Article | Published:

Increasing precipitation volatility in twenty-first-century California

Nature Climate Changevolume 8pages427433 (2018) | Download Citation


Mediterranean climate regimes are particularly susceptible to rapid shifts between drought and flood—of which, California’s rapid transition from record multi-year dryness between 2012 and 2016 to extreme wetness during the 2016–2017 winter provides a dramatic example. Projected future changes in such dry-to-wet events, however, remain inadequately quantified, which we investigate here using the Community Earth System Model Large Ensemble of climate model simulations. Anthropogenic forcing is found to yield large twenty-first-century increases in the frequency of wet extremes, including a more than threefold increase in sub-seasonal events comparable to California’s ‘Great Flood of 1862’. Smaller but statistically robust increases in dry extremes are also apparent. As a consequence, a 25% to 100% increase in extreme dry-to-wet precipitation events is projected, despite only modest changes in mean precipitation. Such hydrological cycle intensification would seriously challenge California’s existing water storage, conveyance and flood control infrastructure.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1.

    Kottek, M., Grieser, J., Beck, C., Rudolf, B. & Rubel, F. World map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated. Meteorol. Z. 15, 259–263 (2006).

  2. 2.

    Karnauskas, K. B. & Ummenhofer, C. C. On the dynamics of the Hadley circulation and subtropical drying. Clim. Dynam. 42, 2259–2269 (2014).

  3. 3.

    Dettinger, M. Atmospheric rivers as drought busters on the US West Coast. J. Hydrometeorol. 14, 1721–1732 (2013).

  4. 4.

    Stephen, H. S., Terry, L. R. & Michael, D. M. Encyclopedia of Climate and Weather (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 2011).

  5. 5.

    Horton, D. et al. Contribution of changes in atmospheric circulation patterns to extreme temperature trends. Nature 522, 465–469 (2015).

  6. 6.

    Dettinger, M. D., Ralph, F. M., Das, T., Neiman, P. J. & Cayan, D. R. Atmospheric rivers, floods and the water resources of California. Water 3, 445–478 (2011).

  7. 7.

    Langenbrunner, B., Neelin, J. D., Lintner, B. R. & Anderson, B. T. Patterns of precipitation change and climatological uncertainty among CMIP5 models, with a focus on the midlatitude Pacific storm track. J. Clim. 28, 7857–7872 (2015).

  8. 8.

    Swain, D. et al. The extraordinary California drought of 2013/2014: character, context, and the role of climate change. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 95, S3–S7 (2014).

  9. 9.

    Dettinger, M. Historical and future relations between large storms and droughts in California. San Francisco Estuary Watershed Sci. 14, 1 (2016).

  10. 10.

    Wang, S. Y. S., Yoon, J.-H., Becker, E. & Gillies, R. California from drought to deluge. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 465–468 (2017).

  11. 11.

    Swain, D. A tale of two California droughts: lessons amidst record warmth and dryness in a region of complex physical and human geography. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 9999–10003 (2015).

  12. 12.

    Cowling, R. M., Rundel, P. W., Lamont, B. B., Kalin Arroyo, M. & Arianoutsou, M. Plant diversity in Mediterranean-climate regions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11, 362–366 (1996).

  13. 13.

    Griffin, D. & Anchukaitis, K. J. How unusual is the 2012–2014 California drought?. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 9017–9023 (2014).

  14. 14.

    Swain, D., Horton, D., Singh, D. & Diffenbaugh, N. Trends in atmospheric patterns conducive to seasonal precipitation and temperature extremes in California. Sci. Adv. 2, e1501344 (2016).

  15. 15.

    Robeson, S. Revisiting the recent California drought as an extreme value.Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 6771–6779 (2015).

  16. 16.

    Serna, J. California faces $860-million repair bill for roads battered by record winter storms. Los Angeles Times (3 April 2017).

  17. 17.

    Schmidt, S., Hawkins, D & Phillips, K. 188,000 evacuated as California’s massive Oroville Dam threatens catastrophic floods. Washington Post (3 February 2017).

  18. 18.

    Seager, R. et al. Causes of the 2011–14 California drought. J. Clim. 28, 6997–7024 (2015).

  19. 19.

    Simpson, I. R., Seager, R., Ting, M. & Shaw, T. A. Causes of change in Northern Hemisphere winter meridional winds and regional hydroclimate. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 65–70 (2016).

