Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Time to refine key climate policy models

Ambition regarding climate change at the national level is critical but is often calibrated with the projected costs — as estimated by a small suite of energy–economic models. Weaknesses in several key areas in these models will continue to distort policy design unless collectively addressed by a diversity of researchers.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Modelled industrial coal use is minimally responsive to a carbon price in one model.
Fig. 2: Limited model response in electric vehicle deployment.

References

  1. 1.

    Climate Change Legislative Analyses (US EPA, 2017); http://go.nature.com/2p7stXV

  2. 2.

    Annual Energy Outlook 2014 with Projections to 2040 (US Department of Energy, 2014); https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/pdf/0383(2014).pdf

  3. 3.

    Chan, G., Stavins, R., Stowe, R. & Sweeney, R. The SO 2 Allowance Trading System and the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990: Reflections on Twenty Years of Policy Innovation Working Paper 17845 (National Bureau of Economic Research, 2012); http://www.nber.org/papers/w17845.pdf

  4. 4.

    Barbose, G. L. et al. Tracking the Sun 10: The Installed Price of Residential and Non-Residential Photovoltaic Systems in the United States LBNL-2001062 (LBNL 2017); http://go.nature.com/2pwopjG.

  5. 5.

    Annual Energy Outlook 2018 (US Department of Energy, 2018); https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/

  6. 6.

    Gilbert, A. Q. & Sovacool, B. K. Energy 94, 533–541 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Creutzig, F. et al. Nat. Energy 2, 17140 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Berthélemy, M. & Escobar Rangel, L. Energy Policy 82, 118–130 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Gillingham, K., Newell, R. G. & Pizer, W. A. Energy Econ. 30, 2734–2753 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Fried, S. Am. Econ. J. Macroecon 10, 90–118 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Kaufman, N., Obeiter, M. & Krause, E. Putting a Price on Carbon: Reducing Emissions (World Resources Institute, 2016); http://go.nature.com/2patYDX

  12. 12.

    Creutzig, F. et al. Science 350, 911–912 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Craig, P. P., Gadgil, A. & Koomey, J. G. Annu. Rev. Energy Environ. 27, 83–118 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Barron, A. R., Fawcett, A. A., Hafstead, M. A. C., McFarland, J. & Morris, A. C. Clim. Change Econ. 9, 1840003 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    IPCC Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).

  16. 16.

    Huntington, H. Energy Efficiency and Climate Change Mitigation Report no. 25 (Energy Modeling Forum, Stanford Univ., 2011); http://go.nature.com/2FQjMuY

  17. 17.

    Gummerman, E. & Vegh, T. Modeling Energy Efficiency as a Supply Resource Working Paper NI WP 17-06 (Duke Univ., 2017); http://go.nature.com/2GOOQZT.

  18. 18.

    Gillingham, K. & Palmer, K. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 8, 18–38 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    SAB Advice on the Use of Economy-Wide Models in Evaluating the Social Costs, Benefits, and Economic Impacts of Air Regulations EPA-SAB-17-012 (US EPA, 2017); http://go.nature.com/2DJxE4R.

  20. 20.

    National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine Valuing Climate Damages (National Academies Press, 2017); http://doi.org/cmck

  21. 21.

    Saltelli, A. et al. Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer (John Wiley, Hoboken, 2008).

  22. 22.

    Jorgenson, D. W., Goettle, R. J., Ho, M. S. & Wilcoxen, P. J. Double Dividend: Environmental Taxes and Fiscal Reform in the United States (MIT Press, Cambridge, 2013).

  23. 23.

    Fawcett, A. A., McFarland, J., Morris, A. C. & Weyant, J. P. Clim. Change Econ. 9, 1840001 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

A.R.B. is a former Congressional staffer and former EPA official. The author thanks the government employees who have worked diligently over the years to provide modelling and analysis to climate policy makers. J. Larsen, J. Weyant, A. Fawcett and J. Stenhouse provided helpful feedback.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander R. Barron.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barron, A.R. Time to refine key climate policy models. Nature Clim Change 8, 350–352 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0132-y

Download citation

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing