Climate engineering needs a clean bill of health

Climate change will almost certainly cause millions of deaths. Climate engineering might prevent this, but benefits — and risks — remain mostly unevaluated. Now is the time to bring planetary health research into climate engineering conversations.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: A risk–risk framework for assessing the potential health impacts of climate engineering.

References

  1. 1.

    Rogelj, J. et al. Nature 534, 631–639 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Climate Intervention: Carbon Dioxide Removal and Reliable Sequestration (National Research Council, National Academies, 2015).

  3. 3.

    Climate Intervention: Reflecting Sunlight to Cool Earth (National Research Council, National Academies, 2015).

  4. 4.

    Subcommittee on Environment and Subcommittee on Energy Hearing — Geoengineering: Innovation, Research, and Technology (SST Committee, 2017); https://go.nature.com/2oJrFbq

  5. 5.

    Keith, D. W. & MacMartin, D. G. A temporary, moderate and responsive scenario for solar geoengineering. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 201–206 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Tilmes, S., Sanderson, B. M. & O’Neill, B. C. Climate impacts of geoengineering in a delayed mitigation scenario. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 8222–8229 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    McClellan, J., Keith, D. W. & Apt, J. Environ. Res. Lett. 7, 034019 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Yu, X. et al. Glob. Planet. Change 129, 10–22 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Keller, D. P. et al. Geosci. Model Dev. 11, 1133 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Eastham, S. D., Weisenstein, D. K., Keith, D. W. & Barrett, S. R. Atmos. Environ. 187, 424–434 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Trisos, C. H. et al. in Resilience: The Science of Adaptation to Climate Change (eds Zommers, Z. & Alverson, K.) 291–303 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2018).

  12. 12.

    Tilmes, S. et al. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0267.1 (2018).

  13. 13.

    Mordecai, E. A. et al. Ecol. Lett. 16, 22–30 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Pascual, M., Bouma, M. J. & Dobson, A. P. Microbes Infect. 4, 237–245 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Agier, L. et al. J. R. Soc. Interface 10, 20120814 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Trisos, C. H. et al. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 475 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Fuss, S. et al. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 063002 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Caminade, C. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 119–124 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Frank, S. et al. Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 105004 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Xun, W. W., Khan, A. E., Michael, E. & Vineis, P. Int. J. Pub. Health 55, 85–96 (2010).

  21. 21.

    Pasztor, J., Scharf, C. & Schmidt, K.-U. Science 357, 231 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center under funding received from the National Science Foundation (grant no. DBI-1639145).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Colin J. Carlson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carlson, C.J., Trisos, C.H. Climate engineering needs a clean bill of health. Nature Clim Change 8, 843–845 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0294-7

Download citation

Further reading