  20. 20.

    Neelin, J. D., Langenbrunner, B., Meyerson, J. E., Hall, A. & Berg, N. California winter precipitation change under global warming in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 ensemble. J. Clim. 26, 6238–6256 (2013).

  21. 21.

    Berg, N. & Hall, A. Increased interannual precipitation extremes over California under climate change. J. Clim. 28, 6324–6334 (2015).

  22. 22.

    Wang, S.-Y. S., Huang, W.-R. & Yoon, J.-H. The North American winter ‘dipole’ and extremes activity: a CMIP5 assessment. Atmos. Sci. Lett. 16, 338–345 (2015).

  23. 23.

    Yoon, J.-H. Increasing water cycle extremes in California and in relation to ENSO cycle under global warming. Nat. Commun. 6, 8657 (2015).

  24. 24.

    Dettinger, M. Climate change, atmospheric rivers, and floods in California—a multimodel analysis of storm frequency and magnitude changes. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 47, 514–523 (2011).

  25. 25.

    Giorgi, F. et al. Higher hydroclimatic intensity with global warming. J. Clim. 24, 5309–5324 (2011).

  26. 26.

    Trenberth, K. E., Dai, A., Rasmussen, R. M. & Parsons, D. B. The changing character of precipitation. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 84, 1205–1217 (2003).

  27. 27.

    Donat, M. G., Lowry, A. L., Alexander, L. V., Ogorman, P. A. & Maher, N. More extreme precipitation in the world's dry and wet regions. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 508–513 (2016).

  28. 28.

    Diffenbaugh, N., Swain, D. & Touma, D. Anthropogenic warming has increased drought risk in California. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 3931–3936 (2015).

  29. 29.

    Williams, A. P. et al. Contribution of anthropogenic warming to California drought during 2012–2014. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 6819–6828 (2015).

  30. 30.

    Wang, S. Y., Hipps, L., Gillies, R. R. & Yoon, J.-H. Probable causes of the abnormal ridge accompanying the 2013–2014 California drought: ENSO precursor and anthropogenic warming footprint. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 3220–3226 (2014).

  31. 31.

    Swain, D. L. et al. Remote linkages to anomalous winter atmospheric ridging over the northeastern Pacific. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 122, 12194–12209 (2017).

  32. 32.

    Angélil, O. et al. An independent assessment of anthropogenic attribution statements for recent extreme temperature and rainfall events. J. Clim. 30, 5–16 (2017).

  33. 33.

    IPCC Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).

  34. 34.

    Kay, J. E. et al. The Community Earth System Model (CESM) Large Ensemble project: a community resource for studying climate change in the presence of internal climate variability. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 96, 1333–1349 (2015).

  35. 35.

    Diffenbaugh, N. S. et al. Quantifying the influence of global warming on unprecedented extreme climate events. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 4881–4886 (2017).

  36. 36.

    Jakob, D. in Extremes in a Changing Climate: Detection, Analysis and Uncertainty (eds AghaKouchak, A., Easterling, D., Hsu, K., Schubert, S. & Sorooshian, S.) 363–417 (Springer, New York, 2013).

  37. 37.

    Ralph, F. M. et al. Flooding on California’s Russian River: role of atmospheric rivers. Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L13801 (2006).

  38. 38.

    Engstrom, W. N. The California Storm of January 1862. Quat. Res. 46, 141–148 (1996).

  39. 39.

    Porter, K. et al. Overview of the ARkStorm Scenario Report No. 2010-1312 (United States Geological Survey, 2011).

  40. 40.

    Wing, I. S., Rose, A. Z. & Wein, A. M. Economic consequence analysis of the ARkStorm scenario. Nat. Hazards Rev. 17, A4015002 (2016).

  41. 41.

    Jones, C., Waliser, D. E., Lau, K. M. & Stern, W. Global occurrences of extreme precipitation and the Madden–Julian Oscillation: observations and predictability. J. Clim. 17, 4575–4589 (2004).

  42. 42.

    Hoell, A. et al. Does El Niño intensity matter for California precipitation? Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 819–825 (2016).

  43. 43.

    Diffenbaugh, N. S. & Giorgi, F. Climate change hotspots in the CMIP5 global climate model ensemble. Climatic Change 114, 813–822 (2012).

