Matters Arising | Published:

The role of ocean dynamics in king penguin range estimation

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    Cristofari, R. et al. Climate-driven range shifts of the king penguin in a fragmented ecosystem. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 245–251 (2018).

  2. 2.

    Bost, C. A. et al. Large-scale climatic anomalies affect marine predator foraging behaviour and demography. Nat. Commun. 6, 8220 (2015).

  3. 3.

    Sallée, J. B. et al. Assessment of Southern Ocean mixed-layer depths in CMIP5 models: Historical bias and forcing response. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 118, 1845–1862 (2013).

  4. 4.

    Meijers, A. J. S. et al. Representation of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current in the CMIP5 climate models and future changes under warming scenarios. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 117, C12008 (2012).

  5. 5.

    Péron, C., Weimerskirch, H. & Bost, C.-A. Projected poleward shift of king penguins’ (Aptenodytes patagonicus) foraging range at the Crozet Islands, southern Indian Ocean. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 279, 2515–2523 (2012).

  6. 6.

    Sokolov, S. & Rintoul, S. R. Circumpolar structure and distribution of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current fronts: 1. Mean circumpolar paths. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans (2009).

  7. 7.

    Chapman, C. C. New perspectives on frontal variability in the Southern Ocean. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 47, 1151–1168 (2017).

  8. 8.

    Chambers, D. P. Using kinetic energy measurements from altimetry to detect shifts in the positions of fronts in the Southern Ocean. Ocean Sci. 14, 105–116 (2018).

  9. 9.

    Gille, S. T. & Meredith, M. P. in Satellite Altimetry Over Oceans and Land Surfaces (eds Stammer, D. & Cazenave, A.) 297–314 (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2017).

  10. 10.

    Downes, S. M. & Hogg, A. M. Southern Ocean circulation and eddy compensation in CMIP5 models. J. Clim. 26, 7198–7220 (2013).

  11. 11.

    Meijers, A. J. S. The Southern Ocean in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 5. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 372, 20130296 (2014).

  12. 12.

    Cavanagh, R. D. et al. A synergistic approach for evaluating climate model output for ecological applications. Front. Mar. Sci. 4, 308 (2017).

Download references

Author information

A.J.S.M., M.P.M., D.P.C. and E.F.Y. provided physical oceanographic interpretations of the papers in question, and commentary on the present state of the art. E.J.M., M.B. and E.F.Y. provided the same for the ecological subject matter. A.J.S.M. created Fig. 1.

Correspondence to A. J. S. Meijers.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark
Fig. 1: Longitudinal comparison of the modelled future meridional ACC core displacement and SST contour displacement.