The scientific response to Antarctic ice-shelf loss

Article metrics

Biological communities beneath Antarctic ice shelves remain a mystery, hampering assessment of ecosystem development after ice-shelf collapse. Here we highlight major gaps in understanding of the patterns and processes in these areas, and suggest effective ways to study the ecological impacts of ice-shelf loss under climate change.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Ecosystem properties and processes shown with their responses to ice-shelf collapse.

References

  1. 1.

    Rignot, E., Jacobs, S., Mouginot, J. & Scheuchl, B. Science 341, 266–270 (2013).

  2. 2.

    Pritchard, H. D. et al. Nature 484, 502 (2012).

  3. 3.

    Shepherd, A., Wingham, D., Payne, T. & Skvarca, P. Science 302, 856–859 (2003).

  4. 4.

    Cook, A. J. & Vaughan, D. G. Cryosphere 4, 77–98 (2010).

  5. 5.

    Scambos, T., Hulbe, C. & Fahnestock, M. Antarctic Peninsula Climate Variability: Historical and Paleoenvironmental Perspectives (eds Domack, E. et al.) 79–92 (American Geophysical Union, Washington, 2003).

  6. 6.

    Rignot, E. et al. Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L18401 (2004).

  7. 7.

    Bruchhausen, P. M. et al. Science 203, 449–451 (1979).

  8. 8.

    Lipps, J. H., Ronan, T. E. & Delaca, T. E. Science 203, 447–449 (1979).

  9. 9.

    Riddle, M. J., Craven, M., Goldsworthy, P. M. & Carsey, F. Paleoceanography 22, PA1204 (2007).

  10. 10.

    Post, A. L. et al. Cont. Shelf Res. 74, 77–87 (2014).

  11. 11.

    Arrigo, K. R., van Dijken, G. L., Ainley, D. G., Fahnestock, M. A. & Markus, T. Geophys. Res. Lett. 29, 8–4 (2002).

  12. 12.

    Bertolin, M. L. & Schloss, I. R. Polar Biol. 32, 1435–1446 (2009).

  13. 13.

    Barnes, D. K. A., Fleming, A., Sands, C. J., Quartino, M. L. & Deregibus, D. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 376, 20170176 (2018).

  14. 14.

    Peck, L. S., Barnes, D. K. A., Cook, A. J., Fleming, A. H. & Clarke, A. Glob. Change Biol. 16, 2614–2623 (2010).

  15. 15.

    Hauquier, F., Ballesteros-Redondo, L., Gutt, J. & Vanreusel, A. Ecol. Evol. 6, 305–317 (2016).

  16. 16.

    Gutt, J. et al. Polar Biol. 36, 895–906 (2013).

  17. 17.

    Moline, M. A. et al. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1134, 267–319 (2008).

  18. 18.

    Marchant, J. Nature News 549, 443 (2017).

  19. 19.

    Massom, R. A. & Stammerjohn, S. E. Polar Sci. 4, 149–186 (2010).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This Comment benefited from discussions at the ‘Antarctic Ecosystem Research Following Ice Shelf Collapse and Iceberg Calving Events’ workshop held in November 2017 at the Florida State University Coastal and Marine Laboratory. The workshop and the creation of this product were funded by the National Science Foundation’s Office of Polar Programs through collaborative grants to all authors. We gratefully acknowledge the contributions of the 38 Antarctic scientists who participated in the workshop. This is contribution number 201 from the Institute for Global Ecology at the Florida Institute of Technology, and contribution number 10419 from the School of Ocean and Earth Sciences, University of Hawaii at Manoa.

Author information

Correspondence to Jeroen Ingels.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ingels, J., Aronson, R.B. & Smith, C.R. The scientific response to Antarctic ice-shelf loss. Nature Clim Change 8, 848–851 (2018) doi:10.1038/s41558-018-0290-y

Download citation

Further reading