  44. 44.

    Teng, H. & Branstator, G. Causes of extreme ridges that induce California droughts. J. Clim. 30, 1477–1492 (2016).

  45. 45.

    Trenberth, K. E., Dai, A., Rasmussen, R. M. & Parsons, D. B. The changing character of precipitation. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 84, 1205–1217 (2003).

  46. 46.

    Cvijanovic, I. et al. Future loss of Arctic sea-ice cover could drive a substantial decrease in California’s rainfall. Nat. Commun. 8, 1947 (2017).

  47. 47.

    Lee, M.-Y., Hong, C.-C. & Hsu, H.-H. Compounding effects of warm sea surface temperature and reduced sea ice on the extreme circulation over the extratropical North Pacific and North America during the 2013–2014 boreal winter. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 1612–1618 (2015).

  48. 48.

    Blackport, R. & Kushner, P. J. Isolating the atmospheric circulation response to Arctic sea ice loss in the coupled climate system. J. Clim. 30, 2163–2185 (2017).

  49. 49.

    Taylor, K. E., Stouffer, R. J. & Meehl, G. A. An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 93, 485–498 (2012).

  50. 50.

    Deser, C., Phillips, A. S., Alexander, M. A. & Smoliak, B. V. Projecting North American climate over the next 50 years: uncertainty due to internal variability. J. Clim. 27, 2271–2296 (2014).

  51. 51.

    Fuss, S. et al. Betting on negative emissions. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 850–853 (2014).

  52. 52.

    Dettinger, M.D. & Ingram, B.L. The coming megafloods. Sci. Am. 308, 64–71 (2012).

  53. 53.

    Malamud-Roam, F. P., Lynn Ingram, B., Hughes, M. & Florsheim, J. L. Holocene paleoclimate records from a large California estuarine system and its watershed region: linking watershed climate and bay conditions. Quat. Sci. Rev. 25, 1570–1598 (2006).

  54. 54.

    IPCC Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation (eds Field, C.B. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2012).

  55. 55.

    Overpeck, J. T. The challenge of hot drought. Nature 503, 350–351 (2013).

  56. 56.

    Sandvik, M. I., Sorteberg, A. & Rasmussen, R. Sensitivity of historical orographically enhanced extreme precipitation events to idealized temperature perturbations. Clim. Dynam. 50, 143–157 (2018).

  57. 57.

    Allen, R. J. & Luptowitz, R. El Niño-like teleconnection increases California precipitation in response to warming. Nat. Commun. 8, 16055 (2017).

  58. 58.

    Adler, R. F. et al. The Version-2 Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) monthly precipitation analysis (1979–present). J. Hydrometeorol. 4, 1147–1167 (2003).

  59. 59.

    Kalnay, E. et al. The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 77, 437–471 (1996).

  60. 60.

    Hagos, S. M., Leung, L. R., Yoon, J.-H., Lu, J. & Gao, Y. A projection of changes in landfalling atmospheric river frequency and extreme precipitation over western North America from the Large Ensemble CESM simulations. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 1357–1363 (2016).

Download references


Our work was supported by a grant from the University of California, Los Angeles Sustainable LA Grand Challenge (D.L.S., J.D.N. and A.H.), by National Science Foundation grant AGS-1540518 (J.D.N. and B.L.) and by US Department of Energy Grant 201603457-04 (A.H.). The NatureNet Science Fellows Program provided funding to D.L.S. through a collaboration between The Nature Conservancy and the University of California, Los Angeles.

Author information


  1. Institute of the Environment and Sustainability, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    • Daniel L. Swain
  2. The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA, USA

    • Daniel L. Swain
  3. Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    • Baird Langenbrunner
    • , J. David Neelin
    •  & Alex Hall
  4. Department of Earth System Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA

    • Baird Langenbrunner


  1. Search for Daniel L. Swain in:

  2. Search for Baird Langenbrunner in:

  3. Search for J. David Neelin in:

  4. Search for Alex Hall in:


D.L.S., B.L., J.D.N, and A.H. conceived of the study and designed the analyses. D.L.S. and B.L. provided analysis tools and conducted the analyses. D.L.S. wrote the manuscript and B.L., J.D.N. and A.H. provided comments and feedback.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel L. Swain.

Supplementary information

  1. Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Figures 1–12

About this article

Publication history