Climate change mitigation scenarios are finding a wider set of users, including companies and financial institutions. Increased collaboration between scenario producers and these new communities will be mutually beneficial, educating companies and investors on climate risks while grounding climate science in real-world needs.
Access options
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
$209.00
only $17.42 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
from$8.99
All prices are NET prices.
Data availability
Underlying scenario data for Shared Socioeconomic Pathways are available from the online SSP database. Data for other scenarios, where not covered by licensing restrictions, are available upon request.
References
- 1.
Wigley, T. M. L., Richels, R. & Edmonds, J. A. Nature 379, 240–243 (1996).
- 2.
IPCC Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (eds Nakicenovic, N. & Swart, R.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2000).
- 3.
Krabbe, O. et al. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 1057–1060 (2015).
- 4.
Meinshausen, M. et al. Nature 458, 1158–1162 (2009).
- 5.
McGlade, C. & Ekins, P. Nature 517, 187–190 (2015).
- 6.
Pfeiffer, A., Millar, R., Hepburn, C. & Beinhocker, E. Appl. Energy 179, 1395–1408 (2016).
- 7.
Final Report: Recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD, 2017).
- 8.
Riahi, K. et al. Glob. Environ. Change 42, 153–168 (2017).
- 9.
Krey, V., Luderer, G., Clarke, L. & Kriegler, E. Climatic Change 123, 369–382 (2013).
- 10.
Kriegler, E. et al. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 074022 (2018).
- 11.
McCollum, D. L. et al. Nat. Energy 3, 589–599 (2018).
- 12.
Strefler, J. et al. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 044015 (2018).
- 13.
van Vuuren, D. P. et al. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 391–397 (2018).
- 14.
McCollum, D. L. et al. Transp. Res. Pt D 55, 322–342 (2017).
- 15.
Carbon Asset Risk: Discussion Framework (UNEP FI and WRI, 2015).
- 16.
Slawinski, N. & Bansal, P. Organ. Stud. 33, 1537–1563 (2012).
- 17.
Too Late, Too Sudden: Transition to a Low-Carbon Economy and Systemic Risk (ESRB, 2016).
- 18.
Alessandro, R. Preprint at http://faere.fr/pub/Conf2017/FAERE2017_Ravina.pdf (2017).
- 19.
Emissions Gap Report 2017 (UNEP, 2017).
- 20.
Peters, G. P. et al. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 118–122 (2017).
- 21.
Public SSP Database (IIASA, 2018); http://go.nature.com/2iepr2x
- 22.
Energy Technology Perspectives (IEA, 2017).
- 23.
Shell Scenarios: Sky (Shell, 2018).
- 24.
Statoil Energy Perspectives (Equinor, 2018).
- 25.
BP Energy Outlook 2018 (BP, 2018).
- 26.
ExxonMobil Outlook for Energy (ExxonMobil, 2018).
- 27.
Creutzig, F. et al. Nat. Energy 2, 17140 (2017).
- 28.
Perspectives for the Energy Transition (IRENA and IEA, 2017).
- 29.
Extending our Horizons: Assessing Credit Risk and Opportunity in a Changing Climate (UNEP FI and Oliver Wyman/Mercer, 2018).
Author information
Affiliations
Contributions
C.W. primarily performed the data analysis and initial drafting with input from D.M. All other authors provided substantive feedback and ideas to substance and structure of text and figures.
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weber, C., McCollum, D.L., Edmonds, J. et al. Mitigation scenarios must cater to new users. Nature Clim Change 8, 845–848 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0293-8
Published:
Issue Date:
Further reading
-
Emissions – the ‘business as usual’ story is misleading
Nature (2020)
-
Achievements and needs for the climate change scenario framework
Nature Climate Change (2020)
-
Research priorities for supporting subnational climate policies
WIREs Climate Change (2020)
-
The projected timing of abrupt ecological disruption from climate change
Nature (2020)
-
Between stranded assets and green transformation: Fossil-fuel-producing developing countries towards 2055
World Development (2020)
