Article | Published:

Coastal wetland management as a contribution to the US National Greenhouse Gas Inventory

Nature Climate Changevolume 8pages11091112 (2018) | Download Citation

Abstract

The IPCC 2013 Wetlands Supplement provided new guidance for countries on inclusion of wetlands in their National GHG Inventories. The United States has responded by including managed coastal wetlands for the first time in its 2017 GHG Inventory report along with an updated time series in the most recent 2018 submission and plans to update the time series on an annual basis as part of its yearly submission to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). The United States followed IPCC Good Practice Guidance when reporting sources and sinks associated with managed coastal wetlands. Here we show that intact vegetated coastal wetlands are a net sink for GHGs. Despite robust regulation that has protected substantial stocks of carbon, the United States continues to lose coastal wetlands to development and the largest loss of wetlands to open water occurs around the Mississippi Delta due mostly to upstream changes in hydrology and sediment delivery, and oil and gas extraction. These processes create GHG emissions. By applying comprehensive Inventory reporting, scientists in the United States have identified opportunities for reducing GHG emissions through restoration of coastal wetlands that also provide many important societal co-benefits.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Data availability

Some of the data that informed this analysis are included in the US Greenhouse Gas Inventory (see previously published studies5,6). Other data can be made available upon request to the corresponding author (S.C.).

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    IPCC Good Practice Guidance for Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry (eds Pennman, J. et al.) (IGES, 2003).

  2. 2.

    Houghton, J. T. et al. (eds) Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 1997).

  3. 3.

    The Good Practice Guidance and Uncertainty Management in National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2000).

  4. 4.

    2013 Supplement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories: Wetlands (eds Hiraishi, T. et al.) (IPCC, 2014).

  5. 5.

    Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2015 (US EPA, 2017); https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/inventory-us-greenhouse-gas-emissions-and-sinks-1990-2015

  6. 6.

    Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2016 (US EPA, 2018); https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/inventory-us-greenhouse-gas-emissions-and-sinks-1990-2016

  7. 7.

    Poffenbarger, H. J., Needelman, B. A. & Megonigal, J. P. Salinity influence on methane emissions from tidal marshes. Wetlands 31, 831–842 (2011).

  8. 8.

    Dahl, T. E. & Stedman, S. M. Status and Trends of Wetlands in the Coastal Watersheds of the Conterminous United States 2004 to 2009 (US Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, 2013).

  9. 9.

    Kennish, M. J. Coastal salt marsh systems in the U.S.: a review of anthropogenic impacts. J. Coast. Res. 17, 731–748 (2001).

  10. 10.

    Olea, R. A. & Coleman, J. L.Jr. A synoptic examination of causes of land loss in southern Louisiana as related to the exploitation of subsurface geologic resources. J. Coast. Res. 30, 1025–1044 (2014).

  11. 11.

    Twilley, R. R. et al. Co-evolution of wetland landscapes, flooding, and human settlement in the Mississippi River Delta Plain. Sustain. Sci. 11, 711–731 (2016).

  12. 12.

    Syvitski, J. P. M. et al. Sinking deltas due to human activities. Nat. Geosci. 2, 681–686 (2009).

  13. 13.

    Blair, N. E. & Aller, R. C. The fate of terrestrial organic carbon in the marine environment. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 4, 401–423 (2012).

  14. 14.

    GFOI Integrating Remote-Sensing and Ground-Based Observations for Estimation of Emissions and Removals of Greenhouse Gases in Forests: Methods and Guidance from the Global Forest Observations Initiative (Group on Earth Observations, 2013).

  15. 15.

    Schuerch, M. et al. Future response of global coastal wetlands to sea-level rise. Nature 561, 231–234 (2018).

  16. 16.

    Visser, J. M., Duke-Sylvester, S. M., Carter, J. & Broussard, W. P. A computer model to forecast wetland vegetation changes resulting from restoration and protection in coastal Louisiana. J. Coast. Res. 67, 51–59 (2013).

  17. 17.

    Kroeger, K. D., Crooks, S., Moseman-Valtierra, S. & Tang, J. W. Restoring tides to reduce methane emissions in impounded wetlands: a new and potent blue carbon climate change intervention. Sci. Rep. 7, 11914 (2017).

  18. 18.

    Couvillion, B. R., Steyer, G. D., Wang, H. Q., Beck, H. J. & Rybczyk, J. M. Forecasting the effects of coastal protection and restoration projects on wetland morphology in coastal Louisiana under multiple environmental uncertainty scenarios. J. Coast. Res. 67, 29–50 (2013).

  19. 19.

    DeLaune, R. D. & White, J. R. Will coastal wetlands continue to sequester carbon in response to an increase in global sea level?: A case study of the rapidly subsiding Mississippi River deltaic plain. Climatic Change 110, 297–314 (2012).

  20. 20.

    IPCC Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis (eds Solomon, S. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).

  21. 21.

    Lowther, A. & Liddel, M. (eds) Fisheries of the United States 2015 (National Marine Fisheries Service, 2015); https://www.st.nmfs.noaa.gov/commercial-fisheries/fus/fus15/index

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the Coastal Blue Carbon Working Group, Restore America’s Estuaries, the NOAA, the USGCRP and the EPA for support and technical input as part of this process. This is contribution number 9 of the Sea Level Solutions Center at the Institute of Water and Environment, Florida International University.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Author information

Author notes

    • Ariana E. Sutton-Grier

    Present address: Maryland/DC Chapter of the Nature Conservancy, Bethesda, MD, USA

    • Blanca Bernal

    Present address: Winrock International, Arlington, VA, USA

Affiliations

  1. Silvestrum Climate Associates, San Francisco, CA, USA

    • Stephen Crooks
    •  & Lisa Schile-Beers
  2. Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA

    • Ariana E. Sutton-Grier
  3. National Ocean Service, NOAA, Silver Spring, MD, USA

    • Ariana E. Sutton-Grier
  4. Sea Level Solutions Center, Institute of Water and Environment, Florida International University, Miami Beach, FL, USA

    • Tiffany G. Troxler
  5. NOAA Office for Coastal Management, Charleston, SC, USA

    • Nathaniel Herold
  6. Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, Edgewater, MD, USA

    • Blanca Bernal
  7. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA

    • Tom Wirth

Authors

  1. Search for Stephen Crooks in:

  2. Search for Ariana E. Sutton-Grier in:

  3. Search for Tiffany G. Troxler in:

  4. Search for Nathaniel Herold in:

  5. Search for Blanca Bernal in:

  6. Search for Lisa Schile-Beers in:

  7. Search for Tom Wirth in:

Contributions

S.C. and T.G.T. led the process for including coastal wetlands in the US Greenhouse Gas Inventory with technical input from T.W. and with help from A.E.S.-G., N.H., B.B. and L.S.-B. S.C., A.E.S.-G. and T.G.T. wrote this manuscript with help from T.W.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen Crooks.

Supplementary information

  1. Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Discussion, Supplementary Tables 1–2, Supplementary References

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0345-0