Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Global trends in carbon sinks and their relationships with CO2 and temperature

Nature Climate Change volume 9, pages 73–79 (2019)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Elevated CO2 concentrations increase photosynthesis and, potentially, net ecosystem production (NEP), meaning a greater CO2 uptake. Climate, nutrients and ecosystem structure, however, influence the effect of increasing CO2. Here we analysed global NEP from MACC-II and Jena CarboScope atmospheric inversions and ten dynamic global vegetation models (TRENDY), using statistical models to attribute the trends in NEP to its potential drivers: CO2, climatic variables and land-use change. We found that an increased CO2 was consistently associated with an increased NEP (1995–2014). Conversely, increased temperatures were negatively associated with NEP. Using the two atmospheric inversions and TRENDY, the estimated global sensitivities for CO2 were 6.0 ± 0.1, 8.1 ± 0.3 and 3.1 ± 0.1 PgC per 100 ppm (~1 °C increase), and −0.5 ± 0.2, −0.9 ± 0.4 and −1.1 ± 0.1 PgC °C−1 for temperature. These results indicate a positive CO2 effect on terrestrial C sinks that is constrained by climate warming.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Global trends in NEP and their contributing factors.
Fig. 2: Estimated effects of the interactions of the statistical models.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are publicly available in the web pages provided in the article. The TRENDY simulations are available from the corresponding author upon request.

References

  1. Canadell, J. G. et al. Contributions to accelerating atmospheric CO2 growth from economic activity, carbon intensity, and efficiency of natural sinks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 18866–18870 (2007).

  2. Le Quéré, C. et al. Global carbon budget 2017. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 10, 405–448 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ciais, P. et al. Europe-wide reduction in primary productivity caused by the heat and drought in 2003. Nature 437, 529–533 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Crowther, T. W. et al. Quantifying global soil carbon losses in response to warming. Nature 540, 104–108 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fernández-Martínez, M. et al. Atmospheric deposition, CO2, and change in the land carbon sink. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–13 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Peñuelas, J. et al. Shifting from a fertilization-dominated to a warming dominated period. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1438–1445 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ainsworth, E. A. & Long, S. P. What have we learned from 15 years of free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE)? A meta-analytic review of the responses of photosynthesis, canopy properties and plant production to rising CO2. New Phytol. 165, 351–371 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Medlyn, B. E. et al. Using ecosystem experiments to improve vegetation models. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 528–534 (2015).

  9. Keenan, T. F. et al. Increase in forest water-use efficiency as atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations rise. Nature 499, 324–327 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. IPCC: Summary for Policymakers. In Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).

  11. Fernández-Martínez, M. et al. Spatial variability and controls over biomass stocks, carbon fluxes and resource-use efficiencies in forest ecosystems. Trees Struct. Funct. 28, 597–611 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Beer, C. et al. Terrestrial gross carbon dioxide uptake: global distribution and covariation with climate. Science 329, 834–838 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Luyssaert, S. et al. CO2 balance of boreal, temperate, and tropical forests derived from a global database. Glob. Change Biol. 13, 2509–2537 (2007).

  14. de Vries, W. & Posch, M. Modelling the impact of nitrogen deposition, climate change and nutrient limitations on tree carbon sequestration in Europe for the period 1900–2050. Environ. Pollut. 159, 2289–2299 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wamelink, G. W. W. et al. Modelling impacts of changes in carbon dioxide concentration, climate and nitrogen deposition on carbon sequestration by European forests and forest soils. For. Ecol. Manage. 258, 1794–1805 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wamelink, G. W. W. et al. Effect of nitrogen deposition reduction on biodiversity and carbon sequestration. For. Ecol. Manage. 258, 1774–1779 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. de Vries, W., Du, E. & Butterbach-Bahl, K. Short and long-term impacts of nitrogen deposition on carbon sequestration by forest ecosystems. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 9–10, 90–104 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Luyssaert, S. et al. The European carbon balance. Part 3: forests. Glob. Change Biol. 16, 1429–1450 (2010).

  19. Magnani, F. et al. The human footprint in the carbon cycle of temperate and boreal forests. Nature 447, 848–850 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Thomas, R. B., Spal, S. E., Smith, K. R. & Nippert, J. B. Evidence of recovery of Juniperus virginiana trees from sulfur pollution after the Clean Air Act. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 15319–15324 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Oulehle, F. et al. Major changes in forest carbon and nitrogen cycling caused by declining sulphur deposition. Glob. Change Biol. 17, 3115–3129 (2011).

  22. Truog, E. Soil reaction influence on availability of plant nutrients. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 11, 305–308 (1946).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fernández-Martínez, M. et al. Nutrient availability as the key regulator of global forest carbon balance. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 471–476 (2014).

  24. Zhu, Z. et al. Greening of the Earth and its drivers. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 791–795 (2016).

  25. Chevallier, F. et al. CO2 surface fluxes at grid point scale estimated from a global 21 year reanalysis of atmospheric measurements. J. Geophys. Res. 115, D21307 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rödenbeck, C., Houweling, S., Gloor, M. & Heimann, M. CO2 flux history 1982–2001 inferred from atmospheric data using a global inversion of atmospheric transport. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 3, 1919–1964 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Aber, J. et al. Forest processes and global environmental change: predicting the effects of individual and multiple stressors. Bioscience 51, 735–751 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Prentice, I. C., Heimann, M. & Sitch, S. The carbon balance of the terrestrial biosphere: ecosystem models and atmospheric observations. Ecol. Appl. 10, 1553–1573 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Cheng, L. et al. Recent increases in terrestrial carbon uptake at little cost to the water cycle. Nat. Commun. 8, 110 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Norby, R. J., Warren, J. M., Iversen, C. M., Medlyn, B. E. & McMurtrie, R. E. CO2 enhancement of forest productivity constrained by limited nitrogen availability. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 19368–19373 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Norby, R. J. et al. Forest response to elevated CO2 is conserved across a broad range of productivity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 18052–18056 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Van Groenigen, K. J. et al. The impact of elevated atmospheric CO2 on soil C and N dynamics. Ecol. Stud. 187, 374–391 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Terrer, C. et al. Mycorrhizal association as a primary control of the CO2 fertilization effect. Science 353, 72–74 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. McCarthy, H. R. et al. Re-assessment of plant carbon dynamics at the Duke free-air CO2 enrichment site: interactions of atmospheric [CO2] with nitrogen and water availability over stand development. New Phytol. 185, 514–528 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Hyvönen, R. et al. The likely impact of elevated [CO2], nitrogen deposition, increased temperature and management on carbon sequestration in temperate and boreal forest ecosystems: a literature review. New Phytol. 173, 463–480 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ryan, M. G. Effects of climate change on plant respiration. Ecol. Appl. 1, 157–167 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Amthor, J. S. Scaling CO2–photosynthesis relationships from the leaf to the canopy. Photosynth. Res. 39, 321–350 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Wu, Z., Dijkstra, P., Koch, G. W., Peñuelas, J. & Hungate, B. A. Responses of terrestrial ecosystems to temperature and precipitation change: a meta-analysis of experimental manipulation. Glob. Change Biol. 17, 927–942 (2011).

  39. Chevallier, F. et al. Toward robust and consistent regional CO2 flux estimates from in situ and spaceborne measurements of atmospheric CO2. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 1065–1070 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Olivier, J. G. J. & Berdowski, J. J. M. in The Climate System (eds Berdowski, J., Guicherit, R. & Heij, B. J.) 33–78 (Swets and Zeitlinger, Leiden, 2001).

  41. Sitch, S. et al. Recent trends and drivers of regional sources and sinks of carbon dioxide. Biogeosciences 12, 653–679 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Harris, I., Jones, P. D. D., Osborn, T. J. J. & Lister, D. Updated high-resolution grids of monthly climatic observations—the CRU TS3.10 Dataset. Int. J. Climatol. 34, 623–642 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Vicente-serrano, S. M., Beguería, S. & López-Moreno, J. I. A multiscalar drought index sensitive to global warming: the Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index. J. Clim. 23, 1696–1718 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Zuur, A., Ieno, E., Walker, N., Saveliev, A. & Smith, G. Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R (Springer, New York, 2009).

  45. Mathias, J. M. & Thomas, R. B. Disentangling the effects of acidic air pollution, atmospheric CO2, and climate change on recent growth of red spruce trees in the Central Appalachian Mountains. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 3938–3953 (2018).

  46. R Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (Scientific Research, Wuhan, 2016).

  47. Barton, K. MuMIn: Multi-model inference. R package version 1.17.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2015); http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn

  48. Nakagawa, S. & Schielzeth, H. A general and simple method for obtaining R 2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods Ecol. Evol. 4, 133–142 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Breheny, P. & Burchett, W. Visualization of regression models using visreg. R package version 2, 2–0 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2015).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Spanish Government project CGL2016–79835-P (FERTWARM), the European Research Council Synergy grant no. ERC-2013-726 SyG-610028 IMBALANCE-P and the Catalan Government project SGR 2017–1005. M.F.-M. and S.V. are postdoctoral fellows of the Research Foundation—Flanders. J.G.C. thanks the support of the National Environmental Science Programme ESCC Hub. We thank C. Röedenbeck for his advice and for distributing Jena CarboScope and all the modellers that contributed to the TRENDY project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre of Excellence PLECO, Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium

    M. Fernández-Martínez, S. Vicca & I. A. Janssens

  2. CSIC, Global Ecology Unit, CREAF-CSIC-UAB, Bellaterra, Spain

    J. Sardans & J. Peñuelas

  3. CREAF, Bellaterra, Spain

    J. Sardans & J. Peñuelas

  4. Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement, CEA CNRS UVSQ, Gif-sur-Yvette, France

    F. Chevallier, P. Ciais & A. Bastos

  5. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria

    M. Obersteiner

  6. Global Carbon Project, CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia

    J. G. Canadell

  7. College of Engineering, Computing and Mathematics, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK

    P. Friedlingstein & S. Sitch

  8. Sino-French Institute of Earth System Sciences, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China

    S. L. Piao

  9. Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

    S. L. Piao

Authors
  1. M. Fernández-Martínez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. Sardans
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. F. Chevallier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. P. Ciais
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. M. Obersteiner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. S. Vicca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. J. G. Canadell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. A. Bastos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. P. Friedlingstein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. S. Sitch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. S. L. Piao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. I. A. Janssens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. J. Peñuelas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

M.F.-M., J.S., I.A.J. and J.P. conceived, analysed and wrote the paper. F.C., P.F. and S.S. provided the data. All the authors contributed substantially to the writing and discussion of the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Fernández-Martínez.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary discussion, Supplementary Figure 1, Supplementary Tables 1–24, Supplementary references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fernández-Martínez, M., Sardans, J., Chevallier, F. et al. Global trends in carbon sinks and their relationships with CO2 and temperature. Nature Clim Change 9, 73–79 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0367-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0367-7

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene