Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

International law poses problems for negative emissions research

New international governance arrangements that manage environmental risk and potential conflicts of interests are needed to facilitate negative emissions research that is essential to achieving the large-scale CO2 removal implied by the Paris Agreement targets.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Rockstom, J. et al. Science 355, 1269–1271 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Goodwin, P. A. et al. Nat. Geosci. 11, 102–107 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson, K. & Peters, G. Science 354, 182–183 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hansen, J. et al. Earth Syst. Dynam. 8, 577–616 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Griscom, B. W. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 11645–11650 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. National Research Council Climate Intervention: Carbon Dioxide Removal and Reliable Sequestration (National Academies, 2015).

  7. Dooley, K. & Kartha, S. Int. Environ. Agreem. 18, 79–98 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Summary of Solutions by Overall Rank (Drawdown, 26 February 2018); http://www.drawdown.org/solutions-summary-by-rank.

  9. Lomax, G., Lenton, T. M., Adeosun, A. & Workman, M. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 498–500 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pasztor, J., Scharf, C. & Schmidt, K. Science 357, 231 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Scott, K. N. Mich. J. Int. Law 34, 309–358 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Decision Adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity at its Tenth Meeting: X/33 Biodiversity and Climate Change UNEP/CBD/COP/DEC/X/33 8(w) (Convention on BiologicalDiversity, UNEP, 2010).

  13. Decision Adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity at its Eleventh Meeting: XI/20 Climate-related geoengineering UNEP/CBD/COP/DEC/XI/20 (CBD, UNEP, 2012); https://go.nature.com/2w2M4Pe

  14. Decision Adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity: XIII/14 Climate-Related Geoengineering CBD/COP/DEC/XIII/14 (CBD, UNEP, 2016); https://go.nature.com/2rdL6K0

  15. Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter 1972 (International Maritime Organization, 1972); https://go.nature.com/2KekHUs

  16. 1996 Protocol to the Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter 1972 (International Maritime Organization, 2006); https://go.nature.com/2wGqHDJ

  17. Resolution LP.4(8) on the Amendment to the London Protocol to Regulate the Placement of Matter for Ocean Fertilization and Other Marine Geoengineering Activities LC 35/15 Annex 4 (International Maritime Organization, 2013).

  18. Ginzky, H. & Frost, R. Carbon Clim. Law Rev 8, 82–96 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Assessment Framework for Scientific Research Involving Ocean Fertilization LC 32/15 Annex 6, 2.2.2 (International Maritime Organization, 2010).

  20. Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter, 1972 and its 1996 Protocol: Statement of Concern Regarding Iron Fertilization of the Oceans to Sequester CO 2 LC-LP.1/Circ.14 (International Maritime Organization, 2007).

  21. Nature 458, 562 (2009).

  22. Blackstock, J. Nature 486, 159 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Nature 485, 415 (2012).

  24. Bourzac, K. Nature 550, S66–S69 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Fuss, S. et al. in The Emissions Gap Report 2017 58–66 (UNEP, 2017).

  26. Peters, G. P. & Geden, O. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 619–621 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Priority Three: Governance of Carbon Removal Technologies (C2G2, 24 February 2018); https://go.nature.com/2w665V1

  28. McGee, J., Brent, K. & Burns, W. Aust. J. Mar. Ocean Aff. 10, 67–80 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

K.B. was supported by a scholarship from the Institute for the Study of Social Change at the University of Tasmania, Australia. E.J.R. acknowledges Australian Laureate Fellowship FL120100050.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kerryn Brent.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brent, K., McGee, J., McDonald, J. et al. International law poses problems for negative emissions research. Nature Clim Change 8, 451–453 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0181-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0181-2

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing