Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Model-based assessments for long-term climate strategies

Many countries are formulating a long-term climate strategy to be submitted to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change by 2020. Model-based, multi-disciplinary assessments can be a key ingredient for informing policy makers and engaging stakeholders in this process.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Global, regional, sectoral, and technology perspectives.
Fig. 2: An integrated perspective provides a basis for achieving a broad set of goals.

References

  1. A Clean Planet for all - A European strategic long-term vision for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate neutral economy. Communication COM(2018) 773 final (European Commission, 2018).

  2. In-depth analysis in support of the Commission Communication COM (2018) 773 (European Commission, 2018).

  3. Rogelj, J. et al. Nature 534, 631–639 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Vandyck, T. et al. Glob. Environ. Chang. 41, 46–63 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rockström, J. et al. Science 355, 1269–1271 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Keramidas, K. et al. Global Energy and Climate Outlook 2018: Sectoral mitigation options towards a low-emissions economy (EU, 2018).

  7. Rogelj, J. et al. Nat. Clim. Chang. 8, 325–332 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. IPCC Special Report: Global Warming of 1.5°C (eds V. Masson-Delmotte. et al.) (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2018).

  9. Iyer, G. et al. Nat. Clim. Chang. 7, 871–874 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Esmeijer, K. et al. 2°C and 1.5°C scenarios and possibilities of limiting the use of BECCS and bio-energy (PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, 2018).

  11. van Vuuren, D. P. et al. Nat. Clim. Chang. 8, 391–397 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Vandyck, T. et al. Nat. Commun. 9, 4939 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hong, Y. C. et al. Air Pollution in Asia and the Pacific: Science-based solutions (Climate and Clean Air Coalition, UN Environment, 2019).

  14. Bhanarkar, A. D. et al. Atmosph. Environ. 186, 158–177 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Springmann, M. et al. Nat. Clim. Chang. 7, 69–74 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toon Vandyck.

Ethics declarations

Disclaimer

The views expressed are purely those of the authors and may not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official position of the European Commission.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Weitzel, M., Vandyck, T., Keramidas, K. et al. Model-based assessments for long-term climate strategies. Nat. Clim. Chang. 9, 345–347 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0453-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0453-5

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing