Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Five dimensions of climate science reductionism

The tendency of modern science to reduce complex phenomena into their component parts has many advantages for advancing knowledge. However, such reductionism in climate science is also a problem because it narrows the evidence base, limiting visions of possible futures and the ways they might be achieved.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. Hulme, M. Osiris 26, 245–266 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Agrawal, A., Lemos, M. C., Orlove, B. & Ribot, J. Glob. Environ. Change 22, 329–331 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Castree, N. et al. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 763–768 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tanner, T. & Allouche, J. IDS Bull. 42, 1–14 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Beck, S. et al. Gaia 23, 80–87 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Few, R., Brown, K. & Tompkins, E. L. Clim. Policy 7, 46–59 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Vardy, M., Oppenheimer, M., Dubash, N. K., O'Reilly, J. & Jamieson, D. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 42, 55–75 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Adger, W. N., Barnett, J., Brown, K., Marshall, N. & O’Brien, K. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 112–117 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tschakert, P., van Oort, B., St. Clair, A. L. & LaMadrid, A. Clim. Dev. 5, 340–350 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Barnes, J. et al. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 541–544 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Farbotko, C. & Lazrus, H. Glob. Environ. Change 22, 382–390 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ward, P. J. et al. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 712–715 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Barnett, J., Tschakert, P., Head, L. & Adger, W. N. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 976–978 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lövbrand, E. et al. Glob. Environ. Change 32, 211–218 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chakrabarty, D. Crit. Inquiry 35, 197–222 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Malm, A. & Hornborg, A. Anthrop. Rev. 1, 62–69 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Taylor, M. Clim. Dev. 5, 318–327 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank J. Gabbert for his invaluable editorial assistance with this Comment.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan Rigg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rigg, J., Mason, L.R. Five dimensions of climate science reductionism. Nature Clim Change 8, 1030–1032 (2018).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing