Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

A reconciled estimate of the influence of Arctic sea-ice loss on recent Eurasian cooling

Matters Arising to this article was published on 02 February 2021

Matters Arising to this article was published on 26 November 2019


Northern midlatitudes, over central Eurasia in particular, have experienced frequent severe winters in recent decades1,2,3. A remote influence of Arctic sea-ice loss has been suggested4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14; however, the importance of this connection remains controversial because of discrepancies among modelling and between modelling and observational studies15,16,17. Here, using a hybrid analysis of observations and multi-model large ensembles from seven atmospheric general circulation models, we examine the cause of these differences. While all models capture the observed structure of the forced surface temperature response to sea-ice loss in the Barents–Kara Seas—including Eurasian cooling—we show that its magnitude is systematically underestimated. Owing to the varying degrees of this underestimation of sea-ice-forced signal, the signal-to-noise ratio differs markedly. Correcting this underestimation reconciles the discrepancy between models and observations, leading to the conclusion that ~44% of the central Eurasian cooling trend for 1995–2014 is attributable to sea-ice loss in the Barents–Kara Seas. Our results strongly suggest that anthropogenic forcing has significantly amplified the probability of severe winter occurrence in central Eurasia via enhanced melting of the Barents–Kara sea ice. The difference in underestimation of signal-to-noise ratio between models therefore calls for careful experimental design and interpretation for regional climate change attribution.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Sea-ice-forced patterns of boreal winter SAT and atmospheric circulation anomalies in the observed and simulated historical variabilities.
Fig. 2: Sea-ice-forced patterns of SAT and SLP anomalies in observations and MIROC4 sensitivity experiments.
Fig. 3: Sea-ice-forced modulation of the probability of WACE occurrence.
Fig. 4: Reproducibility of variance and its fraction of SAT anomalies associated with WACE.
Fig. 5: Sea-ice loss impacts on the recent Eurasian cooling trend.

Data availability

The monthly SST and SIC in HadISST33 are available from the Met Office website ( The ERA-Interim reanalysis data sets44 are available from the ECMWF website ( The six additional AGCM outputs analysed are freely available from the NOAA FACTS website ( The MIROC4 AGCM output generated and analysed in this study is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


  1. 1.

    Horton, D. E. et al. Contribution of changes in atmospheric circulation patterns to extreme temperature trends. Nature 522, 465–469 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Johnson, N. C., Xie, S. P., Kosaka, Y. & Li, X. Increasing occurrence of cold and warm extremes during the recent global warming slowdown. Nat. Commun. 9, 1724 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Cohen, J. et al. Recent Arctic amplification and extreme mid-latitude weather. Nat. Geosci. 7, 627–637 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Mori, M., Watanabe, M., Shiogama, H., Inoue, J. & Kimoto, M. Robust Arctic sea-ice influence on the frequent Eurasian cold winters in past decades. Nat. Geosci. 7, 869–873 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Inoue, J., Hori, M. E. & Takaya, K. The role of Barents Sea ice in the wintertime cyclone track and emergence of a warm-Arctic cold-Siberian anomaly. J. Clim. 25, 2561–2568 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Chen, H. W., Alley, R. B. & Zhang, F. Interannual Arctic sea ice variability and associated winter weather patterns: a regional perspective for 1979–2014. J. Geophys. Res. 121, 14433–14455 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Tang, Q., Zhang, X., Yang, X. & Francis, J. A. Cold winter extremes in northern continents linked to Arctic sea ice loss. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 014036 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Honda, M., Inoue, J. & Yamane, S. Influence of low Arctic sea-ice minima on anomalously cold Eurasian winters. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36, L08707 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Kug, J.-S. et al. Two distinct influences of Arctic warming on cold winters over North America and East Asia. Nat. Geosci. 8, 759–762 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Petoukhov, V. & Semenov, V. A. A link between reduced Barents-Kara sea ice and cold winter extremes over northern continents. J. Geophys. Res. 115, D21111 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Semenov, V. A. & Latif, M. Nonlinear winter atmospheric circulation response to Arctic sea ice concentration anomalies for different periods during 1966–2012. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 054020 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Kim, B.-M. et al. Weakening of the stratospheric polar vortex by Arctic sea-ice loss. Nat. Commun. 5, 4646 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Peings, Y. & Magnusdottir, G. Response of the wintertime northern hemisphere atmospheric circulation to current and projected Arctic sea ice decline: a numerical study with CAM5. J. Clim. 27, 244–264 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Nakamura, T. et al. A negative phase shift of the winter AO/NAO due to the recent Arctic sea-ice reduction in late autumn. J. Geophys. Res. 120, 3209–3227 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Screen, J. A. Far-flung effects of Arctic warming. Nat. Geosci. 10, 253–254 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Screen, J. A. et al. Consistency and discrepancy in the atmospheric response to Arctic sea-ice loss across climate models. Nat. Geosci. 11, 155–163 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Shepherd, T. G. Effects of a warming Arctic. Science 353, 989–990 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    IPCC Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2013).

  19. 19.

    Perovich, D. et al. Sea ice cover. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 98, S131–S133 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Chen, H. W., Zhang, F. & Alley, R. B. The robustness of midlatitude weather pattern changes due to Arctic sea ice loss. J. Clim. 29, 7831–7849 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Sun, L., Perlwitz, J. & Hoerling, M. What caused the recent “Warm Arctic, Cold Continents” trend pattern in winter temperatures? Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 5345–5352 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    McCusker, K. E., Fyfe, J. C. & Sigmond, M. Twenty-five winters of unexpected Eurasian cooling unlikely due to Arctic sea-ice loss. Nat. Geosci. 9, 838–842 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Ogawa, F. et al. Evaluating impacts of recent Arctic sea ice loss on the northern hemisphere winter climate change. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 3255–3263 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Barnes, E. A. & Screen, J. A. The impact of Arctic warming on the midlatitude jet-stream: Can it? Has it? Will it? WIREs Clim. Change 6, 277–286 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Hoskins, B. & Woollings, T. Persistent extratropical regimes and climate extremes. Curr. Clim. Change Rep. 1, 115–124 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Overland, J. E. et al. Nonlinear response of mid-latitude weather to the changing Arctic. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 992–999 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Smith, D. M. The Polar Amplification Model Intercomparison Project (PAMIP) contribution to CMIP6: investigating the causes and consequences of polar amplification. Geosci. Model Dev. (in the press).

  28. 28.

    Palmer, T. N. A nonlinear dynamical perspective on climate prediction. J. Clim. 12, 575–591 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Deser, C., Sun, L., Tomas, R. A. & Screen, J. Does ocean coupling matter for the northern extratropical response to projected Arctic sea ice loss? Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 2149–2157 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Sorokina, S. A., Li, C., Wettstein, J. J. & Kvamstø, N. G. Observed atmospheric coupling between Barents Sea ice and the warm-Arctic cold-Siberian anomaly pattern. J. Clim. 29, 495–511 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Eade, R. et al. Do seasonal-to-decadal climate predictions underestimate the predictability of the real world? Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 5620–5628 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Sakamoto, T. T. et al. MIROC4h: a new high-resolution atmosphere-ocean coupled general circulation model. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan. 90, 325–359 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Rayner, N. A. et al. Global analyses of sea surface temperature, sea ice, and night marine air temperature since the late nineteenth century. J. Geophys. Res. 108, D144407 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Screen, J. A., Simmonds, I., Deser, C. & Tomas, R. The atmospheric response to three decades of observed Arctic sea ice loss. J. Clim. 26, 1230–1248 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Donner, L. J. et al. The dynamical core, physical parameterizations, and basic simulation characteristics of the atmospheric component AM3 of the GFDL global coupled model CM3. J. Clim. 24, 3484–3519 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Neale, R. B. et al. The mean climate of the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM4) in forced SST and fully coupled experiments. J. Clim. 26, 5150–5168 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Neale, R. B. et al. Description of the NCAR Community Atmosphere Model (CAM 5.0) NCAR Technical Note NCAR/TN-486+STR (NCAR, 2012).

  38. 38.

    Roeckner, E. et al. The Atmospheric General Circulation Model ECHAM 5. Part I: Model Description Techical Report 349 (Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie, 2003).

  39. 39.

    Molod, A. et al. The GEOS-5 Atmospheric General Circulation Model: Mean Climate And Development from MERRA to Fortuna NASA Technical Report Series on Global Modeling and Data Assimilation NASA/TM-2012-104606-VOL-28, GSFC.TM.01153.2012 (NASA, 2012).

  40. 40.

    Saha, S. et al. The NCEP climate forecast system version 2. J. Clim. 27, 2185–2208 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Hurrell, J. W., Hack, J. J., Shea, D., Caron, J. M. & Rosinski, J. A new sea surface temperature and sea ice boundary dataset for the Community Atmosphere Model. J. Clim. 21, 5145–5153 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Wallace, J. M., Smith, C. & Bretherton, C. S. Singular value decomposition of wintertime sea surface temperature and 500-mb height anomalies. J. Clim. 5, 561–576 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Bretherton, C. S., Smith, C. & Wallace, J. M. An intercomparison of methods for finding coupled patterns in climate data. J. Clim. 5, 541–560 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Dee, D. P. et al. The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 137, 553–597 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Ward, M. N. & Navarra, A. Pattern analysis of SST-forced variability in ensemble GCM simulations: examples over Europe and the tropical Pacific. J. Clim. 10, 2210–2220 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Smoliak, B. V. & Wallace, J. M. On the leading patterns of northern hemisphere sea level pressure variability. J. Atmos. Sci. 72, 3469–3486 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Luo, D. et al. Impact of ural blocking on winter warm Arctic-cold Eurasian anomalies. Part I: blocking-induced amplification. J. Clim. 29, 3925–3947 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Crasemann, B. et al. Can preferred atmospheric circulation patterns over the North-Atlantic-Eurasian region be associated with arctic sea ice loss? Polar Sci. 14, 9–20 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We acknowledge the modelling groups and their members who generated the FACTS climate model simulation data provided by NOAA/ESRL/PSD. We are grateful for the stimulating discussions with B. Taguchi. This work is supported in part by the Integrated Research Program for Advancing Climate Models from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan, by the Arctic Challenge for Sustainability (ArCS) Program from MEXT, Japan, and by the Japan Science and Technology Agency through the Belmont Forum Collaborative Research Action ‘InterDec’ project.

Author information




M.M. designed the research and performed the numerical experiments and analyses. M.M., Y.K. and M.W. wrote the manuscript with discussion and feedback from H.N. and M.K.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masato Mori.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–10, Supplementary Table 1

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mori, M., Kosaka, Y., Watanabe, M. et al. A reconciled estimate of the influence of Arctic sea-ice loss on recent Eurasian cooling. Nature Clim Change 9, 123–129 (2019).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing