In exchange for political support, the Brazilian government is signalling landholders to increase deforestation, putting the country’s contribution to the Paris Agreement at risk1. The President of Brazil has signed provisionary acts and decrees lowering environmental licensing requirements, suspending the ratification of indigenous lands, reducing the size of protected areas and facilitating land grabbers to obtain the deeds of illegally deforested areas2. This could undermine the success of Brazil’s CO2 emission reductions through control of deforestation in the previous decade. Integrated assessment models are tools to assess progress in fulfilling global efforts to curb climate change3,4. Using integrated assessment models developed for Brazil, we explore 2 °C-compliant CO2 emission scenarios estimating the effort needed in other sectors of the economy to compensate for the weakening of environmental governance, potentially resulting in higher deforestation emissions. We found that the risk of reversals of recent trends in deforestation governance could impose a burden on other sectors that would need to deploy not yet mature technologies to compensate for higher emissions from land-use change. The abandonment of deforestation control policies and the political support for predatory agricultural practices make it impossible to meet targets consistent with Brazil’s contribution to a 2 °C world.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Subscribe to Nature+
Get immediate online access to Nature and 55 other Nature journal
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $8.25 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Tollefson, J. Political upheaval threatens Brazil’s environmental protections. Nature 539, 147–148 (2016).
Tollefson, J. Brazil’s lawmakers renew push to weaken environmental rules. Nature 557, 17 (2018).
van Vuuren, D. et al. Alternative pathways to the 1.5 °C target reduce the need for negative emission technologies. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 391–397 (2018).
Creutzig, V. et al. Towards demand-side solutions for mitigating climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 268–271 (2018).
Estimativas Anuais de Emissões de Gases de Efeito Estufa no Brasil 3rd edn (Brazil Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovações e Comunicações, 2016); https://go.nature.com/2t0WWrO
Soares Filho, B. S. et al. Cracking Brazil’s forest code. Science 344, 363–364 (2014).
Crouzeilles, R., Feltran-Barbieri, R., Ferreira, M. S. & Strassburg, B. B. N. Hard times for the Brazilian environment. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1213 (2017).
Viola, E. & Franchini, M. Brazil and Climate Change: Beyond the Amazon (Routledge, New York, 2018).
Fearnside, P. Brazilian politics threaten environmental policies. Sci. Policy Forum 353, 746–748 (2016).
Portaria no. 68, 14 January 2017; http://go.nature.com/2u4gJFm
Medida Provisória no. 756, 19 December 2016; http://go.nature.com/2vhtste
Law no. 13.465, 11 July 2017; http://go.nature.com/2f7CbYj
Viola, E. & Franchini, M. Brazilian climate politics 2005–2012: ambivalence and paradox. WIRES Clim. Change 5, 677–688 (2014).
PRODES – Monitoramento da Floresta Amazônica Brasileira por Satélite (Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais database, 2017); http://www.obt.inpe.br/prodes/index.php
Messner, D., Schellnhuber, J., Rahmstorf, S. & Klingenfeld, D. The budget approach: a framework for a global transformation toward a low-carbon economy. J. Renew. Sustain. Energy 2, 031003 (2010).
Gignac, R. & Matthews, H. Allocating a 2 °C cumulative carbon budget to countries. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 075004 (2015).
Rocha, M. et al. Analysis of Equitable Mitigation Contribution of Countries (Climate Analytics, 2015); http://climateanalytics.org/files/climate_analytics_report_sept_2015.pdf
Lucon, O., Romeiro, V. & Fransen, T. Bridging the Gap Between Energy and Climate Policies in Brazil —Policy Options to Reduce Energy-Related GHG Emissions (World Resources Institute, Washington DC, 2015).
Kanitkar, T., Jayaraman, T., D’Souza, M. & Purkayastha, P. Carbon budgets for climate change mitigation: a GAMS-based emissions model. Curr. Sci. 104, 1200–1206 (2013).
CD-LINKS Stocktaking/Fast-track Database (version 1.0) (CD-Links, 2016); https://go.nature.com/2HM208O
Soares Filho, B. S., Rajão, R., Merry, F., Rodrigues, H., Davis, J., Lima, L., Macedo, M., Coe, M., Carneiro, A. & Santiago, L. Brazil’s Market for Trading Forest Certificates. Plos One 11, e0152311 (2016).
Modelagem Setorial de Opções de Baixo Carbono para Agricultura, Florestas e Outros Usos do Solo (AFOLU) Technical Report (MCTIC, 2015); https://go.nature.com/2MpDIVJ
The data of the energy system model, compiled in the Supplementary Information, follow the format and template of an international effort on climate and energy systems modelling, the so-called CD-Links project (www.cdlinks.org), where the BLUES model used in this study is registered. A.K., A.S., A.F.P.L., E.V. and R.S. received support from the Brazilian Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq). B.S.-F., J.L.D. and Ra.R. received support from the Climate and Land Use Alliance (CLUA), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG), CNPq and the Humboldt Foundation. P.R.R.R. and Re.R. received support from the Brazilian Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES). The authors also thank B. Strassburg for some initial discussions on the subject of this study.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Rochedo, P.R.R., Soares-Filho, B., Schaeffer, R. et al. The threat of political bargaining to climate mitigation in Brazil. Nature Clim Change 8, 695–698 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0213-y
This article is cited by
Nature Communications (2022)
Communications Biology (2022)
Can global models provide insights into regional mitigation strategies? A diagnostic model comparison study of bioenergy in Brazil
Climatic Change (2022)
Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2022)
Conservation Policy Changes in Protected Areas on Hilltops in Brazil: Effects on Hydrological Response in a Small Watershed
Water Resources Management (2022)