Comment | Published:

Time to refine key climate policy models

Nature Climate Changevolume 8pages350352 (2018) | Download Citation

Ambition regarding climate change at the national level is critical but is often calibrated with the projected costs — as estimated by a small suite of energy–economic models. Weaknesses in several key areas in these models will continue to distort policy design unless collectively addressed by a diversity of researchers.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    Climate Change Legislative Analyses (US EPA, 2017);

  2. 2.

    Annual Energy Outlook 2014 with Projections to 2040 (US Department of Energy, 2014);

  3. 3.

    Chan, G., Stavins, R., Stowe, R. & Sweeney, R. The SO 2 Allowance Trading System and the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990: Reflections on Twenty Years of Policy Innovation Working Paper 17845 (National Bureau of Economic Research, 2012);

  4. 4.

    Barbose, G. L. et al. Tracking the Sun 10: The Installed Price of Residential and Non-Residential Photovoltaic Systems in the United States LBNL-2001062 (LBNL 2017);

  5. 5.

    Annual Energy Outlook 2018 (US Department of Energy, 2018);

  6. 6.

    Gilbert, A. Q. & Sovacool, B. K. Energy 94, 533–541 (2016).

  7. 7.

    Creutzig, F. et al. Nat. Energy 2, 17140 (2017).

  8. 8.

    Berthélemy, M. & Escobar Rangel, L. Energy Policy 82, 118–130 (2015).

  9. 9.

    Gillingham, K., Newell, R. G. & Pizer, W. A. Energy Econ. 30, 2734–2753 (2008).

  10. 10.

    Fried, S. Am. Econ. J. Macroecon 10, 90–118 (2018).

  11. 11.

    Kaufman, N., Obeiter, M. & Krause, E. Putting a Price on Carbon: Reducing Emissions (World Resources Institute, 2016);

  12. 12.

    Creutzig, F. et al. Science 350, 911–912 (2015).

  13. 13.

    Craig, P. P., Gadgil, A. & Koomey, J. G. Annu. Rev. Energy Environ. 27, 83–118 (2002).

  14. 14.

    Barron, A. R., Fawcett, A. A., Hafstead, M. A. C., McFarland, J. & Morris, A. C. Clim. Change Econ. 9, 1840003 (2018).

  15. 15.

    IPCC Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).

  16. 16.

    Huntington, H. Energy Efficiency and Climate Change Mitigation Report no. 25 (Energy Modeling Forum, Stanford Univ., 2011);

  17. 17.

    Gummerman, E. & Vegh, T. Modeling Energy Efficiency as a Supply Resource Working Paper NI WP 17-06 (Duke Univ., 2017);

  18. 18.

    Gillingham, K. & Palmer, K. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 8, 18–38 (2014).

  19. 19.

    SAB Advice on the Use of Economy-Wide Models in Evaluating the Social Costs, Benefits, and Economic Impacts of Air Regulations EPA-SAB-17-012 (US EPA, 2017);

  20. 20.

    National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine Valuing Climate Damages (National Academies Press, 2017);

  21. 21.

    Saltelli, A. et al. Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer (John Wiley, Hoboken, 2008).

  22. 22.

    Jorgenson, D. W., Goettle, R. J., Ho, M. S. & Wilcoxen, P. J. Double Dividend: Environmental Taxes and Fiscal Reform in the United States (MIT Press, Cambridge, 2013).

  23. 23.

    Fawcett, A. A., McFarland, J., Morris, A. C. & Weyant, J. P. Clim. Change Econ. 9, 1840001 (2018).

Download references


A.R.B. is a former Congressional staffer and former EPA official. The author thanks the government employees who have worked diligently over the years to provide modelling and analysis to climate policy makers. J. Larsen, J. Weyant, A. Fawcett and J. Stenhouse provided helpful feedback.

Author information


  1. Environmental Science and Policy, Smith College, Northampton, MA, USA

    • Alexander R. Barron


  1. Search for Alexander R. Barron in:

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander R. Barron.

About this article

Publication history



Newsletter Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing