342 (2016).

  10. 10.

    Matthews, H. D., Solomon, S. & Pierrehumbert, R. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 370, 4365–4379 (2012).

  11. 11.

    Leach, N. et al. Nat. Geosci. 11, 574–579 (2018).

  12. 12.

    Tokarska, K. Nat. Geosci. 11, 546–547 (2018).

  13. 13.

    Jasanoff, S. Theory Cult. Soc. 27, 233–253 (2010).

  14. 14.

    Geden, O. Nat. Geosci. 11, 380–383 (2018).

  15. 15.

    Rogelj, J. et al. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 245–252 (2016).

  16. 16.

    Geden, O. & Löschel, A. Nat. Geosci. 10, 881–882 (2017).

  17. 17.

    Shah, A., Mullainathan, S. & Shafir, E. Science 338, 682–685 (2012).

  18. 18.

    MacMartin, D., Ricke, K. & Keith, D. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 376, 20160454 (2018).

  19. 19.

    Asayama, S. & Hulme, M. Clim. Policy https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1623165 (2019).

  20. 20.

    Heyward, C. & Rayner, S. in Anthropology and Climate Change: From Actions to Transformations (eds Crate, S. & Nuttall, M.) 86–104 (Routledge, 2016).

  21. 21.

    Sillmann, J. et al. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 290–292 (2015).

  22. 22.

    Grundmann, R. Nat. Geosci. 9, 562–563 (2016).

  23. 23.

    Evensen, D. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 428–430 (2019).

  24. 24.

    Allen, M. Why protesters should be wary of ‘12 years to climate breakdown’ rhetoric. https://theconversation.com/why-protesters-should-be-wary-of-12-years-to-climate-breakdown-rhetoric-115489 (2019).

  25. 25.

    Hulme, M. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 222–224 (2016).

Download references

Acknowledgements

S.A. acknowledges the support of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grants-in-Aid for JSPS Research Fellow (17J02207). W.P. acknowledges the support of the Economic and Social Research Council Future Leaders Research programme, “Making Climate Social” project (ES/N002016/1)

Author information

Correspondence to Mike Hulme.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark