Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Mora et al. reply

The Original Article was published on 28 August 2019

The Original Article was published on 28 August 2019

The Original Article was published on 28 August 2019

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    Mora, C. et al. Bitcoin emissions alone could push global warming above 2°C. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 931–933 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Houy, N. Rational mining limits Bitcoin emissions. Nat. Clim. Change (2019).

  3. 3.

    Dittmar, L. & Praktiknjo, A. Could Bitcoin emissions push global warming above 2 °C? Nat. Clim. Change (2019).

  4. 4.

    Masanet, E. et al. Implausible projections overestimate near-term Bitcoin CO2 emissions. Nat Clim. Change (2019).

  5. 5.

    Moss, R. H. et al. The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature 463, 747–756 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Deryng, D., Conway, D., Ramankutty, N., Price, J. & Warren, R. Global crop yield response to extreme heat stress under multiple climate change futures. Environ. Res. Lett. 9, 034011 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Kapur, M. R. & Franklin, E. C. Simulating future climate impacts on tropical fisheries: are contemporary spatial fishery management strategies sufficient? Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 74, 1974–1989 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Jones, A. E. et al. Bluetongue risk under future climates. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 153–161 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Mora, C. et al. Broad threat to humanity from cumulative climate hazards intensified by greenhouse gas emissions. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 1062–1071 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Greenberg, P. & Bugden, D. Energy consumption boomtowns in the United States: community responses to a cryptocurrency boom. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 50, 162–167 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    World Energy Outlook 2017 (OECD/IEA, 2017).

  12. 12.

    de Vries, A. Bitcoin’s growing energy problem. Joule 2, 801–805 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Bitcoin Energy Consumption Index (Digiconomist, 2019);

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Camilo Mora.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mora, C., Rollins, R.L., Taladay, K. et al. Mora et al. reply. Nat. Clim. Chang. 9, 658–659 (2019).

Download citation


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing