Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Mitigation scenarios must cater to new users

Climate change mitigation scenarios are finding a wider set of users, including companies and financial institutions. Increased collaboration between scenario producers and these new communities will be mutually beneficial, educating companies and investors on climate risks while grounding climate science in real-world needs.

Your institute does not have access to this article

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Near-term rate of change for market-relevant variables from research and industry scenarios.

Data availability

Underlying scenario data for Shared Socioeconomic Pathways are available from the online SSP database. Data for other scenarios, where not covered by licensing restrictions, are available upon request.

References

  1. Wigley, T. M. L., Richels, R. & Edmonds, J. A. Nature 379, 240–243 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. IPCC Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (eds Nakicenovic, N. & Swart, R.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2000).

  3. Krabbe, O. et al. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 1057–1060 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Meinshausen, M. et al. Nature 458, 1158–1162 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. McGlade, C. & Ekins, P. Nature 517, 187–190 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pfeiffer, A., Millar, R., Hepburn, C. & Beinhocker, E. Appl. Energy 179, 1395–1408 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Final Report: Recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD, 2017).

  8. Riahi, K. et al. Glob. Environ. Change 42, 153–168 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Krey, V., Luderer, G., Clarke, L. & Kriegler, E. Climatic Change 123, 369–382 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kriegler, E. et al. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 074022 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. McCollum, D. L. et al. Nat. Energy 3, 589–599 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Strefler, J. et al. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 044015 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. van Vuuren, D. P. et al. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 391–397 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. McCollum, D. L. et al. Transp. Res. Pt D 55, 322–342 (2017).

  15. Carbon Asset Risk: Discussion Framework (UNEP FI and WRI, 2015).

  16. Slawinski, N. & Bansal, P. Organ. Stud. 33, 1537–1563 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Too Late, Too Sudden: Transition to a Low-Carbon Economy and Systemic Risk (ESRB, 2016).

  18. Alessandro, R. Preprint at http://faere.fr/pub/Conf2017/FAERE2017_Ravina.pdf (2017).

  19. Emissions Gap Report 2017 (UNEP, 2017).

  20. Peters, G. P. et al. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 118–122 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Public SSP Database (IIASA, 2018); http://go.nature.com/2iepr2x

  22. Energy Technology Perspectives (IEA, 2017).

  23. Shell Scenarios: Sky (Shell, 2018).

  24. Statoil Energy Perspectives (Equinor, 2018).

  25. BP Energy Outlook 2018 (BP, 2018).

  26. ExxonMobil Outlook for Energy (ExxonMobil, 2018).

  27. Creutzig, F. et al. Nat. Energy 2, 17140 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Perspectives for the Energy Transition (IRENA and IEA, 2017).

  29. Extending our Horizons: Assessing Credit Risk and Opportunity in a Changing Climate (UNEP FI and Oliver Wyman/Mercer, 2018).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

C.W. primarily performed the data analysis and initial drafting with input from D.M. All other authors provided substantive feedback and ideas to substance and structure of text and figures.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Weber.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Weber, C., McCollum, D.L., Edmonds, J. et al. Mitigation scenarios must cater to new users. Nature Clim Change 8, 845–848 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0293-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0293-8

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing